How can people offer '1st-page Google SEO services'?

83 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Thanks for the responses.
#1stpage #google #offer #people #seo #services
  • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
    Banned
    The one I use, Matt LaClear's service ... he has a large private network and he posts the links (100 per day) until you reach page one. I have two orders in ... one has already reached page one for numerous keywords and the other is still being worked on.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4489695].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author highrank
    I can assure you that it is very possible, but it depends entirely on the keywords you are trying to rank for.

    I would assume that any decent SEO company would have a network of websites available to them in a majority of the most popular niches, so that any banklinks have maximum affect.

    You really don't need 1000's of backlinks to get a page #1 ranking. Just one backlink on a single website can get you a page 1 ranking.

    I despise backlinking software, it just seems like cheating and I very much doubt it will work in the long run. So any SEO company using these methods are not likely to have a good reputation.

    Hope that helps
    Signature
    FUNNY FLAPPY BIRD FAILS!

    ---> Flappy Bird <---

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4489715].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by highrank View Post

      I can assure you that it is very possible, but it depends entirely on the keywords you are trying to rank for.

      I would assume that any decent SEO company would have a network of websites available to them in a majority of the most popular niches, so that any banklinks have maximum affect.

      You really don't need 1000's of backlinks to get a page #1 ranking. Just one backlink on a single website can get you a page 1 ranking.

      I despise backlinking software, it just seems like cheating and I very much doubt it will work in the long run. So any SEO company using these methods are not likely to have a good reputation.

      Hope that helps

      This!

      You don't need 100's of backlinks per page, most times a few authority links will get the job done.

      Assumes your not trying to rank for the keyword insurance.
      Signature
      Hi
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4489914].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DPM70
    The answer to your question is - both. They use software to put out the content with your links and they will post to a network of sites. I also use Matt, and it works.

    One of the things to realise, though, is that you can be at numbers 5-10 on page 1 and get next to no traffic. You often really need the sweet spot (positions 3 to 1) to actually get that traffic for any particular keyword. It always varies depending on the keyword.

    But, yes, people can offer page one of google, but if you end up in position 9 or 10 you might be getting no more traffic than you were in the first place. You might need to be committed to that keyword to take it higher to where the traffic is - on top of that service.
    Signature
    I don't build in order to have clients. I have clients in order to build. - Ayn Rand
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4489734].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Latsyrc
    I've thought about using Matt's service. Most of my kewords are 2-3 words...however, there is one keyword in particular that is only 1 word. Will he try and aim for 1 word keywords or do they have to be at least 2 words? Sorry for the ignorance...I'm just now learning about private blog networks and backlinking services.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4489806].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author b1833
    I think a lot of the just run presetup nuke runs over and over on auto.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4489818].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
    Originally Posted by GoldPro View Post

    Well, I've seen many people offering services that provide 1st-page Google results. How is this possible? Are they using some sort of software? Or do they have 1000s of sites and they just put your link on each one of them?
    Both. Some people use software and do blasts and some use 1,000s sites and put your link on them. First page isn't where the action is though so its not as hard as it sounds

    there is various research as to the click through rate on the front page
    Google Organic Search Click Through Rate Statistics | Fortune3 Blog

    Top Google Ranking Captures 18.2% of Clicks [Study] - Search Engine Watch (#SEW)


    But generally everything after position 3 and 4 gets little traffic. None of the services you see guarantee to get you where the traffic is so their value is limited (but it does have value for some search results.)
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4489889].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

      Both. Some people use software and do blasts and some use 1,000s sites and put your link on them. First page isn't where the action is though so its not as hard as it sounds

      there is various research as to the click through rate on the front page
      Google Organic Search Click Through Rate Statistics | Fortune3 Blog

      Top Google Ranking Captures 18.2% of Clicks [Study] - Search Engine Watch (#SEW)


      But generally everything after position 3 and 4 gets little traffic. None of the services you see guarantee to get you where the traffic is so their value is limited (but it does have value for some search results.)
      Maybe, but If your getting no traffic or very little traffic at #3-10 in the SERPs, I doubt very much the #1 position is worth fighting for.
      Signature
      Hi
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4489927].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

        Maybe, but If your getting no traffic or very little traffic at #3-10 in the SERPs, I doubt very much the #1 position is worth fighting for.
        Why would that be? Lets take the optify data in the link. Frankly the others look too low to me . First place gets 36% of a keywords volume 6th place gets 4% so thats 9 times less amount of click throughs from position 1 to position 6

        Position 10 which is still first page gets you 18 times less traffic.

        so a keyword that gets 330 per day in google (10,000 per month approx) would give you say seven lousy visits a day at 10. Position 6 would give you 14 and one would give you well over a hundred. all rough numbers

        Agree with you on the quality over quantity. See it every day.
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4490007].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
          Originally Posted by counselormom View Post

          I've thought about using Matt's service. Most of my kewords are 2-3 words...however, there is one keyword in particular that is only 1 word. Will he try and aim for 1 word keywords or do they have to be at least 2 words? Sorry for the ignorance...I'm just now learning about private blog networks and backlinking services.
          I remember reading that Matt's service is two words or more to guarantee Google.com page one.

          I gave him a challenging one to work on to say the least. It's a brand new .ca that he guaranteed to rank in the first page of Google.com. It's the loan industry too. Might be tough.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4490464].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Latsyrc
            Thank you for letting me know! Good luck on your website!
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4490898].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
            Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

            I remember reading that Matt's service is two words or more to guarantee Google.com page one.

