Angela's Links Still Working Well For Everyone?

Why don't you pm Angela or send her an email directly to find out?

I have been using profile/member links for ages and my sites are doing very nicely, so I have to say yes they still work. The only time they won't is if so many people are using the same packets that Google notice the pattern and start doing something about it.

Much of What Angela does is clever... some is spam. Unfortunately when it come to linking a lot of the people buying her packets have no idea how to create a link that won't get banned. So those people will not have success.

People who learn how to place a quality link will do well. It's exclusive of the packets. You need to learn how to contribute to the sites you link from.

I can't see why they wouldn't on the face of it. Sure as Internetmaketing alluded to alot of people use those packages that can spoil it for everyone but Angela has tried to educate them on using the links properly and even if some sites veto the links its hard to claim it isn't still a good deal at $5.

I havn't contributed to the forums where the links were put at all. It says in her diretions you don't have to, but I guess I would.
Are you guys seeing your links in those forums getting indexed? If so how long??

Ya the links are really very helpful

I think I need to get back into Angela's packets, I have MONTHS and MONTHS of packets and a few websites that could do well with the promotion these packets offer - ESPECIALLY with my sites not jumping any PR in the last PR Update.

The packets work well just don't do them all in 1 day and then use pingler unless you already have a decent backlink footprint. I learned the hard way, I did about 180 profile links within a 7 day period and used pingler on each one. On day 8 my site dropped from having 3,500 backlinks indexed on google to having 400 using site:domain and using link:domain my site only shows 1 backlink where it did show a few hundred. My main keyword dropped from page 2 to page 42 overnight.

This was 3 months ago, I've been adding about 15 links a day since and bookmarking with socialbot and the same keyword finally broke to page 18 on google last week, however it's page 1 for yahoo and bing and has been for awhile now. I even filled a reinclusion request with google last month and still no dice. The thing you have to consider is even if the google algorithm doesn't see it, which it probably won't unless you go a little crazy, if a competitor has google alerts setup for that keyword they may tip off google that you're trying to manipulate the serps which is probably what happened in my case as they have also been trying to do sql injections on my server and run up my adwords bill. That's another story though.

I used angelas links for two months, for 4 sites (@ 60 links each) - i did not ping nor bookmark the pages. I dont think I have seen much benefit from the links, maybe i should ping them. Has anybody used Angela's packets without pinging/bookmarking but still found exceptional results?

How is pining your site helping your the back links? :confused:

Thanks!

I think here way is getting more saturated with many thousand people opting for the same technique as hers. In years to come here ways will saturate more reducing the effects of the links.

I've been using Angela's Links for second time now. And I seem to be having no issues at all

Just that, a link or two is kinda messed up. Else, A++.

-Anirudh

Why Angela Backlinks doesn't Work?

Hey Warriors, some of you might be very skeptic about Angela backlinks, especially when you already try it and see no result!

Don't you curious why many warriors see great result while yourself left alone in the dark? Let me explain a little bit of this...

To make any kind of backlinks work, you need to pick "the right keywords"! What is the right keyword?

When you try to rank for a keyword, you need to perform competitive analysis, knowing roughly how many competition pages are in Google. For more in-depth analysis, you need to learn top 10 competitive analysis, see how many backlinks for the top 10 website have...

For example:

If the keyword you are targeting are in page 1 #10, and it has 1,000 backlinks, you won't beat it unless you have 1,000 better quality backlinks! This is both quantity + quality game, so if you think you can outrank a site with 1,000 High PR backlinks, by just using 60 backlinks, you won't have much luck!

You can try my fast article traffic method using Angela Backlinks, definately see result in 7 to 21 days!


How Do I get Massive Traffic + Profit?

Easy! just follow my article traffic method, and scale it up with tons of articles - outsource is the key...

Backlinks every articles with necessary number of links, do it until all rank on page 1 and you will start to see the money coming in

Don't pick super competitive keyword, you are not Daniel Molano, it will take you ages before you can see any result, and most people will give up even before the result shows.


Conclusion

Do proper keyword research, balance between searches and competition, pick the lowest competition keyword with the highest searches! Keyword research is the key to SEO success!

- Kok Choon

I just had an article that was written in August and backlinked with nothing but these links de indexed.

I made another sales page and used specific product names and and got to the #3 and #6 spot using these links then two days ago poof i was slapped back to page 9.

I had been back linking since June and making full profiles using only one or two links per site and writing a 200 word or longer bio

Coincidence who knows for sure.

They did work very well until this happened, can't blame the links for sure but got a gut feeling!

my article still is indxed and my rankings are still pretty good in the google caffeine sandbox Google

Not sure what that all means, anyone have an idea?

