Adsense TOS: How do you read this blog post?

by paulgl
14 replies
  • SEO
  • |
If you don't know about the adsense blog, you should read it.
How does this grab you:

Fiction: Publishers can put ads on auto-generated pages or other copied content that was not created by them.

Fact: We don't allow sites with auto-generated or otherwise unoriginal content to participate in the AdSense program. This is to ensure that our users are benefiting from a unique online experience and that our advertisers are partnering with useful and relevant sites.
AdSense Facts & Fiction Part V: Unoriginal content - Inside AdSense

When you read more into the post, it talks about passing content off as your own or
original.
Sometimes we come across sites that are using software to generate automated content. These sites might look like normal news sites, but the information is completely plagiarized. Scraping content and passing it off as one's own is not only wrong, but it also happens to be a serious violation of our policies.
The first quote does not 100% coincide with the second one.

Seems like they are once again not drawing a line in the sand, but leaving a lot up to
interpretation. Until you get banned.

Paul
#adsense #blog #post #read #tos
  • Profile picture of the author Zeb
    I've read that blog post as well and came to WF to see what other members thought of it.

    Personally i think that google just wants to get publishers to write more original content. This is because that almost the whole of the net is filled with duplicate content. That's something that will exist forever.

    I don't think it's much to worry about. However there's this tingly feeling at the back of my head that slightly worries me but thinking logically, how can google stop what is happening on the internet which is content will be used elsewhere (like it or not).
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3166647].message }}
  • It's saying if you have an autoblog, and they catch you, then your account will get banned. Pretty simple as that, plr or content that you have rights to is completely different (hence you have the rights to republish it).
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3166660].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author hilhilginger
    I am really confused after reading this blog. I am afraid I should remove my adsense code from third pary bloging sites. But it was working fine for last couple of months.
    Signature

    They have over 2300 Offers, Instant PayPal Payments and Free Training Articles.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3166765].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author thebitbotdotcom
    I think Google talks from their butt much of the time. For example, take a look at EZA. They publish articles that have already been published on numerous sites. I know this from personal experience. They do it with my articles. Ususally, they are the last directory to approve it...and...they have Adsense ads plastered all over their pages, so Google apparently doesn't strictly enforce this. However, what it does allow them to do is deindex any site they don't "like" or that pisses them off on a whim. Then they can just say: "Oh, you violated our terms of service...sorry...go cry somewhere else."
    Signature
    Do Your Copywriting Skills Suck?

    Let Us Help You Develop Your Writing Skills!

    Submit Guest Posts With [ TheBitBot.Com ]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3167066].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author adsenselive
    I think they are meaning to imply if not actually imply, that it is the "Junk" scraper sites that they don't want running adsense
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3167642].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author warteg
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3167722].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      I don't autoblog, but was in mind to scrape a little in the future.

      The first quote seems to be a no-nonsense approach. That is, nothing
      from other sites. But then after reading between the lines as the post
      continues, it looks like they are really talking about junk sites. But what
      defines a junk site? They talk about a site disguised as a real news site.
      Well, seems to me that would not be a junk site. Every news site uses
      copied content and feeds from AP, Reuters, CNN, etc.

      So what are they really talking about? Again, must be "junk" sites.

      Since google seems to have no real definition in this post, I take that
      they will use this as a way of banning sites at their discretion, using
      this as a reason.

      If I was autoblogging, I would make dang sure that my site looked professional
      and unique.

      I don't use many EZA articles, but it seems even this would violate the terms
      as stated. Does not make sense.

      All autobloggers should take note. I may not continue with business as usual.

      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3168193].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Rsberg
        Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

        So what are they really talking about? Again, must be "junk" sites.
        I'm fairly confident this is what they are referring to. I know several people (myself included) who have had Adsense on automated sites for some time and have had no issues.


        Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

        If I was autoblogging, I would make dang sure that my site looked professional
        and unique.
        This is one of the keys to not only keeping your account active but making money with autoblogging as a whole.

        Build quality sites that offer value to the reader and the net and you wont have any problems...and yes, you can do this with autoblogs.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3170670].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fraggler
    I read those 2 statements as:

    1. Don't use scraped content.
    2. Don't use content that you don't own.
    3. Especially don't scrape content that you don't own and make it appear like you do own it.

    I guess it is a matter of who they think owns the original content.

    Reading the whole post though I think they are taking a dig at the (mediocre) autoblog sites that are ripping off other peoples work on a mass level and profiting. The BH sites are full of people doing this.

    There are guys who will do it over a range of subdomains hoping to get a little bit from each with no credit to the original articles. This is a breach of copyright so these guys shouldn't be suprised that Google is booting them out.

    Edit: The comments are gold!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3170727].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      Originally Posted by Fraggler View Post

      I read those 2 statements as:

      1. Don't use scraped content.
      2. Don't use content that you don't own.
      3. Especially don't scrape content that you don't own and make it appear like you do own it.
      Yeah. #1 and #2 are black and white. The post then seems to make special note
      of sites that do bad things. It still leaves you wondering why the first statements
      are so black and white, no gray.

      I use content from google on many sites: Topical newsfeeds provided by google
      specifically to publish on your website.

      The whole post has to be directed to scraped sites for no reason other than to
      put adsense on them.

      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3170906].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      [DELETED]
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3171021].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author noble
    It seems pretty clear to me, not a lot of grey area there... Unless you're not seeing the part that says "fiction" meaning its not true...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3170937].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author rich_henderson
    I think that google if they target anything are going to be going after autoblogs which scrape content from other sites without permission and claim it as their own.

    If you build sites with content from sites that permit you to share content like articlesbase as long as you attribute that content to them in the form of a backlink I can't see google having a problem with it.

    If is is the non unique stuff they are after then they are going to lose 80+ percent of the pages they have their ads on. I can't see them doing that somehow.

    If you autoblog ethically ie always include any original links back to the source I think it will be ok for now.

    I dare say we shall be inundated with linkbait over the next few weeks with wannabee gurus claiming autoblogging is dead and then releasing some kind of alternative course, happens every time google send out messages.

    I'd also put money on whoever it is knowing absolutely nothing about autoblogging and just playing on newbie marketers fears to make a buck, par for the course unfortunately.

    Anyway when it happens can someone post a link so I can make sure it goes viral, panic = less competition for me
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3186503].message }}

Trending Topics