            I gave him a challenging one to work on to say the least. It's a brand new .ca that he guaranteed to rank in the first page of Google.com. It's the loan industry too. Might be tough.
            But Melissa, you also had to give 4 other keywords, which are probably not as difficult. That particular service guarantees to get 1 of your keywords to the first page, not all of them. So even if you supplied 1 that is "tough", one of your other words is likely to get to page one first, and then he has done what he promised.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4493079].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
              Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post

              But Melissa, you also had to give 4 other keywords, which are probably not as difficult. That particular service guarantees to get 1 of your keywords to the first page, not all of them. So even if you supplied 1 that is "tough", one of your other words is likely to get to page one first, and then he has done what he promised.
              I'll let you pick the easy one:

              car loan
              car loans
              auto loan
              auto loans
              bad credit
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4493872].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
                Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

                I'll let you pick the easy one:

                car loan
                car loans
                auto loan
                auto loans
                bad credit
                I actually don't think car loan or car loans are that difficult. They won't happen overnight, but page one is not that tough on either of them. Top 5, forget it.

                That is based on US results. If you are looking for search results in another country, I would have to look at those keywords again.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4494481].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
                  Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post

                  I actually don't think car loan or car loans are that difficult. They won't happen overnight, but page one is not that tough on either of them. Top 5, forget it.

                  That is based on US results. If you are looking for search results in another country, I would have to look at those keywords again.
                  I'm using Matt's service on my home site as a drip feed to juice my more locally targeted four sub domains for which I have four targeted campaigns running. It doesn't really matter to me how long it takes, actually I prefer a slow rise to page one.

                  "car loans" and "car loan" wont be difficult for a brand new .ca domain to rank on page one of Google.com? I think this will be a true test of Matt's service.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4494729].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
                    Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

                    I'm using Matt's service on my home site as a drip feed to juice my more locally targeted four sub domains for which I have four targeted campaigns running. It doesn't really matter to me how long it takes, actually I prefer a slow rise to page one.

                    "car loans" and "car loan" wont be difficult for a brand new .ca domain to rank on page one of Google.com? I think this will be a true test of Matt's service.

                    No I don't think either of those terms would be extremely difficult to get onto page one. Matt's service will probably get you there. I wouldn't expect it in two months or anything, and I'm sure Matt would tell you the same thing. Those are some keywords that will take awhile. I don't think you will find yourself breaking into the top 5 though without doing a lot of additional work on your own.
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4494939].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
                      Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post

                      Those are some keywords that will take awhile. I don't think you will find yourself breaking into the top 5 though without doing a lot of additional work on your own.
                      Thanks Mike but the top five is not my goal. Those keywords wont make mike me a dime anyway. For the car loan niche I need to target localized traffic (provincial in my case). That's the purpose of my sub domains.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4495274].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                        Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

                        Thanks Mike but the top five is not my goal.
                        Word to the other Mike . Give up trying. When someone says they Don't want to rank at the top they just are looking to get to the first page there is no winning
                        Signature

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4495312].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
                          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                          Word to the other Mike . Give up trying. When someone says they Don't want to rank at the top they just are looking to get to the first page there is no winning
                          Urgh!! Please read my previous post as to why I joined up with Matt's service. It's purpose is to indirectly help me with keywords that matter to me. For those targeted sub domains I want to live at position #1 for all eternity on Google.ca!
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4495370].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author ElectronPlumber
          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

          Why would that be? Lets take the optify data in the link. Frankly the others look too low to me . First place gets 36% of a keywords volume 6th place gets 4% so thats 9 times less amount of click throughs from position 1 to position 6

          Position 10 which is still first page gets you 18 times less traffic.

          so a keyword that gets 330 per day in google (10,000 per month approx) would give you say seven lousy visits a day at 10. Position 6 would give you 14 and one would give you well over a hundred. all rough numbers

          Agree with you on the quality over quantity. See it every day.
          I've noticed that clicks are not equal here either. Those seven lousy visits a day are actually just that, lousy visits! The person you likely want at your site, the impulse buyer/clicker, is going to click on the first or second link. The people who bother to look down the page are likely hunting for something out of the norm and likely won't find it at your site either.

          So position #6 might get you 4% of the clicks, but you'll see only 1-2% of the sales you would get otherwise. I noticed this before but never had proof until I checked my data for the results I've been seeing in my link building experiment and saw it in action. I get more click throughs per visitor and sales per visitor on the #1 site than I get on the sites currently at position #6 and position #9. Details here: http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...nt-2011-a.html
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4495525].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
            Originally Posted by ElectronPlumber View Post

            So position #6 might get you 4% of the clicks, but you'll see only 1-2% of the sales you would get otherwise. I noticed this before but never had proof until I checked my data for the results I've been seeing in my link building experiment and saw it in action. I get more click throughs per visitor and sales per visitor on the #1 site than I get on the sites currently at position #6 and position #9. Details here: http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...nt-2011-a.html
            Mr Electron!

            Love your thread there. love testing and real data although when it leads you to conclusions that gurus don't like they and their followers get all upset and launch at you.

            anyway I had never considered that angle as well. Great job spotting that. I do know I have seen people say they were on page one and making no money and that stats show why.

            Your explanation for lack of conversions seems very plausible too. As well it may also be that the decisive buyers just don't have the time to get down the page. They know what they want, get it and are gone. Window shoppers (google style) meander all over and down the page but not buy anything.

            Good stuff. I will drop in on your thread again soon.
            Signature

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4495937].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Matt Ward
            Originally Posted by ElectronPlumber View Post

            The person you likely want at your site, the impulse buyer/clicker, is going to click on the first or second link. The people who bother to look down the page are likely hunting for something out of the norm and likely won't find it at your site either.
            That's pretty interesting, and I've never thought about it that way. It would make sense, though.

