SEO Mistakes That Destroy Your Search Engine Rankings

61 replies
  • SEO
  • |
SEO is important for the survival of an online business. Many business owners and marketers would disagree with the statement as they like to think that content is more important. Moreover, they presume that having amazing content on their websites is enough for their survival.

If you are one of those people and only praise the content, then you are very wrong as SEO is equally important. In fact, SEO and content go hand in hand, and good quality of both these aspects is required to ensure the survival of online businesses.

After realizing the importance of SEO, be sure to avoid these mistakes that could potentially destroy your search engine rankings for good.

Google Keyword Tool
Some people have the misconception that they are committing a horrendous act of cheating by using the Google keyword search. But this is not the case as this keyword tool is for helping the business owners in identifying the popular and least popular keywords.

Moreover, they also help the people in learning about the popular keywords that could be used by the visitors in their particular niche. So by not using the Google keyword tool and by inventing your keywords is a great way of stuffing up your rankings.

Promotion of Content
The other mistake that could destroy your ranking is not enough promotion of your content. A lot of people feel shy in sharing their content or asking other people to share it on their behalf.

This behavior is totally normal but for the sake of building a huge audience base and to rank better on the searches, one need to remove the feeling of shyness and share their content endlessly on multiple social platforms.

There is no need to promote content when you own a popular website, but you would have to undertake the strenuous task of manually sharing you content in case of the new or unpopular website.

Inconsistent Publishing
A recent study showed that publishing content on your website twice per day has a better chance of ranking in the search engines than those who share content once every week.

So restricting the process of uploading the content to once every single month can destroy your only chance of ranking better in the search engines.

Search Engines' Webmaster Tool
The webmaster tool is an amazing feature provided by both Bing and Google. It was made public for the benefits of the web owners.

The registered members of the Webmaster Tool have access to a unique way of evaluating their sites and knowing about their status among their target audience. Not utilizing the Webmaster Tool is like driving on a dangerous track with your eyes closed.
Webmaster Tool is an easy process; it doesn't require technical knowledge. By not utilizing its services, online business owners are destroying their only chance at visibility among their target audience.

This list, in any way, doesn't make up for the entire SEO mistakes; there are so many other mistakes that even seasoned web owners are committing on a daily basis. So every business owner should be mindful of their environment and should stay clear of these mistakes that could cost them no ranking at all.
#destroy #engine #mistakes #rankings #search #seo
  • Profile picture of the author webby0031
    "A recent study showed that publishing content on your website twice per day has a better chance of ranking in the search engines than those who share content once every week."

    Evidence please...

    dont post crap unless you have a reference for it
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10701755].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Enterprisemonkey
      Originally Posted by webby0031 View Post

      "A recent study showed that publishing content on your website twice per day has a better chance of ranking in the search engines than those who share content once every week."

      Evidence please...

      dont post crap unless you have a reference for it
      I do agree with your statement. High-quality fresh content plays a crucial role for increasing organic traffic. If you are updating your blog with two and three quality blogs then within the short span of time your can get your desirable results.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10703232].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author webby0031
        Ok you mus tbe earning over 30K per month to tell me I am wrong, otherwise you are wrong as you dont have the experience.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10703319].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author DABK
      Just be glad he's not seen a recent study about happens if you take just 1 content, split it into 3 contents and publish 3 times a day.

      And proof? The proof is in the pudding and he ate the pudding for breakfast this morning.

      Ok. I'm kidding. I don't want you to be glad, I want him to show his sources and how the tests were conducted. If there's something to be learned, I wanna learn.

      Back to kidding mode: Doesn't it sound good to say, publish 2 times a day vs 2 times a week? It's very symmetrical. Symmetry is beautiful, or else you wouldn't have 2 eyes, one on each side of your nose.

      Back to serious: Don't break Dan's streak, please.

      Originally Posted by webby0031 View Post

      "A recent study showed that publishing content on your website twice per day has a better chance of ranking in the search engines than those who share content once every week."

      Evidence please...

      dont post crap unless you have a reference for it
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10703630].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TZ
      We have a few old site started in 2003-2005 and they get a combined unique hit count of over 1000 people a day. These sites have been getting 1 post a month for 5 years now. Search engines still love these sites.


