6 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
6 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

Is my site worth to rank for?

by JackeyRoe
5 replies
  • SEO
    • |
Hi My Dear Friends : )

I created a site just one month ago, it means that the site only 1 month old. In the last month, I only created web2.0 links to this site (about 40 2.0 platform, 60 web 2.0 sites I created), today I search the domain in Majestic, it show me TF only 9, with 239 web2.0 links, one of my friend told me that a site with all web2.0 links it is very unnatural in big G eyes, I should devise the links type to my site.

The thing what I worry is, is it too late to devise the links types now? Since one month has gone now, if I devise the links type now, is it too late in Google eyes?

If it still in time to devise the link types, which types of links should I build to my site : )

Any kindly friend could tell me should I rank for the site again or just give it up since it only with the web2.0 links in the first month?

Which types of links should be built if it still in time for ranking? : )



Big Big Thanks!!!
#rank #site #worth
  • Profile picture of the author jasminemartin
    If you creates web 2.0 with unique and high quality content so this is definitely useful for your website just wait 2 or 3 week might these sources are not crawl yet.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10309130].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tywe
    It's never too late to diversify your link profile, unless you have already been penalized or de-indexed, but that's unlikely to have happened already based on your description.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10309260].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author metricbuzz88
    You can make the links disavow at anytime!
    Google doesn't kick you for this action, of course Google nowadays dislikes web 2.0 links. becuase it was covered by most of the SEO peoples.

    Built any high quality links related to your niche is the good idea. Do not go for platform targeting (like web2.0)

    My advice is to work on diversified link building
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10309558].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author itos
    If you have quality and lengthy content on those web 2.0 properties then you don't have nothing to worry about. Probably they are still not indexed and crawl by Google. Sometimes SEO takes time when done properly to take effect. But White Hat results are long term, not just a quick ranking.

    The key is to diversify your link-building. So I recommend you do:
    Directories
    Press Releases
    Blog Comments
    Guest Posting
    Forums posts with your signature and in your profile
    Social Media links
    Blog aggregators
    .gov domains
    .edu domains
    Web 2.0 properties (unique and high quality content)
    Social Bookmarks
    High PR Article Directories only

    And try that every link from there is natural, unique and manual, from related sites only, not done with quick black hat tools. And diversify your keywords, use also "click here" and things like that.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10312341].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nettiapina
      Originally Posted by jasminemartin View Post

      If you creates web 2.0 with unique and high quality content so this is definitely useful for your website just wait 2 or 3 week might these sources are not crawl yet.
      Just adding content wont help you. You need to have backlinks to those sites for them to help your money site.

      Originally Posted by metricbuzz88 View Post

      of course Google nowadays dislikes web 2.0 links. becuase it was covered by most of the SEO peoples.
      No, they do not. That claim is completely ludicrous. Do you even understand what "web 2.0" means? It's basically a shorthand for "user-edited content" or something along those lines. And there's no way Google dislikes user content or interaction.

      However, the links from these kinds of properties are often weak or nofollow. That's also normal: your average user isn't really an authority.

      Originally Posted by itos View Post

      The key is to diversify your link-building. So I recommend you do:
      You don't need to build BS links just to keep Google happy. You don't need to avoid them, but it's usually not something you need to worry about.

      Originally Posted by itos View Post

      .gov domains
      .edu domains
      Disregard this. It's mostly just a long-running scam.

      Originally Posted by itos View Post

      Social Bookmarks
      These tend to be completely pointless. It's also possible that the sites people try to pass as "social bookmarking" are spammy article directories.

      Originally Posted by itos View Post

      And try that every link from there is natural, unique and manual,
      If you're trying to talk about "natural" links why did you post a list of tactics that have absolutely nothing to do with "natural" links? Doing something slowly or manually is not "natural". If you're linking your own site the link is artificial by definition.
      Signature
      Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
      Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

      What's your excuse?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10314770].message }}

Trending Topics