Backlinking - Is it worth the hassle?

46 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Back linking - It takes a lot of time. Is it really worth the effort?

Please share you ideas and opinions here. I am frustrated. In fact, very frustrated and perhaps a little confused.

Background:

We have been online for over 10 years now with a few of our businesses. Each business has two or three websites. Some sell products and some just provide information. All of these sites are over 5 years old and they all make us money in one way or another and more than pay the bills.

This is not to brag or anything, just to show that we are serious and know how to convert traffic to paying customers reasonably well.

I think we have been fortunate with these historic sites, as we do get some very good rankings and have NEVER done any back linking ourselves.

All of the incoming links we have acquired, have been earned naturally over the years and we must also benefit from the age of our sites, as apparently Google take into account the age of sites etc in their ranking algorithms.

Over the years we have acquired a lot of good domain names (in our opinion) but haven't done anything with them. Now we want to expand, as we now have the time and resorces to get the sites built.

So what is the point of my post?

Two things really.

Question 1 - Is back linking worth all the effort?

Question 2 - After all these years, should we start back linking campaigns for our old established sites?

Why do I ask this? Well, I have just read most of Terry Kyle's long thread about back linking and quite a number of others threads about back linking.

It seems an awful amount of work for what appears to be not much return. Certainly not enough it seems to make it worthwhile, unless I have missed something.

In the good old days, we use to just build good, informative sites. People found them somehow and found the articles and content valuable. They would link to it sometimes and over the years this has built up.

Now it appears our early sites seem to be what people call Authority Sites.

The problem we have is that we want to make use of the unused domain names we hold and build some new sites.

Some of these domain names would on paper be excellent and keyword rich. Almost the equivalent of owning "weightloss.com" in our niches.

We are good at keyword selection, market research, design and writing useful content in our niches.

I know times change and the net is far more competitive than when we started.

But do we really need to go to the extremes, of building 1000's of links, to get new sites well ranked these days?

Perhaps we were lucky in having built our main sites years ago.

If we just build some great sites now, each with a few hundred pages or more, will this be enough to eventually get some decent traffic?

Maybe I am naive, but it seems to me to be wrong to "artificially" create hundreds or thousands of links to sites or articles, from forums, web 2.0 properties, link wheels and crappy blogs etc.

I'm sure it's not what was intended when google created their algorithms and giving links a lot of weight in the rankings.

But if this is what it takes these days to rank new sites, then sadly this is what we will have to do, as well as create valuable content rich sites.

So please give me some inspiration or guidance about this issue of "artificial" link building.

Do we have to join the link building rat race?

Sonny
#backlinking #hassle #worth
  • Profile picture of the author Barry Unruh
    Is it really "artificial" link building if you provide quality information, and quality content in many places?

    If your audience/market is using sites like Squidoo, YouTube, Flickr, and Facebook, don't you owe it to them to provide useful information where they live and search?

    There are two ways to accomplish your task. The first way is exactly what your are describing, creating junk and scattering it to the wind.

    The second way is to provide quality, and excellent information which guides people to your sites.

    Is it a crappy blog if yourself, or another expert from your staff creates a blog and shares useful information for the niche?

    Are articles written with the intent of giving good information, which then link back to your site not valuable?

    I'd agree, you do see many people creating links for the sake of links. Then there are market leaders who create a web of quality, and trust.

    I'm guessing I already know which direction you want to follow.

    But to answer your primary question. Is backlinking worth the hassle? Of course, it is. The internet is vast, search engines algorithms are tougher, and only by getting your site to the top do you offer your superior quality to your market.
    Signature
    Brain Drained...Signature Coming Soon!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1603839].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Odhinn
    I think it depends on how "good" your traffic is. For instance, I have a regional site that is #1 for a search like businesstype cityname, state, so I don't need to do any backlinking - it's hard to improve on that, and I know I'll never compete for just the business name. If you have maximized what you can do, backlinking isn't worth it.

