Importance of nofollow

28 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Dear Experts,
As we know Wikipedia is a nofollow but backlink from wikipedia is like a thumb up from president for Google...
Very Little amount of wiki backlinks can rank a site..
What about importance of nofollow?

If next update of google will be a good for nofollow backlinks what you say???..
#importance #nofollow
  • Profile picture of the author johnabay
    never helpful in any terms because if google allow no follow link will be helpful then his business of ppc going to shutdown.
    Signature
    Providing PSD Design Service
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10396878].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ultrasonic
    I don't think Google has been throughly remove value of nofollow links, even if no value for seo, I always believe that Wikipedia is worth doing because its high ranking and exposure on Google, but it is hard for me to get link into Wikipedia.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10396891].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author fastreplies
      Originally Posted by Ultrasonic View Post

      ... but it is hard for me to get link into Wikipedia.
      Thank you, thank you God for one of your miracles!!!!!!!!!!



      fastreplies
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10397568].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      [DELETED]
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10397621].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Ultrasonic
        [DELETED]
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10398285].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      Originally Posted by Ultrasonic View Post

      I don't think Google has been throughly remove value of nofollow links, even if no value for seo, I always believe that Wikipedia is worth doing because its high ranking and exposure on Google, but it is hard for me to get link into Wikipedia.
      Exposure is one thing....the other is crapola.

      Google (their employees) invented nofollow. So one would assume they
      can remove anything they want.

      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10397658].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author AliKashif7
    never.. this is impossible. the updates of google cant rank them.. because this will a huge blast for marketers.. and others expert..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10397386].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    Originally Posted by dianapenti View Post

    Dear Experts,
    As we know Wikipedia is a nofollow but backlink from wikipedia is like a thumb up from president for Google...
    Very Little amount of wiki backlinks can rank a site..
    What about importance of nofollow?

    If next update of google will be a good for nofollow backlinks what you say???..


    You obviously don't have a clue what you're talking about.

    Just a bunch of off the wall 3rd world rambling.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10397491].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ultrasonic
    I have not seen a high-ranking website without nofollow links, social links are valuable although being nofollow, So that the key is that you have the links from relevant and valuable content.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10398270].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author DABK
      Accurate thinking is important even though most people, including you, don't indulge in it.

      The question is not: Are nofollow links useless from any point of view? The question is: Are nofollow links useful for SEO?

      Here's where accurate thinking comes into play:

      If you know nofollow links don't help SEO you don't go and create a ton of them, for the sake of creating them.

      If you create some, as in you choose to participate in some kind of social media activity the way you create it is different, you actually participate in the site in a manner that other people who visit that site find engaging, so that they visit your site and buy whatever it is you're selling.

      I've never seen someone get promoted who didn't show up for work regularly is a lot like what you said about nofollow links. People don't get promoted because they show up for work regularly; showing up for work regularly allows them to do the other things that cause them to get promoted...

      The fact that you've not seen a site rank that doesn't have nofollow links can only mean 2 things:
      1. you didn't look well
      2. whois, what's the value of your site, and similar sites exists and create nofollow link to any site as soon as they find out it exists.
      Originally Posted by Ultrasonic View Post

      I have not seen a high-ranking website without nofollow links, social links are valuable although being nofollow, So that the key is that you have the links from relevant and valuable content.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10398882].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Ultrasonic
        Originally Posted by DABK View Post

        Accurate thinking is important even though most people, including you, don't indulge in it.

        The question is not: Are nofollow links useless from any point of view? The question is: Are nofollow links useful for SEO?

        Here's where accurate thinking comes into play:

        If you know nofollow links don't help SEO you don't go and create a ton of them, for the sake of creating them.

        If you create some, as in you choose to participate in some kind of social media activity the way you create it is different, you actually participate in the site in a manner that other people who visit that site find engaging, so that they visit your site and buy whatever it is you're selling.

        I've never seen someone get promoted who didn't show up for work regularly is a lot like what you said about nofollow links. People don't get promoted because they show up for work regularly; showing up for work regularly allows them to do the other things that cause them to get promoted...

        The fact that you've not seen a site rank that doesn't have nofollow links can only mean 2 things:
        1. you didn't look well
        2. whois, what's the value of your site, and similar sites exists and create nofollow link to any site as soon as they find out it exists.
        First, let me comfirm the question that I replied: "what about importance of nofollow?" Obviously the importance is beyond SEO.

        Doesn't matter, just as you said "Are nofollow links useful for SEO?" My answer is still "yes".

        1) As I mentioned before the high-ranking website has nofollow link more or less, why we always emphasized the importance of nature backlinks but we don't do that, diverse links mixing with nofollow link can make your backlinks look more nature.

        2) Content reprinted. That's why I said we should build links from valuable content, one of the reasons is that high-qulity content have more chance to be reprinted to other dofollow websites together with your links.

        3) Seo is not only for Google, I don't know the other search engines how to deal with nofollow tag, just the same as Google? May be, maybe none.

