Matt Cutts: Google algorithm change launched

by 53 replies
63
Hi all,
As you might know, Matt Cutts of Google is fairly active on Hacker News. He just posted up the following announcement there:

Source (on HackerNews)
Source (on his blog) - thanks jasonboom for the blog post mention, didn't see it


So if you have an auto blog/content scraper, consider checking it out since it might be affected by this change.
#search engine optimization #ago #algorithm #announced #change #cutts #google #hour #launched #matt
  • I was expecting the change to come, but not this soon, and not to this effect.

    It looks like the original source is going to gain the most value, so that long-time myth about you must publish on your own website first, might finally be true.
    • [1] reply
    • I guess this is a good one if you write your own reviews/content.
      At the end of the day as an end user in google, the last thing you want to see is identical content on the first page of results.
  • I saw some of my sites move up recently and all of them had original articles. Many other sites that do not have original content have been long lost and I don't make those types of sites any more. I think original content is the way to go.

    Now I wonder how much spinning of an article is enough to make it look original... As I often do spin content to use on m blogs or articles sites for backlinking.

    Regardless it will be interesting to see how this change effects everyone long term.
  • Tip: Only buy an autoblogging tool with an inbuilt spinner in future. lol
    • [2] replies
    • If true, that would be awesome!
    • Yep. And it better have whole phrase rewriting too.

      None of my autoblogs have been negatively affected by the algo change so far. 4 of them are getting more traffic now.

      If you are using a powerful phrase and word rewriter and have auto-internal linking, you will be fine.
  • Sooooo.... If I publish an article or press release on my own site, get it indexed, and then send out submissions for press releases, will that boost my site up?

    I wonder how this is going to work.
    • [1] reply
    • So hope this actually happens and has some effect, not seen too many rank changes in the past few days though
  • Hello, ding ding ding here comes the wagon!

    Matt Cutts and Hacker News: wrong source!!!
    • [1] reply
  • This makes a lot of sense. No more debates on EZA first or blog first. And for avid 'spinner' fans, it's time for you guys to spin and spin REALLY hard.

    YouTube - Can a ball spin anymore?
    • [1] reply
    • Does this mean using article spinners like Article Wizard will become less affective?

      I know that they submit to many auto blog sites.

      Thoughts?
      • [1] reply
  • Themain aim of Google is to provide BEST results of searchers.

    Pros: If you write unique content - GREAT!

    Cons: If you're using autoblogging sotware - BAD!
  • For those who keep insisting there is no problem ranking with duplicate content (which logically is absurd), this may be a wake-up call.
    • [2] replies
    • I have seen many people ranking with duplicate content.

    • My only argument with this is that article syndication before 2005 had nothing to do with playing Google, but getting great content to larger audiences.

      If people rely solely on Google for their traffic, they are silly at best.

      Changes in Google's algorithms will never affect those who syndicate quality content that answers questions and solves problems for real human readers.

      I will continue to syndicate my content all over the web, because it is not about rankings but eyeballs.

      So logically, if you are intent on using that word, it is absurd to declare the death of article marketing based on your own limited view of the marketplace.
      • [1] reply
  • I write all my content myself on my main hub but the rest are using a spinning service so can't wait to see how this turns out. Hope there is positive results without complication in between.
    Thanks for sharing
    WandaSue
  • So, cutting through the bull,

    Anyone actually notice any changes?

    I haven't.

    I checked some of my sites that have almost no original content and they are still rockin', same as always. Plenty of #1's and Top 10's, just like they were last week, just like last month.

    To be fair, they aren't auto blogs but are blogs made up of heavily used content. I only changed the titles, added in some h2 subtitles and occasionally tweaked the text.

    Now, there could be some ranking changes at the page level, I'm not sure. This is probably where you are going to see most of the effects but I don't keep track of long-tails n' randoms.

    So... changes, anybody? Or is this another Big Foot sighting?
    • [2] replies

    • Good analogy.

      Cutts did say it will only affect "slightly over 2% of queries change in some way, but less than half a percent of search results change enough that someone might really notice."
    • There is no bull. Please don't start with the old Google conspiracy theories again. its not supposed to affect many serps. From Matt's blog.

      In addition algorithm changes of this kind take effect when the crawler moves on through so it won't take effect immediately if google is not in the habit of reindexing your page often (no new links , no new contetn etc).
  • Interesting, I haven't seen any changes in my sites at all so I guess I must be doing something right! (Phew!).

    I have a LOT of autoblogs, but I always add some unique content to them and those are actually the pages I am trying to rank, the rest is just additional stuff for people to read and videos for them to look at (and products). So I guess it makes sense that my rankings and traffic are the same.