    If you're under the top 5 for your money kws, you should probably start a backlinking campaign. It can't hurt.
    Signature

    Check out my WSO:

    100 Backlinks a Day

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1604020].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RNMKR
    Well Im not sure the impact that Backlinks have, but I stick with the methods I use and I usually get to the top of Google for medium comp. keywords in about a month... I dont take that much time so its not really a hassle...

    I would just do it whenever you want a boost or something...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1604036].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JoeJ
    I'd really like to know opinions about this.

    It seems that Internet Marketing is VERY time consuming and back linking is one of the MOST time consuming of all.

    Considering that not all links are worth the same, it is a shame that many hours of work could be in vain by link building if they are poor quality.

    I sure wish I could find ways to speed this up somehow.

    I find it quite demoralising actually and it is the one thing about Internet Marketing that I find really upsetting. It is no exaggeration to say that I feel sick in my stomach when I think about link building and the mind-numbing work involved.

    Is it worth the hassle? I really don't know.

    I'm another one that needs a pep talk about this subject. If indeed it is worth the hassle.

    Gulp. Please help.........

    Joe
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1604254].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bgmacaw
    Originally Posted by Steadyon View Post

    Do we have to join the link building rat race?
    No. Google would much prefer that you spend your money on PPC (Adwords) with them instead of trying to get links.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1604269].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JoeJ
    An interesting point bgmacaw.

    Are you suggesting that this is a viable option, or could be, if someone can't be bothered with link building?

    Or are you saying we should linkbuild to avoid having to go ppc?

    Please clarify as you seem knowledgeable in this field :-)

    Thanks,

    Joe
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1604293].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Ram
      Depends on the purpose of your site and your traffic strategy.

      If you depend on search engine traffic, backlinking is one of the key strategies.

      If you choose to primarily drive traffic from PPC, other online ads, offline advertising, etc. to a squeeze page - not important at all. We do very little SEO at all because that's not our business model. We just chose to buy traffic rather than earn it.

      There is no ONE model for online business.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1604313].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author bgmacaw
      Originally Posted by JoeJ View Post

      Are you suggesting that this is a viable option, or could be, if someone can't be bothered with link building?
      I agree with what Ram said, essentially, PPC and other paid advertising is a viable alternative to SEO. I mainly do SEO myself but I dabble a bit in Adwords and some other methods. Others use PPC heavily while others list build.

      It's really a matter of which traffic generation method or methods you're most comfortable with and will work for you and your business. As long as the techniques you use get traffic and make you money, who cares?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1604996].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ExRat
        Hi,

        Is there a "magic" way to speed up the process of getting links?
        Yep. Aim for organic backlinks. Then you have the added bonus that all of the 'signs' will point to them being organic. As time goes by, you will reap the benefit.
        Signature


        Roger Davis

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1605435].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TheRichJerksNet
    How can it be artificial links when you go to forums, web 2.0 sites, and similar sites every day and join in a discussion or post useful information.. ??

    For one thing there is way more than just google, I do not know why everyone relates everything to google. They certainly are not the only search engine and million upon millions use many other websites to find things they desire.

    Link building is not a waste of time if you wish to build a solid business because the only way you are going to build a solid business is by building links. If someone else does it or you do it, either way it still must be done. Unless of course you have thousands upon thousands to put into media buys, ppc adverts, commercials, and etc ..

    I guess what it boils down to is what is best for your business and what your budget is. Nobody can really answer your question for you because there are so many factors involved that others do not know, such as budget and time..

    I will say this though ... It certainly does not hurt you to have 200, 500, or even 1,000 links built every day..

    James
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1604338].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MikeWalker
    James,

    Is there a "magic" way to speed up the process of getting links?

    I also find it so time consuming. Getting hundreds a day - Wow!

    How do you do that?

    Can you point me in the right direction?

    Cheers,

    Michael
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1604368].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TheRichJerksNet
      Originally Posted by MikeWalker View Post

      James,

      Is there a "magic" way to speed up the process of getting links?

