are you affected by Google Panda update Oct 13 2011

by 675 replies
806
Today i have noticed changes in google. It seems google is rewarding aged authority sites. Is there anybody else who observed this change?

Edit: Matt Cutts confirms it, http://twitter.com/#!/mattcutts/status/124905069748559872
#search engine optimization #dance #dropping #google #mentioned #noticed #page #serp #sites #today #update
  • [DELETED]
  • How do you know they were penalized for using a private blog network? I use a private blog network to give my websites a massive boost in the rankings and have yet to see a penalty for doing so.

    Noticed changes in Google? Google is CONSTANTLY changing. For some various keywords that I am not actively targeting I see constant fluctuations in the rankings. However, with keywords that I am purposefully targeting and WANTING to rank in the SERPs all I have seen is a rise.

    I have even seen a rise for some pages that I haven't actively promoted with backlinks, BUT I still want to rank for that specific keyword.


    -- Jeff
    • [1] reply
    • Today i have noticed 2 sites dropped a little. They both were using private blog networks as their main backlinking strategy.

      1 is hereshowtoloseweightfast.com the other is in mortgage niche. Yesterday it was ranking @ #1 for their main keyword but today it is @ #5.
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
  • No, not really, all of my sites are doing pretty well, I submit everything manually with unique content.

    You can out rank amazon easily if you know what your doing. Alot of those amazon listings are extensions.
    • [2] replies
    • Whether you use blog networks or link wheels the result will still vary on each sites. Some may be successful and others may not. I did a lot of case studies and still I'm not relying on those as I believe that SEO is uncertain.

      All we need to do is use white hat tactics and follow Google's rules for SEO.


      Jack
    • I agree; I see websites with only 10 backlinks rank out amazon.
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • [DELETED]
    • Hi,

      If you don't try to trick Google everything will be fine. In less than a month i jump on page 3 for a keyword that have 135.000 exact US searches.

      If you don't buy links, if you don't spam if you make all manual you don't have to worry about Panda Update.

      Good luck !
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • I have seen a significant drop in a few sites today. Other sites no problem and another site increased in ranking.

      We are all at the mercy of the Big G...
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Yes, all my sites have dropped in ranking; it's unfortunate, some were number 1, 2 and 3 for their main keyword. Seems I'm not the only one, if that's any consolation.

      My hope is that this is only temporary, since it seems to have affected many of us, and that the sites will bounce back.

      Anyone have more insights into this?
    • [DELETED]
      • [1] reply
  • yeah ive noticed the same thing with most of my sites, a lot of the main keywords have dropped out , being replaced by wikipedia and amazon. My other lsi keywords have dropped a couple of places too.

    Seems strange as these sites have unique and well written content and are pretty well established.

    as per previous posts id just stick with what you're doing and id expect them to bounce back sometime soon

  • Yes i should also say this even since last some days around 1 month i am experiencing major up and down my one keyword which was on 1st page went on 3rd than 7th and than no where in 100 but now its back on its position.
  • Hey guys,

    For some strange reason when I checked my niche sites today my top adsense site apparently fell from #2 to #10 over night for its main keyword, and then my top amazon site fell to the 2nd page for all 5 of its top performing keywords. these sites are completely laid out differently and the only thing similar between them is the backlink strategy.

    I dont get it, I never see my competitors bouncing around like this. It seems like if I leave the site alone for a while it will slowly climb then when I build some backlinks or add content to the site it will take a huge plunge sometime shortly after. I only build 1-2 backlinks to each site per day, if that.

    I build 90% of my backlinks with BMR and throw in some profile and blog links every once in a while. This is very discouraging, as I dont have many niche sites and planned on building 4-5 more over the next month but if they are this unpredictable then what is the point?
    • [19] replies
    • I had 3 sites go from #1-2 to #10+ overnight as well... Huge setback and disappointment.

      There must have been an update last night with the search alrgorithm.. so many other people are commenting on the update.
    • [DELETED]
      • [1] reply
    • The only sites that dropped were the ones I didn't use BMR on

      I consider a drop of 2-5 spots normal. I'm only concerned with my sites that went from top 3 to page 3.
    • I dont use BMR, but my sites are dropped too.
    • This has nothing to do with BMR or any other network.

      Geez, it's funny how people just start making things up without having any proof or evidence of anything.
      • [ 9 ] Thanks
      • [2] replies
    • [DELETED]
    • I've seen a few drops on some of my sites, but just like peterjames said, just keep adding content and continue to build links. Sometimes, you just have to ride out the storm.

      Eventually everything will come back together, and when it does, you may find out that your rankings are a bit higher than they were previously.
    • I seem to have got away relatively unscathed this time, but I'm investigating some 'suspects':

      -Avoiding having "tag clouds" which have allegedly fallen from favour, as they look too much like keyword stuffing..
      -Increasing encouragement of social media links and not relying so much on forum back links?
      - No follow on forum posts on your site that don't have replies... until they get replies?
      - Avoiding duplicate content - ie. where you publish blog posts, and also have published articles with some of the same content.
      - Avoiding having internal Search Results - which allegedly fallen from favour as Google wants to be the god of search?

      Anyone had any experience with any of these ideas? I'd be interested to hear?
    • All have experienced the same scenario. That's pretty normal because I'm doing some adjustments regarding on this update and finding it effective (but not 100% yet).

      I'm going to share it if I found out that it is effective. My site dropped almost 50+ in SERP but now its getting back on its feet again with a quite high level competition keyword.
    • Fight on and continue to add fresh unique content and build better quality backlinks and more backlinks.

      Analyze those websites that have moved up instead and what could be done to improve the affected websites.

      In addition, explore ways at which traffic could be driven from alternative means. For example, posting articles to document sharing sites always gives me a boost in traffic for awhile.

      Social book marking also helps a little.

      For income wise provide a service or sell a product to make active income while still build on your sites for passive income.

      Algorithm and system changes, it happens, don't give up
      • [1] reply
    • One of my sites dropped big time, from #1 - #5 spots for multiple keywords, all the way to deep google pages, like page 3, 4, 9, etc..
      This particular site was mostly promoted using web2.0, could be an indicator. Hopefully things will stable out.
      • [1] reply
    • [DELETED]
      • [1] reply
    • [DELETED]
    • Yeah my rankings dropped too. Not too much...one keyword from #1 to #2 (#1 is now wiki, which was #2 before). Another keyword went from #6 to #11. I'm seeing about a 40% drop in usual traffic today. Hopefully it's just temporary or else I'm going to have do a lot more work.
      • [1] reply
    • Looks like Google have another updates. I have all my sites drop in rankings and after few hours...2 of them recovered while the other 2 significantly drop until now.

      Google is doing a continuous experiment on the search results with their algorithm.

      Code:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5RZOU6vK4Q
      • [1] reply
    • i am also getting very few traffic today Like 1/3 for a normal friday. My site is in spanish, so the update also applied to other languages.

      I hope things come back to normal in the next days
    • [DELETED]
    • Strange.

      For one of my money sites, it was ranked in top three for many profitable keywords.

      Earlier this month I got quality backlinks from PR7, PR6 and PR 5 pages. I did it via sponsorship, not with private blog network, forum profile network, blog commenting and other usual stuff you know. And, there are not many links (less than 20) on the same page where my site is listed. I've actually got those links via personal connections. As mentioned, the links are high quality.

      Still this site got hit. My competitors, who used spammy link building tactics are ranked. higher.

      WTF?
      • [1] reply
    • I got caught up in a little bit of this as well. Sites that have been performing very well got hit a bit, still "on the map" though thankfully
    • Hey Guys-

      My sites just took a big hit too. I had multiple page one rankings on each site. Have 17 adsense sites. Here's what I've been doing. Maybe we can figure this out.

      Out of 17 sites, only 2 are still ranked in the top 3 positions of page 1 of google. The rest (including previously ranked subpages) have had their rankings drop from 1 page to 3 pages. They were previously on page 1 of Google. This all hapened today and today my adsense income dropped like a rock.

      So check this out. Over 2 months ago, I rebuilt these sites for Panda. They have between 18-30 pages of content. They have Google Adsense on them. Each page has a 1000 word article, a youtube video, an outbound link to an authority site and at least 2 pictures on each page. And i didn't put crappy $5 articles on the pages - I used a "real" writer and paid $30 for EACH article! - So I have quality content. So I'm having a problem believing that this was an ONPAGE Google update. But who knows!

      Regarding Backlinking: I've been a heavy user of ALN (Authority Link Network). That is the "free" High PR blog network. Other people on this thread have said they use different blog networks and are experiencing rankings drops today.

      Other than that, I use Web 2.0 blogs, press releases, PAD file backlinks, ALN, social bookmarks. I DO NOT use forum profile backlinks.

      When I look at the big picture it almost looks like if you have adsense on your site or affiliate links, you're getting penalized! Of course it's too early to tell, but in time we'll figure it out.

      All I can say is that i think we should all start to slowly move away from SEO. I think that within the next couple of years it will become impossible to "game" the search engines any longer. Google is getting smarter and smarter every day.

      For the past couple months I've been diversifiying online income away from Google - Have you?
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • It's a never ending battle in getting ranks higher and higher. A race too with many others trying to reach the top as well for the same keyword. I've had a site dance around when I first apply SEO to a dormant keyword. It started in a better place then went back, then eventually started to climb. It can be mind boggling with the SERPs. Google is one that seems to keep me on my toes. It always a challenge in trying to figure out the updates to the "T". If it was that easy we'd all be #1. Just keep building quality links and the rewards will flow.
    • Banned
      [DELETED]
    • Has anyone else noticed a very large drop in traffic today? I lost between 60 and 70% of my traffic on 4 different sites since yesterday. The traffic is usually fairly even, and always takes a dip on Friday - Sunday, but this is extremely unusual.

      They are in totally different niches, hosted on 3 different servers, at 3 different hosting companies. They are all different ages, 7 years, 2years, and 1.5 years old. I use Google analytics on two of them, and Sitemeter on the other two. Two are word press blogs, one is a static site built with a Yahoo site building tool, and one is a Moveable Type blog.

      I've seen this happen on single sites before, but this is the first time I've seen such a large, almost instantaneous drop on 4 sites at once, especially 4 sites with such disparate characteristics.

      None of them are really thin affiliate sites. One has over 600 pages, some of them quite long, of entirely unique and themed content, and one of the others has over 200 pages. I have noticed after a quick look at the analytics, that I lost a page or two for several keywords, but I haven't yet done an in-depth analysis.

      Anybody else notice a big drop today? I wasn't really affected by panda at all, so although this is not unheard of, it is definitely unusual for me.
      • [2] replies
    • Banned
      [DELETED]
    • 2 of my profitable sites are still ranking well on the serps for their main keywords. In fact, most of my sub keywords shot up to page 2 ( usually page 3-4). Here is what I did.

      - about 800-1000 words article
      - keyword density of 2.5% - 3%
      - each page links out to authority site & internal pages
      - backlinks from BMR to specific pages I want to rank.

      Google's main objective is to provide quality content when users do a search, so as long as we do what Google wants, it should be fine.
      • [3] replies
    • It could possibly be that some of the links you are using with BMR have been penalised and you are reaping some of that penalty
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • My health blog had one of it's best Google traffic days ever yesterday.

    It's an aged four year old blog that publishes only unique, original content and generates backlinks using guest posts and other bloggers linking back.

    My high traffic continued until the early hours of the morning (UK time) and then at 5am it took a right dive.

    See the attached screenshot showing my traffic by hour.

    I've updated my Market Samurai rank tracker and I have a mixture of about 40% of my target keywords losing ranking by 3-20 places, and 20% of my keywords going up in rankings.

    Unfortunately, all my #1 ranked keywords took a dive to the second page, and all the keywords that increased were in positions 20+ originally and only went up a few places, so they didn't reach the first page.

    I hope this update is temporary!

    James
  • Yep, noticed some changes in SERP. 1/3 down from #1-2 to #7-10, 1/3 not affected, 1/3 went from #4-6 to #1-4. Competitors are either gone or moved down a few spots. Hope this is not permanent.
  • [DELETED]
    • [2] replies
    • I can't see this as being permanent...makes no sense unless G has lost its mind. Sites in a lot of my niches getting completely jumbled.
    • Maybe Google wants to hammer home the message that SERP rankings are anything but stable, unless you are Wikipedia or Amazon.

      A lot of newbies think internet business is stable stuff.....Maybe 5 years ago it was so, but not any more.... In a single day, a lot of top rankings went poof......
      • [1] reply
  • Most of my websites dropped average 2-3 spots yesterday. Google definitely did something at the back-end.
  • although my main website (12 yrs age in competitive niche) dropped few places #4 to #9 but still i can see funny things happened, for example in one of my keyword #1 reserved as usual for brand name website and #2 guess what ? affiliate link ranked in #2 in very competitive KW with its CJ unmasked extension,
    i think (hope this is not a wishful thinking) this a temporary because this insane from big G makes no sense and the guys over there they are just updating there algorithmic data ....
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Looks like update is not done yet.
      • [1] reply
  • Depends on the niche. Google, IMO, has always given a slight preference to aged / authority sites in broad & competitive niches. I haven't seen any changes on my end. But I mainly focus on micro niches.
  • [DELETED]
  • No change over here, yet. All site's rankings are still down. Sigh. Revenue is about a tenth of what it would normally be. If this is temporary, how long, typically, do such shifts last before things bounce back?
  • I have noticed a change in my rankings also. Two of my top sites moved from #1 to #4 and #5.
  • One thing I noticed is that the sites that moved up for my keywords, are newer domains and they have only a fraction of the links and link diversity.

    I'm going to try adding more content on a regular basis for the next little while and keep building links. Hopefully it will even out eventually.
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      [DELETED]
      • [1] reply
    • Hi,

      There is not effect at our websites. All of our websites are working well and have same position
    • Banned
      [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Just from my sites, a lot of my EMD affiliate product sites were hit. Google seems to be bumbing the big product store sites up the serps.(another crackdown on Affiliate sites?) My adsense sites seem to have remained relatively the same.(knock on wood). Hopefully it is just a temporary shift and things will be back in a few days...(fingers crossed)
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • I've noticed a large change as well, and so far today, I have about 1/3 the visits I normally have for a Friday (it's 6:42).

      I googled my sites for their main keywords, and found they went from 1>2, 1>3, 2>9 and 3>8. These are sites that have held their position for over a year.

      So, something's up. The ads are paying fine, but the problem seems to be traffic.
  • Yep. Definitely an update. Lost a few #1 rankings in few sites, one site went from 100 visits to 14 visits.

    This is not the typical google dance.
  • My main KW has dropped from rank 6 to 27 overnight. My competitors still have their rankings on the first page. Really hope this is temporary...

    All my secondary keywords dropped completely off anywhere near the top.
    • [1] reply
    • Have your competitors been in the Top 10 longer? That's what I noticed for one of my keywords too...that I was the only one that dropped. But I also knew that I was the newest addition to the Top 10. I was #4, now I'm #11.

      My other keyword, #1, dropped to #2, with Wikipedia taking over the #1 spot.
  • A couple of my sites have gone down 1-2 positions and a couple other have moved up 2-3 positions. Anyone have any idea what kind of sites the update has effected?
  • I think this is definitely an update. The rankings on my new site started dropping last Thursday (it's Saturday morning right now in PH). Much like what was experienced by many of what I read here. The site is 2 months old, so I'm guessing that's not authority so it got a really massive hit. I already managed to get to 2nd page on a really competitive niche (I was very serious about this site) but right now all of my pages were gone in the Google rankings. Market Samurai can't even find a single page from 1000 search page results. T_T

    They are still indexed though, so I guess I'll try to work on it more for a few months and hope for the best.


  • I still need a little more data but this is what I am finding.

    1. High PR links got more value

    2. Link Diversity Counted for more - Multiple IPs, Multiple Anchors, Mix of Text and Contextual

    3. No Onpage Changes were noticeable

    4. Aged sites got valued just a little bit more
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [12] replies
    • Initial Effort,

      I definitely agree. We are seeing more value with high PR links.

      It was just a matter of time before Google started more and more looking at the COMPLETE link profile. The algorithm has improved, obviously.

      It is UNNATURAL to have a brand new site and 10 PR6s pointing to it. By the same token... it is also unnatural to have 10,000 forum profile links pointing to a domain.

      Gimmicks do work, but only temporarily.
    • How did you come up with these results so quickly? Can you provide any background to give your claims weight? Not trying to say you're wrong, just curious how you come to make these statements.
    • My sites were fine, (Which are thin affiliat/cpa/adsense sites)

      My brothers however who builds legitimate websites took a huge hit on 2 of his websites.

