Developing web 2.0 properties

by Matt Ward Posted: 16 years ago 3 replies

People suggest using web 2.0 properties to give backlinks to money sites. I get that.

Exactly what would constitute a proper web 2.0 site, though? I rewrote (not spun) an article from my site and put it on a wordpress.com blog. 1 page, and linked it to my site. Is that good enough, or do you need to actually develop a "mini website"? I noticed that webmaster tools isn't showing the backlick, which doesn't necessarily mean it's not counting, but I'm just not sure.

#search engine optimization #developing #properties #web

socialbookmark 16 years ago

You should link to your website from several web 2.0 sites and then link to each of them from another one. You need linkwheel and i explained it as easy as i could. There are many threads about strategies for linkwheel and you can use them. But the main idea is what i said.
Matt Ward 16 years ago

Yeah, I understand the concept of a linkwheel (and that the standard circular ones are no longer effective) but my real question is what I mentioned in the first post: what constitutes a proper web 2.0 site? Can it be a single article, copied verbatim from your site? Or should it be a mini site composed of several unique pages?
pjman 16 years ago

You want it to be unique content (an article or multiple posts, a review) that relates to the site that you are targeting your link to (money site).

Join the discussion

Next Topics on Trending Feed

4

Developing web 2.0 properties

Matt Ward • 16 years ago • 3 replies

People suggest using web 2.0 properties to give backlinks to money sites. I get that. Exactly what would constitute a proper web 2.0 site, though? I rewrote (not spun) an article from my site and put it on a wordpress.com blog. 1 page, and linked it to my site. Is that good enough, or do you need to actually develop a "mini website"? I noticed that webmaster tools isn't showing the backlick, which doesn't necessarily mean it's not counting, but I'm just not sure.