      I also find it so time consuming. Getting hundreds a day - Wow!

      How do you do that?

      Can you point me in the right direction?

      Cheers,

      Michael
      Michael,
      It's really simple ...

      Outsource it, send out a press release, send out a news release.. and etc

      go to PRWeb Press Release Distribution Increases Online Visibility and Web Traffic and pay for their top release and you will have hundreds if not thousands of links within hours..

      And before anyone says the myth again ... No building thousands of links in a few hours will NOT hurt your rankings. It is normal and natural, ask anyone that does major press releases..

      James
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1604453].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Joe Pace
        Originally Posted by TheRichJerksNet View Post

        Michael,
        It's really simple ...

        Outsource it, send out a press release, send out a news release.. and etc

        go to Prweb
        James,

        For PRweb, are you saying to use the "media visibility" package?

        Thanks for clarifying.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1607128].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author TheRichJerksNet
          Originally Posted by Joe Pace View Post

          James,

          For PRweb, are you saying to use the "media visibility" package?

          Thanks for clarifying.
          Joe,
          Use whatever package works for you and your budget.. My point is that no matter what site you use, building backlinks is natural and that includes building thousands a day...

          Those that teach backlinks must be built slow have no idea what they talk about and they sure are not no real marketer.

          It does not matter if it is no follow, do follow, high pr, low pr and etc . A link is a link and it is that simple... You should be marketing yourself every place you can and as often as you can... (as long as it is legit)

          James
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1607351].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Joe Pace
            Originally Posted by TheRichJerksNet View Post

            Joe,
            Use whatever package works for you and your budget.. My point is that no matter what site you use, building backlinks is natural and that includes building thousands a day...

            Those that teach backlinks must be built slow have no idea what they talk about and they sure are not no real marketer.

            It does not matter if it is no follow, do follow, high pr, low pr and etc . A link is a link and it is that simple... You should be marketing yourself every place you can and as often as you can... (as long as it is legit)

            James
            James,

            I was going to do a press release anyway, which is how I found this topic. So you don't really have to convince me

            My budget can fit the highest price package there, but I just wanted to solicit your opinion about the best package to use in this instance.

            Thanks!
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1607366].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author TheRichJerksNet
              Hi Joe,
              Understood... Well I am no press release expert but I have put out some press releases that have done great while others have bombed.. Which I think we all have this problem from time to time no matter what method we are doing...

              Personally and this is just my opinion so take it for what that is worth .. I would pay for their top package as long as I had a properly written press release. I would not worry about the money spent because if research was done properly and you have a well written release then you should make that money back with little effort..

              James

              Originally Posted by Joe Pace View Post

              James,

              I was going to do a press release anyway, which is how I found this topic. So you don't really have to convince me

              My budget can fit the highest price package there, but I just wanted to solicit your opinion about the best package to use in this instance.

              Thanks!
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1607476].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Joe Pace
                Originally Posted by TheRichJerksNet View Post

                Hi Joe,
                Understood... Well I am no press release expert but I have put out some press releases that have done great while others have bombed.. Which I think we all have this problem from time to time no matter what method we are doing...

                Personally and this is just my opinion so take it for what that is worth .. I would pay for their top package as long as I had a properly written press release. I would not worry about the money spent because if research was done properly and you have a well written release then you should make that money back with little effort..

                James
                I hear you..

                Thx James
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1607571].message }}
  • There's automated tools for everything, it's finding the one that works the best and gives you the most options which is a challenge to find.

    The day I have enough money, any method of building backlinks is being outsourced to a programmer to make an All-in-one program for me, so I can add as many sites as needed and as many functions I like.

    Meanwhile I test other peoples software and pickup ideas from them Then I could either keep the product to myself, or I could sell it for one time fees or monthly fees
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1604994].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Grapho
    Originally Posted by Steadyon View Post

    Question 1 - Is back linking worth all the effort?

