Edu Backlinks - Waiting Period vs Non Waiting Period

7 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Need some input here Warriors. I have heated debate going on with a couple of friends about;

" Is it best to wait 2 weeks, 1 week, 5 days, 3 days, etc., prior to actually putting links into your profile on the .EDU sites."

If you would please provide some detail and reasoning behind your opinion. Perhaps, if possible, some references to back you up.

Ken Leatherman

The Old Geezer
#backlinks #period #waiting
  • Profile picture of the author aaron_nimocks
    Depends on the site and how active their adminstrators are I would say.

    But the longer you wait the less likely you will get deleted OVERALL. That can't be argued.
    Signature

    My free PSD logs can be downloaded at PSD Bum. Enjoy!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3156177].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3156178].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Ken Leatherman
      Originally Posted by iAmNameLess View Post

      Are you doing this manually? Why wouldn't you do it immediately?
      Thanks.

      That is actually a part of our debate. I'm thinking with manual registration, one should be able to leave a link immediately. But the other 2 are saying wait.

      Aaron said: Depends on the site and how active their adminstrators are I would say.

      But the longer you wait the less likely you will get deleted OVERALL. That can't be argued.
      Thanks Aaron,

      I hear what your saying, are you basing this on the TOS of the sites, fear of looking spammy or from personal experience of manual backlinking? Not trying to put you on the spot, but I would really love to hear your thinking.

      Ken
      Signature
      Ghost Writing Services Coming Soon


      So Check Out My WSO
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3156235].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author iAmNameLess
    I think you should go for it, and make worthwhile contributions.

    That is what I would do, why not? If they ban you then create a new account. lol.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3157262].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ken Leatherman
    the .EDU may be a pot o gold, but there are quite a few that swear by it. That is the intent of my post; to get as many thoughts as I can from those who have used or not used them.

    Thanks to you guys for your thoughts.

    Ken
    Signature
    Ghost Writing Services Coming Soon


    So Check Out My WSO
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3157605].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author bgmacaw
      Originally Posted by Ken Leatherman View Post

      the .EDU may be a pot o gold, but there are quite a few that swear by it. That is the intent of my post; to get as many thoughts as I can from those who have used or not used them.
      I use them, but the links I get are typically unique to my sites and are most often unsolicited. For example, one of my sites in a business niche has a number of .edu links from professors' or students' web pages as a reference. These are typically more valued links than a profile page on a poorly moderated school forum or a comment on a free-for-all student blog stuck between auto-spammed "Great Post" comments with links to cheap male enhancement products or porn sites.

      I also value getting links from other established authority sites, like CNN or MSN. It's not the domain extension that's valuable but the authority of the site and page linking to you.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3158176].message }}

Trending Topics