What about web 2.0?

Manasarao

9 years ago

No it will help to get quality back links.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10308691].message }}

dewalds86 9 years ago

Originally Posted by Manasarao

No it will help to get quality back links.

Why will it help you to get quality links? Give some detail please.
- Thanks
Signature
Locksmith Somerset West
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10308967].message }}

ramskl

Banned 9 years ago

[DELETED]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10308717].message }}

jinx1221 9 years ago

[DELETED]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10308789].message }}

sno hospital

Banned 9 years ago

[DELETED]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10308724].message }}

dewalds86 9 years ago

Originally Posted by sno hospital

web 2.0 is basically a content based activity. You create web 2.0 pages to describe about our site and anchor it with our site to get traffic.

Yes but are links from those sites good for your websites SEO and why?
- Thanks
Signature
Locksmith Somerset West
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10308973].message }}
stevencies 9 years ago

Originally Posted by sno hospital

web 2.0 is basically a content based activity. You create web 2.0 pages to describe about our site and anchor it with our site to get traffic.

That's right basically the web 2.0 for quality content and you can try to make kontenberkualitas and love your website link.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10345923].message }}

jaxrefinance

9 years ago

Yes, backlinks from free properties like that do help. No on their own, but as a part of a campaign.

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10308773].message }}

randomzeus

9 years ago

[DELETED]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10308776].message }}

dewalds86

9 years ago

Originally Posted by randomzeus

Oh yes, Web 2.0 backlinks do work and there's also software that can help you create your own blog networks and automatically post articles on them, namely FCSN and/or RankWyz.

Reference: FCS Networker In-Depth Tutorial and Genuine Review - SEO Software of the Gods | Inet Solutions

Regards!

Why do back links from these sites work? They only give you nofllow link anyway.

Thanks

Signature

Locksmith Somerset West

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10308977].message }}

Franklin Hatchett

9 years ago

High PA and TF Web 2.0 rank and bank

yes they work very well

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10308856].message }}

tareqq

9 years ago

Thank you very much all for replies

Originally Posted by nettiapina

They're helpful only if you build backlinks to those sites too. They're empty new sites, and have no "juice" to pass to your site.

Originally Posted by dswtechnologies

helpful only if you build backlinks to ther site otherwise worth less.

Thank you guys, off-course I'll do tier 2 backlinks

Originally Posted by Franklin Hatchett

High PA and TF Web 2.0 rank and bank

yes they work very well

Thank you Franklin but I didn't understand really what TF does mean

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10309506].message }}

jinx1221

9 years ago

Originally Posted by nettiapina

They're helpful only if you build backlinks to those sites too. They're empty new sites, and have no "juice" to pass to your site.

True. But only so far as if you are only using them to boost your site for "juice". However, your target market/audience can be driven to these pages, with various information on each, and a link to your site.

We must get out of the mentality of "juicing" up your sites to be on top (or ahead) of Google. They are past that point now, and so should we. I can spot a bullshit page built strictly for "juice" a mile away... Google can better than I can. Trust me.

Various topics on different subjects about the theme of your website can be created easily, making a self-made 'network'. If the keywords are longtail, they certainly can be picked up and indexed by Google.

These pages, in turn, can include links to both the site you are promoting, as well as the other web 2's that have various other information on them.. which also, in turn, include links to the site you are promoting.

Originally Posted by dswtechnologies

Helpful only if you build backlinks to their site, otherwise worthless.

Very true. Except for the "only" part. And the "worthless" part lol!

Links from true private blog networks (ones that are high in metrics) will definitely help boost, or "juice" your individual web2 pages. Most use expensive ones toward their main site. But cheaper ones can be aimed at your web2's. Definitely a boost, especially for long(ish) tail keywords.

Originally Posted by Franklin Hatchett

High PA and TF Web 2.0 rank and bank yes they work very well.

PA and TF stand for Page Authority and Trust Flow. Most (not all, but most) web20's have a pretty high Trust Flow. The site is trusted as a reliable source of truth, so to speak. Page Authority IS going to start at zero. Perhaps some 'juice' from the sites homepage will trickle into these pages, maybe even long enough to index them.

That is why it is best to look at these Web2 pages as promotional and/or informational pieces. That traffic can then be crafted to land on your homepage. This doesn't have to necessarily be done on purpose, or thinking too hard about the content, though. You don't have to lead traffic from D to C to B to A, in a way that you are selling something at the end (a.)

The best approach is to create content that is a combination of syndicated (w/ source), and unique content (either bought or dreamt up in your mind lol), at least in some way, shape or form, that relates to and is helpful and informative to your audience. Include links to some of the other sites, and of course, to your own.

Peace and stuff

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

The Ultimate Private Network Management,
Visualization and Automation Tool

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10309618].message }}

nettiapina

9 years ago

Originally Posted by jinx1221

True. But only so far as if you are only using them to boost your site for "juice". However, your target market/audience can be driven to these pages, with various information on each, and a link to your site.