    Question 2 - After all these years, should we start back linking campaigns for our old established sites?

    [...]

    Now it appears our early sites seem to be what people call Authority Sites.

    Short answer

    Q1: Yes - Q2: Depends

    Long answer

    I am almost in the same situation you are. The main site I work on (company site, b2b services) is aged and has gained authority -never built a backlink for it in 9 years and it always sat #1 in google for all the money making keyword.

    Last year competitors began link building and they were able to grow. And in some cases they were able to outrank ours even with paper thin content pages.

    So yes, backlinks do matter a lot.

    You will need to build backlinks for new sites, and keep an eye on your authority site just in case someone attempts an hostile takeover of your #1 spots (or do pre-emptive link building for it anyway).

    Originally Posted by Steadyon View Post

    Maybe I am naive, but it seems to me to be wrong to "artificially" create hundreds or thousands of links to sites or articles, from forums, web 2.0 properties, link wheels and crappy blogs etc.
    I felt the same as you feel regarding "gaming" google. On the other hand the competitors have paid links, links from unrelevant chinese directories... thousands of crap links built every day.

    So it was really not a matter of gaming the search engines, but to prevent others from doing so.

    Think of linkbuilding as a form of advertising campaign. Do ethical link building -that's to say no paid links, no spam, no fake profiles.

    Tweeting, getting real facebook fans, contacting old partners and having a few case studies published on their sites... A few quality backlinks matter more than a thousand crap ones.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1605667].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CDawson
    Banned
    Backlinking is the soul of the search engines, without backlinks you are losing a lot of potential traffic from the search engines, no matter if your site was made 3 years ago or yesterday.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606134].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author scottgallagher
    I'm going to try a different persepctive. Forget about SEO and backlinks and think business challenges.

    No business sells anything without marketing, ever. Even if it's word of mouth, it's marketing. Word of mouth marketing takes relationships, time, money, etc. Advertising is another form. SEO as we call is another. internet marketing best defines SEO.

    Internet Marketing is merely creating transparency and exposure, however we look at as backlinks. This is merely another site giving you word of mouth. To get that endorsement, you need to earn the endorsement, or earn the link.

    Bottom line, a money site that needs to be rank needs to be marketed. You need to expose the website. Therefore, yes, absolutly, links are critical to most online marketing campaign.
    Signature
    Father, Entrepreneur, Author, Adranalist
    I teach entrepreneurs to build a sustainable Internet Marketing Agency with real value. I have many free resources and paid training programs available

    -->My Training Website
    -->My Agency Website
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606339].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jasonmorgan
    Is it really "artificial" link building if you provide quality information, and quality content in many places?
    Adding the occasional link to your site when it's relevant is acceptable. When you are adding lots of links to your site as a means to draw traffic or boost SE rankings is artificial link building and spamming.

    All of the incoming links we have acquired, have been earned naturally over the years
    I have just read most of Terry Kyle's long thread about back linking
    What Terry Kyle is doing is bringing his sites up to the same level as yours except he's not waiting years for the backlinks to come naturally - he is speeding up the process and creating those backlinks himself.

    Would your sites be doing as well without all of their backlinks? If your answer is 'no' then you've answered your own question.

    In this day and age it's going to be difficult to get a new site off the ground and noticed without backlink building in one form or another.
    Signature

    I'm all about that bass.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606472].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JackPowers
    Use automated tools.

    The reason why this strategy is not promoted more, is that many guys earn their money by selling SEO tips to newbs without money. Having an automated article submitter, feed submitter, directory submitter, maybe even Web 2.0 submitter, will cut back on your time spent. And it works fast. Then supplement with some profile links from Terry, Angela etc.

    Or pay someone to do it. It pays off. I've had awesome results with massive article submission campaigns.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606501].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
    Alright, my turn to chip in.

    There is alot of BS when it comes to SEO and link building. And one of the big ones, apart from article spinning being rubbish, is that you cannot add more than say 30 or so back-links in any given single (don't quote me on that specific number) because 'it wont look natural' is another one of these easily disproved lies.