            As for "1st page Google services" - I've had experience with one that I won free here, and it was very negative. From what I'm reading here it seems like a lot of them are taking advantage of people that don't know any better. I'm not referring to any service in particular, but if you're putting all kinds of stipulations on a "page 1" ranking then it's likely that you're using your SEO knowledge and competition-gauging skills to take advantage of the customer that knows next to nothing of SEO. Reading some of the testimonials pretty much proves that, with comments like "A month ago I was #215 and now I'm #30!" :p

            On another note, it seems as though almost every single SEO service WSO that shows "proof" is intentionally trying to mislead the customer. Find one with ranking proof, and I can guarantee it will be something like an exact match domain ranking #3 for a keyword with 100 searches per month. :confused:

            edit: Here's a "proof" I found from one of the page 1 guaranteed SEO sellers. You will note that this is a keyword with 6 words and that zero searches showing in Google Keyword Tool. What a "deal." I would be embarrassed to be offering an SEO service with proof like this. :confused:

            Signature
            "Keep moving forward."
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4501263].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author mattlaclear
              Originally Posted by mattward View Post

              That's pretty interesting, and I've never thought about it that way. It would make sense, though.

              As for "1st page Google services" - I've had experience with one that I won free here, and it was very negative. From what I'm reading here it seems like a lot of them are taking advantage of people that don't know any better. I'm not referring to any service in particular, but if you're putting all kinds of stipulations on a "page 1" ranking then it's likely that you're using your SEO knowledge and competition-gauging skills to take advantage of the customer that knows next to nothing of SEO. Reading some of the testimonials pretty much proves that, with comments like "A month ago I was #215 and now I'm #30!" :p

              On another note, it seems as though almost every single SEO service WSO that shows "proof" is intentionally trying to mislead the customer. Find one with ranking proof, and I can guarantee it will be something like an exact match domain ranking #3 for a keyword with 100 searches per month. :confused:

              edit: Here's a "proof" I found from one of the page 1 guaranteed SEO sellers. You will note that this is a keyword with 6 words and that zero searches showing in Google Keyword Tool. What a "deal." I would be embarrassed to be offering an SEO service with proof like this. :confused:

              Just because you cannot rank a site onto page one for $99 doesn't mean every one else is as inept as you. Because we have proven again and again that it can be done.
              Signature

              When it comes to SEO, there are zero dumb questions. Find the answers you need in our SEO FAQ section. If I don't address your question there, send me a pm and I'll answer it that way.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4502893].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                Originally Posted by mattlaclear View Post

                Just because you cannot rank a site onto page one for $99 doesn't mean every one else is as inept as you. Because we have proven again and again that it can be done.

                You do realize that had you just ignored it and not tried to insult him no one would have thought that example was yours right? He never identified the seller. Thats the thing with turning every thread about services or networks in this part of the forum into sales and review threads. its not a WSo thread and people can bring up negatives as well.
                Signature

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4502990].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                  You do realize that had you just ignored it and not tried to insult him no one would have thought that example was yours right? He never identified the seller. Thats the thing with turning every thread about services or networks in this part of the forum into sales and review threads. its not a WSo thread and people can bring up negatives as well.

                  I just want to know if they left a testimonial about their new page one ranking.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4503049].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Matt Ward
                Originally Posted by mattlaclear View Post

                Just because you cannot rank a site onto page one for $99 doesn't mean every one else is as inept as you. Because we have proven again and again that it can be done.
                lol

                I do very well for myself doing my own SEO on my own sites, thank you very much.

                There's no reason for childish personal attacks, especially since I didn't even specifically mention you or your service. I have no idea what you're even talking about, because I didn't say you or anyone couldn't rank a site on page 1. Anyone can rank a BS keyword that doesn't amount to anything, yes.

                Comments like yours only make one person look bad, and it isn't me.

                And for the record, yes, I was referring to Matt LaClear's service when I was referring to the "bad experience." I wasn't going to go out of my way to name names, but I guess it's fair game when they out themselves. :confused:
                Signature
                "Keep moving forward."
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4503104].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author mattlaclear
                  Originally Posted by mattward View Post

                  lol

                  I do very well for myself doing my own SEO on my own sites, thank you very much.

                  There's no reason for childish personal attacks, especially since I didn't even specifically mention you or your service. I have no idea what you're even talking about, because I didn't say you or anyone couldn't rank a site on page 1. Anyone can rank a BS keyword that doesn't amount to anything, yes.

                  Comments like yours only make one person look bad, and it isn't me.

                  And for the record, yes, I was referring to Matt LaClear's service when I was referring to the "bad experience." I wasn't going to go out of my way to name names, but I guess it's fair game when they out themselves. :confused:
                  Big surprise. If you are a client or a former client pm your ticket id and I'll check on your campaigns. If not then smell you later.

                  Edit: Oh wait. I know who you are now. You're the dude I popped with an infraction for coming on to our wso thread raising stink and not backing up your allegations. Still not going to share your ticket ids?
                  Signature

                  When it comes to SEO, there are zero dumb questions. Find the answers you need in our SEO FAQ section. If I don't address your question there, send me a pm and I'll answer it that way.

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4504300].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Matt Ward
                    Originally Posted by mattlaclear View Post

                    Big surprise. If you are a client or a former client pm your ticket id and I'll check on your campaigns. If not then smell you later.

                    Edit: Oh wait. I know who you are now. You're the dude I popped with an infraction for coming on to our wso thread raising stink and not backing up your allegations. Still not going to share your ticket ids?
                    Do we really need to have a public pissing match?

                    I'll PM you the ticket ID, but to be fair, in that thread I offered to show proof, and you didn't ask me for a ticket ID nor did you respond to my response to your PM. I didn't think to refer to the ticket ID, I'll admit, because it's been so long that I forgot about it.

