Yahoo is good option, has less traffic, you can direct link as well,

Converting is different story though. you need to test, I have campaign doing good at Google and yahoo its fail, another one canned at Google , getting good ROI at yahoo search.

I don't know exactly what Google are looking for, but I know what I would look for.

You site is just a wall of boringly presented text with lots of grammar and spelling mistakes. Sorry to be blunt, but it won't sell anything as it is because no-one will read it.

You really need to start again from scratch. Think about what your site is for and why and then present the information accordingly.

For example: If you are aiming for a review type site you need to be more objective. You say at the beginning that "the products are of high quality". I think anyone that uses Clickbank knows that this isn't necessarily true. It would be more helpful if you explained, with illustrations, how to decide which are the high quality products.

Piero,

People (who you should listen to) have already told you that the text is boring and hard to read.

But let's think this through a little more constructively.

Google are telling you that the page is of poor quality. That much is for certain, but looking at it from Google's point of view, what does that most probably mean?

Google are in the game of sending people to the most relevant pages according to the keyword they have typed in - and that applies as much to natural search as it does to pay per click traffic.

So they are bound to look at your page to see if it has any relevance to the keywords you are bidding on.

I have a free website where you can see what the search engines see on your page: Free Keyword Density Tool - Which Keywords do the Search Engines See?

Go there and type in the URL you gave us to look at.

What do you find? A page that has no discernible keyword focus at all! The only phrase that stands out at all is 'pay per click' - and with a keyword density of just 0.3% and no support words or terms used at all, it is easy to see why Google rejected your page.

When you create a web page, it is not enough to write a wall of text. Nobody (and especially not the SEs) is impressed by verbiage for the sake of it.

What we all want is relevant, interesting and enticing copy that makes us want to read on and go to other pages on your site.

We want an answer to the implied question that our original search suggested.

We don't want a page that does and says nothing and, as Google have pointed out, bears little relevance to whatever search term it is supposed to be helping.

There are several ways to make your pages more interesting to read and more focused on the right key words and phrases - check out latent semantic indexing at some time in the future. But for now, concentrate on tightening up your writing - 500 words that get to the point will be far better than the 1500 words that say nothing much you've currently got there - and making sure that every paragraph (5-6 lines max, by the way) has something to do with whatever keywords you are bidding on.

And use Keyword Hacker. It should be the first thing you do when you write a new web page or article - and it is totally free.

Martin

My question is what is the keyword you're targeting. it's better to target one keyword per page. That way Google can index you easily. Keyword density per any web page (doesn't matter if it's article, blog post, web page) should be between 2% - 5%. Anything over 5%, Google will consider this Google Bombing, and that can get your website kicked into the sandbox for 4 to 6 months.

How do you calculate keyword density? Keyword divided by total word count x 100%. Remember that keywords in your link and titles count as part of the density. You want them in there, but use them judiciously within that density.

That's just the keyword part.

When it's time to promote your website, you need to gain links naturally over the course of a couple of weeks to a month or so. Be careful software or websites that give you super fast links within days. SANDBOX! Some article submitters work that way.

Getting traffic is the goal, but you cannot do anything that would cause Google to think you're cheating their algorithms, even though that isn't your intention. So scale back on your main keyword for each page. In fact you may want to consider using different keywords on your other pages. You list a few products. The product name can be a keyword as well.

Then build links naturally with article marketing. RSS. Social bookmarking. I'm not saying you can't use article submitters to facilitate your article marketing, but use the ones that build links slowly. SubmitYourArticle.com is a good one. That's slow building links.

Articles make good, permanent backlinks. RSS feeds make instant but temporary backlinks because there are always new feeds every day, every minute. Maybe a smart combo of the too would be best. This, in my opinion, is best for the long haul. You won't really have to use pay per click marketing because you focus more on SEO efforts.