    For any newbes here, people who make these kinds of claims usually either offer a service in relation to link building or SEO in some way, or a just have no idea what they are talking about, or had a site which got de-indexed because they were doing something they shouldn't have been.

    Such as using a link farm etc.

    example:

    Exrat runs a blog in a particular niche I wish to enter, now he has the top spot in the listings. According to the 'natural' link building thumpers if he adds over x amount of links in a day, he will be sand-boxed and effectively de-indexed.

    Now I am a jerk and want to get him sandboxed so according to the thumpers, all I have to do is use a comment spamming program to send out thousands of links in a day and Google will slap him out of existance.

    Can you not see the OBVIOUS FLAW with this 'natural' link building belief?

    If this was true, you could easily eliminate your competitors by spamming their links. black hatters waste their time trying but rarely succeed.

    These people also seem to forget that Google is not able to monitor each and every single website in real time 24/7. Meaning by the time it does crawl these sites they wont be 1 after the other resulting in the appearance of each of these links days or possibly weeks after they have been added.

    If you were possibly offended by my use of the term "thumper," subtlety and beating about the bush are not strong suits of mine, I am very blunt at times.


    Chris


    P.S. James, I am still waiting for my review copy of your myth busting WSO
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606600].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TheRichJerksNet
      Chris learns well and fast ...

      Myth Busting WSO Review Copy ...

      James

      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      Alright, my turn to chip in.

      There is alot of BS when it comes to SEO and link building. And one of the big ones, apart from article spinning being rubbish, is that you cannot add more than say 30 or so back-links in any given single (don't quote me on that specific number) because 'it wont look natural' is another one of these easily disproved lies.

      For any newbes here, people who make these kinds of claims usually either offer a service in relation to link building or SEO in some way, or a just have no idea what they are talking about, or had a site which got de-indexed because they were doing something they shouldn't have been.

      Such as using a link farm etc.

      example:

      Exrat runs a blog in a particular niche I wish to enter, now he has the top spot in the listings. According to the 'natural' link building thumpers if he adds over x amount of links in a day, he will be sand-boxed and effectively de-indexed.

      Now I am a jerk and want to get him sandboxed so according to the thumpers, all I have to do is use a comment spamming program to send out thousands of links in a day and Google will slap him out of existance.

      Can you not see the OBVIOUS FLAW with this 'natural' link building belief?

      If this was true, you could easily eliminate your competitors by spamming their links. black hatters waste their time trying but rarely succeed.

      These people also seem to forget that Google is not able to monitor each and every single website in real time 24/7. Meaning by the time it does crawl these sites they wont be 1 after the other resulting in the appearance of each of these links days or possibly weeks after they have been added.

      If you were possibly offended by my use of the term "thumper," subtlety and beating about the bush are not strong suits of mine, I am very blunt at times.


      Chris


      P.S. James, I am still waiting for my review copy of your myth busting WSO
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606746].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jazbo
    Backlinking can bring a huge return if done in conjunction with a well written website and some quality keyword research. Ignore that at your peril.
    Signature
    CONTENT WRITER. Reliable, UK-Based, 6 Years Experience - ANY NICHE
    Click Here For Writing Samples & Online Ordering
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606671].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MarkAse
    Those methods can still work-however for some of us, creating great content isn't good enough without being able to advertise it. Link building helps my content get noticed and I don't feel the need to apologize for that
    Signature

    My current project, the Uncorked Ventures Wine Club. More coming soon, here.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606724].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author wolverine1971
      Posting articles on blogs with several long tail anchor text backlinks to your own blog is a quick natural way to get ranked on many terms. I have found this to be quick and effective without spending hours out there looking for blogs to merely comment on that may end up slapping a nofollow on or deleting all together.