      One of his websites I personally did about 20-25 high PR guest posting contextual backlinks for over a months time to move up a couple spots jumped back 1 spot further then it was at the beginning.

      Another website (making $400 or more daily) completely disappeared.

      I can't make anything of it..
    • [DELETED]
    • Along with updating their algorithm, i think they may also be testing out new SERP formats - I just did a search recently and there were 20 results displayed on the first page as opposed to the usual 10! Anyone else see this too?
    • Im gonna have to agree with the OPs findings.

      I had sites that were cemented in the #1, 2 spots that were there for over 5 months. I never did any high pr backlinking, just some weird spammy things I picked up when I started making sites. They were there up until last night.

      The sites I did do high pr backlinking on, varied the link profile greatly and just generally did way better seo on, moved UP in the rankings... some went up +10 spots overnight (micro niche sites i'm building)

      Overall it looks like people who rely on spam tactics or just generally poor link building techniques are getting hit.. HARD.

      Spam comments, spam profiles, etc etc are all being de-valued and to be honest, I think some people are hurting themselves either in the long run or short run. Some people think getting 24624721477 xrumer links will put them ahead when in reality it'll set them wayy back.

      Anyways thats all my $0.02 so think what you want
      • [3] replies
    • [DELETED]
    • I have to disagree. I have a few sites that have some high quality, high PR links pointing to them (in addition to links from article directories, web 2.0 sites, social bookmarks and some directories), and some of these sites took a dip. I have other sites that stayed the same. Some sites are older, while others are more recently created.

      Either way, I just keep on trucking. Seems when I keep rolling along, things eventually come back to shape. Just gotta keep on building links and adding content to your website.
    • Very interesting. I saw this earlier today and didn't make much of it given none of my sites moved much if at all.

      THEN I went to check the SERPs and while I seem to have the same position, the competition has been shaken up massively... wow. I did some competitive analysis on a Guru to pick some of his niches when I started and he has lost his number 1s
    • After looking at quite a few sites that moved up and down in rankings after this update, I can come to one common theme among sites that went down in rankings: high ads-to-content ratio. Sites with lots of affiliate links and not a lot of content seem to have definitely taken a hit.
      I don't think the update has anything to do with high pr backlinks.
      • [1] reply
    • [DELETED]
    • [DELETED]
    • @raxr - I will disagree, we currently own the top slots for some keywords that get between 100,000 exact match searches to 5 million exact match searches per month. When I say top positions I mean 1 through 5. We have some sites with pop-up ads, exit pop-ups, 50 affiliate links on the homepage etc.
      • [1] reply
    • [DELETED]
    • [DELETED]
    • Well, my site is fairly new, about 2 months old but I thought I was building it right with good quality content and multi-tier linking. I was on 2nd page of Google for one of the terms I'm targeting, so I really thought I'm already getting there. Then suddenly, the site and all of the pages got kicked out of the rankings. Can't even find it within the 1000th results.

      The site is not spammy on ads in any way. I don't even have Adsense on it because I would like to use Adsense only after the site is getting enough traffic - which it did not get to have.

      The site does not have high PR links yet. Aside from being unnatural, I'm not into that point yet in my link building activities.

      So there, with this 1 site I think Google punished me for being very new to the game and having no high PR links. My only plan right now is to keep adding content as I always have and keep building links as I always have too - maybe even get into building high PR links.

      In my mind, I haven't done anything wrong so if this does not correct itself within a few months, I will have to reboot everything and maybe will be left a little discouraged about the system. I guess in a way, that's the comfortable thing about being new.
    • <rant>
      I'm completely screwed! Lost all my rankings, earnings! Feels like i was struck by lightening. I hate this BS! Dammit And Hey! Matt cutts and all his gay buddies and nerdy engineers, can now go back and play with their dildos, as the algo update is over and people are screwed to death!
      </rant>
    • Strangely none of the THIN one or two page EMDs i bought for backlinking my resort site, and I mean most of these have like 10 backlinks dropped at all, and I at least have 10 of these sites

      is there a theme like , most of the sites that dropped for you guys are product theme sites?
      I mean that kind of defines the site as an affiliate site, even without the product links being there
      • [1] reply
  • Its an update. A lot of my sites have dropped 2-3 places. Some results for my keywords have funny results. I expect another rumble before the final settle(if you know what I mean).

    From the horse's mouth
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • My update:

      It seems my main keywords which lead to the home page of the sites are intact, maybe lost 1-2 spots but no more....but one of my sites which brings good money suffered when all my inner pages and sub-keywords got hit bad that I can't find them anywhere and they were on page 1 prior to the update.

      Ideas now that we know this was an update? Keep building links and adding content as before??

      Thanks...
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • From $100/day to $13 today!
    I hate this game!
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Big drop there. Not easy to build up to $100.

      That's why it's called a GAME....

      Adsense-SEO game is strictly for those who like torturing themselves.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [DELETED]
  • Have noticed a few changes but nothing major,if you keep building quality links and adding decent content you wont have anything to worry about,yes they do fluctuate but if you want to stay up at the top you have to remember SEO is a ongoing job.
  • Google has always rewarded aged sites, but now it becomes more apparent as it punishes those that attempt to get high rankings too quickly, and unnaturally
  • [DELETED]
  • Today one of my keywords (I guess you'd call it my main keyword) for which I have an exact match domain came back. It had been 6th, then dropped to 27th yesterday and now today is 2nd. However I was ranking top page for two other keywords as well and these are nowhere to be seen.

    However, I do notice many other sites rankingwell that I've never seen before. They have exact match domains for the keywords.
    It doesn't make sense that this update would give more weight to exact match domains, because that could mean very low quality sites ranking well more reasily and undermining a lot of hard work by google thus far.

    Awaiting further information...
  • I saw deeply into what is happening atm. I looked up some of the kw [ that has the potential to make more than 100 dollars per day] in google and find that some of the sites ranking at the top that were using adsense got hit. Their competitors who were not using CPC came up. I guess this is a war against sites that use CPC for monetization. On the other hand, i am sure not all sites that use CPC will get hit. Only those that fit a profile G has in mind.
    • [1] reply
    • That's Pure BS!
      To me it looks like a random update to confuse webmasters with what exactly works and what doesn't when it comes to SEO. And that is all done to stop people putting their efforts on SEO and start buying their PPC crap!

      "Hey! Shopping and holiday season is on the door, let's screw some webmasters and force 'em to use PPC.":rolleyes:
  • Yeah SERP has decreased! Now I'm adding more quality content to all sites. Let's see
  • 1) People that are saying Google is penalizing sites that use Adsense need to take a step back and get away from the crack pipe. That makes absolutely no sense. They may be penalizing sites that are similar to the MFA sites from 5 years ago, but to think that they are penalizing sites simply because they use GOOGLE's OWN ADVERTISING PROGRAM just doesn't hold water. That is G's primary revenue source, and they are far from stupid over there in Happy Valley.

    What I've noticed:
    Lost major traffic on 5 of the 8 sites in my main portfolio. One site that has been getting over 250 visitors a day for years is now getting about 50, and one that was getting over 300 is now getting about 40. These sites have very little in common. I've used a different backlink profile on them. Some I've used both SEOL and BMR on, some of them one or the other, and others neither one.

    3 are WP blogs, 1 is a MoveableType blog, and one is a static site built with a Yahoo Sitebuilder tool. They are hosted at three different hosting companies, on 4 different servers, and are in 4 completely different niches.

    Age is between 7 years and 1.5 years. One has over 12,000 natural backlinks and I've not used any of the backlink networks on it. That site has over 600 pages of totally unique content, and has links to it from several big name authority sites, such as The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post, although these are a few years old. That site has also not been updated in a long time. Tracking is Sitemeter.

    One of the others has over 200 pages of unique, high quality content, with images (but no video). It is over 2.5 years old, and has a fairly high bounce rate, but an average time on site of over 4 minutes, which is very high. It went from over 300 visitors a day to 75. That one I've used BMR and SEOL on, in addition to plenty of natural link building.

    I use no forum or other profile links for backlinking on any of my sites.

    I really see no correlation between the amount of content, site/domain age, backlinking profile, monetization, etc.

    One of my WP blogs that has only about 50 pages, but all high quality content, saw very little effect. It has plenty of affiliate links on it, and I've used BMR and SEOL on it, in addition to lots of natural link building. It's been getting over 300 uniques a day, and it still looks to be doing so. I haven't posted on it since December 2010, however.

    Yes, it sucks, and hopefully for smaller marketers they are not giving an edge to the larger, Fortune 1000 sites with well established brand names, but we'll just have to wait and see how ti all shakes out.

    I would suggest getting a hold of a copy of Google's 2011 Handbook for Manual Reviewers and looking at exactly what they want their human reviewers to rank sites on, then do exactly that. Here is an interesting blog post from Pot Pie Girl, where you can find a link to download it. She makes a number of other interesting observations about Google's algo updates as well.
    Google Algo Changes and Google Manual Reviews - How It Works | PotPieGirl.com
    • [ 5 ] Thanks
    • [4] replies
    • Why would you say adsense is their primary revenue source? It is NOT. They make most of their income through ads shown on search [ not through the publishers ]. As for the recent changes, i am not saying every site using adsense is prone to get hit. I suspect those that use above the fold ads have higher chances of getting hit. That is just my opinion.
      • [1] reply
    • Steve,

      I had the exact same experience. My four biggest earning sites were all hit hard, and three of them had very little in common (two of them were fairly similar). One was a squeaky-white SBI! site with lots of pictures. Another was built out of an old micro niche site that had been doing especially well.

      What I've noticed from what people are saying is that there seems to be no pattern at all to what happened. One of my sites should have absolutely aced any manual review, but got hit. People have had micro-nice, authority, young, old, grey hat, white hat, outlinking, not outlinking, adsense, non-adsense, etc. sites all slammed. There just seems to be no pattern, and I have no idea what to fix.
    • My portfolio is very diverse as well, and use HTML/WordPress/Joomla. Most got hit (mostly small hits....a few bigger ones). When you add them all up, it is BIG.

      The only ones that were not touched were EMDs, and those NOT monetized at all. Yes, I have sites I make not for money.....strange as that may seem around here.

      Google seems to have valued EMDs perhaps even more, with this nonsense update. Considering most EMD sites are nonsense....

      All those that were hit have one thing in common - monetization.

      People who cannot understand why would Google hit Adsense sites really do not understand ALL the motivations of Google and other huge global companies....and should not sneer at those who suggest so, because strange as that may seem, Google is not all about the money, as I've said before.

      And for someone who has sites with no monetization, I can understand why. Google definitely has their own agendas. Just (one) agenda can be seen here - Google.org - Google Technology-Driven Philanthropy

      I'm willing to bet very few guys here even know about this. Google does not promote it at all.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply

    • This little site with 9 high quality unique articles survived every Panda update... never thought I would see this day. That little site was as white hat as it gets. That's why I don't waste time building these large sites, but micro niche sites. Seems like this update has no regard for whatever you do whether it's white hat or black hat, so it's not clear what Google's main objective is so far.

      Still accessing the situation... and what the next course of action should be. What are the new rules now? I really thought I had SEO figured out, damn. Any statement from Google?
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Ran my reports this morning and about gagged on my coffee. The traffic was down across the board. My webiste are very diverse and many are 7-8 year old authorty sites that get a steady flow of fresh content that's all real deal. I don't use writers and most of my websites are about my areas of knowledge.

    I went and checked a few serps and many of my #1 are now #5 or 6. Nothing disappeared nor got de-ndexed. My websites are diverse as you can get on different categories, format, location, and linkng.

    Based on about an hour of analysis I see no one or even a couple of common factors.

    I've been through this many times and I just continue to do what I do since I have no idea what the cause is at this point. Traffic down by 2/3, same with revenue.

    I'm still on the frontpage so there is hope the websites will recover, but who knows.

    I'm going forget about it for today and go on with my work and play.
  • Looks like my thread my merged, I also like how someone is reusing the heart image I made. Good stuff.

    But my sites were relatively untouched as I described. I am very pleased with this update.
  • [DELETED]
  • Many people are running around like a chicken with their head cut off looking for answers as to why their sites got slapped in this last Google update. I completely understand, having a site/sites that you've put tons of work into get pushed down in the rankings is a terrible feeling and can be financially crippling, I have, and I constantly do experience this first hand.

    The Reality

    - Many Google SERP changes are there solely to help hide their algorithm.

    They will push pages around to ensure that there is no absolute way to game rankings. Even if your page is aged and backlinked well. This has been a main job of Panda. Its not always that theres anything wrong.

    - Panda's rules are there because thats what Google would like your site to be, its not necessarily what panda looks at though

    Comparing sites with many colleagues over all the different Panda algos has left many of us with the same conclusion. The rules Google has told us will keep us safe are just their way of trying to get us all to "fall in line". Many great sites that follow every rule that Panda should like and reward, get penalized, just like many sites that break all rules stay at the top. Panda doesn't do what Google tells us it does.

    - The rules are highly subjective as to keep us guessing and to give Google an excuse as to why sites were punished

    With the rules set in place Google could make an argument that any site in the world could or should be penalized. Google could claim Apple.com has too much duplicate content, or pages with too little content if it wanted to.

    - Don't kill yourself looking for answers

    With any SERP change your site can come back in a few weeks and never be penalized again. On the other hand you may constantly be in a back and forth swing... who knows.

    When it has been stated publicly that the algorithm has elements built in to keep you guessing, then trying to look for answers like 1 + 1 =2 is pointless. For site A, 1 + 1=2 about 90% of the time but for site B 1 + 1=2, 20% of the time. Its no fun for us but its how these things work.

    It is what it is. SEO is a wild ride. To sustain a living, my advice is to have many different sites. Also developing a few tricks up your sleeve never hurts also.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • Let's use the tremendous wisdom and experience on this forum to figure out EXACTLY what Google changed in their algorithm in the Halloween Massacre SERP update. Admins, please don't lump this thread in with the "Anyone Noticed Changes In Google SERPS" discussion that is mostly just people complaining.

    Post what you know that can help this effort! If you have five sites that went down and five that weren't, please post EVERY DETAIL about the differences that you can think of.

    Please post DETAILS of your experience and lets see if collectively figure this out. I'll keep this list updated as more people post.

    FACTS:
    1. There was a wide reaching algorithm update on October 14th at around 2am.
    2. The change was confirmed by Matt Cutts via a Tweet, although not the wide reach.
    SPECULATION:
    • [5] replies
    • One of my sites got affected [say site1] while the other [let us call it site 2] did not. Actually, the traffic for site2 is up 400 percent.

      Here are the differences:


      site1:
      1. monetized with CPC
      2. crap comment links
      3. decent content

      site2:

      1.not monetized yet
      2.has only a few links [just directory submissions]
      3.excellent content created by experienced professionals in the field [not professional writers]
    • My Experience:

      Site #1:
      One of my oldest and best sites was hit with now 50% lower traffic. I had done very little backlinking on this site other than some social media and manual blog commenting. It has about 600 pages of manual high quality content and is regularly updated. Many keywords that were ranking #1-3 are now ranking #3-7 instead.

      What I noticed is that the few pages that have diverse external backlinks mostly maintained their positions. Pages with nothing other than internal backlinks dropped dramatically for their targeted keywords.

      The site had Google Analytics and an approx 50% bounce rate, as it was heavily targeted to driving people off the page to Amazon.

      Sites #2-5:
      The sites used for my backlinking experiment all increased in value FOR THE MAIN PAGE that had 90% of the backlinking for the keyword that had been backlinked. All the other pages that relied on internal links and had no backlinks dropped dramatically. Almost all long tail keyword traffic due to on page factors died.

      Sites #5-10:
      Similar as the others, pages with external keyword focused backlinks regardless of the quality of the links (profile, blog comment, etc) stayed about the same, pages that had no external backlinks are no longer getting long tail keyword love.
    • [DELETED]
      • [1] reply
    • The feedback I have read seems to say its more about high PR backlinks or having deep varied backlinks, and if you did not you got booted

      then again some people insist thats the reason they got booted and google was targeting high PR backlink networks
    • Hey! I was one who started one of those threads... and I wasn't complaining I was wondering about an observation and wanted to know if anyone else was experiencing the same thing.

      But... to carry on there...

      We have two sites that are both very old... ten years old. Get good traffic, lots of backlinks from both relevant and non-relevant websites all over the internet.

      Interestingly, site #1:

      The other day, Google Webmaster Tools was reporting about 18,500 backlinks. Today, Webmaster Tools is reporting a drop of about 1,000 backlinks.

      Ranked highly on Google.CA and on .COM (searches within Canada) for major search terms in the site's niche up until two days ago. Didn't check yesterday, but Analytics shows a drop of 50% traffic from what is normal, yesterday.