        Maybe nofollow links are not very important, but it's useful for SEO.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10399436].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author DABK
          1. Everybody has nofollow links. From whois type of sites, etc. So, what's the point of creating them, if the goal is just to have some nofollow?

          2. Yes, it has a chance of being reprinted. It also has a chance of being reprinted by someone who adds the nofollow tag.

          A very effort-intensive, indirect way of maybe getting link juice. Why do it when there are more effective, and more certain, ways?

          Even if your content is good, how do you know they don't just email it to people? Or they don't just tweet about it? Or bookmark it on sites that give nofollow links?

          Originally Posted by Ultrasonic View Post

          First, let me comfirm the question that I replied: "what about importance of nofollow?" Obviously the importance is beyond SEO.

          Doesn't matter, just as you said "Are nofollow links useful for SEO?" My answer is still "yes".

          1) As I mentioned before the high-ranking website has nofollow link more or less, why we always emphasized the importance of nature backlinks but we don't do that, diverse links mixing with nofollow link can make your backlinks look more nature.

          2) Content reprinted. That's why I said we should build links from valuable content, one of the reasons is that high-qulity content have more chance to be reprinted to other dofollow websites together with your links.

          3) Seo is not only for Google, I don't know the other search engines how to deal with nofollow tag, just the same as Google? May be, maybe none.

          Maybe nofollow links are not very important, but it's useful for SEO.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10399690].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Ultrasonic
            Originally Posted by DABK View Post

            1. Everybody has nofollow links. From whois type of sites, etc. So, what's the point of creating them, if the goal is just to have some nofollow?

            2. Yes, it has a chance of being reprinted. It also has a chance of being reprinted by someone who adds the nofollow tag.

            A very effort-intensive, indirect way of maybe getting link juice. Why do it when there are more effective, and more certain, ways?

            Even if your content is good, how do you know they don't just email it to people? Or they don't just tweet about it? Or bookmark it on sites that give nofollow links?
            I certainly would not recommend you to creat nofollow links purposefully, the point is to creat links from relevant and valuable contents, I think that's the effective and certain work we should do rather than excessively caring about tags.

            Link juice is well, however, just take consideration , we get it for what? If someone enter our website via an authoritative and relevant page such as Wikipedia , Is this not our ultimate goal?
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10399967].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author irawr
              Banned
              Originally Posted by Ultrasonic View Post

              I certainly would not recommend you to creat nofollow links purposefully, the point is to creat links from relevant and valuable contents, I think that's the effective and certain work we should do rather than excessively caring about tags.

              Link juice is well, however, just take consideration , we get it for what? If someone enter our website via an authoritative and relevant page such as Wikipedia , Is this not our ultimate goal?
              Not on the SEO forums, No. Our goal on these forums is to improve the ranking of the site, not get traffic. You do not seem to understand the goal of SEO, it's not to get traffic, it's not to make content, and it's certainly not to build links of zero SEO value. It's to improve our rankings in google and ideally get to the first position for a specific search term.

              It should be well known that the first spot in the organic listing of google will receive the highest click rate and also the highest conversion rate.

              So go ahead, sit there and build a bunch of no follow links to your site to build up a flow of traffic while I build up a flow of customers.

              Originally Posted by Ultrasonic View Post

              Doesn't matter, just as you said "Are nofollow links useful for SEO?" My answer is still "yes".
              If your strategy is to build nofollow links for traffic that's fine, BUT IT'S NOT SEO. Get over it, rock is not water, elvis is dead, the earth is not flat, ghosts are not real, there's no secret system to winning the lottery and nofollow link building is not SEO.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10399986].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Ultrasonic
                Originally Posted by irawr View Post

                Not on the SEO forums, No. Our goal on these forums is to improve the ranking of the site, not get traffic. You do not seem to understand the goal of SEO, it's not to get traffic, it's not to make content, and it's certainly not to build links of zero SEO value. It's to improve our rankings in google and ideally get to the first position for a specific search term.

                It should be well known that the first spot in the organic listing of google will receive the highest click rate and also the highest conversion rate.

                So go ahead, sit there and build a bunch of no follow links to your site to build up a flow of traffic while I build up a flow of customers.



                If your strategy is to build nofollow links for traffic that's fine, BUT IT'S NOT SEO. Get over it, rock is not water, elvis is dead, the earth is not flat, ghosts are not real, there's no secret system to winning the lottery and nofollow link building is not SEO.

                I showed that why nofollow has value for SEO, then you just replied me nofollow is not SEO. All right, thanks for your truth, you beat me.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10400003].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author nettiapina
                  Originally Posted by Ultrasonic View Post

                  I showed that why nofollow has value for SEO, then you just replied me nofollow is not SEO. All right, thanks for your truth, you beat me.
                  You know, the points you made were pretty lousy. DABK actually took the time to answer them, but in my opinion they don't really even need answers.

                  1) Pet theory of some link spammers. Not much evidence to support this hypothesis.
                  2) Do you really want links from scrapers and other such sites?
                  3) Speculation about something that's not relevant to most people here.

