
Can SEO Backlinking Word For Stupid People Like Me?
- SEO |
Well, this forum and SEO theory in general seems to be so full of theory and systems and debates and discussions, its just too complex for me. So I basically want to keep to a stupid, simple system... My question to you, will it work?
From what I've gathered so far... This is a system that I can work with
(please critique).
Basically, I'd just
- Build a 100 back-links (to main blog) from web 2.0 properties over a year (from a dozen or so top web 2.0 properties)
- Submit a 100 articles linking (to main blog) over a year (from a dozen or so top article directories)
- Backlink to site from a 20 different posts from many different related forums (where I'd build up a presence with value-giving posts, not just spam, maybe mention a link only after 20 good posts)
- Backlink (100 times) to site by commenting to related blogs
All of this would be unique, high-quality content...
Now, what BASICS am I missing? Like I know there are thousands of different factors and things, but I'm kind of stupid. If there are too many factors in a plan, I'll just screw it up.
What are these basics that I'm missing? What's the 10% that brings 90% of the results, but I didn't include in my plan above? What are the top, basic ways of building backlinks except:
forums
web 2.0
article directories
comments
Powerful Indexer That Makes Your Backlinks Count ==> Nuclear Link Indexer