      Today, those same searches show site #1 on page two for those search terms, however some locations such as Vancouver BC, some search terms are still showing on page 1, but further down.

      Some of the new sites on Page 1 of google are a bit odd to me. An online store for one, that has little content. As well, some brands in the niche that have always been on page 2 or 3 for this search term now occupy spots on page 1.

      My site has TONS of content that has been built up over ten years. It is quality content.

      Originally, it was a "directory" and "content" site, but with more of a focus on content.

      What I have recently done:

      Removed many of the outgoing links to other sites (over time, many of them had become dead so two weeks ago, I did a major clean up of those).

      Added a new business directory as a subsection of the site, which added about 10,000 pages to the website.

      Done some heav(ier) backlinking in the past month.

      Cleaned up some duplicate meta descriptions that I discovered.

      Interestingly - as I began to do this work, my site increased it's rank on page 1 for the major search term. Appeared I was doing everything Google was wanting me to do.

      This site does have a lot of Google Adsense on it - we've used the maximum number of adblocks per page. If I don't, I keep getting messages from Google that I am "missing out on opportunities" - but I'm thinking that this is why my site took a big drop.

      But if that is the case, it's odd that one part of Google is encouraging me to use the maximum number of Adsense blocks, while the other part of Google is penalizing me for that.

      At this point, I'm thinking I'm just going to wait a couple of days and see what happens - I've seen situations like this with other web properties I have where they take a sudden dip, and then come back even stronger in the SERP's than before.
    • seems like google is really emphasizing on content quality over quantity. somewhere i read that Google is now giving less importance to bounce rate. but i have experienced exactly opposite of that.
  • @FBGuy: I'm no SEO expert, if you find something (like what the change was exactly), please do let us know. Much thanks.

    *sigh* just when I started to figure out opt-in forms and consistent blog posting.

    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Here is overview of my site that got hits and its written really well because I'm hiring professional writer to write content to make sure that visitor will gets what they are looking for and since lot of website reviewing my site organically so I don't make any backlink for the site and it was there on position one for year. But now drop like a stone



    This one is really poor site that made for adsense and I only have couple article for this site and If I were visitor I will close the website in a second because its pointless site. For backlink I use spammy trick. but see the spike of the traffic.



    So this statement is really true

    When it has been stated publicly that the algorithm has elements built in to keep you guessing, then trying to look for answers like 1 + 1 =2 is pointless. For site A, 1 + 1=2 about 90% of the time but for site B 1 + 1=2, 20% of the time. Its no fun for us but its how these things work.
  • For no reason other than to join in on the global self commiseration... here is what happened to one of my sites I had been building up for nearly a year....

    img822.imageshack.us/img822/1680/trafficdrop.jpg

    300-400 per day down to 40-50 per day - with Adsense earnings following suit.

    Thank you Google, though you simply run a search engine and we have no reason to expect free traffic from you, I still want to kick you in the nuts.

    Commiserations all, I'm off to drink a lot of beer.
  • I have a product review that has been ranking at #1 for a year at least, practically since the item came out... Lots of traffic to it etc...

    Overnight, 2 Amazon listings + 2 lousy Youtube Videos outrank my long review.

    I wonder if they're penalizing or 'disliking' pages with affiliate links.
  • Woah I thought my main site was just experiencing the Google dance but it may be something more. One of my sites also saw a drop in rankings and earnings as well -_-. Most keywords dropped 10 spots and a couple past 50+. This sucks cause I was experiencing my highest earning days this week. Hope it just temporary.
  • Same hing has happened to my UK domain. Was sitting nicely at #1 for google.co.uk dropped to 7 and jumped to #3 for google.com I picked it up with big drop in adsense earnings cos drop in placement. really hope it is temporary
  • I've recently experienced the same thing ... I went from #8 to #175 for my main keyword on Google.com ... but on Google.ca I'm at #1! (which I think is actually an increase of a couple of spots, but I haven't been watching it closely as I only get a trickle from .ca vs. com)

    Also my site is a .US so obviously it should be aimed at the .com/US market.. eh? (domain whois is in the US too...)
  • I would like to know if the dropped domain is dead no chance to recovery ?
    should we better start new domain from the very begining that make me crazy.
  • Calm down people. This is just a phase
    • [1] reply
    • Easier said than done. There are some of us that are making $xxx to $xxxx per day. This means that every day that passes, we miss out on that income.

      I, myself, am not panicking yet. I'm just going to sit tight for a few days and let things settle. Then, I'll plot a course of action.
  • Well my 5 biggest sites got a left hook from Panda 2.5
    First time I've noticed any Panda related effects since February.

    These are all quality, authority sites. Tons of long, unique and well written content you can't find anywhere else.

    The main keywords on each site haven't budged. These are all 100,000 to 250,000 Exact Match.

    All of the thousands on long tail keywords i used to rank for are now gone. That's 60% of my traffic!

    What the frack does Google want?

    I have other thin affiliate sites that weren't affected. One good example, is a 5 page site, 200 words each -- Making $150 per day with adsense. What the ****?
    • [8] replies
    • Banned
      [DELETED]
    • so google doesnt want us to rank for long tails now? unless we backlink the crap out of them? how to do that on so many longtails?
      • [1] reply
    • Nothing is safe anymore on google...I think facebook is changing the google way to rank sites,facebook is getting more and more traffic and Google is trying to get this traffic back ranking different sites on the top, if not working in few weeks they change the first page again, maybe your site will be back if the one is on the top doesn't bring views and traffic and they're spinning like that all the time.
      Does it matter if you have quality content?

      Yes it does in fact they swap the first spot with another quality site, it can be just to test or permanently.

      How you SEO the whole thing?
      • [1] reply
    • All that makes me wonder:

      Is worth make an authority sites nowdays????

      Just imagine the money you will spend on articles,backlinks and time and Google slaps the whole thing out to nowhere.
    • I have a great answer. I pay my copywriter hundreds of dollars (she writes for huge magazines like Vogue and Elle.). You need QUALITY content. Nobody want's to read some stupid article that your cheap asian writers wrote in 5 minutes (no disrespect). I have seen HUGE increase in traffic the last 48H while everyone else has been dropped from the serps.. Dp you REALLY think it is strange that huge brands like Amazon are ranking higher than you?.. C'mon think... THINK.... I love it that google focuses more on large companys and great WRITERS. The days of "get rich quick" are over. You need to INVEST in your online business.
      I love it.
      • [2] replies
    • Well that's great for her.

      The point is here, I'm competing with the likes of eHow, some random Wikipedia writer, Amazon product pages, outdated pages from the 90s and early 00s, and thin MFA sites with 500 words or less of content.

      My content is better and more helpful to the reader by a good mile. Why is google giving it to these big brands and thin sites ? The fact that the thin MFA sites are ranking throws a wrench in your whole thing about google favoring big brands with "professional writers".
      • [1] reply
    • Btw Google doesn't rank YouTube over you. Google ranks YouTube videos related to search query. If you search for how to do something than Google will consider if video should be an option. So that means you should make a YouTube video or any video. Google doesn't rank YouTube they rank content from Y youTube. YouTube is user created content so they are still ranking your content not YouTube persay. Your argument that Google will rank YouTube over "your" content doesn't make sense. YouTube is "our" content.
    • I figure, the best way to beat out the updates or whatever people think is going on with they're website is to keep building high quality backlinks and keep adding some new content to your websites each week.

      Getting ranked highly in Google is kind of like a battle, you gotta keep fighting if you want to win.
      • [1] reply
    • Interesting discussion, Panda affected some and some it didn't. That basically covers what i just read there.

      And some random trolled some people for a while, then quit.

      Me thinks Panda will affect some and miss some nearly every time it comes out because everyone is doing things differently with different sites so it should never affect everyone as a whole. Relax, be patient and work out how to get around it like everyone else will.

      Until next Panda...
  • Why don't you make your whois private then?

    I don't see this pattern with affiliate sites being hit. I wasn't hit, and my site is an Amazon affiliate site. My newest site went up from rank 35-40ish to 15 overnight. It's also gradually going up as we speak, but I also have a 2500 word review on it rather than the usual 500-word review.

    A few of my competitors were hit, but most of them are still there.

    Also, number of affiliate links shouldn't matter since I have 3 or 4 per review. If anything, it might be words per # of affiliate links though.
    • [1] reply

    • That makes more sense
      put 150 word review with 5 affiliate links ....ummmmmmm spammy

      1000 word review with 1 or 2, that might fly under the radar
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • We have two sites over five years old (1 is 9 years, the other 10 years old) that have been both affected.

      For relevant search terms on the 10 year old site, the top three on page 1 are still the same. The balance of the page 1 results are kind of twisted and bizarre. One of the beneficiaries is a small online shop with little content, and their product is actually a sub-niche of the niche.
      • [1] reply
  • Since the recent update to PANDA, I and many others have seen lost rankings...I think we need to update our pages.

    I would really like some opinions on the following observations and add some more that I have left out?

    1/ Now need more words for an article..I think 650-1000 words is now optimum. And of course it still needs to be relevant and high quality.

    2/ Having one less than optimum page on your site will now hurt your whole site. ie: a post that is thin with quality or a page with an affiliate offer that is in your face without much useful information will hurt your whole site.

    3/ Having outward links to spammy or bad neighborhood sites will harm your whole site. But having links (dofollow) to high quality authority sites is GOOD

    4/ There has always been debates about duplicate content, but now there seems to be no doubt that it will harm your site. Scraped content, bad spinning etc..equals VERY BAD

    5/ Speed of your site now counts for more..(having one slow page could harm your whole site)

    6/ Certain niches are now being penalized..ie: **** Berry, male enhancement, get your ex back, and more...(over saturated niches)

    7/ Single keyword targeted sites will also now be penalized..that means google sniper sites etc

    8/ High bounce rate pages will also affect your rankings more than it used to.....

    Is there anything I have left out? Do you agree or disagree with the above?
    • [9] replies
    • That's silly. Maybe your sites in those niches got hammered, but Google is not going to penalize the entire niche. They have to show something for those searches.

      So if someone searches for "**** berry", they are going to show results for what?
    • Banned


















      • [ 5 ] Thanks
      • [2] replies
    • Banned
      I'm here to tell you I've tested 100% duplicate sites/content & still ranking #1.

      Matt Cutts isn't looking out for you.

      BTW, I'm suggesting anyone copy a sites/content you don't have any rights to.

      If it's public domain, you can copy it all day long, just do your own public domain research.
    • I did not just make those point up you know....

      I have gathered those points from several articles written by very experienced internet marketers....and they have come up with these theories through testing...

      Just because a site using scraped duplicate content, thin pages with few words, a high bounce rate and loads slow is still ranking well...doesn't mean the points I raised are not valid..... just means the better quality sites haven't filtered thru yet I reckon.

      Have a read of these articles where I got most of these points from....(the potpiegirl one is all about those saturated niches).

      Bottom line: Google is constantly changing its algo so that the searches result in better quality, more relevant pages are being found...so sites and pages that are still ranking well that lack that quality will eventually filter down the serps allowing room for the better quality sites to come thru...and all those points I made above amount to better quality so makes sense to me...

      To rtailor...no your site will not be penalized for someone stealing your content as long as that original content was indexed on your page first.
      • [2] replies
    • Yes..okay..I agree with you that quality information is not just words...but from what I have read, it seems to be the general consensus that since the recent panda update late last month...the quantity of information plays a bigger part to its overall quality...so that if you had a page that only had one article (say 500 words) and one picture and that's it..and it was ranking well...but then it fell in the serps..then a good idea might be to make that article longer (say 1000 words) and even (like you say) add some other stuff like a video and another picture or a graph...and it might pop up again.

      So what i was really trying to say..is that if your site IS about text...then more of that text is better...

      As for other pages affecting your whole site..well I find that hard to believe too but that's what they're saying....

      But the whole reason I put this up is too see what everyone thinks because I don't know..I am only going off what I have read ...I need to do something to the pages that I lost serps in and if everyone agrees with those points then I would apply them..if not..well..what was it then?
      • [1] reply
    • Analysis of first page on average, has over 1000-1200 words of content. Not an opinion but results of large sample size meta analysis conducted by respected researchers. How you use that information is on you.
    • I disagree with a number of different points. Though, #6 definitely stands out. Google is definitely not going to penalize an entire niche. it makes zero sense at all.
      • [1] reply
    • I'm just in a thread someone posted he have content of 500 words which word cost $10 dollars... 500 word = $5000 per article he found this lady making content for big magazines and hired her for all this crazy money and he said he just put amazon link after the content and he makes thousands of dollars per day.

      Please don't follow yukon strategy 10 words content, that makes me laugh he probably is a great IM with a lot experience on find easy keywords to rank.
    • I'am not shure!
      Website CoolNailsArt - Nail Art - Nail Art Pictures - Nail Art Gallery - Cool Nail Designs and Nail Art have 5# position with keyword nail designs (about 80.000 searches per month). Website haven't any good content.
      I have website with good content (500 word articles) which was on top 5 position, but now is droped on 20 to 25 positions.
  • This is all sand in your eyes folks, from Google.

    The real deal is what happened to Amazon.com the last week of September, and first two weeks of October.

    They got an early Christmas!!!

    Check this out: Amazon.com Site Info

    Compare the "Reach" and the "Search %" tabs... Search went down, total traffic way up, almost like last year's Xmas season...

    I predict many of our sites will get back to "quasi normal", but Amazon will have an awesome Xmas season... starting right now.
  • I don't believe it is because of Adsense and other ads.
    I don't even have Adsense on my site!
    About 2 to 3 links only to an Amazon affiliate offer throughout the whole site - that's it.
    But all pages are nowhere to be seen on serps... but still indexed, that's for sure.
    I hope this helps the experts crack this down.

    From what I read, I can only conclude to myself that this is Google's way to test me and my website. I guess I just injected some positivity on that statement but I sincerely hope all of those affected in here can recover back soon.
  • I just found this thread today and I'm thinking "Whew! At least it's not just me..."
    3 days ago I just had my all-time highest daily income and 2 days later my earnings drops by 90%! !@#$%^& GOOGLE, MY FAMILY'S GOTTA EAT!!! (Sorry, I just had to shout that out somewhere and where better than here LOL) I wonder why IMers go crazy over SEO. It's all so volatile and others are right when they say we are completely at Google's mercy. But I'm a firm believer that what doesn't kill you only makes you stronger. So I'm doing to continue what I've always been doing with seo BUT I've also learned my lesson and will start on other projects that don't involve G^^*&%$#$#!!!
  • Banned
    same it is happening everywhere, even if the authority site is not really even targeting the search. I personally like it alot as a authority site owner
    • [1] reply
    • Becker,

      I've been following your blog and you and/or Alex are using BB, right? Have your BB sites been affected at all by this most recent update? Because I've been using BMR and all my top authority sites have dropped huhuhu

      JB

  • And while we're on the subject of SEO, can you guys help me out with this thread:

    http://www.warriorforum.com/main-int...-software.html

    It's been nagging me for weeks now, I'll even paypal anybody $5 who can give me the right answer LOL
  • I am looking at a Google search for a toy with 2 Adwords ads at the top of the page: Amazon and eBay,

    that page ALSO includes Amazon and eBay Adwords ads along the right-side of the page

    (yes, they are allowed to double-their ads)

    and of course Amazon and eBay are doing quite well in the SERPS.

    That is 6 top listings for Amazon / eBay. Actually 8, as eBay has 3 SERP listings on the first page.

    Takeaways:

    Buy stock in Amazon and eBay.

    Your affiliate business is being destroyed.

    But you may want to sell on Amazon and eBay.

    If you can no longer compete in SEO against Amazon / eBay by having better content, or more specific page backlinks, or longtail keywords, then it is close to checkmate for a massive chunk of traffic.

    How are you going to get a higher search ranking?

    Get your own trusted PR9 site with tens of millions of pages and backlinks? That sells products and is not an affiliate site? Good luck.

    .
    • [1] reply
    • I'm seeing some evidence of what you are talking about but it is not across the board. Some non AMazon, Ebay and other commerce powerhouse are in fact outranking the biggers sites. However not so much affiliate pages or MFAs (Where I am looking anyway).

      Still too early to say but it does appear like this either indirectly or directly targets those kinds of sites. The problem is if that holds up Google won;t be adjusting it too soon because a lot of the times the searcher actually does want to get straight to where they can buy especially if you take into account we are in the Christmas retail season.

      IF (big if) things hold out that way then might have to reevaluate how keyword research is done and not target the long tail product niches as much.
      • [2] replies
  • Hi,

    I'm literally losing sleep over this issue.