      By adding actual quality content to someone elses blog not only are you adding something of value but in return getting a backlink - like article marketing but without the restrictions of where you can place your backlink and how long the anchor text can be. (or Ezine restrictions like the landing page has to look a certain way - too much adsense above the fold and they reject the backlink now)

      If you can't find blogs to post articles to for free read my review in my signature to see how to do it completely free I hate to sound like a broken record here or an affiliate (which I am - FTC disclosure... ooooh LOL) but this works and people can opt in for Free. Free natural backlink building - yes it works and I haven't been sandboxed by building them too fast.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606748].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TheRichJerksNet
        Originally Posted by wolverine1971 View Post

        I have found this to be quick and effective without spending hours out there looking for blogs to merely comment on that may end up slapping a nofollow
        Many sites are nofollow.. who cares as it means nothing, this is another one of those myths that has been proven to be wrong...

        PR also means nothing and is another myth ...

        James
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606772].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author wolverine1971
          Originally Posted by TheRichJerksNet View Post

          Many sites are nofollow.. who cares as it means nothing, this is another one of those myths that has been proven to be wrong...

          PR also means nothing and is another myth ...

          James
          I really don't know what the prevailing myths are. I just know what works fast and will continue to duplicate success.

          PR means nothing as far as ranking - sure I have PR0 pages that outrank PR5 pages. But it attracts advertisers and good quality link exchanges. I don't believe that is a myth is it?
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606865].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author TheRichJerksNet
            Originally Posted by wolverine1971 View Post

            I really don't know what the prevailing myths are. I just know what works fast and will continue to duplicate success.

            PR means nothing as far as ranking - sure I have PR0 pages that outrank PR5 pages. But it attracts advertisers and good quality link exchanges. I don't believe that is a myth is it?
            Sure it is a myth because you are lying to advertisers or customers just to get money knowing the whole time that PR means nothing... Just because you sell it to others does not mean it is not a myth ...

            Personally myself I will not hype or lie to make a sale but that's me ...

            James
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606886].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author wolverine1971
              Originally Posted by TheRichJerksNet View Post

              Sure it is a myth because you are lying to advertisers or customers just to get money knowing the whole time that PR means nothing... Just because you sell it to others does not mean it is not a myth ...

              Personally myself I will not hype or lie to make a sale but that's me ...

              James
              Great to hear! I've been in technology sales for over 15 years and have never lied to make a sale either so glad we are on the same page there.

              I actually don't sell links either - was just saying that there is value out there and I don't agree that a higher PR backlink doesn't help if it comes from the right place. I have been able to move up ranks on terms by just getting a couple links in the right spot. I analyze every single move I make to see what is working. I have a site that I haven't even started a backlink building campaign to and it became a PR4 from just 2 of these links and is also on google page 1 for the exact term I was going for. sure not a big deal, but what you are saying does not work actually worked for me. I wouldn't have got my own page ranked on page 1 against the department of energy and other government sites by just getting a backlink from a couple Ezines or nofollow blog comments. sorry - it just wouldn't have cut it.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606945].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author wolverine1971
          Originally Posted by TheRichJerksNet View Post

          Many sites are nofollow.. who cares as it means nothing, this is another one of those myths that has been proven to be wrong...

          PR also means nothing and is another myth ...

          James
          I've also analyzed all of my competitors backlinks to see why they are ranking high. The ones with primarily nofollows I've been able to outrank quickly by having less overall links. The point is there are multiple paths to success.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1606883].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author FriendlyRob
    I disagree that backlinking requires any real effort. I spend about an hour a day building backlinks. It is just part of my business routine.
    Signature

    See What I'm up to Now The New Blog

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1607031].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author wolverine1971
      Originally Posted by FriendlyRob View Post

      I disagree that backlinking requires any real effort. I spend about an hour a day building backlinks. It is just part of my business routine.
      I agree with that too. I spend about an hour doing targeted work.

      I used to use a shotgun approach to backlink building, now I use a sniper rifle approach. Many things work but it's all about time management and directing activities to the right things to ensure success and cost.

