Another way of Keyword Research - But i dont get it. Explain please.
- SEO |
This in regards to a method which i came across through a fellow warrior.
I need some input by experienced SEOs what they think about this.
Without going too much into detail ,the method is a method of keyword research by analyzing web site stats.
For example, there are ways to analyze the stats of a big web2.0 site (like article site etc.) , and in the stats i see that the most traffic to this site is coming from the search phrase "hair loss". <--- EXAMPLE
Now, the logic behind this new way of keyword and niche research is that it is assumed when Keyword X is responsible for the majority of traffic to the site, it is also "easy" to rank for this keyword on this particular site!!
The problem is that i cannot follow this logic.
Some of those analyzed sites have very competitive keywords which do indeed cause most traffic to the site (according to stats)....so does this mean that even if its a competitive keyword, the stats are proof that it is easy to rank for this particular keyword???
Eg. if would write an article optimized for this KW and put it on that web2.0 site it will RANK high and can be considered a "good" and profitable keyword?
Any SEO can explain this logic to me?
I need some input by experienced SEOs what they think about this.
Without going too much into detail ,the method is a method of keyword research by analyzing web site stats.
For example, there are ways to analyze the stats of a big web2.0 site (like article site etc.) , and in the stats i see that the most traffic to this site is coming from the search phrase "hair loss". <--- EXAMPLE
Now, the logic behind this new way of keyword and niche research is that it is assumed when Keyword X is responsible for the majority of traffic to the site, it is also "easy" to rank for this keyword on this particular site!!
The problem is that i cannot follow this logic.
Some of those analyzed sites have very competitive keywords which do indeed cause most traffic to the site (according to stats)....so does this mean that even if its a competitive keyword, the stats are proof that it is easy to rank for this particular keyword???
Eg. if would write an article optimized for this KW and put it on that web2.0 site it will RANK high and can be considered a "good" and profitable keyword?
Any SEO can explain this logic to me?
Beats OptinMonster, Popup Domination & Co. hands down.