The Duplicate Content Myth

28 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Is there a duplicate content penalty?

I don´t think so.

I´ve just checked the rankings of one of my keywords. I´m on Rank 4 in G.
But on Rank 2 and Rank 3 are Twins with the exact same layout and content. (not mine sites)

Here are the twins:
Medically Supervised Weight Loss Albuquerque
Medically Supervised Weight Loss Albuquerque

The ankertext is the same, but the URLs differ.

Both rank high in google with 100% duplicate content. But not for long anymore, he he he
Page one has 122 Backlinks and Page 2 has only 22 BL.
So, my conclusion. Forget the duplicate content penalty.
If you have a site that is successful, then clone the site and here is your multiple ranking in Google.
Psst, don´t tell anyone. That would destroy the whole spinning Industry.

What do you think?
Christoph
#content #duplicate #myth
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3379720].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Richard Van
      If you have a site that is successful, then clone the site and here is your multiple ranking in Google.
      Psst, don´t tell anyone. That would destroy the whole spinning Industry.
      If we all went around cloning sites I'm sure the "myth", which is actually common knowledge, would swiftly become a reality.

      I wouldn't advise anyone to do what you're recommending because it'd also kill the article syndication industry and as this is already a well known myth and the spinning industry still exists very happily, it is unlikely to have any impact on it other than making it stronger.

      Here's another angle, what's to stop me cloning all your sites?

      Lets not encourage people to do this please.

      Just saying. :rolleyes:
      Signature

      Wibble, bark, my old man's a mushroom etc...

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3379773].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Andrea Wilson
    I seriously wont want to see duplicate results on the top of my search results. So whether it is a myth or not, I wont do it.

    Andrea
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3380029].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seoforu
    You must be right,but still why should we use duplicate content ?We never know it can get us harmed in the future!
    Signature

    Guest post links are effective when they are contextual and natural!!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3380171].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nimmysnv
      Duplicate content can really affect the ranking of the site so it is better to be aware of the duplicate content. Content modification can be done but duplication may result in penalty.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3380194].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ChrisWF
      I haven´t done this site cloning yet.
      But maybe I´ll give it a try in the future.
      Whats o ever. The duplicate content thing makes no real sense to me.

      That said back to work. Need a few more Backlinks to climb up the google ladder.

      Christoph
      Signature

      WAIT! Don't Buy The Expensive Amazon Course "Amazing Selling Machine" for $4K.
      Start With The Proven Amazon Course First!

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3380221].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MrWonton
    Do you clone them, or did they clone you?
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3380216].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ChrisWF
      Originally Posted by MrWonton View Post

      Do you clone them, or did they clone you?
      These two sites are not mine.
      They just show up in google for my targeted keyword.

      Fact is, somebody managed to get on page 1 of google on position 2+3 for one keyword with two identical websites.
      Just another URL and thats it.

      That´s exactly what I dream on.
      Pos 1 to 10 all with cloned sites.
      If it´s possible for rank 2+3 why not for 1 to 10???

      Christoph
      Signature

      WAIT! Don't Buy The Expensive Amazon Course "Amazing Selling Machine" for $4K.
      Start With The Proven Amazon Course First!

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3380267].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MrWonton
    But think of the end user. If Google noticed that searchers were receiving 10 of exactly the same search result, they'd seriously overhaul their algorithm. It would be bad for searchers, and thus, bad for Google, resulting in visitors using competing search engines instead.

    If I got 10 of the same result every time I searched, I'd make the move to Yahoo!
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3380287].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author implrseoetc
      there is NO duplicate content penalty, unless you are using the same content repeatedly on the same domain.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3380328].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ChrisWF
        >That´s exactly what I dream on.
        >Pos 1 to 10 all with cloned sites.

        I don´t mean it seriously.
        Forgot the smiley.

        Christoph
        Signature

        WAIT! Don't Buy The Expensive Amazon Course "Amazing Selling Machine" for $4K.
        Start With The Proven Amazon Course First!

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3380374].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author OKFarmgirl
    I have a question about this. My client started with a EMD that he decided was too long and he switched to another that I think isn't great for an EMD but it's his call. The original site is still up but all of the pages link to the second. The first page contains the exact same content as the second though, and I'm wondering if we should take it down or just do a 301 redirect?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3380388].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Supafly
    Matt Cutts, the head of Google's anti-spam division, recently wrote in his Blog dated January 28th, 2011:

    My post mentioned that "we're evaluating multiple changes that should help drive spam levels even lower, including one change that primarily affects sites that copy others' content and sites with low levels of original content." That change was approved at our weekly quality launch meeting last Thursday and launched earlier this week.
    I agree with the last comment that there may not be a penalty, but Google certainly does not like it and I would not recommend cloning sites. It will catch up to you eventually.

    Regards,
    Dino
    Signature

    User banned from this site for being relevant.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3380747].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nimmysnv
      Originally Posted by Supafly View Post

      Matt Cutts, the head of Google's anti-spam division, recently wrote in his Blog dated January 28th, 2011:

      I agree with the last comment that there may not be a penalty, but Google certainly does not like it and I would not recommend cloning sites. It will catch up to you eventually.

