Yes, personal use.

Shared hosting will have same IP address for each account, we need multi c for ip diversity. In practice, we'd be building using different providers, not all with the same one.

Want to steer away from free hosting, that leaves us vunerable. It will cost us time and money to build these sites and free hosting is a risk.

Got a link? I'm looking for something like this from a legit source.

Thanks!

I tried to be a customer, but he was a jerk to me when I PMed him. Heck, he didn't even click the thanks button on your post.

Totally agree.

Cheers Matt.

We've used your services several times and the effect on our ranks is undisputable.

Wow that's truly amazing. I might start the same as you did, it's kindof inspiring to hear something like that. Good luck with the 10.000 blogs though!

30-50k!, wow, that's a hell of an investment. But that's what I like about this approach, you can start of small and scale up as the profits increase.

Cheers and good luck to you also Dripable.

We only use pr0 and pr1 .info blogs and we generate over $75k a month. We pay less than $2 a piece to register them at GD.

1) Never thought of this - good pointer, thanks.
2) We've several ideas on this one, but I'll check out the tools you mentioned - cheers.
3) Yes, currently trialing BogzBot to install base sites with the usual syndication plugins.
4) Currently testing NuclearLinkindexer, if this doesn't stack up then we'll be switching to backlinkindexer.com.

Cheers Sean, very much appreciate your ideas.

Paul

Your gonna give all of the secrets away man!!! LOL...

We haven't actually kicked off yet, we're currently costing up and devising a strategy. In the short term, for use on our own sites but if things go well then eventually we may run it as a service (limited).

For private useage, the boost in rankings on our money sites should (hopefully) justify the ROI but yes, you're right, this has to be closely monitored.

By starting off small, < 50 sites, we can perfect and fine tune our system and procesess for mantenance and monitoring before upscaling.

Anyone willing to share some ideas on how to feed 200 WP blogs the right way?

I chose Matt's service because #1 all the testimonials and #2 because it IS a private blog network.

I don't want to spam the Internet with my links. I want my links placed where no one will be offended by them.

True enough regarding this thread going off topic.

If you use Article Marketing Robot you can easily post to all 50 of the different blogs on your network very quickly and efficiently.

AMR = under $100
50 .info domains = under $100

As you say It works but the downside is you can't really expand that past a certain point plus theres the downside of the properties not being yours. You could build them up to great strength and they could be deleted tomorrow. Frankly i wouldn't be bothered with the Infos . NEtfirms for example has had a special for like 4.95 with the coupon and they throw privacy in for free. I'll take a .com .net. org over a info any day not because infos are bad for SEo but because as a property com , .net and .org are seen as more established ever I ever needed to sell a site or build it into its own presence.

For 50 domains you would need 5-10 separate c class ip's. Which would fall under the cheapest hosting plans of every seo host you check out.

You do not need to reregister a domain once it expires. Just clone it and add it to a new .info domain. Works like a charm.

The problem we had with them was the fact our sites kept going down regularly. They take a bit to rectify issues too. But they are one of the cheapest seo hosts around though.

Yes i did that too! and its now 3 years over and we have total 3k site in our network including my client's site as i sell website for leaving.

But you need to keep in mind that you need separate hosting and separate domain account. Cos if google track you then google start deindxing site.

I can say that cos that happen me to ... so i follow it by my own idea and now its over....

Best of luck
KAZi

Fernando you are getting too emotional. The point of dispute between Matt and I is EXTREMELY important to building a network. It is NOT off topic. Its one of the first strategy questions you have to ask yourself.

Do you buy a pack of .Info and utilize NA links etc or do you go the way the OP is going by getting websites with authority.

That is a critical choice you need to make in building a network. I chose the Ops strategy and it allows me to go after any serp not just relatively weak competition. Now of course you have to really build it out to go after the strongest of the strong but generally speaking some high authority links even if you decide to go with Infos also is going to do you nothing but good. It is not an SEO myth that authority links help you rank. Things you will need to do is learn how to acquire aged domains with authority and existing links. Lots of ins and outs so you don;t get ripped off.

But with the N/A zero approach what is there more to learn? Buy the Info domains set them up with the ability to let AMR post to them and you are off to the races. Only question that takes anything to figure out is hosting since the majority of SEO host stink. Some of them go down days at a time.

