Google Tries To Bury Low-Quality Content With Major Search Algorithm Changes

by Adie
22 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Very important news


BARBARA ORTUTAY and MICHAEL LIEDTKE 02/25/11 06:19 PM AP


NEW YORK -- Google has tweaked the formulas steering its Internet search engine to take the rubbish out of its results. The overhaul is designed to lower the rankings of what Google deems "low-quality" sites.

That could be a veiled reference to such sites as Demand Media's eHow.com, which critics call online "content farms" - that is, sites producing cheap, abundant, mostly useless content that ranks high in search results.

Sites that produce original content or information that Google considers valuable are supposed to rank higher under the new system.

The change announced late Thursday affects about 12 percent, or nearly one in every eight, search requests in the U.S. Google Inc. said the new ranking rules eventually will be introduced in other parts of the world, too. The company tweaks its search algorithms, or formulas, hundreds of times a year, but most of the changes are so subtle that few people notice them. This latest change will be more difficult to miss, according to Google engineers.

"Google depends on the high-quality content created by wonderful websites around the world, and we do have a responsibility to encourage a healthy web ecosystem," Google fellow Amit Singhal and principal engineer Matt Cutts wrote in a blog post. "Therefore, it is important for high-quality sites to be rewarded, and that's exactly what this change does."

Google makes significant adjustments to its search formula on the same scale as the latest change four or five times a year, Singhal said in a statement Friday.

What makes the new revisions so notable is that Google spent about a year trying to come up with a way to judge the quality of the content posted on the site.

That focus could hurt Demand Media, which depends on search engines for about 41 percent of the traffic to its websites, with most of those referrals coming from Google, according to documents filed last month after the company completed an initial public offering of stock.

Demand Media, based in Santa Monica, assigns roughly 13,000 freelance writers to produce stories about frequently searched topics and then sells ads alongside the content at its own websites, including eHow.com and Livestrong.com, and about 375 Internet other destinations operated by its partners. Articles range from the likes of "How to Tie Shoelaces" to "How to Bake a Potato" and more.

Many of the ads appearing alongside those articles are sold by Google, which accounts for about one-fourth of Demand Media's revenue of $253 million last year.

Demand Media said it doesn't consider itself a "content farm" or "content mill," but rather as a more responsive approach to addressing topics on people's minds.

"We believe that our platform for satisfying today's consumer demand is the most comprehensive and effective of any online publisher," Demand Media CEO Richard Rosenblatt told analysts earlier this week after the company announced the first quarterly profit in its four-year history. "The standards we put in place, the process that we follow, and most important, the qualified professionals we rely on to create and copy at the solution are unprecedented in traditional and new media.definition."

In a Friday blog post, another Demand Media executive said the company applauds search engine changes that "improve the consumer experience." Google's revisions caused some of Demand Media's articles to rank higher and other to rank lower in search results, wrote Larry Fitzgibbon, Demand Media's executive vice president of media and operations.

"It's impossible to speculate how these or any changes made by Google impact any online business in the long term - but at this point in time, we haven't seen a material net impact," Fitzgibbon wrote.

Investors seemed uncertain how Google's move would affect Demand Media. After falling nearly 5 percent in earlier trading, Demand Media's shares rebounded to close at $22.96, up 36 cents for the session.

___

Liedtke reported from San Francisco.

___

Online:
Google's blog post: Official Google Blog: Finding more high-quality sites in search
Demand Media's blog post: Growing Demand Blog

Source: Huffngtonpost
#algorithm #bury #content #google #lowquality #major #search
  • Profile picture of the author Fun to Write
    Hmm. Interesting. Thanks for posting this.

    I think Demand Media is a content farm that has some useful info, but there is also lots of duplication. So, we'll see how the rankings play out in the next few weeks.
    Signature

    Focus+Smart Work+Persistence=Success

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435418].message }}
  • Lol, I know a lot of people will read this and go off assuming Google is directly attacking all those content farms and ranking their pages lower.

    Posted by the New York, they've simply referenced a huge company to stir the pot a bit. Google may have found a great way to evaluate the quality of a page, nothing more. I don't think, and I'm almost sure that they are not purposely devaluing any sites domain; but rather devaluing pages they find provide no value.

    Unfortunately sites like ehow and ezine articles have a ton of people who create useless crap. I can't believe some of the sh*t which is classed as content on ezine articles. They definitely need to tighten up on Article acceptance.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435430].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Jason Perez O'Connor View Post

      Lol, I know a lot of people will read this and go off assuming Google is directly attacking all those content farms and ranking their pages lower.
      They will.

      And some will go off wishing that were true but suspecting it may not be, really.