It doesn't have much to do with SEO then, does it? Of course it's completely fine to drive traffic to pages by other means, but if you're doing that I don't see why you would not drive them to your money site instead.

Originally Posted by jinx1221

We must get out of the mentality of "juicing" up your sites to be on top (or ahead) of Google. They are past that point now, and so should we. I can spot a bullshit page built strictly for "juice" a mile away... Google can better than I can. Trust me.

They're getting better at this. Tiered link building seems fairly risky, and of course it gets a lot riskier if done in a dump way. However, people build and use web 2.0 and PBNs all the time. It does work at the present moment.

After this bit you posted something that sounds exactly like building a network of sites to channel "juice" back to your main site. I don't quite get your point here.

Originally Posted by jinx1221

PA and TF stand for Page Authority and Trust Flow. Most (not all, but most) web20's have a pretty high Trust Flow. The site is trusted as a reliable source of truth, so to speak. Page Authority IS going to start at zero. Perhaps some 'juice' from the sites homepage will trickle into these pages, maybe even long enough to index them.

Err... No. The TF for your new site is usually close to zero. If you're reading the Domain Flow Metrics for the main site you're just fooling yourself. It's tracked for each page and for the entire site. See URL Flow vs. Domain Flow metric.

And even if Majestic got that somehow wrong, it's just 3rd party evaluation. Not Google.

Nothing trickles from the front page on your typical web 2.0 platform. This is a common misconception that you see on these forums all the time.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10311002].message }}

jinx1221

9 years ago

Originally Posted by nettiapina

It doesn't have much to do with SEO then, does it? Of course it's completely fine to drive traffic to pages by other means, but if you're doing that I don't see why you would not drive them to your money site instead.

Not sure why you are trying to school me, Nettiapina. Kind of like trying to debunk the theory of relativity, if you ask me. But anyways, yes it does have a LOT to do with SEO.

Why would you drive them to your money site directly, and not a web20?

Short answer: It's not called the 'web' for nothing.

And yeah, did I say TF on your new page would be higher than zero? Nope.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

The Ultimate Private Network Management,
Visualization and Automation Tool

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10313907].message }}

nettiapina

9 years ago

Originally Posted by jinx1221

Not sure why you are trying to school me, Nettiapina. Kind of like trying to debunk the theory of relativity, if you ask me.

I have no idea what you're trying to say. Is that supposed to mean something?

You're no Einstein, and your random forum posts have nothing to do with one of the most celebrated scientific theories. Sounds extremely reality challenged if you ask me.

Originally Posted by jinx1221

But anyways, yes it does have a LOT to do with SEO.

You forgot to add the explanation here. Why are you saying that?

Traffic is related to this field, but it's not a ranking factor or anything like that.

Originally Posted by jinx1221

Short answer: It's not called the 'web' for nothing.

Well, at least that's completely vacuous statement. I'm not sure if there was something in the first paragraph, but this part obviously doesn't mean anything at all.

Originally Posted by jinx1221

And yeah, did I say TF on your new page would be higher than zero? Nope.

Not with those words. But you claimed that the web 2.0 services are some kind of authority, and said that the juice would trickle to the new properties. The first part isn't related to this in any way, and the second part doesn't happen.

It's pretty hard to say what you're talking about when you're comparing Majestic's metrics to Moz's ones the way you were.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10314862].message }}

jinx1221

9 years ago

Originally Posted by nettiapina

I have no idea what you're trying to say. Is that supposed to mean something?

You're no Einstein, and your random forum posts have nothing to do with one of the most celebrated scientific theories. Sounds extremely reality challenged if you ask me.

You forgot to add the explanation here. Why are you saying that?

Traffic is related to this field, but it's not a ranking factor or anything like that.

Well, at least that's completely vacuous statement. I'm not sure if there was something in the first paragraph, but this part obviously doesn't mean anything at all.

Not with those words. But you claimed that the web 2.0 services are some kind of authority, and said that the juice would trickle to the new properties. The first part isn't related to this in any way, and the second part doesn't happen.

It's pretty hard to say what you're talking about when you're comparing Majestic's metrics to Moz's ones the way you were.

Ok Mike, whatever lol. WF idiocy must be contagious, even immunities can't stop it.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

The Ultimate Private Network Management,
Visualization and Automation Tool

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10339123].message }}

nettiapina 9 years ago

Originally Posted by jinx1221

Ok Mike, whatever lol. WF idiocy must be contagious, even immunities can't stop it.

I guess so. I feel stupider already just for reading this line of vacuous gibberish.
- Thanks
Signature
Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10342582].message }}

nettiapina

9 years ago

Originally Posted by tareqq

My question now: is the link that came from free domains like blogger helpful for SEO? if it's not does it harmful?

They're helpful only if you build backlinks to those sites too. They're empty new sites, and have no "juice" to pass to your site.