      Regards,
      Dino
      Yes, it all depends on catching and when Google catches the duplicate content than they may pull the site back to the below position (ranking) in SERPS.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3387114].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author smwordsmith
        While I have absolutely nothing against the desire to make money, I do have a problem with the money-making desire turning into greed.

        Greed, to me, is making money without providing anything of value. Copy-cat content is not valuable.

        Actually, doesn't copy-cat content fall into the theft category?
        Signature

        Sheila

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3387193].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author BenJackson
    Real, naturally occurring "duplicate content" -

    www.yoursite.com/green/widget

    VS

    www.yoursite.com/widget/green

    Two different URLs with the same content. The penalty? Zip, zilch, there is none. This goes hand in hand with canonicalization - choose one canonical URL and 301 redirect the other pages to it just to make things easier for Google.

    If you're not familiar with it, I did a post on canonicalization: What is Canonicalization | SEO Discovery

    When a number of pages from different domains all have the same content, one (or a few) show up in the results and the rest are placed in the supplemental index.

    How can you get penalized for DC? You might if you make an entire site with the same article posted on every page:

    www.yoursite.com/keyword1
    www.yoursite.com/keyword2
    etc.

    Just don't be stupid ^(see above example)^ and you'll never have any problems with DC.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3381970].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kysersoze
    Originally Posted by ChrisWF View Post

    Cloning sites and getting them both ranked on the first page may work for a term with little competition such as the one you used in your example. Replicating such results with a more competitive term would not work and may actually hinder your chances at getting to the front page especially when dealing with more experienced webmasters and competition.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3382449].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jhonsean
    Duplicate is always duplicate there is no changes in that. I would suggest that spend your time in creating strong content to become more competitive in the market.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3382476].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Branlan17
    If you want to create sites that invite and convert, don't use DC. However, for backlink purpose many of my submissions I just spin the title well and find similar articles indexed dozens of times.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3382725].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TZ
    It really comes down to HOW MUCH a piece of duplicate content has been duplicated. Google has no problem indexing a half a dozen piece of content that are identical.

    The big scare on dup content is false.
    Signature

    $php_coding = "consistent cash";

    echo ("Give me" . " " . $php_coding . "!");

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3382892].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JohnnyEnglish
    once, my competitors copypasted my original article to their site. they was on 3d position and i was at 1st for certain query for a months. after, i wrote them and they've delete my article.

    but fact is a fact - they was on top
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3387536].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Heavenstorm
    it may be truth that google does not penalize duplicate content now, but in the future if they decide to punish this act...all your duplicate sites will go to waste and its not worth it to risk doing this
    Signature
    How To Lose Weight Fast
    -------------------------------------------------------
    GUARANTEED SEO GOOGLE PAGE 1 SEO SERVICES
    -------------------------------------------------------
    SEO | SEO SERVICES | ONLINE MARKETING
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3387957].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author dburk
      Originally Posted by Heavenstorm View Post

      it may be truth that google does not penalize duplicate content now, but in the future if they decide to punish this act...all your duplicate sites will go to waste and its not worth it to risk doing this
      Hi Heavenstorm,

      I disagree, in part, with your assertion. Google is not in the business of issuing penalties, they are not the Internet police, nor do they want to be. They are simply trying to deliver useful and relevant results for their users, nothing more.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3388162].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author nimmysnv
        Originally Posted by dburk View Post

        Hi Heavenstorm,

        I disagree, in part, with your assertion. Google is not in the business of issuing penalties, they are not the Internet police, nor do they want to be. They are simply trying to deliver useful and relevant results for their users, nothing more.
        Yes, you are right but, at the same time they dont really allow any such activities that may let down those results of websites that are not having any duplicate.
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3403507].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author dburk
          Originally Posted by nimmysnv View Post

          Yes, you are right but, at the same time they dont really allow any such activities that may let down those results of websites that are not having any duplicate.
          Hi nimmysnv,

          I'm not really sure what you are trying to say, but Google allows you to do whatever you want. As long as it doesn't violate their webmaster guidelines they will index the pages of your website. Again, Google is not trying to tell you what to do, they are just trying to deliver useful and relevant search results for their users.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3403788].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author outwest
    I have heard the opposite
    that google does not care about dupe content on the same domain, after all its the same person nobody is stealing content, I thought they worried about dupe content on different domains, someone trying to steal someone elses content and then checked to see by their records who first posted the content, then ignored the new "copy" content on the different domain
    Signature
    Tech article writing .Native English Speaker(with Proof)
    specializing in SmartPhones , Internet security, high tech gadgets, search engines, tech shows, digital cameras.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3403574].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author dburk
      Originally Posted by outwest View Post

      I have heard the opposite
      that google does not care about dupe content on the same domain, after all its the same person nobody is stealing content, I thought they worried about dupe content on different domains, someone trying to steal someone elses content and then checked to see by their records who first posted the content, then ignored the new "copy" content on the different domain
      Hi outwest,

      Google doesn't care if you want to use duplicate content as long as you are not using it in a blatant attempt to manipulate the search results to an undeserved advantage.

      Generally, they have no way of knowing if content was syndicated or stolen, unless you file a DMCA complaint. Google will display dulpicate content in search results when no other near equally relevant information can be found. Otherwise, they filter duplicate content to provide users with diversity in the SERP.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3403823].message }}

Trending Topics