    I run a fitness blog over at fitmole.com and my goal on that site is to provide nothing but high quality 100% original content. There is ZERO duplicate content on that site and there is no adsense. Everything is written by me and is 100% original. There are a few affiliate links, but that is for only products I truly believe in.

    My site is about 4 months old and for the past 2 months I was ranking high on page 1 for terms like "Ryan gosling workout" , "Jason statham workout", and "beyonce workout".

    But as of the past 3 weeks, they simply dropped off page 1 and I couldn't even find them in the first 30 pages of Google.

    Does anyone have any idea as to why my rankings would just drop off like that. It's killing my traffic levels.

    Any help is appreciated. Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • There was a change to Google's algorithms very recently.
      To get back to page 1, you either need lots of quality backlinks from edu / gov or other contextual backlinks.
    • Affiliate sites have gotten hit in the past few weeks. The only way to bring back the rankings i suppose is to remove those affiliate links. I know that is just unacceptable. But i see no other way. Here is one suggestion for you. Concentrate more on getting the readers to subscribe to your newsletter. Remove majority of the affiliate links off the site. Promote the products through the newsletter instead. I know this seems to be a radical move but this is just one of the solutions. I am sure there is some other solution. But if nothing works out, you are better off experimenting with what i have said.
  • I don't know why one of my website is improving traffic from the day you mentioned (Oct 14), may be because of minor Panda update. My site always benefits whatever there is update from Google.
  • I also noticed a change. 2 of my #1 sites moved to #6 and #8.

    major blow.
    • [1] reply
    • Another interesting observation... while I am lower in Google since this update, I've risen in Bing.

      Go figure. Unfortunately, Bing doesn't seem to bring me much traffic.
  • I'd like to see at least the start of the working week's worth of traffic before doing too much analysis but I have so far seen a 30% reduction in traffic with comparing the same day last week on my diet blog (previoulsy between 2500 to 3400UV/day).

    A few people are basing their drops on a couple of the quiet dats of the week. Wait until Monday/Tuesday before seeing the real damage.

    The traffic drop has come from a lot of keywords losing a few places, not massive changes. Last Saturday (+10GMT) I received traffic for 506 different keywords; this Saturday was 411. A lot of little changes adds up fast!

    The interesting thing is that one of my major goal keywords jumped up from #5 to #2 for both the singular and plural version. A few other big keywords returned to #1 after a couple of weeks down a spot.

    Some context:

    The site does have a lot of limited release PLR on it but for the last few months I have hired dedicated writers so a new article is added 5 days/week.

    The site has 'social proof' with regular facebook comments and likes (as well as tweets and +1s) so I would like to believe it passes at least some of the quality tests. Navigation is clear and siloed for lack of a better word.

    This is the first blog I made to make money so the linking profile is as rough as guts. Most of the original links have disappeared but it still has a fair chunk of crappy blog comments and profile links. These have been replaced by article directories, syndication, forum discussion, BMR, high pr rentals, and finally natural blog and facebook links.

    I'll post an update in a couple of days just to see how much of this actually sticks.
  • Two of my big performing sites are down traffic by 60-80%. Going through my analytic stats it seemed to have happened on around the 13-14th of Oct.

    One of my sites is a very aged site over 7 years and the other is less than 1 year. They both have a bunch of quality unique content as well.

    Well, seems like Google did another algorithm change that we now have to figure out and adapt to.

    Can't wait to see all the WSO's that come out on this one.
  • I think folks get too concerned pleasing search engines than their customers after learning SEO tactics hence we fall into this trap of being affected by a 3rd party so drastically.
  • One thing I can say for sure is that Google is not penalizing sites with Adsense or Amazon links. I have sites that have shot up in Google traffic in the past few days and several of them have the maximum Adsense units on each page and Amazon Ads on a large percentage of the pages.

    The sites that have improved all have two things in common. They have a high percentage of backlinks from authority sites and their other backlinks are mostly "natural". They are links from people who liked the content, not from "artificial" links at blogs with dozens of junk links on the same page, not from hundreds of forum profiles and not from links on crappy articles duplicated at hundreds of crappy sites.

    So my guess is that Google is further attempting to rank sites based on how well they are liked by people that are trustworthy. That's what is in their best interest in their quest to offer search results to the best possible content.

    The reason that brand sites are doing so well is that they have backlinks from many authority sites and from millions of people who liked their content. Your site's content may be better but you don't have their backlinks. I suspect that Google is aware of this problem and will most likely continue trying to account for it in future adjustments to their algorithm.

    About a year ago I decided to totally give up on any "artificial" backlinking and concentrated on content that people would naturally want to link to. That seems to be working better than ever. It also allows me to concentrate on content creation. No more time or money invested in pursuing what appears to be becoming worthless backlinks. No more writing content for SERPS. No more keyword stuffing. Just great content that people want to tell their friends about.

    The only challenge I see is the promotion of newer sites. Obviously, you have to get some traffic in order to get people to see your content and give you those first backlinks. I've got some ideas for doing that naturally too but in my case I think I'll just keep building my authority sites.
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • I dont think solely relying on natural linking will work unless you already have a large real authority site.


      Anyways, the G search results seem to be stuck now... Is this the calm before the storm. There are a lot of results that are looking skewed, G might do another sweep.
      • [2] replies
  • [DELETED]
  • I was affected due to Google Panda But I never left using my basic and some advanced techniques And I am back to my results as quick as previous.
    • [1] reply
    • Did you guys recognize that google webmaster tools shows MANY more of you backlinks now? It used to show me like 100 for most of my sites, now it shows me like 1,5 k.
      So that's probably to give you the possibility to correct your link profile. Maybe they really started to punish you for bad links.

      Daniel
  • Some of the highest traffic pages at my sites are those that have been sitting there unchanged for years. I've sometimes even seen traffic decrease when I've added content to a page.

    I just keep doing whatever I feel improves my visitor's experience at the site and while there are momentary ups and downs, the income just keeps going up year after year.

    The key is ... does the new content make visiting your site more pleasurable. If so, the traffic will eventually come.
  • Well my website is not down to number 10 of google page What to do guys!
  • Yes, My newer site has been affected. It was ranking #3 now it's down to number 9. I'm going to add some content and do more backlinks and see how that goes.
  • I have a new site. First time I have outsourced backlinking. Over 60% of backlinks have vanished. Could they have been de-indexed?
    Just when you seem to be getting somewhere.........
  • I have three amazon review style sites, they all been wiped out. Not in the top 1000 anymore. It started a few months ago when my hompages all of a sudden stopped ranking for any of my keywords. Then, a couple of nights ago, the inner pages (all product name based) vanished from the first 1000 in SERP's too. Pretty much dead in the water as far as google are concerned ATM.
  • my sites are doing fine over the last few updates

    my sites just consist of good, quality content that reads well (and i mean native english reads well) and makes sense.

    Chuck a little bit of link building on the sites, be consistent, and it always works for me.

    I even have an autoblog in a niche that has gone from strength to strength after the panda update. I put it down to people visiting my site and getting what they need or came for.

    I really cant think of any other reason why i would rank so well
  • This is why you shouldn't rely on Google for most of your online income... luckily, i don't.
    • [1] reply
    • Care to elaborate?
      • [1] reply
  • I never noticed Webmaster Tools showing all those backlinks now! Pretty sure that's a new development. Man there is some ugly viewing for some of my sites
  • [DELETED]
  • I was listed as site sponsor (those sites don't openly sell links, I've got the links via personal connections), with less than 30 outbound links. In fact for one of the PR 7 where I am listed, there's only 5 links.
  • I just back from vacation without any SEO works during it so the rank falls but everything seems fine, the PR showing from the third party was not shown last two or three days but now it is back.
  • unique content is still the king. to do this, usually i hire writer or translate other language to english
  • what you guys going to the do for the dropped domains, keep adding content and backlinks and hope for recovery , or just abondon them ,or do a 301 to new domain ?
    • [1] reply
    • I think the best thing to do is if the website is worth it, add content but most important continue to back link it. You really have to asses your websites and see if they are worth it. If so, go for it.
      • [1] reply
  • Yes, Changes are affected on the ranking of websites but it can be earned again by deploying quality SEO.
  • Just an update... If your site already has some level of followers, the traffic should and will return, but the organic traffic due to SERP drop may take longer.

    I scheduled an article to be published this morning (630AM GMT+8) and by noon, my WP stats went back to the usual 1500-2K levels.

    Adsense clicks and CPC were actually higher the since Panda 2.5, but my Amazon clicks dropped by half since Panda 2.5 because of the loss of rank/traffic my previously top-ranked reviews received.

    Let's just keep monitoring...
  • This post has been bouncing between #1-3 the past 15-20 MONTHS... Post panda 2.5, dropped to #13, single digit visit as a result...

    FYI: My site was down on Oct 10, server transfer.



    Other than having FOUR YT videos ranking, I don't really have an issue with the other sites outranking me as they're pretty good anyway, but still hehe.
    • [1] reply
    • Hey,

      I've taken a big hit on two of my sites, I think this has prompted me to leave SEO and focus on article syndication/paid advertising.

      Sam

      EDIT: What I'd love to know is how we're supposed to backlink according to Google? Has anyone seen an increase in traffic/ranking since the change?
      • [1] reply
  • My site went back up in rankings today after being nonexistent after last week's update. Did you guys see the same on your sites?

    I just did what I did before, nothing special. Maybe it's just a Google test if the same thing happened to your sites.
    • [2] replies
    • Good for you ruff. The Google Algorithm update has a lot of surprises which can be beneficial or disappointing as well. We are still uncertain of the next generation of SEO methods.
    • Mine haven't. They're in the same positions as after last weeks update. Could it be that Google haven't updated all sites yet? Or maybe that's just wishful thinking.
  • Okay, so it's not the same for everyone. I just thought that I'm bringing in good news since we all got kicked out by Google at the same time and I just happened to check mine first. In any case, keep at it. I'll keep monitoring mine.
  • Is there anyone whose sites actually moved UP in rankings?
    • [1] reply
    • My site with 180, well-written, nearly 99% unique articles also got hit very hard. My daily visitor took a nose dive from around 1500 UV/day to just 300 UV/day.

      On the other hand an Amazon affiliate site with only one article (keyword on domain with 1300 monthly global search term) moved up to #1 spot, beating Amazon and Cnet.

      What's wrong with the Big G?
      • [1] reply
  • Google has updated Panda to penalise websites that have crappy content?

    YAY!

    It's strange how i've never been affected by Google Panda and i'm fairly confident it's because the quality of content on my website is high. There has to be some sort of correlation of no Panda infractions and the fact the information on my websites is of high quality - either that or i should put the lottery on
    • [2] replies
    • I have a 7 year old site with hundreds of articles that are 100% unique and high quality that got hit really hard. So I don't think it has anything to do with quality.
      • [1] reply
    • Something VERY interesting happened - VERY depressing too...

      My site has been affected throughout, most keywords have gone down a few places, and my traffic has also gone down accordingly. BUT there is something which, apart from making me feel awfully depressed, has also caught my attention.

      My site is a WP site with excellent on page seo, unique content and fresh updates a few times a week. There is ONE page though, which is the MOST important, the sales page of my ebook.

      This particular page is the ONLY one that is very different from the other ones because:

      - it has no no sidebars (it has been laid out like a squeeze page)
      - it has no ads
      - it had no social media buttons (until yesterday)
      - it contains a clickbank product
      - its content is constantly copied (duplicated) by hopeful affiliates who think this is the way to go making sales... (I have given up emailing them now, it is a waste of time).

      Well, this page has been COMPLETELY wiped out of Googleland since the 14th. Makes you think.... I have now added a Facebook like button at the bottom, and asked my friends to click on "like", as a desperate attempt to rescue it from hell...LOL

      Can't think of any quick way of getting it back, as Google seems to have taken a serious dislike on it since the update. Was number 1 page for most targeted keywords before... * sigh *

      One year worths of work out of the window...yay!! Luckily my home page is still alive...so will try to get more leads from there I guess...

      Something good will come out of this, I am sure ... ! (....let's hope!...)
  • My site went down the drain 2 weeks ago. I was getting some very good results, a couple keywords slowly getting to the top 10 with 2-3 KW in top 5.....I lost everything in a matter of hours, site disapeared from top 500...

    However, this morning I kinda crashed the place getting tons of keywords back on the top, much better than it was 2 weeks ago, best results ever. I did some minor changes yesterday which might have helped but still, my site is only 5 months old with PR2.

    I guess there is always hope somewhere, you just gotta keep doing the right things.
  • Yes, my own websites and all my client websites have seen increased in SERP around 9-10 am - GMT, Friday 14th Oct. 2011. However, one of my main keyword drop from 3rd to 8, actually it was thin affiliate website. All other affiliate websites have quality content, authority links and all varieties of links have seen improvement in ranking. All of my client website who are into ecommerce, have seen improve in ranking.

    My one site which is in weight loss niche is no 1 now, getting traffic of around 1300-1400 per day as compared to 800 per day before updates.
  • Dolors, give it a few days or a week or two. I really don't think you have wasted a year... I think some major changes are happening right now and if your site is of high quality, youre gonna bounce back quick enough. Thats my understanding right now of the process going on and many people seem to think the same thing...

    ...however, at the end of the day, google is still the only one in control, nobody has the perfect recipe.
    • [1] reply
    • Thank you Wolfez.

      Yes, we all need to wait before jumping into any conclusions... And yes, Google is in control, whether we like it or not!

      Let's see what happens in a few days :-)
  • Yes, we've all been affected in one way or another.

    Time to man up, pick up the pieces and move on.

    I know it sucks to lose years worth of work in literally one night, but if this is something you truly want, you'll find a way to make it happen.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • It is definitely important to be consistent, more than anything else. With my Sniper sites, the first tweak I had to make a year ago was to begin adding relevant, consistent content and backlinks. The days of putting up a site and walking away are long gone.

    Learning to think like Google is impossible - but if you focus on giving value to the customer and understand you need to be in it for the long haul, you will always end up okay. Yes, my connected FB pages have helped save me and my sites from a complete drop in sales, but it still hurt!
    • [1] reply
    • In my main niche (travel) i have lost many-many keywords for now.

      What puzzles me is that the top 10 travel websites haven't been touched and they belong to big players like LonelyPlanet.com and TimeOut.com.

      Also some junk websites between them, so let's not talk please about "quality" any more. Guess what ? All of them have huge ammount of backlinks, some really strong backlinks.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • I can honestly say I don't see this "quality" upgrade that some people are claiming. I still find lots of poorly conceived and written articles when I search. Google should head back to the drawing board.
  • I have had my butt kicked.

    Never paid much attention to rankings. Just checked in daily to see earnings on adsense. Although from the times when I did check they have all dropped from top 3 spots to bottom of the page or even to page 2.

    Should have flipped them when I could have. HA HA HA

    My adsense is down over 80% since the change. I have not built links to any of these sites in over a year.

    My clients sites where I used BMR have all moved up the ranks.
  • my few amazon review sites which all completely disappeared from google a few days ago have all now reappeared back roughly to the positions they were previous for the keywords i was trgeting. Still no sign of the long-tail product names. Things are shifting about happening no doubt.
  • Interestingly enough, a page that I put up about 6 months ago with ZERO backlinks is now sitting pretty in position 5 for it's targeted keyword. /shrug

    Time to do a little backlinking.
  • Yes! 2 of my main income websites got slapped! 80% of Google traffic drop.
    My referal traffic is now more than from Google.

    One website was on # 2 for 6 months. After this Panda update, it's #10 - almost disappeared!
    • [1] reply
    • I have similar drops to many of sites that are Adsense sites with just 1 Adsense block and have same theme/setup. Typically sites ranking #1 or #2 (unique content, updated recently, and with 10+ pages of content) for months on in have dropped now to #8-#10 and some back to top of page 2. Then there are others that I have not touched in almost a year with like 1 page of content and nothing happened to them or move up a few spots. I have another site that was MIA from the SERPs for like 5 months and all of sudden after the update came back to page 2.

      So it seems to be all over the place on what got hit and didn't and we can't really say "it was because of this or that" that is causing the drop.
      I haven't done any new backlinks to the sites that dropped to see if they might recover again soon. But, I might build some edu/gov backlinks to see if that helps them or not to move up again. Anyone done any new backlinks in the last couple of days and noticed any changes to their sites?
  • I have about 25 microniche sites, I would say they have all stayed about the same. Averaging roughly the same per month, I had a bit of a dip a few months ago but things evened themselves out. I haven't touched the sites in a long time. So all in all it is going ok!
  • Hey guys, I just checked my webmaster tools and google has stopped giving me stats after the 14th. This is for all my sites. You think that has any correlation to the crazy rankings the past few days? Maybe they know the rankings will be out of whack and so didn't bother to record stats since they're messing with stuff?
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • They have a unique position and responsibility, when they shake up the results real people get hurt. I think Google needs to be very careful, their time is coming and they will end up getting regulated.
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
  • my site still shows no signs of recovering to it what used to be :sigh:
    All my targeted keywords now languishing in SERP, the visitors dropped to just few hundreds.