                    I'm a straight shooter, believe me; I wouldn't have said anything if I didn't think something was amiss. I even publicly praised your customer service here at first, because I was pleased with the prompt response and updates I was getting. That was until those stopped happening and my campaign seemingly fell into a black hole. :confused:

                    Update: For the sake of fairness, I'll say that Matt and I have cleared things up privately. Not that this even had to be brought up here, when it wasn't a public matter. Apologies for the thread derailing - back to the complaining about SEO services.
                    Signature
                    "Keep moving forward."
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4504556].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                  Originally Posted by mattward View Post

                  And for the record, yes, I was referring to Matt LaClear's service when I was referring to the "bad experience." I wasn't going to go out of my way to name names, but I guess it's fair game when they out themselves. :confused:
                  Perfectly fair game. You took pains not to call any names . I was going to say that perhaps that was long ago but I notice on the image that it was just a few months ago. Really raises the question (not merely on Matt's service talking generally now) how many of the first page placements that are given are based on long tail. Sellers usually angrily deny it but given that was a proof screenshot it stands to reason that it would be one that would be particularly proud of not some low example

                  To be fair the term gets a 100 per day so it should deliver a little traffic (since it still is not at one) but your point is well taken. Don't worry about the noise level.
                  Signature

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4504372].message }}
    • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4489945].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
        The trick is that they don't let you pick just one keyword and they retain the right to refuse a keyword if they choose. Makes it pretty simple.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4489961].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Marc_L
          Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post

          The trick is that they don't let you pick just one keyword and they retain the right to refuse a keyword if they choose. Makes it pretty simple.
          You don't know what you are talking about. We don't refuse based upon competition we do so when people use keywords that don't relate to their site or if the keywords are in a niche we don't work with.

          I cannot recall ever refusing any keyword based solely on competition.
          Signature

          Want answers to your SEO questions? Check out our library of FAQ's. Good luck and happy ranking!

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4498298].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
            Originally Posted by Marc_L View Post

            You don't know what you are talking about. We don't refuse based upon competition we do so when people use keywords that don't relate to their site or if the keywords are in a niche we don't work with.

            I cannot recall ever refusing any keyword based solely on competition.
            Marc, I wasn't referring to your service. And I apologize. With all the back and forth, I should have probably stipulated that in the post. It was a reference to similar services in general.

            In fact, there is one in the WSO section right now (and I don't want to go looking for it), that has a whole list of factors to "qualify" a word. It has to have below a certain number of search listings, your website must have the keyword in the title tag and h1 tags, etc. Then on top of that, it still has to be manually reviewed and accepted.

            There are a lot of similar services with those kind of stipulations. I was not picking on your service... this time.

            Those listings should just say "Give me the easiest keyword you can possibly find in your niche, and I will get you to #10... Guaranteed!"
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4500170].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Marc_L
              Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post

              Marc, I wasn't referring to your service. And I apologize. With all the back and forth, I should have probably stipulated that in the post. It was a reference to similar services in general.
              Cool beans, at least we've both made that clear now.
              Signature

              Want answers to your SEO questions? Check out our library of FAQ's. Good luck and happy ranking!

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4501506].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cctvinstallers
    The companies who have phoned me offering top positions only offered obscure long tail key phrases. When I asked them if they could do it for a two word phrase they "had to speak to the boss" and came back with a quote for thousands per month.
    Signature
    http://localsearchspecialist.co.uklocalsearchspecialist.co.uk
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4489996].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author donkiston
    I am also offer first page Google SEO website service. but i give a time to person who hire me, about 6 month to get first position in Google ranking.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4490980].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mikelmraz
    Originally Posted by GoldPro View Post

    Well, I've seen many people offering services that provide 1st-page Google results. How is this possible? Are they using some sort of software? Or do they have 1000s of sites and they just put your link on each one of them?
    Since the most important factor in ranking high in Google is backlinks, those services that are able to get many link, high quality links or both, are able to most likely bring your website to page #1.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4490982].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kkchoon
    Why not, as long as you know how to rank a site, you can offer similar services, but most of these services are automated.
    Signature

    Powerful Indexer That Makes Your Backlinks Count ==> Nuclear Link Indexer

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4492106].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PatrickP
    You may want to google matt laclear scam to get better insight.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4492139].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author mattlaclear
      Originally Posted by PatrickP View Post

      You may want to google matt laclear scam to get better insight.
      To date we have had 3 people report us as scammers over the last 18 months. Each of those people threatened to do so if we didn't give in to the threats they were making. I told them each to go jump into the lake. Just like I'm telling you now.

      Do the math champ.
      Signature

      When it comes to SEO, there are zero dumb questions. Find the answers you need in our SEO FAQ section. If I don't address your question there, send me a pm and I'll answer it that way.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4494815].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dreamyhost
    It is possible but it cost a lot
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4492155].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author VladWorks
    Most decent SEO companies won't tell you right away you will reach page 1 or position 1 or whatever. We do however provide a road map we intend to follow to get where you want to go. We generally provide a timeline and cost structure for how long it will take so there is no misconceptions.

    Any site where you can just pay online, auto-submit your keywords and wait for a rank....probably wont get the results you need.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4492315].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PatrickP
    What about a company that had a MAJOR purple cow (stealing a term from Seth Godin) by telling people ok we will get you to page 2 on Google for X amount Page 1 Y amount and top 2 spots and we charge you Z.

    They get your credit card but do NOT charge it until you get up on page 1 or 2.

    Now THAT would get attention I would think.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4492449].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author aliduncan
      Originally Posted by PatrickP View Post

      What about a company that had a MAJOR purple cow (stealing a term from Seth Godin) by telling people ok we will get you to page 2 on Google for X amount Page 1 Y amount and top 2 spots and we charge you Z.

      They get your credit card but do NOT charge it until you get up on page 1 or 2.

      Now THAT would get attention I would think.
      There are a few sites that do pretty much just this such as SEO Services | RankPay™

      They can be a bit on the costly side though.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4492786].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author PatrickP
        Originally Posted by aliduncan View Post

        There are a few sites that do pretty much just this such as SEO Services | RankPayâ„¢

        They can be a bit on the costly side though.