      Originally Posted by Jason Perez O'Connor View Post

      Unfortunately sites like ehow and ezine articles have a ton of people who create useless crap. I can't believe some of the sh*t which is classed as content on ezine articles. They definitely need to tighten up on Article acceptance.
      Agreed.

      They kind of do a little now and again, and the general trend seems to be in the right direction; but it's always somehow "too little, too late" as well, isn't it?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435449].message }}
      • Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

        They will.

        And some will go off wishing that were true but suspecting it may not be, really.



        Agreed.

        They kind of do a little now and again, and the general trend seems to be in the right direction; but it's always somehow "too little, too late" as well, isn't it?
        Yes indeed Although unfortunately I was once 'the majority' and posted some pretty awful articles back in the day in an attempt to grab some leads for my MLM company. My grammar is far from being perfect, and sometimes I cringe at my sentence structure or flow, but I always make sure what ever it is I'm writing has a purpose, and delivers on that purpose very well. If it has to be 1,500 words then it has to be 1,500, but I will make damn sure it helps who ever reads it.

        None of this 300-500 words crap. You can still get buyers without limiting yourself to a ridiculously small article.

        @Orator

        Don't laugh but I'm sure I've used that site to learn something like cutting Onions the right way. Hey! at least it helped
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435894].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Adie
    I believe Google's main target are those big sites and not sites like ours. me too is having some kind of problem with ehow sometimes providing false information on very basic questions....
    Signature



    Moderator's Note: You're only allowed to put your own products or sites in your signature.

    Signature edited.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435456].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author alexanderpoole9
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Adie View Post

      I believe Google's main target are those big sites and not sites like ours.
      I don't think that sounds like a plausible motivation. It seems more based on the logistics of providing overall higher quality content for its searchers.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435492].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Edie47
    As far as ezine articles goes, what they decline and what they accept on any given day seems to vary quite a bit, or maybe it's whoever is doing the reviewing. I've seen very poor quality articles get accepted but a good quality original content article rejected. Very frustrating.

    The original article above suggests it's a veiled reference to eHow.com, but I think it could go for all low or poor quality sites - which seems like a good idea. I've Googled keywords and clicked on the top search results and found some really ugly sites. Hopefully, when all is said and done, they will clean up the search results.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435484].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author kayden57
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Edie47 View Post

      As far as ezine articles goes, what they decline and what they accept on any given day seems to vary quite a bit, or maybe it's whoever is doing the reviewing. I've seen very poor quality articles get accepted but a good quality original content article rejected. Very frustrating.

      The original article above suggests it's a veiled reference to eHow.com, but I think it could go for all low or poor quality sites - which seems like a good idea. I've Googled keywords and clicked on the top search results and found some really ugly sites. Hopefully, when all is said and done, they will clean up the search results.
      EZA is very inconsistent. They aren't the best directory out there anyway. I know of 10 article directories off the top of my head with higher PR that naturally outrank them that I use and submit to. I can also name a few that my articles always get at least 100 views per week when they only get 25 per month at EZA. Do the math. They got a rep as being the best, but clearly they aren't.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435914].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author LegitIncomes
        I only deal with original content on all of of my websites.
        But I'm wondering.....

        Google wants to penalize sites that use duplicate content...well look at all of the news websites. CNN, MSNBC, FoxNews, all of the newspapers, etc... they all get stories right off the wires and post those to their sites. Will they be penalized for this?
        Signature
        100% Unique Sales Page Website +100% Unique Internet Marketing Product
        + Support! All of this, just $397! (PM Me For Details!)
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435933].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Yogini
        Originally Posted by kayden57 View Post

        EZA is very inconsistent. They aren't the best directory out there anyway. I know of 10 article directories off the top of my head with higher PR that naturally outrank them that I use and submit to. I can also name a few that my articles always get at least 100 views per week when they only get 25 per month at EZA. Do the math. They got a rep as being the best, but clearly they aren't.
        Kayden,

        Can you say why you backlink to ezinearticles (which you wrote in another thread) instead of to the article directory where you get more views? Is it to get into the most viewed list?

        Debbie
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3436151].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author kayden57
          Banned
          Originally Posted by Yogini View Post

          Kayden,

          Can you say why you backlink to ezinearticles (which you wrote in another thread) instead of to the article directory where you get more views? Is it to get into the most viewed list?

          Debbie
          Yes, that's one reason, and it's also becaiuse of the popularity and reputation.

          In my opinion, a search engine user is more apt to click on an EZA link than to a directory they have never heard of.

          As I stated earlier, EZA has the reputation, although I do not belive they are the best directory.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3436161].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Adie
    It looks like we are heading to "content vs backlinks" argument......
    Signature



    Moderator's Note: You're only allowed to put your own products or sites in your signature.