      I think the whole argument over post frequency is bunk. However, we have noticed that longer posts seem to do better in the search engines - especially Google.
      Signature

      $php_coding = "consistent cash";

      echo ("Give me" . " " . $php_coding . "!");

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10705007].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Skywriting
      Originally Posted by webby0031 View Post

      "A recent study showed that publishing content on your website twice per day has a better chance of ranking in the search engines than those who share content once every week."
      Evidence please...
      dont post ... unless you have a reference for it
      .

      26. Magnitude of Content Updates: The significance of edits and changes is also a freshness factor. Adding or removing entire sections is a more significant update than switching around the order of a few words.

      27. Historical Updates Page Updates: How often has the page been updated over time? Daily, weekly, every 5-years? Frequency of page updates also play a role in freshness.

      Google Ranking Factors: The Complete List
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10705161].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MisterMister
      Originally Posted by webby0031 View Post

      "A recent study showed that publishing content on your website twice per day has a better chance of ranking in the search engines than those who share content once every week."

      Evidence please...

      dont post crap unless you have a reference for it
      Yeah that doesn't seem effective, I think Authority and backlinks is the key ranking factor there are websites that don't even blog that often and they have articles still appearing in the first page of Search.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10707152].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author freepricecompare
    First I am not ready to favor the content publishing twice in a day. Second there are many SEO mistakes that make your SEO effort "waste of time". I see number of sites which have lots of backlinks while there are many on-page SEO things missing. Like without proper navigation structure or inter-linking and a thoughtful conversion rate optimization, one can't reap the benefit of off-page link building.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10701874].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Skywriting
      Originally Posted by freepricecompare View Post

      First I am not ready to favor the content publishing twice in a day. Second there are many SEO mistakes that make your SEO effort "waste of time". I see number of sites which have lots of backlinks while there are many on-page SEO things missing. Like without proper navigation structure or inter-linking and a thoughtful conversion rate optimization, one can't reap the benefit of off-page link building.
      All the factors work together and the results of changing
      each of the factors is dependant on the competition.
      That said, frequency of change and amount of change
      are well supported ranking factors.

      The Periodic Table Of SEO Success Factors
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10710675].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author yukon
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Skywriting View Post

        All the factors work together and the results of changing
        each of the factors is dependant on the competition.
        That said, frequency of change and amount of change
        are well supported ranking factors.

        A constantly changing webpage can easily drop rank like a brick in the SERPs.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10711137].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Skywriting
          Originally Posted by yukon View Post

          A constantly changing webpage can easily drop rank like a brick in the SERPs.
          No argument there. I did say "The amount of change" and I didn't specify that amount.
          The proper amount of change to rank well is "the normal amount to keep a webpage up to date and fresh." You don't want all new content daily or old stale information.
          5 Reasons Why Fresh Content is Critical for Your Website
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10720988].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mashfi
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10703029].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      Originally Posted by Mashfi View Post

      Hey, waht kinds of mistake we should avoid for SEO?
      Avoid reading threads with similar titles.

      They give you a tip like this:

      Originally Posted by dansilvestre View Post

      Google Keyword Tool
      Here's the biggest SEO mistake SEO wannabes are making, like the OP.
      They are not reading, not researching, not keeping up to date.

      So they give you a tip like using "google keyword tool."

      Yeah, I know. I am a stickler for details.


      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10703751].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tekruiter
    You need to avoid duplicate content publishing for the promotion of your website.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10703378].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Hemantkumar
    Publishing content twice a day....!! Wooww
    Its really impossible.
    I agrees with some of points you mentioned above is we should nit shy in sharing our conteny in social media sites. We should keep sharing our posts every month.
    We should not avoid the awesome webmaster tools. If we avoid these tools then this will really harm your seo rankings like google keyword tools or google auto suggest etc.
    Signature

    Take your blog to the next level with LetsTrick | SEO | WhatsApp | Facebook | Phones | computer

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10704081].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author vikingmarketing
    Thumbs up to SEO and Content, great post for new people!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10704122].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author asabhi
    Great post....Nice job...!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10704519].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author prakashmalhotra
    It's obviously the quality of backlinks that matters a lot and the content quality as well. Both are crucial when you are working on search engine ranking of your website. The ranking of any website goes down at the instant when your backlinks are of bad quality. So, make it very clear prior doing SEO for any website.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10704588].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ronieybrown
    obviously a quality content plays a vital role in getting quality back links that directly effect your site in SERP's. There is no such thing as SEO without content. You need words, articles, substance, keywords, verbiage.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10704624].message }}
  • Sorry, it is not an easy task to post unique contents twice a day.I also use content-based techniques and also share it with social media outlets to get better results.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10704628].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
      Originally Posted by Garrette Custom Homes View Post

      Sorry, it is not an easy task to post unique contents twice a day.I also use content-based techniques and also share it with social media outlets to get better results.

