Does hosting time matter in Search Engine ranking?

8 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Hi all,

I hope this is the right topic to post this under (as this is my first question as Newbie).

I have been offered a free website, but I need to host it somewhere and they pointed me to "a company" (for now I leave it to that).

In the hosting promotional video it was said that "it matters how long your hosting contract with "a company" is in relation to the ranking in Google, Bing, Yahoo, etc.

Their exact words used:
“Remember the longer you sign up for the higher your website will rank in the search engines and the more money you will make.”

That surprised me a bit, as to my (limited) knowledge, these search engines have no clue as to how long I rent space from "a company" to host my site and Google really doesn't care the site will be there tomorrow or not to give it a rank (or am I here totally wrong)?

However it was so consistently promoted that I start to doubt and what place better to ask then here.

So please can the somewhat more experienced people here shine some light on this topic?

I suspect that there might be better deals around the "referring party" does not get commission paid for, but just to be sure I'm not overlooking something simple here.

Thanks
#engine #hosting #matter #ranking #search #time
  • Profile picture of the author sohel
    The important thing for search engine ranking (regarding the fact mentioned here) is.... the domain age, site age --when the site was first found by search engine, page age-- when the published page was first found by search engine.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3944141].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author enderZ
    SEs and specially Google do have a clue where you are hosting and for how long (although you can trick them).

    They are following every IP change, registrar change etc.

    BUT, as far as I know, they won't give a damn if you changed hosting.
    Signature

    If you have a WHY you can go through almost any HOW

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3944596].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author masterjani
    Actually when your site is hosted on Unique c-class ip it gives some positives in ranking in long run.
    Might be they mentioned because they host your site with unique C-Class ip and longer you signup better your domain age better the results.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3944631].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author dburk
      Hi NiteOwls,

      Whoever told you that was full of crap. Google can see who your hosting company is, but they have absolutely no way to know your length of contract. That is ridiculous to suggest they do.

      My guess is that whomever is referring you to that particular hosting company is probably an affiliate and they simply want you to signup for a long contract so they earn a bigger referral commission off their BS sales pitch.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3944719].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Rudy Christoph
      Hi All,

      Thank you so much for your replies. I have learned something valuable.
      - Look for a long time existing hosting provider.

      However, how would Google know that I have a hosting contract for 1, 2, 4 or more years and let that influence the ranking?, that's what I don't get.

      If SE's don't give a damn about changing hosting, then why would it important to take a 4 year hosting package vs a 1 year?

      Domain / Site age will only start to count when registered, I do understand that the longer you exist, the more established you get, but that is not based on a hosting contract, unless google would use WHOIS to determine and see when the domain name renewal is due?

      I can't see on the website of the company that I get a different IP (longer established) IP address when I sign up for a long term contract, surely something I can ask them.

      Again all, thanks for your input!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3944769].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author paulgl
        Domain age and site age have little to do with anything.
        Because it can lead to long-term trustworthiness does not
        make it so. It's rather meaningless. If it were, sites like
        kayak, zoosk, etc. would get nowhere fast. You get
        no extra points for site age, domain age, or any other
        such stats.

        Paul
        Signature

        If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3944806].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author HKSEO Rotzee
          Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

          Domain age and site age have little to do with anything.
          Because it can lead to long-term trustworthiness does not
          make it so. It's rather meaningless. If it were, sites like
          kayak, zoosk, etc. would get nowhere fast. You get
          no extra points for site age, domain age, or any other
          such stats.

          Paul
          Do you have any case studies to support this assertion? There was an E-book last week "offline video BAZOOKA" where it showed you could use a technique to rank a video in under 30 minutes leveraging just daily motions domain strength.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3944942].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author dburk
            Originally Posted by HKSEO Rotzee View Post

            Do you have any case studies to support this assertion? There was an E-book last week "offline video BAZOOKA" where it showed you could use a technique to rank a video in under 30 minutes leveraging just daily motions domain strength.
            Hi HKSEO Rotzee,

            There is no such thing as domain strength, in my opinion, at least none that has any measurable effect on search engine ranking. It all boils down to the strength of the individual page.

            Where are your case studies on domain strength? I have never seen one that was able to separate domain strength from the strength of the individual page. Which leads me to conclude there is no domain strength, only page strength.

            Until I see something credible, I will continue to consider allegations of domain strength to be baseless.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3945164].message }}

Trending Topics