So bottom line is if all you are interested in is setting up new .info domains then this thread doesn't have much further to go. Its extremely easy and not much more to it but if you want to build some stronger networks down the line (as the OP started this thread out with) then theres more to learn but not if you buy that all you need is a weak network for everything and thats my point and why its an important issue when deciding how you want your network built.

who mentioned a manual review? Or are you trying to trash me now?

At this point is seems like over half of YOUR posts are Matt related.

I am very happy with Matts service, should I not let other people know that? For a couple hundred bucks he is doing what I got quoted between $4,000 and $10,000 a month for by the big guys.

Bllimey opened up a hornets' nest here and only slightly related to my original post.

Back on topic, well I've started registering my domains, some new, some aged and I'm currently looking at c class hosting. I've a few ideas for filling these sites with content, AMR is amongst them.

As for high\low PR domains as a requirement, well, I guess like everything else in IM, don't take the word of anyone as gospel, take advise onboard and go try for yourself - and that's just what I'm gonna do.

Thanks for the input folks, sorry to see people getting so riled, personally, I haven't the spare time to get the hump with anyone

For the most part you avoid linking them together and send them straight at your money site (unless you want to strengthen a page that is linking to your home page)

Don't overlook web hosts with multiple datacenters. Site5 for example has over ten. Two added benefits are that you can use some of them to help rank in regional search engine centers and if one goes down they don't all go down together. Depending on some SEO hosts its pretty close in price.

I make myself available to anyone wanting more information on how to put a successful blog network together. Just ask them right here on the thread.

Last year we purchased over $5000 worth of aged domains via auctions at Godaddy. All of which had verified pr's of 3 - 5. We set them up on the network and were hugely disappointed with the juice they generated. So even with having a budget of over $50k a month every month to play with we still register only .info's.

If high pr blogs were more beneficial we'd still have them in the mix.

Buying is faster but still takes some work. I'm too impatient to build them up myself.

You just want to make sure you are not getting screwed. Use something like RankChecker.com to make sure the PR is not faked.

Also check it at Whois Lookup & Domain Availability Search | DomainTools to make sure the domain never got dropped.

Lastly, analyze the backlinks. It may have had great backlinks that have since disappeared. Make sure they still exist or you might buy a PR 3 that goes to a PR 0 on the next update. Also, I prefer to stay away from sites that look like they are holding a decent PR just because of one really good link. I've seen PR 4's that have some crappy PR 0 and n/a links and one PR 6 backlink. If that PR 6 link disappears, you probably now have a PR 2 or less on your hands.

Seofarmer, and everyone else

Go to google and type in some keywords of what you think off hand would be very lucrative keywords to rank for. tell me how often you see a site ranking number one with ONLY links with zero or N/A PR (grab a free copy of SEo Spyglass. you can check it with that) links

Don't let anyone hoodwink you. Look for yourself at tens of serps and ask yourself why these terms have PR links ranking them.

Here I use this one all the time. Its the number one term used to sell PRo and NA links a few years back.

backlinks - Google Search

Check it out and see who is blowing smoke. My goodness even angela has PRed links.

Proof is in the serps. In the serps people can't misrepresent, misspeak or hide the factors that cause ranking. You can see everything in the serps. If somebody cannot show you in the search engines then take it with a grain of salt.

If you have the wherewithal get some authority links and don't make anyone tell you otherwise. You can mix those in with whatever else you want to use.

We started out with 200 sites on our network. But if you went the AMR route you should have no problem generating decent juice with just 50 sites.

My company did learn the hard way, that's why we now only use .infos.

It really isn't much different. You might as well pay $67/month for Magic Submitter or $127/month for SEnuke and just blast a bunch of Web 2.0's. It would be cheaper.

Sounds like a very strong strategy. The only problem I see with your plan is why you want to use unique content instead of spun plr. You're going to all the trouble and expense to setting up a network but by using unique content your linking system is going to be extremely slow and costly. If you outsource your article writing through seogenerals.com you can get 400 word articles for around $5 a piece. Which would equate to an extra $5 per backlink you submit.

You would be better served to take all that content and post them on squidoo and hubpages type of properties. You're not going to come close to creating a blog with pr like those sites. So posting unique content on a blog for the purpose of backlinking makes no sense to me.