      Don't worry. Doing so is a stupid and useless idea for 99% of websites. You can rank just fine without posting twice a day.

      In fact, one could argue you can rank even better.

      Posting twice a day has a better chance of screwing up your internal link structure than helping your rankings if you do not know what you are doing.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10704707].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author DABK
      No, not great.

      Originally Posted by vikingmarketing View Post

      Thumbs up to SEO and Content, great post for new people!
      No, not great.

      Originally Posted by asabhi View Post

      Great post....Nice job...!
      It is, indeed, not easy. It is also not necessary and, like Mike said, it can backfire.

      Originally Posted by Garrette Custom Homes View Post

      Sorry, it is not an easy task to post unique contents twice a day.I also use content-based techniques and also share it with social media outlets to get better results.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10704883].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
    Originally Posted by dansilvestre View Post


    Inconsistent Publishing
    A recent study showed that publishing content on your website twice per day has a better chance of ranking in the search engines than those who share content once every week.

    So restricting the process of uploading the content to once every single month can destroy your only chance of ranking better in the search engines.
    I've supported your other posts but this one is pretty bad. Rather than just blasting it I will explain why its bad.

    If you are referring to blogging then every time you post to the home page you are changing the content relevance score. A lot of newbies blogging often complain how their site is falling or jumping around over time. Well if you are posting and the blog snippet is rolling off the front page and new ones are coming up then of course the content is changing and so your score is fluctuating.

    Second, in promoting content for blogging, link building should be to the permanent link not the home page. that page stays forever the same unless there are comments.

    TENS OF THOUSANDS OF THOSE PAGES RANK AND THEY DO NOT CHANGE.

    posting different pages will not cause them to rank

    Now there is a freshness score but that will not cause permanent ranking.

    You would need to post the study you are referring to because the only thing posting often will do is cause the google bot to crawl your site more often.In the short term. That may make your pages show up faster than sites not posting as often which will fool people with new rankings that they are being ranked for posting more often (not the case just seen sooner by the bots)

    TON LOADS OF SITES WITH EVEN ALL STATIC PAGES rank well all the time over those that post often. Universities, government agencies, medium size businesses, millions of small business. Its all there for anyone to check by googling it.

    None of these businesses or agencies post every day every week or even every month, Posting often has nothing to do with ranking and if you are linking to your home pages (as a blogger) you are changing your ranking factor by causing content to roll of the pages you are updating which may help THAT page but often will hurt its previous score as well.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10704950].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

      I've supported your other posts but this one is pretty bad. Rather than just blasting it I will explain why its bad.

      Really, this one is bad but all the other fiverr gig junk articles he keeps posting just to seed the forum is good?

      Like I said on the first junk article, IT'S JUNK.

      Go look at the OP profile, they're blasting the entire Warrior Forum with $5 articles (roughly 100 bogus threads/articles and counting...).

      FAIL.






      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706351].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

        Really, this one is bad but all the other fiverr gig junk articles he keeps posting just to seed the forum is good?

        Like I said on the first junk article, IT'S JUNK.
        We agree on that part I referenced. We don't for all of the posts. Its not either you reject one or you reject all. Real world we live in. Your assessment that everything is junk is not the final word on anything neither is mine. Shucks you have been around and seen even some decent SEOs totally disagree and still be solid on many other things.

        Go look at the OP profile
        What in the world for? Quite honestly you seem to care more than I do. If you do then your constant whining and putting down FL doesn't make any sense to me. Go work with FL to make it a better place. I'm busy outside of reading a few posts when I have the time and getting on with my business otherwise.

        hey're blasting the entire Warrior Forum with $5 articles (roughly 100 bogus threads/articles and counting...)
        If so thats pretty good and they should share their secret to finding good gigs - outside of some questionable SEO points the English is decent - certainly good enough for first tier -so go forth and backlink.

