Article Marketing Network

I can't speak for Kochtgr, but I'm saying that, as one of the people who switched from doing the former to the doing the latter and reaped the benefits. And actually a whole group of professional article marketers here who have growing businesses based on genuine residual income are saying it, too - every day and in many threads. But I do understand fully that large numbers of people who want to use spinning and submission software because they don't appreciate the difference between article marketing and article directory marketing, and people who value quantitative approaches more than quality and relevance, aren't going to take any notice at all. I console myself with the thought that the more of my competitors there are who think that way, the easier it is for me to build my business and outrank most of their sites in the process.

Two self-evident things I can tell you with certainty ...

(i) Almost all the threads here with titles like "Article Marketing Is Dead" and "Article Marketing Doesn't Work Any More" (we've all seen twenty of thirty of those, over recent months, haven't we?) are started off by people who've actually been doing article directory marketing rather than article marketing - they've been using spinning and/or submission software, and thinking in terms of "numbers of backlinks" ... and although they got the name wrong, in one sense they're right because for them, what they think of as "article marketing" really doesn't work any more;

(ii) When people switch from software and quantitative approaches to article syndication methods based on quality and relevance, they don't switch back, and there are reasons for that.