As far as the ratio of 5:1 you are proposing regarding sites to ip addresses that is fairly aggressive number. We get away with 10:1.
There are only so many free blogging platforms. Therefore a limited number of ip's to post your links on. But if you start posting spun articles on a multitude of free blog platforms you won't see any success whatsoever. Those platforms have fail safes to keep folks like us from destroying their communities. So those types of blogs get deleted very rapidly. A deleted blog equates to deleted links. The key to making it big in seo is establishing permanent links in which you can build upon.

It certainly looks like one.

IMO, the high PR approach is the only way to go if you want to get #1 rankings, which are infinitely more valuable than page 1 rankings.

Looks like a BuldMyRank type of blog, as they usually have those short 150-250 words posts. Just an assumption though, could be wrong too!

It is because private networks are more expensive (domain registration, whois privacy, hosting). Typical Web 2.0 linkwheels are free or close to it.

1. Money investment risk
2. Efforts & time required to manage a network to avoid getting busted by G!
3. Lack of action.

Stop attacking the .info PR N/a networks and what were you taking a bow for? One of those serps you now dominate without any authority links or with some? Inquiring minds want to know (even if they already know the answer).

Again our experience has shown otherwise.

Nope, not saying that at all. What I am saying is that it is much more affordable and practical to use .info and pr 0's. You just can't stack the links on a pr5 site that you can a pr0 one. We have some sites that receive million articles a month. Quality just cannot keep up with quantity.

They wouldn't believe you anyways. But you and I know the truth.

which correlates with why people routinely say of that kind of network that the backlink checkers don't pick up the links. Google is not going to endlessly keep crawling through a morass of N/a links and low quality content on a PR n/a site.

There will probably be some other fanciful explanation but the most likely one why you can't find the links like you would on any other wordpress setup is because google isn't routinely crawling through to find all of them. its hit and miss which is why some people get results and coo and others like on Backlinks forum claim it got them zip.

33.000 links minimum a day on a PR N/a .info domain. Sheesh. can't think of a worse way to build a network. Good thing many serps are really weak in the IM niche.

So now my system does not help my clients? Despite the fact one of them just posted an unsolicited testimonial. There is no talking to you guys. Unbelievable really.

Not really. I only block the ones that want to debate me and build a name for themselves doing so. It is something that doesn't pay very well because it is never ending. Wave after wave of erroneous statements gets a bit tiring after a more than a second. So in order to be of benefit to anyone wanting to ask me about our experience with blog networks I am blocking them out from my view.

But the ones I blocked I have been having run ins on the forums for months now. I realized only today that the ignore feature was a viable way to make my time here on the forum more productive and way more enjoyable.

Pretty cool feature really.

This is absolutely . I love how the 3 Mikes and Matt recommend building a private network. I can see where each of you is coming from and I can see you all are very well versed in SEO.

I would probably have to go with Matt's approach due to the fact that it seems more economical and easier to build, from what I have read here so far. I would love to see if the High PR route can be built for about the same price and be as easy to manage. I have used Matt's service and he did get me to the 1st page for 3 tough keywords. I took it a step further and added high PR back links and it took them all to #1. I can see that High PR works also.

I believe that you can either go high PR or PR0 and be successful. I want to thank all of you for sharing this knowledge with the rest of us. I just love all the gold nuggets of info each one of you is dropping and I can see by the view count a lot of other warriors are watching. I think some of them are like me, taking notes because you guys always spit real knowledge this forum.

I would hope that at the end of the day we all would be able to chill and have a beer and be cool. Thanks again and keep it coming.

Want a thread where everyone agrees with one poster and dissent/legitimate critique is not allowed and called for as in a discussion then go to his WSO thread and be happy. This is the SEO section and if you paid attention to the details of the disagreement you would learn far more than wanting everyone to sing Kumbaya with one poster. Mike Grant made some great points and they have been confirmed by THOUSANDS of people who do real SEO and with real world tests not just running SEO WSOs. The dissent in this thread has led to A LOT more information that you would never get with just everyone agreeing with one person and yet you only complain when people disagree with that one poster.

Hey mark,
I use mostly Html and wordpress. I throw in others for diversity and yes it works. If you think about it when you get into real competition where someone is making good money and you out rank them think their SEO isn't going to look at your links? And what do you think they will do when they see sites that scream bought links like a .info network with ton load of spun content and massive links? Take the financial loss? So thats why I go with good content not because its hard to post to anything. Heres a quick tip -get a good macro program set up vmware or a vps and you can automate posting to ANY content system. Its extremely easy.