        I'll give you one other point though - posting articles and not engaging in the thread afterwards is a fail - this is a forum not Ezinearticles. I can't fault Dan. He probably has his orders. he also apparently has PMed a number of people to get their input (no time for that from me since almost all of us gave input long ago and because some of the suggestions go against FL demographics and won't be done anyway)

        FAIL.
        maybe but the alternative gripe fest isn't anything better. I'll give them one point too- seems they fully understand that something by way of new content and threads is needed. You might not agree that they are doing any better but you got to admit - Its an admission of sorts.

        Meanwhile the people complaining the most have shown in various ways they don't really have any new ideas either.
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706428].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author yukon
          Banned
          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

          We agree on that part I referenced. We don't for all of the posts.
          Lol.

          Sticking to your guns just to spite someone.

          Good stuff.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706520].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
            Originally Posted by yukon View Post

            Lol.

            Sticking to your guns just to spite someone.

            Good stuff.
            If you think we disagree because of spite you are even more delusional than I thought. I've always just called things like I see them. Some of your other objections in other threads were your own fail. This one not so much.

            Thats how the adult world works or it should. None of this childish disagreement because its Moz or Brian dean and you are jealous they have the attention of people outside of a forum or two and you don't.
            Signature

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706575].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author yukon
              Banned
              Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

              If you think we disagree because of spite you are even more delusional than I thought. I've always just called things like I see them. Some of your other objections in other threads were your own fail. This one not so much.

              Thats how the adult world works or it should. None of this childish disagreement because its Moz or Brian dean and you are jealous they have the attention of people outside of a forum or two and you don't.

              Well, at least you're right about OP not having a clue with SEO and simply rehashing silly SEO blogs (moz, dean).
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10707543].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                Originally Posted by yukon View Post

                Well, at least you're right about OP not having a clue with SEO and simply rehashing silly SEO blogs (moz, dean).


                No one but Forum Kiddie SEOs agrees with you that those blogs and people don't know SEO. Might as well get a theme song to go with the tactic of claiming I said something you know I didn't..


                Signature

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10707691].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author yukon
                  Banned
                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                  No one but Forum Kiddie SEOs agrees with you that those blogs and people don't know SEO.

                  Lmao, the only ones that agree with your fail is India.

                  Fiverr gig for the OP article and fiverr gig for the Thanks comments, ha, ha...







                  Originally Posted by vikingmarketing View Post

                  Thumbs up to SEO and Content, great post for new people!
                  Originally Posted by asabhi View Post

                  Great post....Nice job...!
                  Originally Posted by LoraG View Post

                  guys, thanks so much for the tools, I have problems with my own web site, now I thinkI am gonna use your tipsto solve some of them..
                  Originally Posted by EmraanHasanAnik View Post

                  Yep... I do agree with you.
                  Thanks for posting!!
                  Originally Posted by HayleyS View Post

                  I agree with you and I think that you are exactly right that both SEO and content are necessary for ensuring the survival of online businesses. Thanks for sharing your suggestion which can help to avoid all the mistakes which can potentially destroy a search engine ranking for good.
                  Originally Posted by onlinesmsshop View Post

                  This is post is so much helpful about SEO content sharing. i like 1 point to Content Sharing strategy of business. ....
                  Originally Posted by MidelSunRise View Post

                  thanks for sharing
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10707734].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                    Originally Posted by yukon View Post

                    Lmao, the only ones that agree with your fail is India.

                    Fiverr gig for the OP article and fiverr gig for the Thanks comments, ha, ha...
                    Try and keep up for once Yukon. You referenced Moz and Brian dean, See any of them in this forum?

                    It figures that a SEO forum guru wannabe would refer back to forum posters to rebut the superior reputation of the people he is trying to slam as not knowing SEO .

                    Your theme song is still playing

                    Besides The Indians here are making more sense than you are at the moment. Some of them are at least getting a little traffic through their sig while here you are on a forum you trash, say isn't ran well, has no one with an sense and is worthless but still posting to 10-20 times a day every day.

                    sense much?
                    Signature

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10707781].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author yukon
                      Banned
                      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                      Besides The Indians here are making more sense than you are at the moment.
                      Lmao at backing up the one liner forum spam on a fiverr gig article thread.