        Ah very cool! Thanks!
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4493167].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
        Originally Posted by aliduncan View Post

        There are a few sites that do pretty much just this such as SEO Services | RankPay™

        They can be a bit on the costly side though.
        Might want to read the FAQs here


        FAQ | RankPay

        Reading between the lines they start to charge you if there is any positive ranking change. In other words not when you get to the top. Its a pretty good model for you out all it insures is that there is something done. th ened result may still not happen. Or I could be reading it wrong.
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4493267].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author aliduncan
          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

          Might want to read the FAQs here


          FAQ | RankPay

          Reading between the lines they start to charge you if there is any positive ranking change. In other words not when you get to the top. Its a pretty good model for you out all it insures is that there is something done. th ened result may still not happen. Or I could be reading it wrong.
          I haven't actually used the service myself so I'm not entirely sure, but my understanding was that there is a monthly payment which is based on your ranking position.

          So if you don't get to a certain position in the ranking then you won't be charged. However, as you move into a high position (not exactly sure how high) you get charged a certain amount based on the competitiveness of your keyword. The higher your ranking is, the more you are charged. So a number one spot will cost more than just a ranking at the botom of page one.

          It's basically payment on results based ranking. I had a look to check pricing and it can carry quite a large price tag though, so it's not for everyone.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4493493].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by PatrickP View Post

      They get your credit card but do NOT charge it until you get up on page 1 or 2.

      Now THAT would get attention I would think.
      I think SEOs would go for this except for One BIG problem. The fact that we have your credit card does not guarantee we get payment. Having the number does not insure there is money on it to pay the bill.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4492958].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PromoDirect
    There are several methods of bringing the website in top ranking. The most important is the keyword you are targeting. Many companies however fails in achieving the position for their clients in search engines. We must also understand that when there is a company that offers you this service, they have experts with them who are experienced.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4492715].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JamesM
    My employer once received a fax claiming #1 first page rakings for clients. When I was shown the screenshot I pointed out that the #1 "ranking" they were bragging about was in fact a paid AdWords ad.

    A very sneaky tactic that could fool the unwary and unknowledgable.
    Signature

    If this post has been helpful please click the "thanks" button ;-)

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4492737].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PatrickP
    You do realize the irony of that right? lol one BIG problem now is an SEO says they will improve ranking and you pay THEM first and it does not insure there is work done to improve ranking
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4493080].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seocatalysts
    Originally Posted by GoldPro View Post

    Well, I've seen many people offering services that provide 1st-page Google results. How is this possible? Are they using some sort of software? Or do they have 1000s of sites and they just put your link on each one of them?
    Its not useful to just make a bunch of links on day by day...Link quality is more important...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4493241].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author chiragparnami
    I also Provide SErvices to make The Website on Top page of Google .. My Fully work is done Manually .. We apply all SEO strategy to Do That ..

    my skype id - chirag.parnami
    Email - parnami.chirag[at]gmail.com
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4494511].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mattlaclear
    I see the same haters speaking out against our service on every thread, Also I see the testimonials from customers on those threads outweighing the haters. Jealousy no doubt.
    Signature

    When it comes to SEO, there are zero dumb questions. Find the answers you need in our SEO FAQ section. If I don't address your question there, send me a pm and I'll answer it that way.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4494822].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
      Originally Posted by mattlaclear View Post

      I see the same haters speaking out against our service on every thread, Also I see the testimonials from customers on those threads outweighing the haters. Jealousy no doubt.
      Reading the shock of some people in your testimonials that you actually achieved page one when they didn't think you had a hope in hell is what sold me on your service Matt.

      I do agree that your WSO's success is resulting in all the envy. Just think of it as free advertising.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4494927].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
        Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post


        I do agree that your WSO's success is resulting in all the envy. Just think of it as free advertising.
        Why is it exclusively against Matt service? For what its worth I would point out my figures on click throughs for any service and did just awhile ago because the OP wasn't specifically talking about Matt's. The other Mike has routinely on other threads talked about what really competitive serps are. Here you are new and might not have known this -

        http://www.warriorforum.com/search.p...rchid=10697361

        SEE? - There are multiple services on WF that guarantee first page placement and thats why the Op said plural plus they all have testimonials that work (some more expensive and some cheaper) so this isn't a thread about one service.
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4495277].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

          ...this isn't a thread about one service.
          I do realize that Mike A. I joined in this thread to answer someone's question about, specifically, Matt's service to which I was familiar with and knew the answer. It evolved the way it evolved. Matt came on and seemed defensive so I just pointed out that he should be happy with all this attention he is getting.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4495344].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
            Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

            It evolved the way it evolved. Matt came on and seemed defensive so I just pointed out that he should be happy with all this attention he is getting.

            I understand where you are coming from its just that you kind of stepped into No man's land with siding with the envy comment he made. He was taking a slap at seeing some people's names on this thread that have had strong disagreements with him in the past about over valuing first page placement over positions that get traffic.

            You probably were not aware of that history but it is a disagreement that is based on principle and would apply to the value of ANY first page placement service not just matt's. In short you agreed to a characterization that is entirely false and insulting.
            Signature

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4495397].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
              Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

              He was taking a slap at seeing some people's names on this thread that have had strong disagreements with him in the past about over valuing first page placement over positions that get traffic.

              You probably were not aware of that history but it is a disagreement that is based on principle and would apply to the value of ANY first page placement service not just matt's. In short you agreed to a characterization that is entirely false and insulting.
              I have been reading the recent arguments so I do know what you are saying. My feeling is that for $99 I'm going to receive a foundation in the middle of a giant ocean from which I can build my dream home.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4495511].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

                I have been reading the recent arguments so I do know what you are saying. My feeling is that for $99 I'm going to receive a foundation in the middle of a giant ocean from which I can build my dream home.
                and because you dream thats the case you think its fine to join in on characterizing others who you don't know as jealous? Thats nice. let us know know when you rank for any of those terms. Dreams and feelings are a dime a dozen in IM.
                Signature

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4495839].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                  and because you dream thats the case you think its fine to join in on characterizing others who you don't know as jealous? Thats nice. let us know know when you rank for any of those terms. Dreams and feelings are a dime a dozen in IM.
                  My apologies for using such a complex analogy. The emphasis was on "building a foundation" site ranking that can be built upon. There is no "dream" when I am relying on Matt's guarantee. If he fails to deliver on his promise I will then take issue with his service.