How much someone pays for a service says nothing.and frankly $1,000 is on the lowend for SEO services So if thats a point then the tens of thousands of SEOs that disagree with Matt would have a greater point because most of their clients have dropped far more than that per month.

Just looking around, I believe Magic Submitter can be used to submit to your own Drupal, Joomla, Wordpress and other platforms (but it's a monthly subscription - grumble grumble...).

If you are only promoting one site, then yes I would put a link on each page to that site.

It's not really any different than when article submitting was a big deal. People would throw 10 different articles at EZineArticles, all linking to the same page.

You want to have domain and IP diversity, but it not unusual for a site to link to another site in three different places.

You might want to use different anchor text on each page, but that is up to you.

Like Mike suggested Dreamweaver is a good way, but may not be in everyone's budget initially. I think it was $499 when I picked it up. I have no idea what it sells for now.

When I first started, I just used plain old Notepad and Filezilla. It's a little more time consuming, but unless you are promoting a hundred sites it doesn't take that much time. Again, if you are going the high PR route, you don't need thousands of sites to get the same results. For most keywords I see the majority of IM'ers and affiliate marketers going after, 10-20 PR 4 sites will get them top rankings. For much more competitive markets, obviously you need more.

Oh and to save some time, I just spent a day downloading as many free HTML templates as I could find. I have bought a couple of packs too along the way. I don't really care all that much about the site looking perfect. I just don't want to hand code all these sites from scratch.

As far as the article distribution, it is up to you. I just make sure the same content is not on identical sites as much as possible. If I have 10 articles on one site, I do not put the same 10 articles on another site. Unless you have a very large network, there is going to be some overlap. I just don't want the same outgoing backlinks and same anchor text on each site. I have my sites divided into clusters to help organize this.

James,

I did a quick search of Google to see what was available and found this how to set up a blog network - Google Search

I have not checked out any of them yet, but it looks promising. I am interested in this too.

Whats aspect? Are you talking about setting up .info sites, getting aged domains populating content?

At the level of a hundred or so like some people are going to do based on horrible advice? Nada You would be better of submitting to article, blogs , press release sites etc. Remember not even Matt's system works with a hundred or two .infos for the results it gets (not top three most of the time) so I think you are beginning to see the real issue

and I think by the questions you are asking its becoming clearer to you that the .info na just flat out won't work at all for small network. You are better off picking up some High PR links . You will see immediate effects from those in your serps, they will allow you to ofset costs and you can leverage them to exchange links.

I like the questions you are asking , You are thinking for yourself not following guru worship. Thats fine for other facets of IM in SEO its best to think for yourself and weigh all the issues.

Trust your instincts. You are right the N/A approach is nonsense for building out a small network for yourself and despite the rah rah from people who don't know a thing about SEO it is the LEAST flexible. You can't rent space on a small network of N/As to offset your costs. no one will care to link exchanges with you and each individual domain is weak and can only be effective (and only in weak serps) if you are prepared to go into it the hundreds if not thousands of domains.

Best advice acquire a few authority domains and see the results and move forward with that.

I think I can answer this one - because those sites in the AMR directory are totally burned out, Google probably recognises them as link farms as many many sites have the same set of sites in their backlink profile, or there could be some factor related to Panda. Either way, your own little network is going to be a lot more exclusive than all those heavily spammed article directories (though they still have their place).

Anyway, awesome thread, I am learning a lot, thanks people for sharing (it's not like we will be competing with you guys any time soon )

I have to agree, he has taken a lot of crap here, right or wrong and has been very helpful. Regardless if you agree with his methods. That is really what this place is suppose to be about.

and with that I'd like to thank the other two Mikes particularly Mike grant recently. You took a lot of abuse and garbage in this thread from people who really don't know SEO just for letting people know what is well established in the industry and has been tested and verified in multiple tests with observable not hidden data. You made valuable inputs that one side has consistently tried to characterize as not useful and you did it with no pointing at your services.

Thats truly remarkable because the temptation sometime is just to let things go and go on your merry way but you have been involved not only in this thread but are regulars in the SEO section that consistently share your expertise without pointing to your service. Pms I have received along with many posts in this thread indicate that been appreciated.

Its extremely important in SEo that we go off hard data and open test results not the kind of rah rah people use in JVs and such. SEO is a different beast. So thanks for helping to bring that.