                      Thanks for the laugh, at least you still have a sense of humor.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10707807].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

                        Lmao at backing up the one liner forum spam on a fiverr gig article thread.
                        The amount of times you say you have LYAO you must have quite a medical bill attaching it back or not much of an A

                        Thanks for the laugh, at least you still have a sense of humor.
                        My secret is simple - If am ever in danger of losing it I come over to WF see you posting 10-20 times a day every day and it comes right back.

                        toodles
                        Signature

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10707982].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author LoraG
    guys, thanks so much for the tools, I have problems with my own web site, now I thinkI am gonna use your tipsto solve some of them..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10705241].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sananu107
    I found blog commenting on niche websites and updating content frequently makes it for a better ranking in recent times. Off course the link profile of that website has to be good enough to beat the competition.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10705495].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Amolcityweb
    Spam backlinks will destroy all your hard work that is created earlier. This is the only way that your efforts will down your website for long, even if your website is built nicely.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10705842].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Lineikosen
    1. Telling the search engines you don't want them to add your website to their database or follow its links.
    2. Relying on SEO software to "optimize" your website.


    3. Writing to your CEO instead of your customer.

    4. Creating a new site on a new domain and leaving the old site up as well.
    Signature
    http://www.3d-architectural-rendering.com/3D-Exterior-Rendering.html
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10705950].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jacks009
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706001].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author BrainSponge
    You would need a team of people to be able to write multiple quality content posts of decent length and seo optimized every day. And that's before you think of the time needed to promote each and every post.
    If you don't have a team then you're writing short poor quality content that's not being promoted properly. That doesn't sound like a recipe for seo success.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706040].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
    Ignoring the fact that a lot of these posts have some fairly significant inaccuracies and the writing quality is not great (but better than something you would get from iWriter), the strategy is a bit lacking.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706565].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post

      Ignoring the fact that a lot of these posts have some fairly significant inaccuracies and the writing quality is not great (but better than something you would get from iWriter), the strategy is a bit lacking.
      Meh...They have less inaccuracies than you and Yukon are claiming and the writing quality is fine. Representing that Dan's stuff is like fiverr and/or just a bit better than Iwriter stuff is just you two going overboard because lets face it you have an issue with anyone from FL posting on SEO unless they agree with you. Its all a part of the thou shalt have no gurus before us syndrome.

      You can fool the newbs but most seasoned SEOs know there are those in the respected SEO community that believe more comprehensive content helps in ranking, social signals are where Google wants to go (as I wrote in another thread not particular networks but reputation against the social graph of the internet) and yep even that content marketing and SEO have essentially merged or overlapped significantly.

      Shucks the two of you know perfectly well that there were some half knowledgeable people here a few years back that disagreed on no follow links. So SEO whether you like it or not doesn't have to bow to two posters that no one knows outside of forums.

      Dan is wrong on frequency of content publishing because the serps can fairly quickly and convincingly show otherwise with hundreds of thousands of examples (not just cherry picking Dafonts and Youtube)

      Thats not the case with many other points in other posts.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706613].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
        Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

        Meh...They have less inaccuracies than you and Yukon are claiming and the writing quality is fine. Representing that Dan's stuff is like fiverr and/or just a bit better than Iwriter stuff is just you two going overboard because lets face it you have an issue with anyone from FL posting on SEO unless they agree with you. Its all a part of the thou shalt have no gurus before us syndrome.

        You can fool the newbs but most seasoned SEOs know there are those in the respected SEO community that believe more comprehensive content helps in ranking, social signals are where Google wants to go (as I wrote in another thread not particular networks but reputation against the social graph of the internet) and yep even that content marketing and SEO have essentially merged or overlapped significantly.

        Shucks the two of you know perfectly well that there were some half knowledgeable people here a few years back that disagreed on no follow links. So SEO whether you like it or not doesn't have to bow to two posters that no one knows outside of forums.

        Dan is wrong on frequency of content publishing because the serps can fairly quickly and convincingly show otherwise with hundreds of thousands of examples (not just cherry picking Dafonts and Youtube)

        Thats not the case with many other points in other posts.