I've used them for several months without pinging or backlinking and have seen results. It is more powerful if you use fewer links in your profile (one or two at most). It might not get you to number one, but it sure can be a springboard. I focus on insurance keywords which are some of the most difficult (because of the industry's deep pockets) on the net.

Probably the best testimonial Angela can get for her backlinks is by Googling "backlinks". I don't use them personally but I follow similar guidelines with my own linking campaigns and I have great success and am still yet to experience the sandbox.

take a closer look at her backlinks. you'll find there is more going on then just her packets at work. I doubt her packets alone would have achieved the same SE rank for that keyword.

I doubt she would give up all of her secrets for $5 a month!

Easiest thing to do is just use a backlink checker and see what links she has to her articles.

Actually, I did use my packet links for the article. If you look at the links, you will find only these same sorts of links there; I haven't done any kind of "trick" or any of that for it. No link wheels. No three-way links. No link networks. No RSS feeds. None of that stuff...just High Page Rank links. And yes, I AM giving away "all my secrets" for $5 a month. If I weren't, how do you think I would come up with a packet of Page Rank 6 and above links EVERY month? Don't you think I'd keep the PR 8s and PR 9s and maybe even some of the PR 7s for myself only and have a "monthly packet" of PR 5 and PR 6 links?? The BEST sites I find, I share with my subscribers...UNLESS the site requires a comment, which unfortunately, I can no longer put into the packet, due to the abusive subscribers, who spam the heck out of those types of sites and ruin them for us all.

It's fine to debate about the links themselves if you want to, but don't insinuate that I'm doing something tricky that I'm not sharing, as that is not in any way true.

seeing one of my heavily linked articles disappear after a 5 months kinda scares me off from these types of links though.

that article was an experiment, another i have is still ranking but is mixed up quite a bit with comments, links and other things.

I'm not accusing you of 'tricks' but you do have a lot more going on with your backlinks then simple n/a profile links.

But in all fairness... the backlinks you've built up for your sites are great work. Which is why you rank as well as you do. It's a solid balance of filler profile backlinks, blog commenting and personal web 2.0 sites.

If I'm not mistaken, the backlinks you have pointing towards your sites resemble more of what was found in your earlier packets but due to various reasons you've dropped some of those methods.

But... the methods you've dropped are also the ones I think may have been the most valuable.

I know and it's unfortunate that it had to be that way. The abuse of a few ruined the resource for all.

Does anyone know if profile links pass a manual inspection from google? I've recently applied for a reinclusion request after getting bumped to page 40 in August. Google replied and said they had reviewed my site however still no love, on google for my main keyword I'm on page 35 and on sandbox I'm on page 1. Other than ezine articles, profile linking was all I was doing with only 1 link per profile. Site is 2 years old and we sell physical products, Any ideas?

You aren't excluded from the index though, you said yourself you are on page 35. Google just doesn't think your site is the best one for the respective keyword.

yes these links still effective i use a package and it was very beneficial

I just worry about the links getting indexed - it will take a while. I've been trying to get my web 2.0 properties indexed by using pinging sites - still not working.

You gotta get links indexed first - then carry on...

Bad idea.

You haven't been banned. You are on page 40 because your site SEO is weak.

I would never apply for reinclusion unless my site was absolutely banned and could not be found and then only if the site was completely white hat.

A manual review of your site is going to show that you are link spamming and I wouldn't expect google to care or do much about it.

I've had sites drop down to the 900's and then bounce back to the top 10 a month later. It's all a part of the game.

all my sites rankings came back as well, so i guess i got scared for nothing.

If you are going the SEO route, it a marathon not a sprint.

I see that the backlinks are mostly used by members for articles. Are many people using them for main sites? Like a company site etc...

Also is anyone worried that Google may eventually ban this and ban all the sites you linked this way?

Signed up for the packets a while ago and need to catch up on them but always been a concern for me.

True,

but what if they changed their algorithm so that pages that were ranked PR n/a had no link value... that would eliminate profile spam and not effect legitimate linking.

That would be a very simple solution that google could implement in a day. They are aware of what is going on and I'm sure they are looking into solutions.

For now, profile backlinking does work but if that is your only backlinking strategy your building a house of cards.

Sure.

First off, I'm not an article writer. I build websites and I target medium to high traffic keywords.

I don't use articles and rarely use directories.

*I use your articles to fluff out my support sites (more on those later)

blogs, profiles and forums. I use all of these through different methods to build backlinks. I follow some of what is mentioned here at WF and I have a few other tricks and methods I use as well.

I've given away some of my tricks in various posts here and some things I am keeping to myself so they aren't exploited and lose their value.

The biggest difference between what I do and what many others don't do is building my own support sites. I've put a lot of time into developing my own little network of sites that I can use for backlinking.