      For many people starting out they have little time and no money. If they only have 1 hour a day and don't have a budget they can have a degree of success when it is focused correctly and a plan is drawn out.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1607052].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author webmasterphi
    For me backlinking is an effective way to market your site but it somehow eats a lot of time, specially if you don't have any tools in doing this... Backlinking is best if you need traffic for targeted niche...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1607067].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jbsmith
    I would begin by determining your ranking on Google, MSN, Yahoo for the keywords you have decided are a priority.

    Some, you are bound to already rank highly on and backlinking (as a strategy to improve SERP) won't be as high a priority - others you may be way down the list in terms of your desired position for that keyword phrase. If that is the case, then check and see how many backlinks you have and the competitive position of the top 10 pages above you - you may find that backlinks are where you are weak or it may be something else such as keywords in the domain name, longer domain life, etc...

    The first step is to know the important keywords that get you ROI

    Next, know where you rank with respect to those keywords

    Third, know what your competitors have that you don't

    Then - that will tell you if backlinks are a legit way you can raise your position - then they can be VERY worth the effort.

    Jeff
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1607600].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author karlhadwen
    My first journey into IM all started with back linking was so proud getting my blog to PR 5, then I just let it slip, as for me it wasn't worth the hassle. But I do have a friend who buys and sells links and generates links for his website just from back links and makes a full time living from it. So personally I do think back links are still profitable.

    But for me, I'll leave it for somebody else to grind.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1607644].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author amylimcd
      I had this same question and I spent the whole year of 2009 testing whether backlinks were worth the effort.

      Before 2009, I had several websites that were between 1-3 years old and they ranked fairly well for my main keywords. This was after doing zero backlinking other than posting the sites on Yahoo Directory and Writing a Few Ezine Articles.

      In 2009, I ran a test. I have two sites similar in age and selling similar products. I tested one site by adding lots of backlinks to one site using Linkvana and Unique Article Wizard. I also used Angela's backlinks and I used popular software to get listed in directories and create and post RSS feeds. I did these regularly over at least a 6 month period. After 6 months, I saw no improvement (well a slight improvement with some keywords but the other site experienced same improvement with no backlinking so I attribute this to age).

      Now, I did notice some big jump in rankings at times but it only lasted for a period of one week to 10 days (until the next time Google spidered my site).

      I then turned UAW off and switched to Article Marketing Automation for another 3 months- regular dripping of articles and thus backlinks. Same result at year end- no noticeable difference in positions.

      Summary for me- I go for quality linkbuilding - i.e., links that can brign me real traffic. Ezine Article is an example. Also, topically relevant sites.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1607733].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Steadyon
    Wow, everyone.

    Thanks for all your answers.

    It looks like we will have to get some back linking done for our newer sites. Ah well, such is life :-)

    Does anyone have any more auto or semi-auto software solutions which might help us speed up the back linking process a little?

    Kind regards,

    Sonny
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1608802].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sundown16
    if you're committed to trying to dominate your niche for the long haul, you better be cozy with the search engines with serious backlinking going on. Quantity of links and more important quality link partners is critical. If you don't want to do it, automate or outsource ... take your pick
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1609087].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author juzanobo
    Building QUALITY backlinks are worth the effort(if you do it yourself) and worth the $$$ (if you outsource it). After all, Quality Content + Good on page SEO + Quality backlinks will be the determining factors for your sites to rank really well for a longer period of time.
    Signature
    Do you need an article writer that can deliver quality contents directly to your mailbox without having a sky-high bill? Book Your Own Full Time Article/Content Writer from the PHILIPPINES NOW!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1609120].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author carlos123
    Originally Posted by Steadyon View Post

    Do we have to join the link building rat race?
    Sonny
    Hi Sonny. I haven't read the rest of this thread yet but wanted to commend you on the authority sites you previously built and to say that yeah...it does seem like it has become a link building rat race.