    I wonder it is to do with SEO Search Term Tagging 2 Plugin because a friend of mine who installed it on his site also had the same problem?
  • When the last Panda update was rolled out about 6-7 months ago, wasn't there some fairly big changes about 1 or 2 weeks later where a lot of the effected sites moved back up the SERPs, if i remember correctly?

    • [1] reply
    • This is the unpredictable nature of the beast. Making a prediction is exactly that, we don't know for sure. Unless you work behind the scenes we just don't know what will happen and when.

      Keep working hard on your sites, improve where you can and keep your fingers crossed for more news in the near future.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • I have seen reduced number of visitors to my few sites and was really concerned, Seems Google is dancing again.


    .
  • I've noticed in a niche that I work in the #1 site that was ranking for last 6 months was dropped on 10/14 to the #3 position. Then when I checked the SERPs this morning they have gone back up to the #1 spot again. They were in the #3 spot all weekend long. For the same keyword I am targeting my site stayed on at this same position on page 2 before and after the October update. So I don't know if things are shifting again and sites are moving back to their previous positions, but let's hope that it starts to happen to several of my sites where I was #1 and now on page 2. Maybe it takes time for the datacenters to update again?

    Anyone know why that site went back up to the #1 spot again? I'm sure it wasn't additional content or any backlinks that they did since it would not show up that fast. Their site is on a everyday product with affiliate links. Each post talks about a specific brand or model and will links to various stores like Best Buy, Amazon, Buy.com.

    The site hasn't added any new content since 8/2010.
  • The quote ttomp13 is talking about is here: https://twitter.com/#!/mattcutts/status/121480187375398912

    Dated Oct 5th... meaning the "next few weeks" would have meant the Oct 14th shakeup. Cutts wasn't saying that there would be changes to the Oct 14th update...

    Misleading post...
    • [1] reply
    • I swear... What do you have to do to get people to listen around here? Do I
      need to post a screen capture for every little statement I make? Apparently so.
      I'm not an idiot, folks. (Been in the game for 3+ years). Definitely not a pro, but
      definitely not an idiot.

      If the statement was old, my bad... But it doesn't mean fluctuations are no
      longer taking place.



      Obviously, fluctuations are still occurring....

      Oh... Just so I don't get hammered again... 96.6% of traffic is from Google.
      (Just so you know I didn't get traffic from Stumble or Digg for a few days
      or something.)



      Fluctuations are still taking place.

      I have seen a number of my rankings go from the #1 spot (before the 14th)
      to page #2 or #3, and then back to page #1 again. I would have screen
      captured this too, but didn't know my rankings were going to disappear
      the 14th, and thus, I can't prove what my rankings were beforehand.

      By the way, this is one of my garbage sites. It has good content, and it's
      all unique, but I was just creating the content for the money. The content
      is useful, but there are better sources. This was NOT my main site that got hit.

      All I am trying to point out here is that fluctuations are still taking place.

      PS: Matt Cutts does say, "Next few weeks." So if "few weeks" only means 13 days...

      Cutts posted fluctuations would be occurring for the next few weeks on the 5th.
      It is now the 18th...

      I wonder what Cutt's definition of a "few" is?

      Regardless, I've shown you physical evidence that changes are still taking place.
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
  • The authority website I am building has not been affected. Actually improved.

    Details:
    50 pages worth of content
    3 youtube videos based on niche
    age: 3 months.

    I think the key is to get in touch with the target market through forums and really provide unique content. That is what I have been doing for the past 3 months. Eventually you will not need Google but rather have a community of your own.

    Regards,
    H
    • [1] reply
    • Right on, brother.

      Although I still believe my rankings will return, as well as the rankings of
      many others, people should take this time to reflect.



      When I think of quality websites, I think of websites that are branded.
      Shoemoney, Problogger, Smart Passive Income Blog, and on a lower scale,
      the Bad Blogger, for example.

      To build a brand, you should be working on Youtube and Facebook. Guest
      posting is also a good idea.

      You should be in constant contact with your readers. This means having a
      blogging, video, and guest posting schedule. This also means checking and
      responding to emails on a regular basis.
      My new post panda schedule:
      Monday - Video
      Tuesday - Blog Post
      Wednesday - Blog Post
      Thursday - Blog Post
      Friday - Guest Post
      Readers are looking to read from users who have actually experienced and/or
      attained the desired outcome that they, themselves are trying to experience.



      You do this by proving that your techniques are worth using, because you,
      yourself have accomplished a goal that the reader is trying to accomplish.

      Gone are the days of throwing together a good, factual article. People don't
      want to read a fact book. People want to read other people's experiences.
      People want to be talked to like they're your friends. And for me, my subscribers
      are.


      When you prove you're credible using your blog, Youtube, and Facebook,
      you will begin to build a brand. When people see that you're unique and have
      accomplished what they're attempting to accomplish, they will come to you
      for questions. Answer their questions to establish trust, and always friend
      them
      on Facebook. From there, people will subscribe to you. When this
      happens, you will be on your way to success.

      Being successful in this game is just like picking up girls. Get in, get the contact information,
      and get out of the situation. Then, when they need you, always respond.


      - Have a posting schedule.
      - Prove you're credible.
      - Use Blogging, Youtube, and Facebook.
      - Build a brand.
      - Respond to all reader comments.







  • comes here again.
    what i want to add is that, after the first update that we should realize that only original content can keep alive forever. if you insist on this, your site will never be punished by google.
    • [2] replies
    • :rolleyes:
      That is absolutely, 100% FALSE.

      A lot of people with great, original, unique content got hit hard. Not just in this update, but many before it. Are you even reading the thread?
    • Really?
      Check this out! Metformin side effects - Google Search

      Read the content of that #1 site, your myth will be busted!
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [4] replies
  • It's clear Panda is clearing out the crud.

    It makes sense to serve up the best, most relevant pages to it's inventory ( the searcher ) and Google has a simple decision to make.

    Google knows the days of backlinks are coming to an end!

    If your relying on backlinks... its only going to get harder. And that makes sense.

    Social indicators ( people sharing, liking and +1'ing your stuff ) this is where Google and the like are going.

    Lets face it, if 50 people are 'talking' about your new content... and im looking for information about it, do i really want to see something written 6 months or 2 years ago with a gazillion links OR do I want want to see the buzz.... what people are saying now.

    I'm certain that long term... affiliate only sites will see less traffic from Google. The set it and forget it approach will see long term decline and ALL the search engines will start to favour those people who engage their target market...

    Back to fundamentals..... 'serve your market'

    Mark
    • [1] reply
    • I dont think backlinks will ever become totally useless. But we could see increased importance of social signals. Even social signals can be gamed easily you know. I worked with some big clients who have thousands of FB likes and good social presence most of which have been gamed.


      Maybe because of your dynamic signature link strategy :p
      Why would you link the singular and plural anchor text to the same page from your signature?
  • [DELETED]
  • Social signals can be gamed. It already is with twitter. I don't get those who tout social media as if it can't be? Also, not everything is social. Information on bleaching anus will never be shared or liked. Product niches maybe but the information type of sites aren't social friendly. Google will continue to use links in some aspect. Otherwise I might have to start printing shirts with bleach anus and start my brand.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • My best site that wasnt affected on October 14th fell from #1 to #3 just sometime back.
  • So it seems the effects are still being seen even today 5 days after the initial change in the results. I did notice changes here and there where some thin sites ranking #8 moved up to #2 spot tonight that were at the old spot the last 4 days. So who knows how the results will be in a few days from now since things are constantly changing.
    • [1] reply
    • ROFLMAO! 70 words?
      In my 5 years of IM i have never seen such a bizarre update from G.
      WTH their nerds been smoking off late eh?:confused:
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    I responded on this thread about having a tattoo of my brand and the comment was deleted?

    Really?
  • This update killed two of my best sites. What's funny is they were replaced by exact copycat sites with crappy content and thrown together layouts. I mean these sites that are ranking above mine are terrible. My content is unique and well written and my sites look pretty nice.

    Hoping this is temporary but haven't seen a comeback yet!
    • [2] replies
    • They are just about to enjoy the honeymoon period. I am sure they will be down soon.
    • Haha true, that content is wwwweeeeaaaakkkk! Take a look at that site's backlink profile though. Not so weak. Whoever is doing the SEO for that site is smart. Here's a few points to take away from the methods that site is using.

      1) First, like many are saying, his content on-page is obviously not the best quality.
      2) He's using high PR home page backlinks and/or a private blog network.
      3) He's using high PR Blogroll/footer links (PR is on homepage AND on many inner pages)
      4) The pages he's linking from are not relevant to his money site AT ALL.
      5) He's using MINIMAL anchor text variation
      6) I see minimal, if any, crap links pointing to his site, i.e. blog comments with thousands of OBLs, crappy profile links, etc.
      7) About 95% of his links come from only 2 IPs.
      8) 99% of his links come from .com domains, and the remaining 1% come from .net/.org/.ca/.md.
      9) 99% of his links come from USA IP addresses.
      10) 99% of the domains where his links reside aren't listed in the DMOZ or Yahoo directories.
      11) The domain is only a year old (Oct. 5, 2010).

      Everybody should keep those things in mind when trying to rank your next sites. That being said, maybe we can now better understand what Google does and does not care about in terms of ranking.

      - Quality links are the key.
      - Links don't have to be from relevant sites/pages.
      - Of course your content on your money site should be quality for your visitors, but it obviously doesn't need to be quality in order to fool Google's algo.
      - Don't worry so much about varying your anchor text because it's obviously not that important. (It's probably still a good idea to vary it a little though in case Google decides to weight varied anchor text heavier as a ranking factor in the future).
      - Don't waste your time with crap links. (Again, sure, throw in a few of them for the sake of link/IP diversity, but those crap links won't help you rank for real money-making terms.)
      • [2] replies
  • I feel the difference but my keyword holds a good position from Oct 13. I think Panda started to consider good and reputed websites.
  • Hi...
    yes google panda update i noticed it .
  • The google pand update has a lot of to do with ages doamins. That i'm sure of after a little investigating!

    Blend
    • [2] replies
    • Age is not a factor. We have two sites that are both about three years old that also use identical WP templates. One has had very positive results while the other has had very negative results.
    • Pure inaccurate speculation. I've got a 7 year old site get hit, but not one that is 6 yrs old. I've got a couple of new 3 month sites get hit, but not a few that are 6 months at the moment. All of this is simply guesswork.
  • Here's what I've noticed:

    We have three sites that have been severely impacted by this update. From what I'm seeing, our one site that has a lot of repeat visitors, page views, time on site, etc... has greatly benefited from the update with about a 40% increase in traffic.

    On the other hand, two of our sites that have much poorer visitor stats have just gotten annihilated, with some top five keyword rankings dropping into the seventies and traffic decreases from 50% to 70%.

    The other factor that may or may not be in play are BMR backlinks. The two sites that got hit the hardest have a lot of BMR links while the other site that has done really well has very, very, few, maybe a dozen. We also have one other site though that has a total of about 70 BMR backlinks that seems not to have been affected at all by the update.

    Anyway, if the Panda update is about qualitative issues, then I suggest everyone take a look at their user stats to see if this might not be the primary issue? After all, If I were Google, this is the one factor I would weigh most heavily to determine if a site is truly relevant or not.
  • Could it be that Google has placed more weight/value on the total amount of back-links across an entire domain, rather than to an individual page?

    This could explain why the top ten SERP's are filled with the big stores such as amazon, walmart etc for longtail and product name keywords (which is usually easy to outrank them on) even though those actual product pages have none, or very little back-links to them.

    This also seems to coincide with a lot people losing their longtail and product name traffic with this recent panda update too.
  • For me, I've noticed the following:

    - My sites are all across the board. Some were hit. Some weren't. Some improved, some stayed the same. Needless to say, they all followed the same backlinking and on-page SEO approach.

    What does that mean, exactly? Not much, really.

    While a lot of people will try to figure out the problem, I'm going to move ahead and continue with the way I do things. To me, it's a lot easier to keep on trucking then spend hours (or days) trying to figure out what "might" have happened.

    Besides, by the time you end up figuring out the issue, things will change yet again, only to start an entire thread all over again trying to figure out the reason for that change. No matter how broken it may seem, it will always fluctuate. Nothing is forever in SEO.

    I'm just saying - I would use the time to improve what you already have and continue to build. Having a website lose its ranking is never fun, but why not add more value so it can eventually bounce back? Or, better yet, try other methods of traffic generation that you never have before.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
  • That video was awesome. So spot on.
  • Hi guys,

    Just wanted to give you a bit of an update and some hope for your own sites. My main keyword was relegated from position 5 to position 13 on Friday 14th October. A couple of days ago it climbed up to position 12 and as of this morning it's now on position 11.

    1 of my main competitors has also moved from the second page to position 8.

    Cheers,

    Tom
    • [1] reply
    • Hey Tom,

      Nothing is still known as of now....I have a keyword which was #4 prior to the new update, it then fell to #12, then moved up to #8 and now again it's on #12 spot....

      What can we do? Keep on building links, adding content and monitor Google day by day until we see the end results.
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Some update of from my small 7 websites adsense empire (2 niches).

      1. It seems that old domains are LESS affected by changes, still some traffic and ranking is dropped.

      2. Exact domains seem LESS affected by changes.

      3. I had an old domain that has some so-so content that has been neglected for a year or so. Last week has been getting 20% more traffic and generate some Adsense income !!!
  • Quick update:

    Of my two top sites that got hit hard, one is back and better than ever. The other one, unfortunately, isn't. It went from having two main KWs at the #1 spot to no KWs in the top 200. Sucks. But, another site that fell out of the rankings just before the update is ranking higher than ever now. This site is relatively new and pretty competitive.

    So yeah, I would stop analyzing and start building links!


    -Brock
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • 2 of my websites are back too. Better than before. Few more to go.
  • Noticed some movements, 7 sites back from sandbox (page50+) and 1 is gone. Anyone else?

    Bryan
  • One site bounced back to where it was, thank goodness! The others are still at the lower positions.
    • [1] reply
    • Yup, several of mine are on their way back up too.
  • Hint of returns. Nothing major yet.
  • [DELETED]
  • OK, read through the whole thread, took some time

    Bottom line is, nobody knows why his/her site lost rankings. It doesn't matter if you have good or bad content, good or bad on-page SEO and what your backlink scheme looks like.

    For everyone who has a background in computer science, think about that:
    You have an algorithm that looks at a huge network of websites and tries to rank these websites for a lot of different keywords. This algorithm will obviously need to store a lot of data. Now you change this algorithm and the way it valuates websites. Do you think the new data that is needed to compute the new valuation can be collected in a few minutes or hours? No, I don't think so. Keep in mind that to evaluate a single site, you also need to look at the valuation of all sites that link to that site. And at all sites that link to these sites and so on.

    So what will happen is that the algorithm shuffles all websites around without a visible pattern until it revaluated all sites in the network. Only after the revaluation of all sites, you will be able to see the real results of the algorithm update.

    What do you think?

    Maybe it's only what I WANT to think because my main money site dropped from #1 to page 3 to page 5 for many keywords.
    • [1] reply
    • I think you're not giving webmasters, or Google, nearly enough credit.

      I know exactly why certain of my pages dropped and there is no need to wait for some algorithmic re-ranking and new search valuation to try and figure this out.

      Google has already said Panda is manually run. It is not part of what you are discussing - the regular algorithm which results in continuous changes in the search criteria.

      So if your web pages were hit in a Panda update, you need to change the pages to fix the problem, hope those changes are seen by Google before the next Panda update, and then wait.

      From what I have seen Google is able to compute a lot faster than what you "think" its computers can handle.

      Obviously there is a "pattern" and not some random reshuffling that occurred. Those are not random results at the top of the search listings.

      And yes, I have the computer degree.

      .
      • [2] replies
  • Hey, guys.

    I don't know if you're interested, but I just wrote a post about Google Panda 2.5.2, and
    I figure a lot of people who are stressed out about what they will do next can benefit from
    reading my article.

    Feel free to check it out, and provide Facebook Comment below the article.

    Google Panda 2.5.2: What Now? Who Moved My Cheese?
    • [2] replies
    • Cool post man. I enjoyed it.