Very true. It isn't like it used to be and yes I do think Google has it in for certain article directories. Thing is though theres no universal footprint for an article directory. There are all kinds of platforms. So if Google does target them it has to look for content patterns - sites with lots of links, whatever Google chooses to identify bad content with, multiple subjects etc.

and when you think about it for awhile you realize that would also tend to target blog networks with multiple links and spun content!

Only Google could give you the exact reason but quantity of links as you suggested, algo tweaks that identified the spamminess of the site (how many good sites really cover jock itch, how to get any woman you want , make 50,000 in a week and then link out to a high ratio of one page sales ads?)


of course any weak page needs to have some life injected in it. thats why you build a PR network. Why build a network you have to backlink just to get it indexed?

Not a problem! Keep them as they are at the moment and pile on with fresh content. Deleted pages will show 404 not found pages, or can be 301 redirected. I won't worry too much about the old posts or pages. If you're too much worried or concerned about them, then get them re-written, or else leave them and move on with new posts.

Hey jayweb,

Take down the domain when you can. you are exposing a good chunk of your network to anyone who crosschecks that site with others and uses a backlink checker across a few of them. Ask orange to remove it from his quote too (better safe than sorry).

P.S. To anyone who wanted to contact me. I have a major project that will probably keep me away for a couple days. MY PM is almost full so if you get a bounce then you can try again in a few days when I have time to clean it out. thanks

Thanks orange. Lost in my first post I made was that any page link will help with diversity and link popularity. I and others objected to the claim that you should only use .info N/As and forget about authority links entirely as if they don't work :rolleyes:.

Mixing is fine and great so your approach to buildup sites with links will eventually payoff as you build authority with backlinking you are doing. The only thing I would recommend is that you find a way to monetize your network either through the serps it gives your money site or if you have some PR in them renting the space here and there to cover costs.

Starting over again every year just to avoid renewal fees is a totally losing proposition. Unless all your network exists for is to provide cheap services. you end up skipping all permanent backlinking techniques every year and losing out equity for yourself and whatever sites you service.

Where? the angela page and the squido page both have backlinks with PR



Backlinks: What they are and how to get them - Advertising

Backlinks - Get the Highest Quality Backlinks Here!


run em through spyglass


I see PR 1s,2s,3s in the profile of their backlinks. Not a single one has just .info N/a backlinks

Cheers Matt, thanks again for your time, much appreciated by all.

How about instead of being so passive-aggressive with your underhanded comments, you use your network to go head-to-head with mine?

I'd love to destroy your comments about how a PR N/A link is as powerful as a high PR link, just for the fun of it.

And what reason might that be? We did it because it made our backlinking look much more natural instead of backlinking to a single keyword on all our blasts.

Thanks for yet another smart ass remark. It seems those are the only type you seem to make.

I cannot help it if you know nothing about LSI keywords. Besides we let our clients choose all 5 keywords. You're telling me there isn't 5 tough keywords for every niche?

Me as well. Too many Warriors throw stink on what we do because they cannot duplicate the results we do.

Google will never stop us. They'll cancel out the juice from profile links first. Xrumer still creates huge amounts of juice via profile links. Look how long profile links have been rolling out.

If Google quits recognizing spun articles we'll start sending out unique content. The way we'll do it will be simple though. We'll have one of our staff members write a 400 word unique article on one of our sites. When it gets indexed we'll then mass submit that same article to every site on our network. Including wpmu's as well as every article directory we can get our hands on.

If they stop accepting duplicate content then we'll be looking strong with our spun content system. If both duplicate content and spun articles go out we'll switch over to using very well spun articles instead of autospinning everything.

If they quit accepting Wordpress links we'll switch all our blogs over to different article directory platforms.

If they deindexed our blogs we'll have 5000 new ones up with new hosts, domains and c class IP's within 5 days.

We're not a bunch of dumb hicks who only have one way of sending out links. We tried over 175 different methods and ended up with the system we have now mainly because it worked and was the easiest to scale.

Thanks for sounding in about our service by the way. Most of the arguments against our service are from people who literally have no idea how we can make our service work month after month after month.

Well at least you admit it in the end SO I am going to put it to you gently.

What do you know about building a network? If you had built one it would not cost you more to rank or take more time (takes the same time to place links whether its an N/A or a PR5 page) and you as a onemanSEO would not be using a second person's network if you had your own. Fair?