        I'm not talking just about the SEO stuff being posted. I'm talking about the posts as a whole. There are a lot of inaccuracies on other topics too. Go have a look.

        On the SEO side, sure Google might be looking at social marketing to evaluate the reputation of the person making a post, but that is not in the least bit anything close to what Dan said (although I doubt he actually wrote it) about social signals.

        In regards to content length, I actually agree that longer content can be better, but it is more complicated than that. Dan's post basically said, "longer better, shorter bad" and that was the extent of it. Nothing about semantics, targeting more related keywords, reaching a broader audience. It was just longer is better than shorter, and that was it.

        In throwing into the discussion topics like LSI and social reputation, you are pretty much pointing out the errors in his posts just as much as others of us are.

        As far as the writing quality...

        Webmaster Tool is an easy process; it doesn't require technical knowledge. By not utilizing its services, online business owners are destroying their only chance at visibility among their target audience.
        Come on. That's crap.

        If the OP wasn't Dan from Warrior Forum, would you be as quick to defend the content? You've criticized content and posts that were much more coherent than his in the past.

        Regardless, my real issue is the strategy of these posts. I don't think they make sense on a forum, and they especially are a bad idea when the OP just posts and leaves (as you said).

        Not to mention it could start inviting everyone else to just start dumping articles here, and they will probably make these articles look like Pulitzer Prize Winners.

        It's potentially going to turn into WZine articles.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706656].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
          Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post


          On the SEO side, sure Google might be looking at social marketing to evaluate the reputation of the person making a post, but that is not in the least bit anything close to what Dan said (although I doubt he actually wrote it) about social signals.
          What Dan was proposing is hardly anything novel though Mike. I didn't and don't agree with it but you don't have to go very far to see that discussed and it took on a little bit of credibility with Google+. These things can be for discussion as they are in many top SEO sites

          Google+ flopping has set that back and so they had to more or less scrap the authorship components (frankly forgot the name of that defunct initiative) they were rolling out as that didn't catch on either.

          Frankly I didn't know what Yukon was going on about with me brown nosing as I never even noticed the community manager under his name. There just seems to be an offense at FL having a poster to start threads unless they fit what some of you agree with.

          Dan's post basically said, "longer better, shorter bad" and that was the extent of it. Nothing about semantics, targeting more related keywords, reaching a broader audience. It was just longer is better than shorter, and that was it.
          No it wasn't. Go back and read it. it deliberately compares shorter AND confusing with one longer and more comprehensive. So it was longer and more comprehensive is better that shorter AND confusing. I'd agree with that choice any day. I think the anger was so great that he dare post on SEO at all that it completely overshadowed reading comprehension and before that thread was out he was being quoted as referring to specific lengths and even "Walls of text" he never referenced at all.

          As far as the writing quality... Come on. That's crap.
          Nope..... in restructuring paragraphs I have left out punctuation and a word here and there. Will probably do it again. I am not going to proof read every thing I post. Thats all that was wrong in that quote. I got the meaning fine.

          If the OP wasn't Dan from Warrior Forum, would you be as quick to defend the content?
          As already stated didn't know who Dan was at first. When I posted in his defense.I thought he was a newb. I don't read titles of every new name here on WF and completely missed he was a community manager until much later. The whole brown nosing narrative you and Yukon have going is utterly false. I've been defending newbs quite a bit from cranky old members. I am sure your innder circle will agree (but call ti something else). Thought that was supposed to not happen when MA wasn't in it? ...

          You've all become like Paul....lol,,,,read some of your own posts in the last few months. Slaughter the newbs is the new (and perhaps only) past time..

          I just can't take you seriously on the low quality of the writing part. For someone I figure who has got as many PMs from people showing us their sites with horrendous content the whole denigration that Dan's writing is horrible - just above fiverr quality - just comes across as hating because someone has stepped on what you think should be your turf.
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706739].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author webby0031
            Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

            What Dan was proposing is hardly anything novel though Mike. I didn't and don't agree with it but you don't have to go very far to see that discussed and it took on a little bit of credibility with Google+. These things can be for discussion as they are in many top SEO sites

            Google+ flopping has set that back and so they had to more or less scrap the authorship components (frankly forgot the name of that defunct initiative) they were rolling out as that didn't catch on either.

