So I was taking courses on Local Business SEO. In The lessons it talks about geotagging the photos on your website. Which I thought was a good idea, geotagged them. But later in the lessons, it speaks of making sure your site is fast. On google analytics, it showed that I could make my desktop version faster. It recommended compressing my photos to making it faster.
GEO Tagging VS Site Speed
2
So I was taking courses on Local Business SEO. In The lessons it talks about geotagging the photos on your website. Which I thought was a good idea, geotagged them.
But later in the lessons, it speaks of making sure your site is fast. On google analytics, it showed that I could make my desktop version faster. It recommended compressing my photos to making it faster.
I did so, but it removed the Geotagging on the photos and I lost a crap ton of rankings. I was in 5th. Now I'm on the Second page.
Not the end of the world, but would you sacrifice speed for Geotagging or vice versa?
But later in the lessons, it speaks of making sure your site is fast. On google analytics, it showed that I could make my desktop version faster. It recommended compressing my photos to making it faster.
I did so, but it removed the Geotagging on the photos and I lost a crap ton of rankings. I was in 5th. Now I'm on the Second page.
Not the end of the world, but would you sacrifice speed for Geotagging or vice versa?
- expmrb
Next Topics on Trending Feed
-
2