Getting Backlinks Indexed / Crawled (Linklicious vs. Lindexed)

by 74 replies
91
So I am seeing a low rate of backlinks being indexed recently. It could be due to so many reasons. I know full well that no one can really know 100% how to force Google to crawl a certain link.

Having said all this, I also know that one should ping and rss their backlinks for higher success rate (that has been proven).

I was researching tools that could help out with this, sure enough Linklicious.me came up and I like the idea. Some use a mix of Linklicious and Lindexed.

Was wondering if any of you folks use these tools, and what are your thoughts on them? Do you use both? Is it worth it? Any other tools that could complement these?
#search engine optimization #backlinks #crawled #indexed #lindexed #linklicious
  • use nuclear link crawler it will work best.
    • [1] reply
    • Looks nice. Yes I can see it's from user Kok Choon from WF

      I got excited when I saw the free version (so that I can try it out), but it requires a software to be installed, and I'm not sure I like that idea
      • [2] replies
  • Look into Backlink Energizer.
  • i just upgraded my nuclear link crawler... i used the free version for a decent amount of time i love the service.. more for crawling then indexing....be creative
  • Talking with a few other full time SEOs a consensus is building that not trying to force a link to be indexed could be the way to go, rather just let google find the link naturally and index at it's own rate.........although I've yet to scientifically test this, it's a theory that makes sense to me.....especially post panda....
  • I doubt the OP wants his thread hijacked by two competitors guys...
    • [1] reply
    • He already thanked us and signed up, he fulfilled the threads purpose.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • use NLI and BE both. BE is one time investment. On the other hand NLI requires monthly subscription but worth your money. I have found almost 90%+ success using both of these services/tools simultaneously.

    Most recently NLI has established a blog network so that it will provide much better service then the past. So you will get some link juice too.
  • Please define high quality links...

    1. High PR Domain
    2. High PR Page

    and ...?
    • [1] reply
    • 3. A link from a page that will get indexed on it's own or is already indexed and gets crawled frequently (as opposed to one that requires additional effort, i.e. juicing, boosting, etc.)
      4. A link from a page that has low OBL
      5. Links that come from a range of IPs (although not totally important)
      6. DoFollow (of course)

      ...just to name a few...any additions?
      • [2] replies
  • Are you in or not? I hate long empty post without delivering much useful message.

    Keyword with 3 mil+ competition, each of us go buy a new domain, and setup proper content and start ranking it as of today, let's see how it turns out - with / without indexing.

    You name the keyword, waiting for your reply, friend.
    • [1] reply
    • You already got my reply. I am the one waiting......

      Are YOU in? Find a serp that proves your point and I don't have to expose my network that I have money invested in. Now stop playing your games like you can't read English. I answered you. One hundred dollars to you if you can show a serp where your garbage kind of links ranks anyone in a competitive serp over a page that has good quality high PR links.

      Are you in or are you out?
      • [1] reply
  • That's not the right way to see keyword competition, I hope we are on the same page here:

    https://www.google.com/search?num=10...l0l75l75l1l1l0

    "Backlink pants" had a competition of 2, pointless to rank that.

    On the other hand - backlink itself will be competitive:

    https://www.google.com/search?num=10...70l421l4.1l5l0

    85 millions competitions, or you want to rank for this keyword? I can do that.

    For faster result, I am recommending 3 mil+ keyword competition, let me find few for you -

    Way to get exboyfriend back


    "way to get ex boyfriend back" - Google Search

    "natural treatment for depression"

    "natural treatment for depression" - Google Search

    "get rid of acne fast"

    "get rid of acne fast" - Google Search

    So, here are 3 keywords in my selections:

    "Way to get exboyfriend back"
    "natural treatment for depression"
    "get rid of acne fast"

    Which one you would like to try?

    Regarding you worried about exposing your network, that's some risk you have to take, but there is a way to minimize the risk:

    1. Build backlinks until you reach your ranking, let it stay for a week to proof your point.

    2. Remove all backlinks to that domain.

    3. Or you can mix some fake links just to avoid detection.

    This way you not only proof your point, you can minimize the risk of exposing your network entirely.