    Signature edited.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435499].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
    that is, sites producing cheap, abundant, mostly useless content that ranks high in search results.
    The funny thing is, it's google's fault in the first place that crap was ranking
    Signature
    *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
    -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
    *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
    Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435502].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fernando Veloso
    This is a cycle.

    This time they kick sites in category A, next time it will be the opposite.

    Keep that in mind, will ya?

    Signature
    People make good money selling to the rich. But the rich got rich selling to the masses.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435546].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Orator
    I can't say that I'm not happy about this algorithm change. I've just had a website I've been working on for weeks zip straight to page 1 because of it, or at least I assume because of it.

    I do think that people maybe a little hard on ehow, there is some really useful stuff there. Ezine articles... not so much.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3435576].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dvduval
    I can remember many times I was searching for how to do something and all I got were articles written by people that clearly were not authorities and were only scratching the surface. It can be very frustrating to find what you are looking for when the good stuff is buried. One search I did recently that I know has improved "some" is
    Benefits of Swimming
    It still isn't great however, and I think google has a ways to go. It appears about.com is not hit from what I see.
    Signature
    It is okay to contact me! I have been developing software since 1999, creating many popular products like phpLD.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3436190].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author aduttonater
      Yes indeed. I knew this day would come, when Google gets wise to the small business man trying to earn a dollar. Since Adsense is fre.e it is just one of what millions considered their everyday job. Only some took it serious. Those who took it serious were companies such as ehow and do it yourself. I noticed as I was searching for answers on various topics how they would get 1st page rankings. Then I noticed the adsense ads for content on the sides and, was thinking that who ever owned that account was getting paid BANK!! Thats why I got the idea to set up hundreds of junk blog sites on interesting topics that figured people would be interested in reviewing the topics. I monetized my adsense account with each blog, and began to advertise. Best believe my adsense income sky rocketed.

      As far as the algorithm change, it's okay because I will be getting a .Com and optimizing it to the fullest!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3436249].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MilesT
    This could pretty much tank EZA. 30-40% of their content is low-grade, spun, nonsensical content with no value whatsoever. Thus, many of you who rely on EZA for traffic may feel the hurt, or even lose your traffic altogether.

    Kinda saw this one coming about a year ago when I was interested in article marketing but felt like it was an unstable market. Maybe this will clean it up, but I doubt it.

    As for products like WP Robot and other content aggregaters, Google specifically mentioned that duped content would be targeted as well, so they may be end-of-life as well.

    Bummer :rolleyes:
    Signature
    http://www.RedHeadline.com
    Internet Marketing's Top Daily News (Updated today)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3436293].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
    As for products like WP Robot and other content aggregaters, Google specifically mentioned that duped content would be targeted as well, so they may be end-of-life as well.
    Doesn't this debate EVER end?

    Google always (and FOR YEARS already) never "liked" or favored duplicate content.

    Only a IM fool or total newbie would make a site made from scrapped content, or use scrapped, unaltered content for re-distribution.

    Following the current hundreds of threads in regards to this subject, one could think that google *just* changed its mind and is JUST NOW doing something against bad/duplicate content, penalizing sites etc..etc..

    But this is already the case for AGES <----

    Again, Write it on your forehead:

    DUPE content, scrapped content, unreadable garbage junk spun content, spammy unreadable dupe crap content: BAD, BAD, BAD

    And this is a rule every *serious* SEO/webmaster knows for YEARS...and it does not only apply since two days ago. Good content is the first and most important thing, everything else is secondary.
    Signature
    *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
    -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
    *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
    Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3436902].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Drewry_Media
    I think Demand Media is going to see a significant drop in their AdSense earnings, since I heard Google has a specific department designated now just to allegedly research them.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3437153].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author scott g
      Originally Posted by Drewry_Media View Post

      I think Demand Media is going to see a significant drop in their AdSense earnings, since I heard Google has a specific department designated now just to allegedly research them.
      eHow.com - 1.68Million Indexed Pages (G)

      AnswerBag.com - 2.38Million Indexed Pages (G)

      LiveStrong.com - 12.7Million Indexed Pages (G)

      Cracked.com - 32k Indexed Pages (G)

      typeF.com - Haven't even gotten started on this one yet :p

      Trails.com - 1.07Million Indexed Pages (G)

      GolfLink.com - 718k Indexed Pages (G)

      Google has almost 19Million indexed pages of Demand Media property to go through... Ouch! Lol!

      CHEERS!
      Signature
      scott g
      "Whatever the mind can conceive and believe, the mind can achieve."

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3437597].message }}

Trending Topics