Thanks

Signature

Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10308954].message }}

antonyperk

9 years ago

try with PBNs & advertorials

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10311436].message }}

Shreyasingh

9 years ago

Some of the sites like blogger, wordpress, weebly, tumblr, jimdo are very helpful for making web2.0. By making web2.0 you are going to enhance your website awareness all over the world which is a positive part for your online business.

Web2.0 is one of the best tasks of SEO to generate huge visitors on a website. It helps to provide precise info to the viewers of it which is a good technique to engage online visitors on your website.

Thanks

Signature

How to Start an Ecommerce Store

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10312892].message }}

vanished

9 years ago

Links from Web 2.0 blogs like Wordpress and Blogger are worth if they have some link or traffic power.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10314509].message }}

WareTime

9 years ago

Web 2.0 once worked until the stinky masses glommed on it to to try to make link wheels and the like. On the web free eventually means garbage. Imagine the bandwidth savings and decreased web spam if your average web 2.0 charged just 1$ per year per site/account/whatever.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10345918].message }}

shelviwu

9 years ago

i got the main solutions in this conversation. So we need to build link for those web 2.0 also?

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10346112].message }}

Kherk Roldan 9 years ago

Originally Posted by shelviwu

i got the main solutions in this conversation. So we need to build link for those web 2.0 also?

Absolutely! Aside from the authority factors you'll get from web 2.0s, you also need to remember that you're getting the most RELEVANT link imaginable.
- Thanks
Signature
REQUEST A FREE SEO AUDIT HERE
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10346284].message }}

zhangyue

9 years ago

Originally Posted by tareqq

For some days I've read some advices in this forum about backlinks strategies, a lot of those advices included web 2.0, and because I am a newbie in this work I did a fast research about web 2.0 and I found examples like blogger and wordpress. My question now: is the link that came from free domains like blogger helpful for SEO? if it's not does it harmful?
Note: Am not English speaker so please pardon me if I did some mistakes

If you invest your time to write high quality articles for web2.0 sites so you will get high quality backlinks to your site. And submit your web2.0 sites on popular social bookmarking sites.

Thanks

Signature

The #1 Startup News | Everyday Insights From The World

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10346539].message }}

satyaprakash75per

9 years ago

Web 2.0s are not at all harmful unless done right!!

Thanks

Signature

PROFESSIONAL SEO AGENCY - PAGE 1 RANKINGS GUARANTEED

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10354350].message }}

yukon

Banned 9 years ago

Has PRn/a web 2.0 PBN & not afraid to use it.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10354415].message }}

bagwellpurcell88

9 years ago

I worked with web 2.0 blog free. but it is not very effective

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

EasyVSL 2.0 Review

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10354614].message }}

nettiapina 8 years ago

Originally Posted by bagwellpurcell88

I worked with web 2.0 blog free. but it is not very effective

Usually it's not. This is not rocket science. If you set up a new blog just to talk about your product you've got just another weak new page that doesn't count as a good backlink.
- Thanks
Signature
Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10355133].message }}

counter2015

8 years ago

Build social signals and links to your web 2.0s too and make sure they are indexed or they wont add value

Thanks

Signature

My Must Haves List: Wordpress, GoStats (website analytics), Google Trends

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10363085].message }}

Lemosys

8 years ago

Web 2.0 is the some online platform where we can promote our content,our website,our brand and product information .it is the best way for online branding .because web 2.0 is the most popular website in search engine ranking.Its very beneficial for our website reputation.

Thanks

Signature

Lemosys Infotech is the leading website development company in India, We are team of dedicated web developer. Hire us to get high level IT services for your Business.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10363099].message }}

iharrythomas

8 years ago

Yes, it counts as a good backlink for your website as it has high domain authority. Just you have to write fresh and engaging content. And post this content over social media with appropriate graphics. This is gather the traffic to your specific sub domain. And ultimately this will be beneficial for you

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10364391].message }}

cybnetics

8 years ago

Make an account on High PR Web 2.0 site and performs all options in profile with URL, they generate back links for your website.

Thanks

Signature

Cybnetics is best Website Designing Company in Delhi. we offers SEO, SMO, Digital Marketing Services for your Business.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10364521].message }}

blog orbit

8 years ago

Web 2.0 describes World Wide Web sites that emphasize user-generated content, usability, and interoperability. The term was popularized by Tim O'Reilly and Dale Dougherty at the O'Reilly Media Web 2.0 Conference in late 2004, though it was coined by Darcy DiNucci in 1999.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10411748].message }}

B Ranker

7 years ago

Web 2.0 accounts serves as your foundation in, they maintain you web presence and you brand in the world wide web especially if they build correctly.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11157128].message }}

What about web 2.0?

Trending Topics

Some interesting stats about brand comms

Meta AI now has Google Search results

Fixing a massive traffic drop after rebranding

Looking at the average screen time and socmed usage

What's the Best IM-Related Skill to Learn Today That Can Help in the Future?