                  I do have to admit though, it does come across as petty and jealous when you slam a service that has delivered on it's guarantee time and time again. Thank you for making everyone aware that the traffic stats you might get being at the bottom of page one can be quite low. For me as I stated before I view this page one ranking as a foundation to work from. You make it sound as though everyone is going to stop backlinking once Matt has completed his guarantee.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4496200].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                    Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post


                    I do have to admit though, it does come across as petty and jealous when you slam a service that has delivered on it's guarantee time and time again. .
                    Perhaps in your simplistic analogy (since you broke down its complexity for me) you can show me where in this thread I slammed a particular service or are you thanking and objecting to the stats at the same time? If not then give me the slamming quote from this thread of Matt's service. that would be even simpler if you could do so. Don't you think?

                    And no need to apologize. I just didn't think your analogy was good. You do and thats fine.
                    Here are my posts (to make it easier) before there was a claim about jealousy
                    #13
                    #27
                    #33

                    kindly point out any attack on Matt's service. I thought this was about services in general but once again a thread has been hijacked to be all about one provider.:rolleyes: Sheesh you point out a WELL DOCUMENTED STAT and you apply it to all services and because it doesn't not line up with what a guru is selling there is an incessant whine. I never mentioned Matts service AT ALL. I even referred to services that promise first page ENTIRELY different from his. Was that too complex?
                    Signature

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4496233].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
                      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                      Perhaps in your simplistic analogy (since you broke down its complexity for me) you can show me where in this thread I slammed a particular service or are you thanking and objecting to the stats at the same time? If not then give me the slamming quote from this thread of Matt's service. that would be even simpler if you could do so. Don't you think?

                      And no need to apologize. I just didn't think your analogy was good.
                      You certainly have a talent for deflecting from the main point of my posts. With that last one my main point was that you make it seem as though Matt's customers will stop backlinking once they reach page one and will therefore receive useless traffic forever. Perhaps suggest some ideas as a follow up to Matt's service that could help people rise higher on the first page. Maybe then I wont view your thoughts as so one sided and petty.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4496368].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                        Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

                        You certainly have a talent for deflecting from the main point of my posts.
                        I missed where you answered my questions about a quote where I attacked Matt's service. You have been around long enough to know how to do a quote. it can't be that hard to find a quote on a two page thread

                        What you view , think or feel has no relevance to me. I don' t care what you think is petty. A false accusation is a false accusation. whether you started it or joined in on it. I posted stats applying to click through rates and then the attacks and motive distortions started. says a WHOLE LOT when people get upset over REAL raw data being posted that they don't like.
                        Signature

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4496405].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
                          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                          I missed where you answered my questions about a quote where I attacked Matt's service. You have been around long enough to know how to do a quote. it can't be that hard to find a quote on a two page thread

                          What you view , think or feel has no relevance to me. I don' t care what you think is petty. A false accusation is a false accusation. whether you started it or joined in on it. I posted stats applying to click through rates and then the attacks and motive distortions started. says a WHOLE LOT when people get upset over REAL raw data being posted that they don't like.
                          Okay I'll play your game - You find where I said you slammed Matt's service in this thread. I said earlier that I've read up on this topic previously. You have made your opposition to Matt and Marc's service quite clear in previous threads.
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4496678].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                            Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

                            Okay I'll play your game - You find where I said you slammed Matt's service in this thread.
                            Which being interpreted means

                            "You are right mike but I can't be fair enough to admit it - you made no attack in this thread. so the claim of jealousy in this thread was pointless"

                            You have made your opposition to Matt and Marc's service quite clear in previous threads
                            You mean when I wrote that the service was good for what it is and the price was reasonable for what it did (or you just missed that post?) or when I said in THIS THREAD -
                            (but it does have value for some search results.)
                            since you swear this entire thread is about matt's service in direct opposition to what the OP wrote

                            or because I objected that Matt stated that all other traditional SEO should be ignored and I disagreed that PR N/As were better than HIGH PR 4,5,6?

                            How dare Mike disagree with what the whole SEO world disagrees with and knows is false

                            anyway you just basically admitted that there was no attack in this thread and you basically just inserted it into this thread to trump up your false accusations. My point has been proven and I can dismiss this back and forth. have a good night.
                            Signature

                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4496787].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
                            Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

                            Okay I'll play your game - You find where I said you slammed Matt's service in this thread. I said earlier that I've read up on this topic previously. You have made your opposition to Matt and Marc's service quite clear in previous threads.
                            Actually, I don't think anyone has really slammed Matt's service.

                            We have argued about comments Matt and Marc have made in regards to saying that a bunch of PR 0 and PR n/a .info sites (their network) have the same kind of ranking power as a network of sites with high PR. Or like when Matt said that quantity of backlinks will always beat quality of backlinks. Any professional SEO would find fault with that kind of statement.

                            Their network is what it is. They provide mass quantities of low quality backlinks. I say low quality based on the fact that the links are on mostly PR 0 and n/a .info sites and consist of nothing but auto spun unrelated PLR articles. I think they themselves would refer to that as low quality.
                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4496825].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
                              Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post

                              Actually, I don't think anyone has really slammed Matt's service.