    Would be curious to know how or if this is affecting ezinearticles. Anybody?

    Lee
  • Regarding the article syndication issue, moultano over at HN is also a Google employee and he just posted this:

  • One thing I have noticed recently, getting new pages indexed is a PITA. Getting a new site indexed, can still get this done within 48 hours but the pages are stubborn.

    This could be due to the algorithm changes. I'll have to test it out and whip up something unique and see if it does any better than the slightly modified content.

    Let's see, gotta make it scientific. Select 2 sites that rank well and are having an affair with the google bot. Throw up a not-so-unique article and a unique article on each and do the same on 2 newer sites that aren't performing as well. We'll call it the Half-Assed Scientific SEO Method or HASSEOM.

    But first, I'm gonna put another nail in the coffin. Smoke break.
    • [2] replies

    • That is the kind of thinking I like to see.

      But better. Find the site with Google Love, and link to a blank domain, one page with original content and another with dupe content.

      Then watch.
    • Haven't noticed that . In fact I was working with a site this week and making changes and it indexed things I changed a day later. This will be just the first of changes with google though. Google has been getting a lot of bad press about their results and Bing is out there so they have no chocie but to move up on plans. Bad PR will always make a corporation giddyup. should be an interesting year.
  • Now that doesn't make any sense.

    Aside from the means by which one acquires the content, what is the difference between syndicating an article or scraping an article?

    A google bot doesn't know if I'm allowed to use the content on my site or not. Doesn't know if my site is a legitimate syndicated news source or if I'm running WP Robot to grab everything I can from Amazon and Articlebase.

    So basically, nothing is going to change. Viva la google. We are back to original content doesn't mean squat, you just need your site of dupe content to rank above the rest.
    • [1] reply
    • From what I can see in local results, YOU are correct.

      Even sites reported a long time ago (filled with scraped content) are ranking high.

      Nada changed, or so it seems.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Cutting through the bull = what changes or results have you see, not hypothesis. Nothing to do with a google conspiracy.

    We can sit around and think 'what if' but what matters is 'what is'
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies

    • Yep, that is where I thought you were coming from.
      • [1] reply
    • What is is obvious. there has been a change that affects a few siteS. Claiming it isn't one would be the old conspiracy argument again. Google announces something that isn't true etc. We've been down that road together before.

      Maybe you track a whole lot of duplicate content site serps I don't because it always was an iffy proposition anyway but my bet is there isn't a single person in this thread that tracks more than a handful of those kind of sites to say nothing has changed. Most people on here do some spinning and even you admitted to tweaking and making changes.

      too small a sample. So theres not a reason to claim that because in your own corner it hasn't happened it isn't real thats just the conspiracy thing again and it makes no sense man.
      • [1] reply
  • Oh damn...gotta run. I hear a black helicopter hovering over my house.
  • there are so many people using duplicate content and they are also ranking and i think that their purpose is to wide the influence and its source to the related sites.
    • [1] reply
    • "we're evaluating multiple changes that should help drive spam levels even lower, including one change that primarily affects sites that copy others' content and sites with low levels of original content." ~ Matt Cutts (emphasis supplied; Full post here)

      Cutts goes on to say "This was a pretty targeted launch..."

      My guess is the algo has a narrow focus, so if your site publishes syndicated content, along with content of your own, you shouldn't be affected.

      If the intent is to remove spammy sites from the top results of the SERPs for any given query, it should only be the most egregious sites that are penalized. That means a lot of marginal sites would/should still slip through.

      But as Google won't be giving us specifics, we can only guess at their intent and future effects on our sites.

      It would be interesting to follow up on this thread in about 6 months or so, and look back on the effects this change has or hasn't had on our sites.

      Respectfully,
      -Anita
      • [3] replies
  • Wow...scraper sites ranking lower than the ones with original content. Who would have thought...
    • [1] reply

    • yeah it always was a bad practice for the long term. It really doesn't take that much to add a little uniqueness to pages making you money.
  • .................
    • [1] reply
  • Does that mean ezinarticles and such will now rank lower?
    • [1] reply
    • I'm kind of bummed out that they are going to do this, but it will end some of the ridiculous things that people do, and some autoblog farms, and probably just end autoblogging :/ Hope i am wrong
  • This is a bad news ...
  • That is a great news, I am sure that would stop black-hat seo people work lol... Sometimes back, one of my friend had that problem, the site which got his content was ranking well, but his site was penalized. Later, he struggled a lot to with the ranking as a result, now he is back into action, may be more quality backlinks to his site too help to this.
Join the discussion

Next Topics on Trending Feed