      =-)
      • [1] reply
    • Thanks ttomp13 for the post; and the reminder to find and keep finding new sources of cheese.
  • My site was hit quite badly on the 14th and has not recovered. It's almost 2 years old, and has over 500 pages of what I consider to be high-quality content. I hadn't done any aggressive link building, but had still accumulated a reasonable number of back links, mainly to internal pages, each of which was optimized for a particular key word.

    As a result, the traffic I had been getting from Google was based on quite a diverse range of keywords. Take a look at the exact impact and draw your own conclusions:

    Date / Visits / Keywords
    Sep 28 / 369 / 283
    Oct 5 / 349 / 265
    Oct 12 / 417 / 306
    Oct 19 / 55 / 49

    Pretty grim. Clearly (or that's how I see it) Google has suddenly decided to send many of the long tail key words to other sites. Also, my rankings for those key words that I was actually targeting is jumping around quite a bit, relegating me to page 2 or worse from page 1.

    So I consider the hit I have encountered to be both on the long tail key words and my specific targeted key words. Not sure how I'm going to react to this and recover, but I though the above statistics would be useful for people to think about as they figure out what is happening!
    • [1] reply
    • Michael R.

      That's a pretty sophisticated analysis. Not sure if it's correct or not, but it's worth considering. I would think that Google would have done all of that re-valuating before rolling this change out, but maybe not. The best thing to do is to stay calm, watch what's happening, create a good user experience, and rely less on Google.

      Raza
      • [1] reply
  • Two of my Adsense niche sites that were at #2 spots and sitting now at #8 have not budged at all. I hoping for some movement on these sites soon since they have a diverse backlink profile and have good unique content. I've started getting some edu backlinks to these 2 sites to see if I can build some authority links and if that will move it back up.

    It's just frustrating not being able to do something to get sites to move again. I hate these big drops which move sites from top of page 1 to bottom of page 1 or page 2. A few spots OK, but there is no way that the other 7 sites in front of me did as much backlinks or added content.

    Are you guys continuing with your regular backlink strategy right now for sights that got hit?
    • [1] reply
    • Me, I am just observing them for now, while focusing on sites that moved up or remained unmoved by this update.
  • Damn you guys are seeing the upward movement/correction that I was hoping for. Instead, mine main site actually dropped a second time! They were slowly improving after the Oct 14 hit, but now even worse. I can't for the life of me work out what's different with this site than the others.

    I have a big feeling most of this is related to external links though. I am in the middle of some tests which I hope are conclusive...
  • I guess I'll also give updates on two sites. Maybe we can gather some information or see a trend.

    I created one affiliate site about 3 months ago. It used to be as high as #3 before getting hit by the -50 filter. Soon after that, it disappeared from the SERPs but it was still indexed. I'm assuming it was a penalty for unnatural backlinks (tried out a bunch of WF services and most were disappointing). In any case, two months later (aka today), it came back ranked at #8. I'm assuming this is because of the most recent Panda update, but I'm not entirely sure since I did make some changes to my sites two days ago.

    Rather than simply nofollowing the affiliate links, I created a PHP redirect that takes them to Amazon. I nofollowed that and also used robots.txt to prevent that folder from being crawled. I'm not sure if this is why I came back in rankings or if it's just the recent update. The interesting part is my inner pages. I'm ranked #8 for my homepage and behind 7 other affiliate sites. However, I am ranked #1-5 for most of my inner pages when I google "product keyword". I'm almost always ahead of my competitors. If I'm not first, it's usually Amazon or some other sites that are ahead of me so I'm assuming these other affiliate sites definitely got slapped for their inner pages. I have 14 product reviews that are 1000+ words with pictures and videos. I also have 6 other informational posts.

    As for my second site, which I created about 1.5 months ago, it finally hit page 1 two days ago. In other words, it improved during the initial stages of the update. However, it disappeared from the SERP completely yesterday only to come back today at #10. This is a crappy affiliate site with 700-word reviews. I have nothing but reviews on this site, and each review has 1 photo. I also simply nofollowed the affiliate links rather than redirecting them.
  • From what I have seen all the sites that have been slapped seem to meet the two following criteria:

    1) Google knows they are linked (either through adsense or analytics)
    2) They have similar backlinking profiles (in y case they were all using mainly BMR).

    Perhaps google have just looked at these factors to identify people who are obviously backlinking thier own sites.

    Any thoughts on this?
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • My pages climbed the SE ladder last week.
    A lot of them were dancing crazy and have returned to gain some positions now.
    • [1] reply
    • 2 of my sites were negatively affected on October 13. One has a couple of pages still ranking high with others on pages 9 and 10. The other tanked big time, position 500, 900 and nowhere to been seen Traffic dropped from 2500 unique visits per day to around 200. Earnings dropped the same percentage. Site still ranks #1 on Bing and Yahoo.

      There were some 400 and 500 errors which I've fixed up but I think the big thing is the affiliate links and the redirects and here's why:

      I was lucky enough to get a copy of the Google Raters Guide from PotPieGirl's site before Google politely asked her to remove the link. It's full of gems for what Google is looking for in a site, but the most worrying part of the 125 page document is in the Part 4: Webspam Guidelines.

      In it there is a disturbing statement that simply says:

      "If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam."


      So who cares if your site is full of quality articles? Who cares if your on-page SEO is 100%? Who cares what your backlink profile looks like.

      If you put up a site full of quality articles with the sole intention of making money, you are a target. This isn't what Google wants, no matter how quality your lovely little articles are.

      When Google says the site should be for users this is what it means, the first objective of the site should not be to make money.

      Or at least it shouldn't appear to be :-)

      Secondly, I believe redirects are playing a big part:

      Section 3.3 of the Webspam section talks about the 'Sneaky Redirects'

      "We call it a sneaky redirect when a page redirects the user from a URL on one domain to a different URL on a different domain, with spam intent." - Remember, making money is spam.

      "Some sneaky redirects take users to well-known merchant websites, such as Amazon, eBay, Zappos, etc." In my case, this is BINGO. As I'm sure it is with many of you.

      The problem is, I only use a 'sneaky redirect' so that I can send US visitors to Amazon.com and UK visitors to Amazon.co.uk, enhancing the users' experience. If this indeed is part of why I've been penalized I'll be forced to choose one over the other and with a site that ranks (sorry, ranked) high in the UK and US Google, this is going to be counterproductive and result in a worse user experience. Go Google!

      I've made many changes to the site including removing half of the affiliate links, solving the errors, adding more video, reducing site wide internal linking and adding more authority external linking. Overall, I've made the affiliate links less obtrusive to give a general feeling of a site that isn't there to make money.

      We'll see what happens next but for now, as per that great 'Who Moved my Cheese' video posted by ttomp13, I'm going back to my Xcode and NimbleKit coding, Google can play football on his own but I'll leave you with this once again:

      "If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam."

      "If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam."

      "If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam."
      • [3] replies
  • Many are affected badly while some of getting recovery in traffic drop....
  • Some sites of mine are back from the grave (rank 400-500) and some took the places of those in the grave.

    Some sites I did heavy linking to recently, seems to just have rolled back to where it was 1-2 months ago.

    Off to find some new cheese!
  • I was influenced by the latest panda. my site got promoted to position 4 in the search results from position 7 and that because im doing only white hat SEO.
  • For those wondering about backlinks:

    I have NEVER created a single artificial backlink for any of my sites - least of all comment, blog, and crappy forum links. The reason behind this is that i know Google is smart, and it seems beyond stupid to think you can game the SERPs with 50,000 auto-generated crap links.

    My sites all generate organic links on their own, and enjoyed excellent SERP positions for ages.

    However, several of my sites were hit, and hard by Panda 2.5.2. One site that was hit shares the same layout type, bounce rate, time on site, and even a similar topic to one that wasn't hit at all (and actually gained).
    • [1] reply
    • I've done a little analysis of some of the more commercial queries where I dropped and from what I can tell the sites that seem to be benefiting the most from this update are very thin in terms of content but most do have a lot of backlinks (most not quality). I even found one site that was ranking for a real good commercial keyword that was a splog, setup strictly for link juice to other sites. Seriously terrible site. The articles are totally unrelated to each other.

      Hard to really say at this point but I can't think this update is finished. I could provide examples of queries but from the comments here and on other boards most others are seeing the same thing.
      • [1] reply
  • I totally agree Mike / Zeb. I wasn't suggesting that by monetizing a site you are spamming in Google's eyes.

    But what I am suggesting is that there is a difference between monetizing your great blog and creating a great blog to monetize. If Google thinks you have created the blog soley to monetize and make money then you are a target, no matter how great it is.

    This is what I'll be focusing on in future, creating a great blog to monetize, but giving the appearance that I've monetized a great blog. Confused? So am I :-) ...
  • If you see a pattern, you're more than welcome to share it.

    From what I have read in this thread, the update affected a lot of different types of sites. Some thin sites were hit, some authority sites were hit, some with good content, some with bad content, some with many good links, some with few poor links, and so on and so on.

    When I look at the only one of my sites that lost rankings, I can also see different things that could be a reason. But then again I see sites at the top of the rankings that are much, much worse than my site.

    The thing about the shuffled rankings during re-evaluation of sites was just an attempt to explain something that looks like randomness to me. It can be totally different, of course.

    I didn't want to say that Google doesn't know what they are doing or have limited computing power.
    • [1] reply
    • I agree 100%

      One of my sites got hit while other didn't and I use the same backlinking strategy and all look a like give or take...also, see authority sites on the niche I got hit on, just because they are big sites and stores....and here and there sites worse than mine above my pages which got hit....so how is this a good update when there is nothing clear here?
  • So where is the new cheese? haha!
    • [1] reply
    • You have to find it... But for me, the new cheese is Youtube, Aweber, and
      Facebook.

      Youtube - Some of my videos have 100,000+ views. Why not take advantage
      of this, and create more videos?

      Aweber - I have been blogging for 3 years, and I have just now started
      capturing email subscribers. I should have began building a list a long time ago.

      Facebook - Communicate with your readers, and allow them to share your
      content with their friends.

      The 3 things above alone are enough to run a business --- you don't even
      have to have a blog.

      1. Create Youtube videos.
      2. Send the Youtube viewers to a squezee page.
      3. Capture emails.
      4. Communicate with your list.

      You don't even have to blog to make money, folks. I think a lot of people
      see written content as the only way of making money online. You could make
      videos on Youtube, work on Aweber, and communicate on Facebook, and
      build a million dollar empire.

      Anyway, this is what I am going to do for my new cheese. I say this, because
      I know a lot of people here are too lazy / shy / scared to make videos on
      topics --- Mainly, because they don't know enough about the topic to cover
      it on video.

      Well, I wish you all the best. Like I said, there is new cheese out there. If
      Internet Marketing isn't for you, you could always try real estate --- I have
      been looking into tax liens, myself.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • So where is the new cheese? haha!
  • Google tweaked and I saw some recovery but not full. Haven't done anything new since 14th. Still loss of long tail.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • email marketing is no longer effective in the days of social media. It used to work for specific niches but not for physical products. In any case the rate of emails being opened has dropped recently.
  • peterjamesmorris

    Thanks for the link. Got a copy of the guidelines.
  • WOW so much doom and gloom in this thread, we might as well just pack up and go home
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • A few tweaks here and there and a change in my linkbuilding and on-page strategy, my sites and pages are beginning to shoot up in the rankings. Come on people, stop wasting time waiting for things to "go back to normal", lol. And if you want to quiet, go right ahead.
    • [2] replies
    • TheFBGuy, can you please tell us some more about that few tweaks ? :confused:
    • Hey TheFBGuy,

      I 100% believe that there is a way to gain Google Rankings back, as DaniWeb
      and many other sites have been able to do so in the past.

      If you have developed a strategy or maybe a step-by-step plan for getting
      rankings to shoot back up, you should share that strategy with us.

      At the least, you should post the strategy on your blog so it will go viral, and
      you can get the benefits of getting new, quality backlinks.

      We're all interested in your strategy, and at this point, any information will
      be beneficial.
      • [1] reply
  • @TheFBGuy Do not torture us and tell us the strategy which made you circumvent latest Panda update
  • I'm also trying to tweak the pages that dropped. A bit difficult without knowing why they dropped in the first place. Moreover I have about 100 inner pages that ranked at the top of the first page for their keywords. So a lot of work.

    I think the pages are already well optimized, so I only added some content here and there, nofollow'd a few links and added some links to authority sites. In addition to that, I optimized the page load speed of some pages and started to build more and more diverse links.

    But I don't really see any effects, yet.

    Here a very "motivating" screenshot from Traffic Travis for the rankings of 20 of these keywords. Seems like the software doesn't have enough colors to display more than 12 different keywords .

  • My rankings have all gone back up in the past three days

    I haven't published any new articles or any new backlinks

    today was actually my most profitable day yet

    Also I use blog networks for backlinking so those who say they got hit, it doesn't seem so
    • [1] reply
    • It is good to hear that some people are moving back up - my traffic is still way down, and I'm reticent to start changing things until there is a clearer picture of why this is happening.
  • I had one of my top 4 sites trashed. site was 1.5 years old. several hundred pages of original content. There were 50 -100 first page long tail keywords and regular keywords. about 75% dropped in ranking by 50 places or more.

    I have started going page by page and making changes. What I have seen:

    1) if a page had more then one or 2 affiliate links or links to amazon it got trashed. So as I rewrite pages I cut it down to one sale related link. (For example if I have a page on the top 10 wordpress plugins and 4 of those are plugins you buy, yes I had my affiliate link in there. Now I remove the entire link from all but the best one. People will have to go find the link themselves if they want it. It is a bit of a diss-service to the reader but if I leave the link in, even without my affiliate link, I believe google will see it as a link to a sale page and slam the article).

    2) Pages that had been ranked high but had no backlinks (yes I had many keywords on the first page with no backlinks. The site was somewhat of an authority site and all it used to take was original content and great on page seo) were hit hardest. i will get to backlinking those later.

    3) right now I am making minor changes and reposting and resubmitting to social bookmarking sites. That has gotten a lot of the pages moving back up.

    I disagree with sitting on my hands and waiting to see what happens next.
    • [1] reply
  • As stated before, my keywords are back at one but still no sign of ling tail traffic. Any theories as to how I can fix?
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • I want to say that I agree with you, but earlier in this thread, a Warrior pointed
      out the website Metformin Side Effects dot Org. If you look at the search
      results
      , you will see that this site definitely does NOT have quality content
      compared to other sites.

      Also, if you look at the websites backlink profile, you will see that these links
      are artificially obtained.

      The good news is that this website was in the #1 spot for the past few days,
      and at this very minute, it is in the #3 spot. This tells me that Google is still
      making some changes, or that the changes are not fully established around
      the web.

      Hopefully, this website drops of the rankings completely. Unfortunately,
      Google has trouble devaluing sites that are using home page backlinks on
      Class C IP addresses. If Google could devalue these links, then the organic
      results would be vastly improved.


      At the end of the day, if you don't artificially generate backlinks, and you do
      continue providing good content to your readers, you will eventually win. At
      least, that's what Matt Cutts, myself, and others would hope for.

      Quite frankly, I wish SEO didn't exist. If there was a way to have the search
      engines literally pick out the best content and display it in first place, the
      results would be vastly improved.
      • [3] replies
  • Is it just me, or are Exact Match Domains in the non-product related industries seeing a
    climb in the rankings?


    Example: Wall Mounted Pull Up Bar as an EMD would fall in the rankings, because it's
    product related, and a site like Amazon would rank above it. Same for any other
    product.

    Example: Melatonin Side Effects, Birth Control Side Effects, Accutane Side Effects are
    all ranking really well on page #1 for EMD, even with very little content on the site.
  • Thanks for all the suggestions and encouragement.

    Since the first Panda update, I am seeing a trend here. Google wants to get rid of affiliates. They would love affiliates to go away and then all of the online retailers would have to buy Adwords ads to get traffic.

    If you care to read the document "2011 Google Quality Raters Handbook" you will realize affiliates have been marked unless you are a company with deep pockets.

    All my articles are original content (each about 700 - 1000 words) and each of my site has nothing less than 100 posts. The articles are well researched and no one can argue their value to users who are searching for unbiased independent reviews. My sites often outranked Amazon on many keywords. Now even the long tail keywords are trailing behind. My only standing site is an EMD which has seen an increase in traffic.

    I have added new content and built backlinks during the past 3 months without much upward movement in traffic. If anything they have been temporary.

    As for alternative traffic what choice do you really have? I have tried Bing and Facebook PPC without much success. The revenue can't cover costs. It is a loosing proposition. As for email marketing they don't work for electronics niche. So much product changes are taking place in the electronics world that subscribers don't really bother with the emails anymore! My email list is no longer as effective as it used to be 2 years ago.

