I don't understand why everyone isn't using 3waylinks

Hi Jennifer,

I've been using 3 waylinks for about 3 years now. I listed 50 websites in the network so far . It's great

But not all of those kind of networks are good. I had a bad experience with a similar type of link building network: 3waylinkblueprint as they left it open to the mass and it was abused and became harmful for website. But of course there are many ways to build valuable backlinks to your site that's why some people may be having success using something else.

Hm the site is about A>B>C linking, isn't A>B, C>D better?

One way links is still the effective method you can do it manually to rank your site in google search. Quality link building will do.

He runs onewaylink that is better network than 3way. AT least the links stick even after you leave.

And infact time has changed ..the way you use those links.
They are no longer effective to sustain a backlink campaign to give any significant result.
But still a link is a link is a link..that too automated.
Only the use of those links has changed. So in short, they work if you know how to use them.

5 really *High Quality* links will outweight the benefit you get from the whole network... Avoid it!

Your time and money is better spent, creating relationships in your market and seeking out good links in your niche..

I like Jonathan Leger and a lot of his products, but linking schemes that are created to manipulate Google will be short lived... and for $47 a month, I can think of better things to invest my money in...

...The thing is aswell, if you gain 1000's of links and then decide to cancel your account and you lose those 1000 links, how do you think Google will react to that if these links make up the majority of your backlink profile?

From what I've found it can be difficult to manage all the links efficiently as some of the webmasters may not be maintaining the links or may link them in inappropriate places etc.

Two reasons that I can think of off the top of my head. First, as soon as you drop the service you lose all those links and your SERPs will drop. Second, SEO is a competition. Sharing and all is nice but if you're going for the really difficult, really profitable keywords you'll never get a linking partner.

Everyone will have feeder sites on different IPs that are prime for ranking their money site in those cases. Of course, plenty of other methods to rank for those extremely competitive keywords but setting up feeder sites is a simple one.

3-way linking is very time-consuming. In my own opinion, 3-way has the same impact with one-way linking. Doesn't spell any difference.

Of course it can help you if you have a good network of websites but i myself prefer one way link building. It helps you more than any other backlinking ways.

Yes these links, they never exist forever.. We cannot actually completely depend on these services. build some links for yourself, say some articles and blogs, they will be there forever, no one is going to change it as long as you have the control over it.

I actually have never tried to do "3 way links". I guess the reason for that is I have much success with just building one way links. Which I definitely know Google loves!

From my experience, you don't gain or get much authority from 3 way links as you would one way links.

I have been a member of three way links since beta for a test a few weeks ago I took one of my sites out of the network it jumped up thirty three places to number 11 within two days. I didn't add any more links at the time so I guess I had a penalty for too many links from irrelevant pages.

I know this will get the "seo experts" ranting about how difficult it is for search engines to assess passing relevance to anchor text on a page and the passing of link juice from non relevant pages. One thing though that I find about some of these experts is they don't seem to factor in the niche and the commercial value of the keywords.


My assumption is because the links were on a directory type page and were all unrelated niches and the directory had no organization (didn't assign links into categorized groups) I copped a penalty.

So I assume I got a spam penalty which pushed me back 30 results in the serps.

It could be coincidental as I had other sites targeting seo keywords in the 3 way link network which are still doing fine however I also built a large number of links from other sources to these sites.

One thing I have experienced with three way links is the google cache of the network pages is kept fairly recent and shows changes made as sites drop out and are replaced with new ones this is a positive sign. I checked a few sites today and saw a google cache from two days ago on the pages created by 3way links.

My conclusion is I'd risk three-way links for my aggregation and link indexing sites but not for any of my money sites.

I've also done a few experiments using profile building and link wheels and seen gains only to see those gains lost when the pages were removed. The problem with some of these type links is if you don't log into the site for some time many of them have a removal of your profile policy. This is probably due to program like xrumer, auto backlink builder, seo nuke etc etc being used to create thousands of profile pages.

On the other hand I went back to the old school method of gaining links from relevant topic sites and building a directory as part of my site to provide extra choices and alternatives to my visitors and have seen an increase in serps as a result.

I'm still on the fence about three way links there are too many different variables for me to do provide any accurate data as I have not put a brand new site into the network with zero existing links to gauge the effectiveness.

As I stated earlier I'm hesitant to put any of my good sites into the network as I do worry about the footprint all the sites link to their link pages using php using generic terms like resources, partners, links, network and I don't think it would be very hard for Google to find these sites if they thought it was having a major effect on their index.

I always factor in that a searcher is worth thousands of dollars to Google and it is more expensive for them not to do something about spam than it is to do nothing. Why because if they let systems continue to be able to be manipulated using spam techniques they would end up with a search engine no one used anymore.

Hopefully down the track I'll get some time to collect some data and provide an in-depth analysis using similar niche sites to get a better comparison.

I like Jon too find him to be a straight up guy and I know he experimented with submitting articles with links in them that were totally unrelated to the articles content and got some good results, which would seem to qualify that the search engines currently have no way to assign relevance to anchor text used in links versus content of the page. However I'm in the school of thinking there is always the manual review team, Matt Cutts and his spam team and I'm pretty sure they don't miss much.

Not everyone is using it because there are a ton of linking solutions out there to choose from, it's a continuous membership and there are lots of great ways to do linking where you are in control of the content that can be submitted and where

As mentioned above, continual membership programs for SEO is a bad idea.

Once you opt out, all your links dissapear.

So as well as starting fresh, you will have Google keeping an eye on you for such a mass fall of links at once.

Definitely not natural.

Stick to doing your backlinking manually.

Hey Team

Would say 3 way links is white hat? Or Black hat?

Im thinking maybe grey hat lol

Thanks

Chunkynuts