    I am no expert when it comes to ranking highly. You seem to have much more experience than I do so take what I say with a grain of salt but I would say this in response to your post.

    On page SEO is a given that should be done with no question. Appropriate titles, navigation, interlinking with keyword anchored text links among site pages, keyword focused page content, etc.. I think we can all agree that on page SEO should be done by everyone and as perfectly so as it can be.

    That leaves off page SEO factors and this is where we come to a divergence on what should be done. Some say just keep adding valuable content pages and that the backlinks will come naturally (this tends to be Google's position overall). Others, most on this forum, would say we should be more proactive and go out there and pursue backlinks.

    I tend to think pursuing backlinks is a good thing alongside of adding more content. But how we pursue backlinks is the issue, at least for me.

    Do we create bot nets of feeder sites to give ourselves link juice? Do we use software to create thousands of fake blogs? Do we spin articles we write, again using software, to create thousands of "unique" articles to fool the search engines into thinking our sites are more popular than they really are?

    Do we use other such techniques to deceive and connive and push and prod our way to the top of the rankings? Whatever and however we must do it?

    May I venture to suggest that in view of your success so far that you NOT engage in such tactics much if at all.

    It is one thing for me as a beginning internet marketer to consider using such tactics which I generally find distasteful but it is quite another for you who have successful web sites and have some reputation built up to then start resorting to these somewhat if not entirely questionable methods to promote future sites.

    I say do what you have done. Repeat your past successes.

    I mean do what you can to build backlinks too. But do it in a way that you can be proud of. Do what makes sense.

    Is pushing out thousands of spinned articles something that sounds like it might be worth doing? I mean is that really the way to market our sites these days? I daresay that such is not a viable long term strategy. It's nothing short of spam. It may succeed for a while but it won't last. Nobody but the spammers like spam. It will catch up to them at some point.

    Don't resort to spamming techniques to avoid the need to put in the work to build quality sites.

    Does building hundreds of near valueless blogs with scraped content as feeders of link juice sound like something that someone with any kind of integrity would do? If not...don't do it. If you see yourself as operating with integrity I mean.

    I don't have all the answers. I am still looking and studying and trying to figure out ways to improve my site rankings without having to resort to such techniques.

    Article marketing does show some promise (as much as I have been against it in the past). I've even been on Google Webmaster Help forum discussing whether such is a violation of Google TOS. It's been an interesting discussion but the judgment is that it is not. So that is one way that one can use to promote a site in an ethical manner. There are others.

    I guess what I am saying Sonny is that you are on a forum where a great deal of the not so ethical manner of pushing our web sites is promoted (at least that is how it seems like to me). I like hanging out here to get ideas and also because the discussions can be good. But...I would advise you to be careful about implementing the things you hear here. It's a great big internet world out there and this forum and the techniques promoted here are not the end all and be all of how to do internet marketing.

    In the end we have to do what we feel comfortable doing and what our conscience tells us is good to do. There are risks to doing things that are outside acceptable norms at least by Google. It's up to you whether or not those risks are worth it. But given your past success I would look to your experience more than anything else to help you decide how best to promote your sites in the future. Not to the input you might get on this or any other forum.

    The internet has changed a lot in the past few years. It will undoubtedly change a lot in the future. But, certain things stay the same. Good content, great on page SEO are a given. Add some judicious backlinking and perhaps even some conservative interlinking between your sites and you should continue to do just fine.

    Just my two cents Sonny.

    Carlos
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1642910].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author indianlinkbuilder
    Building backlinks is not waste of time. Google and other search engines considers the number of quality backlinks when assigning search engine ranking. So start building backlinks.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1643157].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author vickybabe
    The best way to build back links is to get an automatic software to do the work for you. I have personally put three websites in number one position for keywords with over 50 million competition. And over 3 million searches per month. I suggest you look up brute force linking loophole software.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1643181].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dan B Rusu
    Its never too late to start backlinking. And you can always outsource it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1652206].message }}

Trending Topics