            Frankly I didn't know what Yukon was going on about with me brown nosing as I never even noticed the community manager under his name. There just seems to be an offense at FL having a poster to start threads unless they fit what some of you agree with.



            No it wasn't. Go back and read it. it deliberately compares shorter AND confusing with one longer and more comprehensive. So it was longer and more comprehensive is better that shorter AND confusing. I'd agree with that choice any day. I think the anger was so great that he dare post on SEO at all that it completely overshadowed reading comprehension and before that thread was out he was being quoted as referring to specific lengths and even "Walls of text" he never referenced at all.



            Nope..... in restructuring paragraphs I have left out punctuation and a word here and there. Will probably do it again. I am not going to proof read every thing I post. Thats all that was wrong in that quote. I got the meaning fine.



            As already stated didn't know who Dan was at first. When I posted in his defense.I thought he was a newb. I don't read titles of every new name here on WF and completely missed he was a community manager until much later. The whole brown nosing narrative you and Yukon have going is utterly false. I've been defending newbs quite a bit from cranky old members. I am sure your innder circle will agree (but call ti something else). Thought that was supposed to not happen when MA wasn't in it? ...

            You've all become like Paul....lol,,,,read some of your own posts in the last few months. Slaughter the newbs is the new (and perhaps only) past time..

            I just can't take you seriously on the low quality of the writing part. For someone I figure who has got as many PMs from people showing us their sites with horrendous content the whole denigration that Dan's writing is horrible - just above fiverr quality - just comes across as hating because someone has stepped on what you think should be your turf.
            Jesus ive been away for a couple of years from this forum and your stil the same spending your whole life on here arguing!!!. Get a life bro please. You must spend your whole life on here writing crap to ghosts. seriously mate wake up . We all agree your right and everyone thinks your right and your the best and your info and knowledge is amazing. happy now ?
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706782].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
              Originally Posted by webby0031 View Post

              Jesus ive been away for a couple of years from this forum
              Lol...you been here more than me but you are right that we have not communicated in years. You did manage not to age in conversation skills though. there is that . Maybe its a signal for you of the niche to get into.
              Signature

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706809].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kay King
    We're getting to "warrior forum as article directory" very quickly. These threads give new people a chance to say "something" - but wrong and dated info is not uncommon in these threads.

    It doesn't seem worth it to point out discrepancies or old info - wouldn't accomplish anything as the articles are WF sanctioned.

    I don't think it's worth getting into an argument about....but some will go there anyway.
    Signature
    Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
    ***
    One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
    what it is instead of what you think it should be.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706583].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by Kay King View Post


      It doesn't seem worth it to point out discrepancies or old info - wouldn't accomplish anything as the articles are WF sanctioned.

      I don't think it's worth getting into an argument about....but some will go there anyway.
      You do realize that both sentences above are completely self contradictory. You seemed to think it was worth it and you went there.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706625].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kay King
    When I posted in his defense.I thought he was a newb
    You've posted in several of his threads in the past 10 days...and didn't notice the title or the sig?

    When I posted in his defense.I thought he was a newb
    Or it is you didn't notice the title or sig because the purpose in posting is to slam Mike or Yukon or me or any of the other half dozen people here you don't seem to like?

    Mike....did you READ the part below:

    ... this keyword tool is for helping the business owners in identifying the popular and least popular keywords.

    Moreover, they also help the people in learning about the popular keywords that could be used by the visitors in their particular niche. So by not using the Google keyword tool and by inventing your keywords is a great way of stuffing up your rankings.
    Do you believe that is great advice from the management of this marketing forum???? How is it helping newbies to defend that sort of info?
    Signature
    Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
    ***
    One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
    what it is instead of what you think it should be.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706770].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

      You've posted in several of his threads in the past 10 days...and didn't notice the title or the sig?
      Learn to read Kay. Said I realized much later after defending him in that thread and sorry but your logically weak narrative that me defending anyone or thread from the attacks of your friends is the same as initiating an attack is old and tired. Get some new original material.

      Mike....did you READ the part below:

      Do you believe that is great advice from the management of this marketing forum???? How is it helping newbies to defend that sort of info?
      What are you yabbering about Kay? Do I support the use of Google's keyword tool so you can know what people are searching for?