These site generally have little to no traffic, aren't set up to sell anything and typically look very innocent at first glance... just some some average joe schmoes blog. These site age, I throw backlinks at them from time to time, they generate low PR and exist only to support my money sites as backlink sources.

With the number of free hosting and blog options available you can build a network of hundreds of these sites at no cost other than time spent.

Having a little army of PR 1 -2 sites can give a nice little boost to any project you are working on and they are 100% white hat spam free backlinks that you'll never lose and nobody can mess with.

This same technique is used by many top IMers, SEO's and corporations to boost up their own sites. Major companies aren't spamming blogs and profiles for backlinks, they buy 100 or 1,000 .com's and set up little sites just for the purpose of driving backlinks and link juice to their own sites. A $1,000 or $10,000 marketing investment isn't much if you stand to gain $10,000 or $100,000 from it.

Now, somebody is going to cry that it's too much work, they don't have the time or it's not worth the effort. That's fine, each to their own. I just don't feel that relying on other sites and spamming as your only means of backlinks is a very smart, safe or wise long-term strategy. Sure, it works great now, I'll drop more profile links later tonight along with a few blog and forum comments as well, but my sites don't rely on these methods alone.

Diversity, that more or less sums it all up

*this was my mini WSO.. that'll be $10 please.

These links work very well. I have many sites that hold spots on the 1st page just from these sort of links.

Steve's SEO Link dominator is a big help in link building, plus he almost supported all WSO's link packet, this is great piece of software!

I have used the backlinks for four of my websites now and I am still finding them extremely useful.

Some links might not show at all, but they sure work - because my page ranking rises, so I know that!

No one try SENuke? Free to use as well !

Watch Your Income Soar To New Levels!" ...all with the click of a button!

simple copy and past from SEnuke site.

the previous poster... who appears to have been banned since the post is no longer there was asking about SEnuke.

I was going to post a link to the site, then I thought... if I can use google to find it, so can he.

So I just decided to be a jackass and copy and past the headline from the SEnuke page.

I wonder if I can make that my signature?

*edit* yes... I can. sorta.

I'm running into tons of problems lately with SENuke. I hope they fix them in their next update.

I for one think you are doing us all a tremendous service Angela. And for $5 if you only get a couple of links from each packet to stick you are still way in the money.

I started using angelas and pauls back links in Sept. So far I have 3 months in, and I haven't really seen any changes. I have not tried the pinging or the RSS feeds, but I will now. I work in the payroll industry, and I don't expect to ever outrank paychex or ADP, but I am surprised that I don't have a higher page rank. I went back 50 pages and could not find my site for either key word. Am I doing something wrong?

I think this kind of method will be useless in the future as it easy to track by google engineer. The pattern are same and peoples doing it in massive way.

it kind like years ago when people spam meta keywords and descriptions, use same text color as background, etc...

These method also like a threat for people who work hard to get high PR... as they will get "scammed"

just my opinion...

could it be an automated anti script for such 'create profile' mothod... ??

then you shouldn't be spamming

if you are a legit business then you should look into pyramid linking (there was a recent post about it) so you can keep your business site clean of suspect backlinks and still spam every forum and blog on the planet.

I think the links do okay for me, but i have to ping them or bookmark them to get them visible.

I do think that pinging the links makes sense. Really though Angela/Paul's lists are no longer a slam dunk for improving SEO. They are simply another tool to be used, for $13 a month total between the two I think they are well worth it.

If you use their links a month or two after they come out you'll have better success-you know after the site owner gets upset and takes down the 5k profiles that were created in the matter of two days.

I find that a lot of profile pages do not get indexed on their own. You need to get them indexed in order for the backlinks to count. You just need to find a couple of good bookmarking sites or other methods in which to get the pages indexed.

I ran a test just before the weekend. Only a handful from a long list of urls were indexed. I bookmarked some of these and today when I ran the app again, those bookmarked profiles were indexed.

Just make sure you don't buid them and then forget about them otherwise you may be wasting your time or money.

Or if you don't want to bookmark, ping or submit profile pages to anywhere, you can always do something on the target page that "leaves a mark". Like for example reply to somebody's post in the forums or something similar. That will get your profile indexed also.

A link pyramid is basically the same thing I outlined in my last ebook, its just creating a "firewall" that takes that crap links hit and passes on any goodness.

I think I need to go to Angela packages, packages, and for months I have some sites that may do well to promote these packages offer - especially anything by jumping on my site has PR PR update.

Much of what Angela is a brilliant ... Some spam. Unfortunately, when it comes to attacking a lot of people buy their own packages have no idea how to create a connection that can not be denied. So, these people are not successful.

Seems some great resources are there! I would like to get some! BUt it seems Angela has quitted this!