Then what makes you think that Matt's way of building a network is better to the many regular SEOs here who have and who rank their terms in positions 1-3 (or does 1-3 not "WORK" for you?) Because they don't offer a $99 special to place in the first page with mostly no traffic to speak of positions and only guaranteed for what? 30 days?

Sorry but what You and Matt try to sell here is that if we have a different business model that does not offer WSos and get testimonials here that we dont know SEO and what works. That you can claim who is better by business model only?

Baaaaalooney.

Here educate yourselves.

SEO Software. Simplified. | SEOmoz

click around here too

Search Engine Roundtable ::: The Pulse Of The Search Marketing Community

Search Engine Marketing (SEM), Paid Search Advertising (PPC) & Search Engine Optimization (SEO) - Search Engine Watch (#SEW)

Stop being hypnotized by WSO hype and read up on the countless top notched SEOs that do not offer anything in the WSO section and learn before you rant to people about what works and what doesn't or against those who have actually offered something on the subject of this thread.

Finally stop fibbing on us. No one claimed you couldn't get top rankings. we said it depended on the serp and competition but at the end of the day what you can't change is that first page is all Matt promises and only for a limited time and only if you choose five different terms so he has five shots at getting one on the first page (LSI nonsense not withstanding).

Want to pretend its another kind of offer then fine - Tell matt to guarantee 1-3 . He won't because he can't............. and stay in business for long. Now excuse me as I go back to work since I HAVE to deliver top three (and most of the time top two) to my customers regardless of their competition. Matt might do better than you but that does not mean he does better than all of us.

If you apologize now I will not hold your last comment against you. I already answered your question on #228 of this thread. It seems I was the only one to answer you. Yet I'm the one you said wouldn't answer you. And you wonder why you and I do not get along?

This has been answered at least twice.

I took you off my ignore list months ago. Our interactions were personal in nature and had nothing to do with my services. So we're cool.

Terry I'm sorry I can't take you seriously. At this point you are going to pretend like Matt is the only one that has talked about how they build their network.

sheesh

Don't waste your time.

Best thing to do is try it for yourself. But if you get all your domains at once from Godaddy they will waive the fee for private registration for each domain. So it's free for the first year at least.

How about transfering these domains another registrar, then adding privacy, or simply adding privacy at this point?

These domains have not been used to date.

Thank you

They turned down the challenge.

I can vouch for Fraggler's service. I've used it. Great service. Great price. Love it.

It is disappointing such a great thread is being wasted pissing on each other.

Yeah, what he said.

The reason everyone is so heated is because all our systems work very well for us. SEO isn't brain surgery. It's about getting links from other sites connecting to your site.

So let's quit strutting around like we're a bunch of rocket scientists.

I guess I don't agree with this characterization. I know the keywords we rank for and that other Mike has no idea. Just because he saw a few that were low comp doesn't mean that he has the complete picture.

Marc thinking that other people do what is common to you in psychology is known as projection and nothing shows that tendency than saying you would only buy PR n/As one day because of testing and two days later claiming the completely opposite . Like it or not I have seen your network . It hardly matters that you can't figure out how linking to the same sites from multiple domains makes it easy to see huge swaths of such networks. Want a lesson on how to use a backlink checker? I can post one to help you out.

We all know that Warriors has a high concentration of people who do MFAs, affiliate pages and a lot (no not all) long tail stuff. Its no secret, so a high degree of customers here are some weak stuff but you want to pretend like you and your .info got no authority PR net is better than everyone else because you charge $99 and cater to a generally less demanding crowd. My lowest paying client pays $1,000 a month (and only because of special circumstances). Want to claim that you could sell your services for that kind of cash ( I mean up front price not the old bait and switch) and get as many customers here. go ahead. You'll show you know about as much about understanding a low pay market as you've proven you know about SEO. Oh and yo tell Matt I'll teach him about LSI too if he needs it. You don't need five keywords to do LSI like he implied. More bunk.

So sorry. I can back up anything I say in the serps? Can you? No. Otherwise you would nave done so by now. You don't want to show a truly top competitive term ranking number one with only .info N/As because you CAN'T - PERIOD it will turn out to be nowhere near as competitive as you claim and you know it.

NO real seo cares what you take seriously. Not now especially. You were caught red handed with your own quotes from Matt misleading people that you had tested and proven that PR networks were so weak in your testing you would only buy .info N/as.

tell me again where you are talking from now?