      Why yes of course. Who in SEO doesn't? This isn't the off topic section. Know what you are talking about before engaging.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10706805].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HayleyS
    I agree with you and I think that you are exactly right that both SEO and content are necessary for ensuring the survival of online businesses. Thanks for sharing your suggestion which can help to avoid all the mistakes which can potentially destroy a search engine ranking for good.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10707299].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author christinehopkin
    Nice sharing. All the information that you people shared over here is useful and nice tips to run SEO in a good way. You can also take SEO services from any reliable company to run it better. It is really helpful in terms of generating money for long term.
    Signature

    Research Executive at VirtueNetz

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10707775].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Connect Creativ
    my problem right now is just there is too much information and most of the people giving the information seem to be selling snake oil. where are the good resources for SEO that aren't trying to sell me something?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10711076].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sami043
    great post... keep it up
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10720317].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Muntaha farin
    If you want to rank your site top, you have to add unique contents as much you can add. it's not about to add content twice a day or same content in different sites. You can take time and write best articles for your site. I don't think more contents can make your sites more SEO friendly. It's about your your content's quality, nothing else.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10720994].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      Originally Posted by Muntaha farin View Post

      If you want to rank your site top, you have to add unique contents as much you can add. it's not about to add content twice a day or same content in different sites. You can take time and write best articles for your site. I don't think more contents can make your sites more SEO friendly. It's about your your content's quality, nothing else.
      You're proof that this thread was useless from the beginning.

      But sometimes I don't really mind threads like this. Maybe, just maybe, the clowns who start and chime will damage their online rep. We can hope!

      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10721445].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dkate9
    Great post, Thanks for listing all the mistakes here so that people can learn about these mistakes and can try to avoid them.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10721749].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author webliquids
    6 SEO Sins That'll Put You on Google's Naughty List :
    1.Buying Links
    2.Joining the Wrong Link Directories
    3.Article Marketing
    4.Keyword Stuffing
    5.Unnatural Anchor Text
    6.Broken Links
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10721807].message }}
  • [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10721903].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tim3
      Originally Posted by Somadrita Chatterjee View Post

      Re: Mistakes That Destroy Your Warrior Forum Rankings

      Signature link spamming (twice in consecutive posts)
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10722699].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author lavyhair
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10722029].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tim3
      Originally Posted by lavyhair View Post

      Yes i am agree with this post i really like this post and its information is really very nice and effective for bad SMO.
      Indian Hair Extensions
      It will be very nice and effective for us all if you go away quickly and never come back and spam us again.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10722706].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author DABK
        What's an unnatural anchor text?
        Why would article marketing get you on Google's naughty list? Are you confusing article marketing with article directory "marketing" (i.e., submitting crappy articles to lots of directories to get links)?

        Originally Posted by webliquids View Post

        6 SEO Sins That'll Put You on Google's Naughty List :
        1.Buying Links
        2.Joining the Wrong Link Directories
        3.Article Marketing
        4.Keyword Stuffing
        5.Unnatural Anchor Text
        6.Broken Links
        You love wasting your time? You don't know what you're doing? Inquiry minds want to know.

        Originally Posted by lavyhair View Post

        Yes i am agree with this post i really like this post and its information is really very nice and effective for bad SMO.

        Indian Hair Extensions
        If you're going to do it, might as well do it with gusto, don't you think?

        Originally Posted by Tim3 View Post

        Signature link spamming (twice in consecutive posts)
        You mean you don't love Indian hair extensions? You're just breaking my heart, you meannie you!

        Originally Posted by Tim3 View Post

        It will be very nice and effective for us all if you go away quickly and never come back and spam us again.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10722726].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Tim3
          Originally Posted by DABK View Post

          You mean you don't love Indian hair extensions? You're just breaking my heart, you meannie you!
          No, Indian hair brings me out in a rash, so I always use Peruvian Virgin hair (WTF?) it has many uses, including cleaning out pipes, nesting material for hamsters, and making lures for Falconry.
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10722747].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author josoftech
    Fresh and quality content always plays crucial role in search engine ranking than same content posting again n again.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10945924].message }}

Trending Topics