    I have been wondering why only Google has the biggest share of search engine traffic? What is Yahoo and Bing doing? Why can't they too send a decent number of visitors to your site? If you are not on the first ten on the SERPs then you get nothing. Imagine the number of sites competing for this positions. There are no clear cut rules on how you appear on the top ten. Above all keeping your position is also difficult as thousands of affiliates are also vying for the top ten positions, and the unpredictable algorithmic changes by Google create nightmares.

    I am at a cross-road here. I have given my best to do what I have been doing. A lot of time and money have been wasted. A lot of Gurus have taken me for a ride. So much have been spent on content writers, graphic designers and VAs to build backlinks. The whole thing looks like some kind of "dark science"

    If I continue building backlinks and add more contents will there be any reward for me at the end of the day? Affiliates are treated as spammers ("If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam", pg 95, 2011 Google Quality Raters Handbook). Is this the kind job you want to do? Your work considered as a spam (as decided by Google) and you are being treated like some kind crook!

    Google has a hidden agenda. Like any business they serve their shareholders first, followed by their top executives and lastly all the low paid employees. You don't figure at all in their scheme of things. Neither do they owe us any living!
    • [1] reply
    • If they wanted all retailers to buy into Adwords, Amazon would not take countless top rankings. G would not know if you're an affiliate if you, for example, used your site to collect e-mails and sell to your list.

      You can always create your own products, and not be an affiliate.

      Affiliates worldwide are not closing up shop.

      I think you are taking this too far. You make it sound like there's absolutely no way for anyone to make it anymore.

      You mentioned your EMD is ranking well. Why not try another one of those in the time being to get your hopes back up. I would imagine in your 4 years you've weathered some storms already.
      • [1] reply
  • Friends,
    Am Abbas form Pakistan. i have a website. my website loose its page impressions 75% down. from last 10 days. I think i just submitted more than 55 Articles to different Directories to boost up my website traffic in just 5 days and i have 12000 back links in just 3-4 days. is this any kind of pnelaty from google??? is google treat this like an unnatural???? please help me to find answer about this.
  • Are your guys' dropped sites have something in connection like Adsense or analytic or webmaster tool ?
  • Maybe google is giving more weight now to the bounce rate of each website for a certain keyword. And from there, google will determine which site is deserving to put on top of the rankings? ? ?
    • [1] reply
    • I've lost a ton of long tail traffic, and also I'm seeing utter crap sites and squidoo and zimbio pages outranking my quality sites. What gives? It's ridiculous.
      • [1] reply
  • For me, the longtail searches have been hit hard (but only on one site in one niche in particular). It has resulted in a 50% - 60% drop in traffic. It's almost as if the G is targeting anyone targeting longtails because they see them as the minnows. The one's going after the crumbs.
    The sites I see at the top for those longtails I used to rank for are what would be described as authority sites - Yahoo Answers, Youtube etc. It's like Google said: "OK we'll give these other minnows a chance to beat them to improve search results - and they did that for a year - but now they've rolled back to where we were a year ago. I kind of wonder if this is damage limitation for the whole Panda thing in the first place. And they're slowly but surely simply rolling back the clock.
    The main keywords that I tried to rank that site for are all still there and ranking well. But the longtails are where 60% of my visitors came from and they made up 60% of my income.
    • [1] reply
    • I agree that the long tails, or related keywords, seem to be what is impacted. And in my case that accounted for close to 80% of my traffic as I focused more on putting up quality content than building back links to support particular keywords, although the links do accumulate when others link to the site.

      But I don't agree that the results for long tail searches are better. I'm seeing lots of crappy sites getting number 1 position, although I do notice Yahoo answers etc. in the top 5. Sites with broken links, sites that are clearly Adsense driven with no valuable content, and so forth!

      Whatever the objective, Google is failing to serve up improved results for the searches I've tried, and for which I previously received traffic. Basically they are returning rubbish as search results! I'm sure they had honorable intentions, but this time they have really messed up their quality of results for many searches.

      Hopefully they understand that and will do something about it. For my personal searches, I'm getting higher quality results from Bing right now, and I'm sure that is not something which Google intended!
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • I do everything manually as well including my blog network posts....other than this everything is done by me...still, my site got hit and sites like CNET, Engadget, Amazon are above me when previously I was ranked #2 and all my inner keywords were on page 1, now on pages 2, 4, or beyond...

      Also, you see that it's not only me that got hit but a lot of people here but there is no clear pattern to why...it's not that clear for now but we have to try more....can't let Google shut us down!
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Talking is great but care to share with us these techniques? Help some friends figure out?
      • [1] reply
  • This post gives me hope. Took 16 days for labnol.org to come right after a panda update

    Website Traffic Improves Two Weeks After Google Panda (Farmer) Update
    • [1] reply
    • If this update has similar effect, there's 1 more week to go.
  • First ever post in the Warrior forum.

    Just wanted to add some comments of my own here.

    Some of my sites were severly affected, others not at all. If I look at my personal website profile it's pretty clear that all the sites that were affected are those that contain lots of affiliate links. I have 1 large adsense site and a whole bunch of local lead generation sites that weren't affected at all. All of my sites have the same backlink profiles across the board, so I don't think it has to do with backlinks. I also seem to have a big drop off in long tail and brandname keyword traffic like some others have said here.

    With regards to this statement from the raters guide:

    "If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam"

    To be honest, this applies to every page at Amazon if you take it out of context like that.
    • [1] reply
    • Well, Amazon is a large corporate client of G so it would be logical to keep your top customers happy, right? However, I think lowering amazon's SEO ranks would be much more profitable for G as they will likely spend more on ad spends, HAHA.

      But the big question is, how would any site keep producing good content and user experience for the Internet without getting some sort of funding to keep it running? Even NGOs need money to operate. Of course, this argument can be a bit lob sided from a marketer's perspective .
  • have the rubbish sites stayed on top of the quality ones for you guys?
    • [1] reply
    • do the "Rubbish" sites have affiliate links in them like your "Quality" sites?
  • yes i was affected and i am losing money rapidly
  • Guys: Quit whining, and continue linking.

    This is what I'm doing to ALL of my sites, including the couple of them that were hit by this update.

    And you know what? They are already starting to rise back up the SERPs.

    This kind of thing happens. When it does, move forward.
    • [3] replies
    • Any particular type of links you are building that is working or just a mixture of links of articles/blogs/comments/profiles, etc.?
    • They are starting to rise up because of tweaks. Here you think your efforts had anything to do with it.

      We'll stop whining if you stop pretending you know how to fix it.
    • Hi Cool Hand Luke

      I totally agree that is important to move on with the backlinking and just move on. Is there any types of backlinks you don't use any longer after these Panda updates and do you prefer some types of backlinks more than others?

      Cheers,
      Christoffer
  • My observation is that the main keyword SERP has not dropped, but the overall traffic dropped. I am assuming that is long tail keywords, which I don't bother to check and verify. But sad thing is that at the end of the day I lost more than 50% of revenue, especially starting today..
  • For the benefit of new guys here like myself, is there a guidelines of tweaking that i can follow. Greatly appreciated!
    • [1] reply
    • I wouldn't personally do profile links ever again, but BMR, social bookmarking, and a couple of other tricks are working great for me.

      It's weird, a lot of my sites rose significantly, and picked up a lot of longtails, where as a couple of them fell (and are now coming back up). Hard to tell what this update was about, but considering the similarities between all of my sites, I'd say there is a major X-factor we haven't pinpointed yet.

      Oh well, like I said, continued linking is getting them all higher than ever.

      :rolleyes:
      Apparently you don't know the definition of irony. Heres a good example: you saying that you know for fact that my sites are rising because of "tweaks" and not my continued, successful linking when in fact, you have no idea, nor could you possibly ever get one, yet you are somehow trying to tell me I'm the one with misguided assumptions...

      Do you work for Google's webspam or algorithm teams? Yeah, I didn't think so. So you're just talking out of your a** without anything to back it up. Got it.

      Keep whining though, I'll enjoy the money I'm making in the meantime.
      • [1] reply
  • My site still drop 50% traffic since 14 October, is there anyone who already recovered from this Panda?
  • I am frustrated with recent Panda updates. One of my sites down grade from PR 5 to PR 3. Dramatically my traffic also going down.
    • [1] reply
    • Question: Should we be worried that our website has been HUGELY rewarded by this latest update (specifically the iteration of 2.5 that hit October 13th/14th?) We've seen an increase of 65% in traffic, 2f% in revenue, 29% in orders. However, our Paid Search is now falling rapidly (clearly as an outcome of our increased Organic numbers). Sitewide, we're not going up a ton, it just seems to be that Organic search is now pulling in larger numbers than our two leaders, e-mail and PPC. My worry is that this is a temporary lift and we're about to get bombed. We've gone to ranking number 1 for a VERY competitive search term: Natural Remedies. Any input would be great. We've built our site on VERY strong SEO, tags, and a huge set of content (instead of only product pages, we actually have more informational pages than products). We got killed by the initial Panda update early this year because we have VERY poor backlinking (no black hat sites, just a VERY small number of links, not many from high PR sites). We have been rebuilding our Organic numbers for quite some time, and we really seem to be at a peak we haven't seen before. Hence the worry...when will the other shoe drop?
      • [2] replies
  • unfortunately, the impact may seem to continue. In addition, I have observed that PR and article publishing sites are affected too as even EZA has been losing its organic traffic. Is it still related to the said changes? Matt Cutts confirmed "minor changes" ironically, it has a huge impact to most sites.
  • Just keep backlinking folks. Nothing to see here.
  • my sites are all doing alright, if not increase in traffic
    • [1] reply
    • Does anyone know exactly, what the October 13th update went after?
      • [1] reply
  • The only sites that dropped were the ones I didn't use BMR on
  • Update...

    2+ weeks after... One of my severely affected post (#1 dropped to page 3 or so) is back up to #2 without me doing anything to it...

    2 of my formerly #1 posts are now #5 and 6, but 1-4 are all amazon product links, at least I moved ahead of the YT videos now.

    My other KWs are still wayyy down, but that's alright..
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Would someone be kind enough to answer my question?

      Google has over 70% market share in Search, complete domination, and won't lose market share any time soon. Most casual searchers are content with Google. Then why constantly tweaking and releasing these "algo updates"? Will users really move way from Google if there weren't all these algo updates?

      Let's be honest here, are these updates all really aimed at improving search? Or is there another motive? If confusion among SEOs, webmasters and internet marketers is one of those objectives, then Google is doing great job, lol.
  • Do you not want to improve your company in any way you can? Would you sit static and still with your current income generators? While everything around you is constantly changing? It happens in all businesses that want to stick around for a while. It's called "Change". Those businesses that don't change and adapt to market forces become stagnant and die. This is what Google is doing. And it will take the likes of you and me out in the "click of your fingers" if you are impacting negatively on their goals.
  • This may have been said before, but with nearly 600 posts, I didn't read them all.

    In the last twelve months there have been over 500 updates to Google's algorithm. So to attribute any changes to Panda or any other named update is a little overboard I think. They make a change more than once per day on average.
  • Don't use a bunch of tools if you don't know what you are doing. Use diverse higher quality backlinks and unique content. Google won't mess with you.
  • Looks mine was a manual penalty after all. Google replied to a reinclusion request stating that some or all pages violate the quality guidelines. Removed every bit of on page optimisation and filed another request. Don't know what else I can do.
    • [1] reply
    • This is the standard cookie-cutter reply one gets from Google. Is it too much to ask what exactly was violated? Why can't they pin-point the violation? Is it on-site or off-site violation? Is it too many affiliate links? Who decides what is too many?

      They used Quality Score to weed out affiliates from Adwords. Today you see e-commerce sites hardly having any content and often does not contain the product you are searching for. They don't add much value other than parading their stuff.

      If you are an affiliate you have a poor quality score, you have violated quality guidelines, ...

      Panda is all about weeding out duplicate content and content farms. When did "quality violation" came into the picture?
  • Hi,
    Everyone, one of my friend told me that google has stopped PR And link building
    is this true. if yes than all are the SEO persons what have to do for this problem.
    if it possible pls provide me the link where this news is published by google please ans me as soon as possible... i am waiting for your ans and link.

    Thanks & Regards
    Winner Shah
    • [3] replies
    • We are waiting for the link from your friend, where he/she got the info from.

    • Your friend is scare mongering you. Like a bunch of other warriors here too. :rolleyes:
    • Yep... Your friend might be the best person to asked for the news link.

      Kindly share once you have it.
  • Not only affected, it changed entirely everything. geez!
  • Has anybody had a drop in the rankings from the Oct 13 update on a website that does NOT have affiliate links on it?... I am still thinking that is the common thread with the Oct 13 update... None of my websites dropped but I don't have any affiliate links on them.. However I use a lot of the "easy" link building techniques with minimal unique content... so if it was the link building or the content, then my sites should have dropped...
    • [1] reply
    • There is a lot more going on under the hood than something as simple as whether there are affiliate links or not. My opinion and this is based on researching my own sites that have been affected negatively and positively by Panda is this.. It does have a bearing but only based on what Google deem as the intent of the searcher and what they want to show them as a result. I have written a blog post about the Panda update if you care to read Panda Update – How to beat the Panda | The Internet Marketing Challenge Blog
      • [1] reply
  • One of my sites have 2 keywords sit on the 1st of google for nearly a year, recent google panda dropped me to #3, and #5. I immediately gave some boost, 1 week later, back to #1.
  • I can;t really see why bounce rate is a factor, perhaps my logic does not align with Google's.

    Surely if someone finds a page that is EXACTLY what they want, then they have no need to delve deeper into the site. Bounce rate as we know is when the searcher leaves the entry page back to Google or presses the 'back' button, but they could stay on that page for 10 mins and it would still be considered a 'bounce'.

    Perhaps time on site is more important that bounce rate??
    • [1] reply
    • I think it would be the combination of both bounce rate and time on site... If Google sees most people going to a website and only staying on a few seconds before they bounce off of it, then Google is probably smart enough to know that the people are not finding what they are looking for... however if the people stay on there a long time and don't bounce off right away, then Google will see that site as having the information they are looking for... To me bounce rate and time on site go hand in hand... and I think it is one of the major factors with the new panda update...

      Anybody with a low bounce rate / long visitor visits get penalized by the new Panda update?

      • [4] replies
  • My experience with all my good content sites has been extremely positive post panda. One website was on and off page#1 now sitting firmly at position 5 not only for the main kw but also for LSI kws....

    However, one of my favourite adsense autoblog site fell heavily from 4000 uniques to about 900.

    This proves that it is good time for content sites :-)
  • My average bounce rate is 32% and average length on site is 4 min 32 sec ...

    I think Google is smart enough to know the difference between an informational search vs a search with high commercial intent... So my guess would be Google's update wouldn't apply to keywords that have no commercial intent (the searches that are just to look up a quick piece of information that would have a high bounce rate because the person found what they were looking for)... So the theories of bounce rate and time on site playing a major role would really just apply to those keywords with high commercial intent (the ones that everybody is trying to monetize)...

    If there are still some "crap" sites out there ranking in the first spot... maybe they somehow found a way to artificially inflate the time on site / bounce rate to be favorable and that's why they are ranked high... afterall, the only people that are going to know those numbers are google and the owner... So if all of the other factors are saying that crap site shouldn't be ranked high, then maybe its the factors that you cant see that are keeping it ranked high...
    • [1] reply
    • Just experienced further drops and some Google Dance. Which is better than seeing it stuck!
      • [1] reply
  • No.. i am working ok. Its only for website like article websites which have got plenty of duplicates contents.
  • A couple of my sites got hit but not that bad. I was ranking on page 1 - went down to the top of page two.
    Did a little link building use SENukeX and I'm back
  • Panda is kind to me so far...
    • [1] reply
    • Well, I am pissed!

      Have a site which was hurt badly and had a keyword in UK with 6,600 searches per month exact for months on position 2 of Google...after the update that keyword went down to #5....a few days later to #7 and today it's #10.....

      I'm so angry, the sites above me are Wikipedia and other authority sites that don't even have the exact phrase and inner pages....Google just let them be up there because they're big, not because they are more suitable than my site...

