Web2.0 Profile benefits!!!!!

by 28 replies
32
Hi, Could anyone mention the benefit of doing web 2.0 submission? In 2015 still web 2.0 plays a major role in SEO?
#search engine optimization #benefits #profile #web20
  • yes still work
  • You should decide which one you want to talk about. Profiles - usually completely pointless. "Web 2.0" - may work in the right hands, but usually people don't know what to do with it.
    • [1] reply
    • Agreed completely, in the right hands!!! most people destroy them, cheers.
  • Yes, Still working good. It is useful to get quality backlinks, more traffic and keywords rank.
    • [2] replies
    • Profiles, no.
    • Was that a joke? 'cuz the whole reply is just laughable. Completely brain-dead.

      Paul
  • [DELETED]
  • Web 2.0s still work yes...
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Web 2.0 will support your main web, it makes the background to make your own website on top position with but backlink pointing to the word, of course, in 2015 and even later, there are still Web 2.0 positions important in seo because it is a source of backlinks and web abundant cotent you
  • Banned
    Lol, typical, making up stupid nonsense to spam sig links.
  • Yes, It is work...By Doing this you can get the back link with unique posted matter...Like You will create a profile of user and their provides the relevant information about user who is concern with company where you can post the link of website..
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • This is the most asinine comment I've read today. If you post an article to some random web 2.0 site why on earth would anyone want to read that and "go to your website"? If they land on that piece of garbage they'd hate you for wasting their time. Well, maybe they'd click the link to see what company to add on their mental black list.

      I'm sure even the signature spammers know this, but "massive traffic" isn't the point of "web 2.0" in SEO.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Yes they do work especially in a multi-layered seo structure.
  • good seo if you use domain aged high DA PA to make dummy blog
  • Been using it, do it the right way with original content and relevant articles. Quality counts. have ranked several sites with them one site particularly being in an Amazon niche was built with only web2.0 links and other good quality links is still ranking well.
    • [1] reply
    • I also doing web 2.0 backlinks from 20+ different high DA and PA websites. Unique contents on all of them. I also ping and build links to them to give them more juice and push my money websites to #1 spot.
  • [DELETED]
  • Yes Web 2.0 website are helpful for SEO and it provides high quality backlinks to your webpage. Some of them are provides Do-follow backlinks which is really helpful for your website.
  • create 2 (or) 3 or three profile daily it's really improve your backlink.
    • [1] reply
    • Why on earth would you suggest something like that? What's the mechanism that allows these weak new pages to "really improve your backlink"?

      What's my theory? Well, I think people like you are making excuses and fooling themselves. Creating pointless profiles is simply something you enjoy more than your real work.
  • hey guys/gals

    talking about web 2.0 properties, I have a clients that need reputation management.

    would my workers just create web 2.0 properties and then ping each of those properties, so they show up in google? By doing this, these high pr sites will show up first right?

    When creating their profiles, if their names are used is it best to use a hyphen to separate their name or don't use it at all...

    Ty
    • [1] reply
    • I'm not sure what you think "ping" means, why "pinging" would rank sites, or what your workers are actually doing.

      Just building a web 2.0 site may not work that well, but if you get some backlinks to the profile/site it may start ranking pretty high. I, for one, am ranking for my social media pages for my personal and brand name, but I haven't built those overnight.
  • I think its working , web 2.0 links can absolutely be valuable if built CORRECTLY with quality content. Also, if you have a strategy for using imagery well.
  • It gives you to,
    1. Anchor Text
    2. Mini website
    3.Index or Sometimes Do Follow Back links
    4. Blogging Experience for Users
    5. Genuine Content
    6. Benefit when people Shares in Social media
  • Recently google updates the web 2.0 forum submission. Comments all in black hat seo .you should create manully high quality backlink.
    You should earn to backlink .
    If your quality content then your site is power full.
  • Web 2.0 still works but you need to be very careful in posting the content on web 2.0 properties. You can also apply link wheel strategy for this. Thanks!!
  • Yes its consider as high Authority website.we can get back link from 2.0 web that is consider as high quality back link.
    • [1] reply
    • It seems a lot of people assume that because the home page of a web 2.0 site has authority (and it does), that each individual subdomain automatically gets that authority as well. That's not the case. You're jumping to conclusions because the home page is in fact an authority page (as in wordpress.com is PR9).

      First, the home page PR doesn't travel to the millions of subdomains at a site like WordPress.

      Second, user accounts have user-supplied content. Look at wordpress.com - there are gambling, pharm, escort, etc sites all over the place on wordpress.com. Do you think Google says "Well, WordPress is a trusted, authority, real business and website, so let's call each of the millions of xxxxxxxx.wordpress.com subdomains trusted and authority subdomains!" Doesn't work like that. Just like the pages of a "real" domain, the pages of your web 2.0 subdomain need to get backlinks to lend them any authority/worth.

      Common sense should tell you that.
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • I'm not quite sure what "top bookmarks" are, but social signals and blog comments are not ranking the site. Uniqueness isn't a factor in anything, and high quality only if you manage to find an audience.

      I'm not saying that the approach can't work, but it's probably hit and miss. And especially if you're building kind of "secondary" web 2.0 sites that aren't really standing on their own.
  • [DELETED]
Join the discussion

Next Topics on Trending Feed