                              We have argued about comments Matt and Marc have made in regards to saying that a bunch of PR 0 and PR n/a .info sites (their network) have the same kind of ranking power as a network of sites with high PR. Or like when Matt said that quantity of backlinks will always beat quality of backlinks. Any professional SEO would find fault with that kind of statement.

                              Their network is what it is. They provide mass quantities of low quality backlinks. I say low quality based on the fact that the links are on mostly PR 0 and n/a .info sites and consist of nothing but auto spun unrelated PLR articles. I think they themselves would refer to that as low quality.
                              Where I come from what you just said is a slam. Very gently worded but still a slam.

                              I can see that you two Mikes are of the same mind so I'll address you both. The system Matt is using is working to get people up Google's ladder. The arguments of having very little traffic at the bottom of page one and using low PR .info's to get there are outside of Matt's guarantee. What the individual does once the keyword has ranked is up to him or her. There are lots of good ideas at this point including one of the arguments you make and adding high quality links.

                              Why not use Matt's results to your advantage somehow. Start with the premise that whatever set up he currently has is working and go from there. If you can't do that then end your slams with "...but for some reason it works!"
                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4497929].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                                Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

                                I can see that you two Mikes are of the same mind so I'll address you both......... If you can't do that then end your slams with "...but for some reason it works!"
                                Sorry (actually not really just an expression) Mellisa but you are exhibiting an exceedingly low amount of intellectual honesty in that reasoning. I have slammed no one and you under the premise of us being of the same mind have tried to bind me to Mike's statements that you consider a slam. Poor form and you ought to be embarrassed. You couldn't find a slam of mine in this thread so you are trying to tie me into what someone else said. Now that is one sided.

                                As for the rest- I am not you. I have ranked sites number one not just first page. in the process whether you choose to admit it or not I know other ways (that i consider better) and that has been the source of my disagreement "in other threads". Face it. You are not A SEO and you do not understand the issues we disagree on . Plain and simple. But in this thread you found nothing that you are complaining about of me. You just didn't like me stating the stats on click throughs because you FELT like it slanted against your guru and your last attempt to bind me to what someone else expressed is all anyone needs to prove your extreme bias.
                                Signature

                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4498004].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author Rucco
                                  Holy Moly. Man I was going to post my review of Matt on the other "private network" thread that I read through the other day, only to find there's another thread of people bashing him like crazy.

                                  Here's the facts from just little ole' me. I don't know Matt. I hired him. I asked for a quick phone call with him, as my market is huge and I was looking to develop a relationship with someone who wanted to be a part of something huge. He denied. No problem. I liked the guy. I liked his attitude, his confidence. So I gave him a chance.

                                  10 campaigns and a few months later, I couldn't be more pleased. Not saying we're top dog for everything, we're not. But I've no doubt we will be. I have never had better customer support from anyone on any WSO aside from Chris Landrum and his Easy wp seo plug in which is awesome. I personally think much of what's offered here is pure crap.

                                  I make NO money from mentioning any of them, and don't care to. My niche brings me far more profit in residual income than likely many of you could dream of. I do not do anything in regards to internet marketing.

                                  Having owned a few successful companies, I can't help but see a common thread churned over and over again. And I see it now here yet again. Some people call it the Walmart effect. Like it or not, it's here and it works.

                                  There's the status quo of an industry, with people sticking to their fundamentals and defending them to the end. "They" have better processes, better tools, therefore they deserve a higher asking price.

                                  Then there's someone who comes up with a different approach, is hugely successful, provides incredible results with less expenses (Therefore they can charge less...i.e. win-win) and gets bashed to next Tuesday. Despite his success and his willingness to even share his approach (which he absolutely doesn't have to) he still gets bombarded with insults. He makes claims that he states are based on "his experience". And then he's attacked because "his experience" is wrong because it's different. Regardless of results or rationality. This place reminds me of Fox news sometimes.

                                  I used to own a high volume lawn mowing company. My crews mowed 45 lawns per DAY. My competition mowed that much per week if they were lucky. I got called a bull****ter, a lowballer, and everything in between. In reality all I did was find a better, far more profitable way. I didn't buy expensive trucks, equipment, gadgets galore like my competitors. I developed great advertising. I bought the bare necessities to get the job done well with the least expense on my part. My customers loved me. And the "other guys" were pissed at me because they wouldn't drop their trailer gate for less than $XXX per lawn. Silly, foolish pride and jealousy cost them a ton of money. I on the other hand sold the company for a beautiful profit and happily got out of the hot Texas sun. The owner has kept the same business model and quadrupled the business.

                                  I really see no difference here. Are there better ways? Maybe. But if a company is getting great results, at a great price with outstanding results should you really spend your time bashing that company? Last I checked that wasn't very profitable. It was only....Jealousy and ego.

                                  I personally don't care what the "Mikes" do. In fact I'll be watching closely to see if you'll somehow be a service that I could use. But in all reality in this case the best man will truly win. That's the one who realizes that business is simple. Just ask Walmart.

                                  Best wishes to everyone!
                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4498154].message }}
                                  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                                    Originally Posted by Rucco View Post

                                    I personally don't care what the "Mikes" do. In fact I'll be watching closely to see if you'll somehow be a service that I could use.!
                                    Nope you don't ever have to worry about that. what I offer you wouldn't be able to use and its not geared to be used by Anyone that thinks posting data and click through rates is useless or an attack. looking forward to you being top dog one day though. best wishes as well.
                                    Signature

                                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4498195].message }}
                                    • Profile picture of the author Rucco
                                      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                                      Nope you don't ever have to worry about that. what I offer you wouldn't be able to use.
                                      Mike since you edited your response I shall edit mine. I was truly sincere in stating that if your services could be of use to me I would consider them. If however you see me as no potential client then that's fine too. I don't really understand your edit though regarding posting data and such.