                  If you're talking about sites that give nofollow links, but where the potential benefit is something other than the link I'd suggest you actually describe what you're aiming for. For example, Facebook might be good for content marketing and link outreach. Same goes for Reddit. The links carry no direct SEO benefit, but if you engage industry contacts or rabid fanboys... You know, that might get you juicy links.
                  Signature
                  Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
                  Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

                  What's your excuse?
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10403023].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author DABK
                  No, you didn't show that nofollow has value for SEO; you showed that nofollow can get you traffic from the page the nofollow link is on.

                  That is not SEO.

                  Success in business is based upon accurate thinking.



                  Originally Posted by Ultrasonic View Post

                  I showed that why nofollow has value for SEO, then you just replied me nofollow is not SEO. All right, thanks for your truth, you beat me.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10403353].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author DABK
              If you are not recommending creating nofollow links on purpose why even bother talking about them?

              If the goal is to have visitors from Wikipedia, why even talk about nofollow links?

              But, if you're talking about nofollow links, it helps if you talk about them accurately. Nofollow links are useless from the point of SEO. Nofollow links can get you direct traffic from the page they are on. But that's not SEO. Which means, you strategy is going to be different than if it were SEO.

              Originally Posted by Ultrasonic View Post

              I certainly would not recommend you to creat nofollow links purposefully, the point is to creat links from relevant and valuable contents, I think that's the effective and certain work we should do rather than excessively caring about tags.

              Link juice is well, however, just take consideration , we get it for what? If someone enter our website via an authoritative and relevant page such as Wikipedia , Is this not our ultimate goal?
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10403341].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author chrisjohn93
    No-follow back links from highly reported website still matter for Google as Ranking factor of your website.. All the no-follow links are not helpful for your website, its just for traffic source for your website.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10398348].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KylieSweet
    It doesn't matter whether if it is no follow or do follow as long as the link contains the interesting and beneficial content in which delivers great user experience. Google consider these qualifications to make your site as a hub of information to the users.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10398508].message }}
  • nofollow doesn't help your rankings... i thought this was common sense lol
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10398608].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by TotalWebsiteControl View Post

      nofollow doesn't help your rankings... i thought this was common sense lol

      It is common sense that's why some of these guys aren't ranking any pages, no common sense.

      The one yahoo even keyword stuffed his forum profile name, lmao, along with a nofollow forum sig.

      Clearly spam is all that matters here, ranking pages isn't happening.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10399006].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nettiapina
    Originally Posted by dianapenti View Post

    As we know Wikipedia is a nofollow but backlink from wikipedia is like a thumb up from president for Google...
    That's actually a really good analogy. As in Google doesn't give a crap about either of those.

    When the press gets all about that thumb up from POTUS, and Fox News brainfarts something about Benghazi or whatever talking points they've got running at the moment, and every politics blogger just has to cover it to overanalyze the meaning of this gesture - then you know there's some link juice flowing around.

    Does that happen with your Wikipedia article? I'd bet that the answer is no unless you're the Most Interesting Man in the World.
    Signature
    Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
    Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

    What's your excuse?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10399020].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ajsahi
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10399045].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by ajsahi View Post

      according to my view it is not important in view of back linking because google do not allow it any way
      so you can not gain any traffic from this sites or this method

      red regard


      You can gain direct traffic from a nofollow, assuming the link is on a targeted webpage.

      I have a few thousand nofollow forum links, they don't rank pages but do bring in direct traffic.

      The key with that is targeted traffic. Dropping nofollow links on random sites/pages is useless, no direct traffic (none that converts ($$)) & no SEO since the link is nofollow.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10399067].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dronehawk
    Nofollow helps prevent people from spamming such sites with their links
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10399141].message }}
  • nofollow can get you traffic nobody questions that. But if you think that somehow a nofollow link will increase your rankings at all then you are sadly mistaken. You could have 10,000 nofollow links and you would be better off having 1 dofollow link (in terms of seo)

    thanks and have a good day SIR
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10401292].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author iharrythomas
    Both do follow and no follow have the equal importance. The backlink signifies that if reader of content is not getting the answer, then he can go to the link for more details if the visitors is getting his desired answer which he is seeking for, then it would count as a good backlink which obviously have the major impact on search engine, and it doesn't matter whether it is do follow or no follow
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10403112].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HarryBajwa
    Nofollow link can increase your website traffic but can't help to improve website ranking in search engine.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10404851].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jimbrown123
    Google isn't very clear about how it uses nofollow in its algorithm. It would look rational to use the fact one of your page is linked from wikipedia as a trust boost even if it's a nofollow link. Chances are you don't get link juice, but it could be a positive signal for Google.

    Anyway, having nofollow backlinks won't harm your SEO, an ideal link profile has follow and nofollow backlinks. It's just "natural".
    Signature
    PR-6 Web Links Directory - Submit Your Links/Articles Free
    Pufi Games - Games For Girls | Play Thousand of Games Online
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10404887].message }}
  • I don't see why people still value nofollow for seo value. Come on guys... its 2015....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10404899].message }}

Trending Topics