      All the inner pages and their keywords are down from page 1 to page 4, 5, and beyond...I know I need to just keep building links and so on but the revenue is down now because all the traffic is down...I don't know where it will stop...so frustrating!!!
  • My automotive site is also affected after the updation of google panda. isitors have drop down. My site have fresh content. Dont know where I went wrong can anybody suggest me what changes I have to do to overcome form this. The name of my site is indiandrives[dot]com. waiting for your reply guys.
    • [3] replies
    • You have a very nice site and I see the amount of traffic is very good...only comes to show that even good, big and quality sites got hurt and not only small niche sites...no one really knows what is the pattern of this update, my site got badly hurt as well - keep on building and adding content...nothing more I can offer for now...make the site more user friendly perhaps in the eyes of Google...
    • The first thing I see when I go to yoru website Trolo is a a big ad for a blackberry... If I am looking for cars and I see that, I would most likely bounce off of your site really quick...

    • One thing I would say is be very careful of that image next to the ads half way down the page. This is against TOS and if Google catch up with you - you could be in trouble.
  • 3 of my main longtail keywords are gone... I was moving up the rankings, hit page 1 for both of them for a couple of days around the 20th October... now, they're gone.

    I used 3 sepearte warrior backlinking services... how can I tell if one of these has hurt my site... I have my suspicions which one (the cheapest)
  • many things have been said about why sites have dropped in rankings etc

    i like to keep things nice and simple

    i am a niche marketer and yes i do have a few sites which make money with adsense and amazon

    but... all i do now is work on 1 site and building it out.

    Who do you think google will value more, someone that makes a new post every 7, 14, 30 days or someone that posts everyday?

    im making new posts nearly every day and my site is doing awesome and constantly being found for new keywords

    by making a new post every single day its impossible for you not to start getting good traffic because you are forcing the spiders to crawl your site every day looking for new content to index

    forget all the other palava

    work on 1 site

    build it really big into an authority site

    post every single day with fresh unique juicy content

    PS: if your not convinced if it will work for you....try it for a month and see for yourself

    paul
    • [2] replies
    • Yeah, this works. Of course, someone will come along and say, yeah, but my quality, authority site got hit too or, yeah, but let me go head to head with your site, and I will just use high power backlinks and beat you every time.

      But for others like me, who really find it easier to produce decent content in a given subject area than constantly be messing around with backlinking schemes of one sort or another, it is going the way you say - just work on the content and watch the results, much easier. This way you can rank page one for a whole new bunch of longtails every single time you produce any new content. It all adds up.
    • The one that makes a new post every 7th day. That's what I do and besides I also try to build quality links.

      But when I see a site with a single page or another whose last blog post was published at the end of 2009 beat me to the top positions, I feel helpless. My site is a combination of a HTML site with a blog attached to it and has more than 300 pages and blog posts between them. It was at the #1 position on Google for more than 2 years until the October 2011 Panda update. Lost the ranking and 70% of the earnings.

      It's a hopeless situation. I don't know what to do. My site, believe me, is better than theirs, from every perspective.

      At the moment I am just doing what I have been doing for months ... adding good content, building links steadily. And praying.
  • Here's an interesting thing I noticed.

    It's not just aged authority sites that got a boost. It was aged links as well.

    In other words, if there are links pointing to your sites that are 5 or 10 years old, that is worth 50 or 100 of my brand new links in Google's eyes, making it even tougher to take down big authorities.
  • Yes. I had sudden drops on traffic since 13th.
  • I'd like to repost a question here, and also include my site this time to get some feedback. Question: Should we be worried that our website has been HUGELY rewarded by this latest update (specifically the iteration of 2.5 that hit October 13th/14th)?

    We've seen an increase of 65% in traffic, 25% in revenue, 29% in orders. Obviously, our Paid Search is now falling rapidly (clearly as an outcome of our increased Organic numbers). Sitewide, we're not going up a ton, though we do show a small increase, it just seems to be that Organic search is now pulling in larger numbers than our two leaders, e-mail and PPC.

    My worry is that this is a temporary lift and we're about to get bombed. We've gone to ranking number 1 for a VERY competitive search term: "Natural Remedies". Any input would be great. We've built our site on VERY strong SEO, tags, and a huge set of content (instead of only product pages, we actually have more informational pages than products, around 5 info pages to 1 page of products).

    We got killed by the initial Panda update early this year because we have VERY poor backlinking (no black hat sites, just a VERY small number of links, not many from high PR sites). Perhaps our lack of content farmed links is finally paying off...? We have been rebuilding our Organic numbers for quite some time, and we really seem to be at a peak we haven't seen before.

    Hence the worry...when will the other shoe drop? Site: nativeremedies[dot]com.
    • [1] reply
    • Congrats on the high rankings.. It looks to me like your website is an actual website selling products, not a website with affiliate links trying to sell a product..

      What is your bounce rate / visitor length on site?.. I bet they are good...

      Your website has great on page seo, great content, no affiliate links, and presumably good bounce rate, visitor length on site... All of that is what Google is looking for to determine that it's giving a visitor a good user experience...

      I bet having your website listed in the BBB helps a lot in making it look legitimate in Google's eyes... how many affiliate websites are in the BBB?... Also having a copyright on your name I bet helps as well...

      I would stay 100% legit with that site if I were you... Are you doing anything with facebook / twitter?...

      Nice Job!


  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • I doubt that Google would penalize websites for having a nice word like "Strategy" in their domain name. Doesn't seem reasonable.
  • Here is a podcast James Martell did about the Panda 2.5 update. James has been in affiliate marketing for a number of years, so its great to hear his take on things.

    Affiliate Buzz #226 – Yet Another Google Panda Update - James Martell | James Martell
    • [1] reply

    • Well in this 30 min long audio all he says its that sites that got dropped didn't vary anchor text. But this is known for a long time. I have very varied anchor text on all of my websites, probably bellow 30% for main keyword. All i see that sites that are above me are aged 5-15 years, they have a lot of pages indexed (many thousands or millions) and millions backlinks to whole domain.
      Some of those sites have 0 backlinks, and not even optimized properly. Some are not even relevant. All i see that large authority sites got boosted a lot and everything else dropped.
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
  • Panda kicked all my sites down and put my income at a quarter of what it used to be. So, Google is definitely pandering to the big boys as these big corporate sites beat me with one paragragh and I have 50-100 unique articles on the same subject. I used to be #1, but now gone or on the first page bottom. Google is going to make enough people angry that they won't stay #1 forever. Anyway, got to keep keeping on. what else can you do.
  • One of my site has been experiencing about 80% drop in the traffic since Oct 12. I added new posts but does not seem to be indexed by Google . After monitoring the site for 2 weeks I filed a reconsideration. The reply is appended below. What does the reply mean and what happens next. Anyone with similar experience care to comment? Thanks

    Reconsideration request for http://www.XXXXXX.com/: No manual spam actions found.

    We received a request from a site owner to reconsider http://www.XXXXXX.com/ for compliance with Google's Webmaster Guidelines.

    We reviewed your site and found no manual actions by the webspam team that might affect your site's ranking in Google. There's no need to file a reconsideration request for your site, because any ranking issues you may be experiencing are not related to a manual action taken by the webspam team.

    Of course, there may be other issues with your site that affect your site's ranking. Google's computers determine the order of our search results using a series of formulas known as algorithms. We make hundreds of changes to our search algorithms each year, and we employ more than 200 different signals when ranking pages. As our algorithms change and as the web (including your site) changes, some fluctuation in ranking can happen as we make updates to present the best results to our users.

    If you've experienced a change in ranking which you suspect may be more than a simple algorithm change, there are other things you may want to investigate as possible causes, such as a major change to your site's content, content management system, or server architecture. For example, a site may not rank well if your server stops serving pages to Googlebot, or if you've changed the URLs for a large portion of your site's pages. This article has a list of other potential reasons your site may not be doing well in search.

    If you're still unable to resolve your issue, please see our Webmaster Help Forum for support.

    Sincerely,

    Google Search Quality Team
    • [2] replies
    • It is the standard reply that everyone gets when they file for reconsideration and the reason has nothing to do with spam.

      Then you get the deliberately open-ended and vague instructions on how to possibly rectify the issue and then fobbed off to the webmaster forum.

      Just hang tight and keep doing what you are doing.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • Google is telling you that your site is not penalized and did not fail a manual inspection by a human. Your rankings are falling purely based on automatic filters from the Google algorithm, this could mean low quality links, a new site without trust, low quality content, bad on site seo, slow loading and performance problems and other such issues.

      Add more unique high quality content, check your on site SEO and do internal linking and get better quality links to your site, that is always the best remedy for falling rankings.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Here are some sure shot tips for ranking higher (I use these methods);

    1) Each post should have atleast 1200 to 1500 words (proper English without spelling and grammatical mistakes)

    2) Use a single page for targetting multiple keywords which convey the same intent. Don't create multiple pages for just the sake of targetting these additional long tail keywords. For example:

    how to lose weight and how to lose weight fast and lose weight should be targetted in the same page and not in different pages.

    3) Don't keep writing about the same keyword again and again in scores of pages. They just don't help. Broaden your niche and write about related topics.

    For example, instead of writing 50 pages about how to lose weight, start including related content like diet & fitness, body building etc.

    4) Remove unecessary links in your Blogroll and footers that point to external websites.

    5) Use rel="nofollow" for all external website links.

    6) Use atleast one image in each blog post. Image file name should have the blog title and so should the alt text of the image.
  • Anyone familiar with Google places noticing a difference in the activity of this section?
  • I have over 100 automated blogs which were created early in 2011 most were created in January just before Panda unleashed its mayhem. However, all blogs have continued to rise in ranks over the last 10 months and now have several thousand first page rankings.

    Traffic has increased by a minimum of 12% month over month.

    I attribute the success of these sites to two things. The quality of the automated content and the scheduling of certain types of links at certain times of the first two months of the sites inception. All links were done through Fiverr providers and the content was generated through Content Revenge (disclaimer...I own Content Revenge).

    However, this method was created after several years of playing cat and mouse with Google and I have to say that Panda is indeed rewarding this method and our sites.
    • [1] reply
    • It's not bad, but I wouldn't say you'd get any real benefit if you post the same link on the same page more than once. You can post your link on two different pages on the same domain, but you still won't get full benefit either, since the link is coming from the same IP (you'll still benefit from those links though, just not as much as a link of same PR & OBL & trustrank etc. as a page on a different domain/IP. I'd still say go for it.
  • That is the key is adding the Youtube video, I would even use a picture unless the property will not let you or you they want you to pay to upload the video. Google's update pretty much is picking on new domains. We have noticed aged domains are very easy to rank and new domains are more difficult, but obviously possible.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • The july panda update penalized sites linking to OTHER sites penalized in the july panda update - IE ezinearticles.com got wacked ; so did my ranking [was #3 in "internet marketing" worldwide] ; in oct ezine's got better; so did mine.

    I have an RSS based article search engine rewriter that feeds off of ezine's and others ; re-builds the material/summary and creates a listing 4 times per day --- talk about new content - over 50,000 article summaries in 75 different channels updating every 6 hours - all with internet marketing type content.

    Ok - maybe over did it?

    However- and here is the BIG ONE - Google also employs real people to review sites from time to time - both line - if you have value; provide something that adds to the web, real content [or at least REALLY READABLE] ; you will be fine...

    And of course link your ass off ; on the highest PR sites you can like a mad man!
    Get on a high PR - .gov or .edu - LINKGASM.
    FYI ; Warriors is PR 5.
    D
  • Hi guys, just wondering if any of you have any clue whats going on with my site:

    I was ranking 6th for my money keyword with my domain, after the October update rankings completely disappeared. Did a bit of tweaking and my domain is not in the top 500 but the blog post of the article im using as my front page for my domain is ranking 35th, the article its self has 0 back links with the domain having 300+

    Any ideas whats up? is just my homepage banned?
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • This morning, I was sh*t upon by Google again. My one site that "survived" the Oct. Panda update dropped from spot 2 to spot 6. Result? Almost no traffic. Total day's revenue thus far: Less than 3 dollars. Amazing, the difference between position 2 and 6, isn't it?

    I put a fair bit of work into my sites, for what they are - small, niche sites - I don't think it's that my content sucks; I'm a good writer...but I've waited long enough to see if things "bounce back". Time for more quality linking than what worked before.
  • I got dropped almost out of top 10. Not sure what happening. But my site was having down time often thanks to my host Dreamhost (a top worst host on the Internet). I think down time has an effect these days.
    • [1] reply
    • Uptime is always important. Time to join hostgator I guess.
  • Here's a great video (with a written transcript) from seomoz.org on their view of Panda, what it does and what people can do about it:

    How Google's Panda Update Changed SEO Best Practices Forever - Whiteboard Friday | SEOmoz

    Suzanne
    • [2] replies
    • WOW- quiet on the panda thread................hehehe

      everyone must be rebuilding and rethinking their sites.

      I got hit hard on the 14th and it was really the first time I was ever hit... it is just amazing the crap thats getting above everyone

      just got my PR lowered by -1- across the board .......bout 10 pr4's became 3's, 20 pr2's became pr1 etc.

      well time to get back to revamping, cleaning up and redesigning my 900 page monster; lol

      hope all is good with everyone!!!

      Dennis
    • Wow, thanks for sharing that video.. I think that answers the question completely... plus it supports a lot of my theory about bounce rate etc..

  • @Chris: My only issue with bounce rate is that a high bounce rate doesn't necessarily means it's a bad page. I have particular calculator that ranks #1 in Google SERPs. The bounce rate is high because people come in, use it and then go about their lives. They just needed that one particular calculation, at that moment in time. However, the % of return visitors to that page is very high compared to my other pages.

    From what I understand, Google does check bounce in the sense when a user clicks a link in Google search results and then bounces back to the search results and clicks another link because the first link didn't give them what they wanted. And now Google is going a step further by asking you if you want to block the website you just bounced out of.

    @Dennis: Just wait till the next Panda update! I'm sure they'll be another thread started! :-) So far, my site has *not* been effected by Panda (in a negative way), but I've been following threads here and in Google's Webmaster Tools forum. You just never now if/when you're going to be hit. I've fixed up a few things on my site, but right now I'm in a "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mode.

    Suzanne
    • [1] reply
    • @suzanne - the problem I too have with bounce rate theory is that the front end of my website is html and services an offline service need. It is extremely common and natural for a potential client in my industry to bounce in and out of 5 sites in order to grab a few numbers to call, or to form an opinion and return to the few better sites to dig deeper. 90% just start calling the numbers they scraped and are in a hurry, so they make their decision on that.

      In fact a manual review might not even realize which site is the best without understanding the industry and spending 20 minutes in my site and competitor sites.

      Feedback from my clients have been phenominal as far as it is clearly the best site they looked over. I tend to get the smarter and more savvy clients and the idiots just hire anybody based on price. - not how long they been in business or how many credentials they carry.

      currently I have a 1 page emd adsense at the top of one of the toughest most competitive terms...it has around 8 generic backlinks and no social,
      then comes a generic directory, then 2 business less than a year old - my site is 10 years old.

      granted things have gotten dusty over the years and it is harder to clean up a 1000 page site. Makes me wanna go get a couple emd's and rank 1 since the hard, expensive and honest way is letting me down at the moment.
  • Google tends to change there policies frequently. I had my adwords account disabled from which I believe due to low grade keywords I was trying to use. I'm still not sure why, So Im not surprised that they are cracking down harder on sites now.
    • [1] reply
    • hey guys.

      Did anyone have any luck recovering inner pages that got hit on October 13/14th?

      Its really pissing me off seeing facebook copy/paste notes outranking my unique content. 1 month passed and still same sh**** results.

      1. Amazon
      2. Random authority site - duplicate content
      3. Facebook notes - duplicate content
      4. Facebook notes - duplicate content
      5. Facebook notes - duplicate content
      6. My inner page - unique content - i used to be 2nd

      I guess it would be much easier to just make those duplicate facebook notes. You make them faster, you don't need to do any SEO and they rank higher anyway.
      • [3] replies
  • Yes, very much affected. My sites and my clients sites suffered because of that Panda. Anyway, we can do nothing about it.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • I think Google has always rewarded aged sites, it would make sense for them to stick with those that have been around for sometime rather than an upstart
  • It's interesting how when you call something a Panda, it is a cute little innocent creature.

    What would you think of this "Panda" upgrade if they never chose to name it a cute name?

    You'd be thinking that Google changes algorithm to sort out thousands of wrongfully linked sites. Hmm, that cant be good for reputation.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • From what I've read, the Panda update is named after a Google employee by the name of Navneet Panda.

    Suzanne
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • It seems affiliate sites were hit hard by Panda. It is frustrating, because I have some sites that have great content but are large, and I think to some extent the shear size of the sites are hurting the entire site.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • I have always stated that as long as you write unique content on your blog and bookmark it as you go along, and continue to create a collection of varied links REGUARLY.
  • you will be fine, as a result any updates should not effect you, never rely heavily on one thing keeping your eggs in one basket.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Nah..

    No changes ...
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]

Next Topics on Trending Feed