                                      Honestly in all reality guys, life is too damn short for all of this bickering. My best buddy's 11-year old daughter just got diagnosed with cancer I just found out. Got kids? Talk about perspective man. Just all do a great job for the people you're servicing and let the rest take care of itself. I hope all you guys do well as I have.
                                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4498212].message }}
                                      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                                        Originally Posted by Rucco View Post

                                        Honestly in all reality guys, life is too damn short for all of this bickering. .
                                        then stop bickering. what? you think when you falsely claim people are jealous or envious thats not bickering? Or that if you claim posting click through rates classify as attack that isn't bickering? same thing guy. Sorry to hear about your friends daughter. I hope she pulls through
                                        Signature

                                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4498374].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author mattlaclear
                    Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

                    My apologies for using such a complex analogy. The emphasis was on "building a foundation" site ranking that can be built upon. There is no "dream" when I am relying on Matt's guarantee. If he fails to deliver on his promise I will then take issue with his service.

                    I do have to admit though, it does come across as petty and jealous when you slam a service that has delivered on it's guarantee time and time again. Thank you for making everyone aware that the traffic stats you might get being at the bottom of page one can be quite low. For me as I stated before I view this page one ranking as a foundation to work from. You make it sound as though everyone is going to stop backlinking once Matt has completed his guarantee.
                    You can read more attacks from them on these threads too:

                    http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...s-help-me.html

                    http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...g-network.html

                    Same people making different attacks using any angle they can.

                    Kind of disruptive really. Wastes our time having to answer them. I thought keeping our word to Warriors was a good thing.
                    Signature

                    When it comes to SEO, there are zero dumb questions. Find the answers you need in our SEO FAQ section. If I don't address your question there, send me a pm and I'll answer it that way.

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4496246].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Melissa82
                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                  let us know know when you rank for any of those terms.
                  I will Mikes. I'll start a new thread!

                  Hey Matt L, regardless of what keywords your clients want ranked because it was them that chose the words, have you ever calculated what percentage of your clients rank to page one within say three or six months?
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4504267].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author mattlaclear
                    Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

                    I will Mikes. I'll start a new thread!

                    Hey Matt L, regardless of what keywords your clients want ranked because it was them that chose the words, have you ever calculated what percentage of your clients rank to page one within say three or six months?
                    That's why I think it is funny our competitors think we do not allow for tough keywords. We allow our clients to choose any 5 keywords of their choosing.

                    I haven't tabulated any type of percentages yet as to what the average times are overall.
                    Signature

                    When it comes to SEO, there are zero dumb questions. Find the answers you need in our SEO FAQ section. If I don't address your question there, send me a pm and I'll answer it that way.

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4504324].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                      Originally Posted by mattlaclear View Post

                      That's why I think it is funny our competitors think we do not allow for tough keywords. We allow our clients to choose any 5 keywords of their choosing.
                      Not a competitor but in their defense its funny because that originated with you

                      Originally Posted by mattlaclear View Post

                      Of course there are limits. Some folks take extremely greedy keywords and we reject them as they come in. Plus the tougher keywords take longer to rank for.
                      I admit it takes guts to tell people others are making up stuff when in your very own thread and Post #995 you said it point blank but it comes from things YOU have said..and said.......

                      Originally Posted by mattlaclear View Post

                      Don't be greedy with the keyword selection though. Otherwise I'll refund your money back so fast you won't even notice it leaving your account in the first place.
                      and um........said

                      Originally Posted by mattlaclear View Post

                      Now I'm telling you to hit the bricks. I have clearly stated that we either guarantee a page one ranking or we give an immediate refund if we think the keyword is being greedy.
                      and well err..... shucks..said

                      Originally Posted by mattlaclear View Post

                      If a keyword is too greedy I immediately refund the money back. SO take your chances.
                      It is funny though.Now if you have changed your policy thats fine but claiming they just pulled it out of thin air is false.
                      Signature

                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4504537].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author mattlaclear
                Originally Posted by Melissa82 View Post

                I have been reading the recent arguments so I do know what you are saying. My feeling is that for $99 I'm going to receive a foundation in the middle of a giant ocean from which I can build my dream home.
                Sorry for the attacks you received on this thread. The same three people continuously attack our customers when they recommend us on a thread.

                It's their strategy no doubt to try to carve up some recognition for themselves.

                I'd repay the favor but not once have I seen any Warriors come on a thread recommending their service.

                Classic debaters. Attacking vendors customers through sheer jealousy. Really unbecoming of a Warrior if you stop and think about it.
                Signature

                When it comes to SEO, there are zero dumb questions. Find the answers you need in our SEO FAQ section. If I don't address your question there, send me a pm and I'll answer it that way.

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4496177].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                  Originally Posted by mattlaclear View Post


                  Classic debaters. Attacking vendors customers through sheer jealousy. Really unbecoming of a Warrior if you stop and think about it.
                  :rolleyes: He has me on ignore and has no idea all i was objecting to was the unfairness of assuming people were jealous who disagrees with someone. I shared raw data about clickthroughs. If raw data is an attack then thats sad and unbecoming a warrior.
                  Signature

                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4496199].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jacob Cuculiza
    I would say that NO ONE can offer #1 page Google results and be 100 % sure to give it! What if 20 companies said yes to the same keyword.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4496262].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seoupdate
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4497957].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seoupdate
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4498038].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Removed. cannot even be bothered responding further to totally ridiculous arguments and derailing of the thread. Op asked how a NUMBER of different services could offer first page placement and the answer is simple

      Its not that hard to rank on the front page for some results. thats why a number of services do it successfully - not just one - no matter how that might hurt some people's feelings.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4498140].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author friendfeed
    Many peoples go for Black hat and many getting Bulk of Links from quality sites.So if we get to go with white hat then the site remains first page and if we follow **** things then we unable to get into first page.
    Signature
    Video Marketing for any Kind of Business.Tested and Approved .
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4504565].message }}

Trending Topics