Do you think Backlink Energizer is better then Nuclear Link Indexer??

by Banned 8 replies
10
I see NLI backlinks de-indexing quickly. On the other hand BE index backlinks for long term results. Are you experiencing the same thing? Or its just happening to me?

Which one is best?
#search engine optimization #backlink #energizer #indexer #link #nuclear
  • Your backlinks don't have unique content, that's why they are easily removed by Google. Go ahead and try this on all other indexer, the result will be the same. Think about this, if I'm Google, why do I want to put repeated junk in my index and let people search for it?

    What you need is Nuclear Link Crawler or Linklicious to crawl your low quality backlinks, at least Google know they are there and give you some credit... However, you'll still get more link juice if you are using any kind of indexing tool, including Backlink Energizer.
    • [1] reply
    • Banned

      Hi Kok okay I understand the backlinks were just spams and this is why I lost these even after indexing. But can you tell me how can I create backlinks to make sure these will be good enough to get google love and will be glued in google index for such a long time?
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Rafiseo instead of wasting time with links that are hard to get indexed you should just go about getting links that do get indexed.
      • [1] reply
  • Linklicious will get them crawled and getting them crawled will boost your SERPS..stop worrying about getting them indexed...that will happen naturally for a lot of them but shouldn't be your focus.

    Your wasting your time worrying about something you cant even get an accurate answer on and that isn't needed to increase your SERPS. Indexing HELPS your SERPS..it isn't required...worry about things that are required like "Getting your links crawled".
  • I've used BE for about 6 months now and I must say, I have my reservations about it. Sure it's helped me get a few back links indexed, but there's just something about the whole system that does't resonate when I consider Google's focus on quality content.

    To illustrate what I mean by this, let's use the example of wanting to get a profile link indexed using a BE Cluster in the 'Celebrity News' genre. So, we put our feeds in, BE does it's thing and does a post onto one of our web 2.0 or SHWP sites using content from some Celeb site's RSS feed. At the end of the post, BE drops in a couple of keywords with anchor text that hyperlink to the profile link we wanted to get indexed.

    Now, here's where things get a little tricky. The keywords that BE uses as anchor text for your links, will be something related to celebrities, let's say, a bunch of celebrity names for argument's sake. However, the links that you want to get indexed have nothing to do with celebrities (unless ofcourse the site you are building links to is a celeb site).

    SO, If you are still with me here, this is my concern: Won't Google get annoyed that you are consistently using celebrity related anchor text to point to a non celeb url??

    Just a thought...
    • [1] reply
    • As of right now we've seen no link between the content around a link and the results that that link will give you. For example, 10 high quality links may rank a long tail word - but they could be on car web sites or medical web sites. Both work equally well for ranking your sports site.

      That's not to say that this won't change in the future. We've just not seen any case studies or experienced any impact with any of our clients.
Join the discussion

Next Topics on Trending Feed