8 replies
  • SEO
  • |
how can i improve the page rank of my site?
#page #rank
  • Profile picture of the author affilorama-portal
    Hello harry12,

    I'm pretty sure this discussion about pagerank will be helpful.
    All the best!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1753498].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author francoza
      Apart from all other difficult stuff, You must do link wheel. Submit articles to top directories. This way you will rank quite well.

      Hope that helps!
      Signature
      10,000+ Quality PLR articles
      pm me

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1753520].message }}
  • My test results lead me to believe PR's a function of this list, probably in order of SE priority (varying percentages of importance, with each factored into each's weight-percentage, making it equations which make up less equations connected to each so as to form less equations and less and less and so on until there's a single equation --- this is just my opinion, so this may or may not be even close to being accurate):

    1) relevance of domain name to niche and target keyword/s;

    2) domain age;

    3) traffic (could most likely inform SEs how much natural backlinking is done for your site);

    4) relevance of content (SEs aim to provide users with the most relevant results, so it has systems, buggy or otherwise, that can most likely find relevant content "accurately" to a certain extent);

    5) updated relevant content;

    6) SEOd onsite keyword content placement;

    7) number of relevant high PR high traffic dofollow sites with backlinks pointing to your site;

    8) number of irrelevant high PR high traffic dofollow sites with backlinks pointing to your site;

    9) your site's average number of outbound and inbound links per page; and

    10) 1 to 9 above of sites with backlinks pointing to your site.

    Could be more.

    I'm even thinking if backlinks on nofollow relevant and irrelevant high traffic sites are counted and factored in by SEs, but just with the least weight-percentage. May be so, may be not, so it's best for me to constantly study results of my tests.

    I strongly suggest testing it out on your own and taking it from there, constantly studying your own results, too, until you find what works for you.
    Signature
    • Deep Learning & Machine Vision Engineer: ARIA Research (Sydney, AU)
    • Founder: Grayscale (Manila, PH) & SEO Campaign Manager: Kiteworks, Inc. (SF, US)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1753650].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author rajivkumar900
      Originally Posted by Marx Vergel Melencio View Post

      My test results lead me to believe PR's a function of this list, probably in order of SE priority (varying percentages of importance, with each factored into each's weight-percentage, making it equations which make up less equations connected to each so as to form less equations and less and less and so on until there's a single equation --- this is just my opinion, so this may or may not be even close to being accurate):

      1) relevance of domain name to niche and target keyword/s;

      2) domain age;

      3) traffic (could most likely inform SEs how much natural backlinking is done for your site);

      4) relevance of content (SEs aim to provide users with the most relevant results, so it has systems, buggy or otherwise, that can most likely find relevant content "accurately" to a certain extent);

      5) updated relevant content;

      6) SEOd onsite keyword content placement;

      7) number of relevant high PR high traffic dofollow sites with backlinks pointing to your site;

      8) number of irrelevant high PR high traffic dofollow sites with backlinks pointing to your site;

      9) your site's average number of outbound and inbound links per page; and

      10) 1 to 9 above of sites with backlinks pointing to your site.

      Could be more.

      I'm even thinking if backlinks on nofollow relevant and irrelevant high traffic sites are counted and factored in by SEs, but just with the least weight-percentage. May be so, may be not, so it's best for me to constantly study results of my tests.

      I strongly suggest testing it out on your own and taking it from there, constantly studying your own results, too, until you find what works for you.
      I think pagerank only matter with the kind of backlinking you are recieving..
      like google consider only quality of links instead of quantity..incoming links matter a lot in pagerank...there are lots of example where only internal linking did this work..
      Signature

      Rajiv Kumar
      Skpe: rajivkumar900
      Email id : rajivkumar900@gmail.com

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1753713].message }}
      • Originally Posted by rajivkumar900 View Post

        I think pagerank only matter with the kind of backlinking you are recieving..
        like google consider only quality of links instead of quantity..incoming links matter a lot in pagerank...there are lots of example where only internal linking did this work..



        I'm lead to believe, based on results I get, that "quality" backlinks for SEs is a function of numbers 1 to 10, with each having its own weight-percentage that makes up a set of equations which in turn makes up another set of equations and so on that point to a single equation, which I mentioned above.

        I think: if volume of "quality" backlinks isn't factored in, which I think otherwise because for me: it's factored in with calculated weight-percentages, then there's nothing to separate sites in terms of ranking with everything else equal, unless PR isn't factored in by SEs when it comes to SERPs for target keywords, which I believe otherwise, because I think SEs have their own PR grading system, and I wouldn't know this but rather: just want to come up with something most likely closest to the PR grading system of SEs based on results I get and other inferences founded on this: SEs most likely aim to provide the best and most relevant results to its users.

        Anyway, this is just my opinion, based on results I get, and it may or may not be the case for others.

        Thanks.
        Signature
        • Deep Learning & Machine Vision Engineer: ARIA Research (Sydney, AU)
        • Founder: Grayscale (Manila, PH) & SEO Campaign Manager: Kiteworks, Inc. (SF, US)
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1753750].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author webbyworld
    Actually quality backlinks help you to achieve high PR for your site. It's better to get backlinks from niche sites having high PR.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1753925].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MayaLocke
    The *only* way to improve pagerank is get quality relevant backlinks to your website.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754049].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author rajivkumar900
      Originally Posted by MayaLocke View Post

      The *only* way to improve pagerank is get quality relevant backlinks to your website.
      I am not completely agree with this statement cause i have seen so many pages where there are no backlinks at all but the still have page rank.

      some website even have page rank right from the first day of launche..this happend due to shared hosting account..

      ok here is quick trick to get high pr..take a new domain and forward that domain to your niche site which already have backlink...live that domain for few days and then remove forwarding and upload your content you will see there would be page rank right from the beginning of the day ...
      so this process prove there is way to get page rank without any kind of external linking..

      but my friend keep in mind its a temp effect..i really dont know how it works but its worked for so many people i have seen this at webmaster forum...I havent tested this method so far...but one of my friend applied this and it worked for him.

      thanks for your time.
      Rajiv
      Signature

      Rajiv Kumar
      Skpe: rajivkumar900
      Email id : rajivkumar900@gmail.com

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1754114].message }}

Trending Topics