    So are you in or not? We can start now, post an update in a new thread every 3 to 7 days, this will be interesting!
    • [2] replies
    • None. You are still being ridiculous. Putting it in quotes makes no difference. It is still not an indication of competition only the amount of times a phrase occurs in the google database

      Heres proof

      https://www.google.com/search?num=10...w=1280&bih=516

      There are not 22 million pages competing for "hate my family"

      https://www.google.com/search?num=10...w=1280&bih=516

      There are not 9 million pages trying to rank number one for personal stories

      https://www.google.com/search?num=10...w=1280&bih=516

      there are not 335 million pages competing for "tell you what"

      https://www.google.com/search?num=10...3c420078196b39

      there are not 181 million pages competing for "last night we"

      These are the amount of times the phrases are in the index KK not how many people are competing fo rthe terms. sellers use this kind of foolishness to fool their buyers into thinking they are beating other "competing sites" when in reality very few people are trying to get number one for these terms because THERE IS NO MONEY IN THEM or not as much as phrase count indicates.

      Competing is determined on the front page, by anchor text links competitors are targeting. You know? what people do in terms of links when they really are trying to compete. My goodness man even Google keyword count of searches per month for a term that can make cash would be better. First page for keywords people want to make money with - thats how you determine competition.

      Like I said try and sell that to the newbs


      Nope. I don't have to take any risk just because you are afraid to show your proof in the present existing serps. My counter challenge is out there and it leaves me with the same amount of risk as you. Show the principles in the serps. you don't get to dictate to me what risks I have to take that you don't. There is no way to minimize my risj to none as you claim.

      I think anyone in this thread can see the ridiculousness of you calling for a competition that exposes my network to deindexing where you don't have any to expose. I made a perfectly fair counter proposal. If your kind of junk links work then show where they have in the serps where we can all see the backlinks etc without anyone exposing their own investments or links and lets show it in a TRULY competitive serp. There are search results all over Google without any of our links to show the principles for you to make your point without telling me I will have to take risk you don't and won't.

      Tell me when you are ready to show it in the serps where none of us have to put anything at risk and stop playing games.
      • [1] reply
    • Banned
      Ultimate SEO fail.

      I won't even bother explaining way. :rolleyes:
      • [1] reply
  • Get him Mike ..learn him good.

    3 million competing pages ...hahahaha. I LOL every time I see Angela peddling that crap.
    • [1] reply
    • You are welcome to join the competition.
  • Linklicious does have a good reputation, and I would recommend it
  • Its even more of a hoot Paul. A seller in this thread is claiming if you put the term in "quotes" thats the real determination of competition

    So if I say now that My first car was a Honda Civic and this post is crawled by Google and appears as one result in a quote search for "Honda Civic" its because I am Competing for the term and not incidentally mentioning it.
  • KK,

    You're really not doing yourself any favours man by trying to adopt an objective stance in a thread that you have a vested interest in.

    The OP is looking for advice not a sales pitch.

    You've put forward your defence of your software now leave it and allow the thread to breathe.
    • [1] reply
    • I have enough business of my own, really don't need to pitch anything here.

      Indexing had it place in SEO, while Mike and many might think that High PR links doesn't need indexing, that would depends.

      Bottom line, indexing will guarantee low quality backlinks being credited and high quality backlinks get credited faster! Can you be sure that all high PR sites will get 100% index rate - naturally? I don't think so.

      I'm open minded learner, that's why I don't mind people have different idea, but accusing me not giving advice instead of just a sales pitch, that doesn't do anyone any good, why don't you tell me if you agree that indexing is useless and why, I'll share my experience with you.
      • [1] reply
  • Can't we all just get along. Anyways after reading the bottom portion of this thread, i thought i would just say this. Some amount of of 'garbage' links works for me (not 5000 profiles blasted in a day and then back linked to death with scape box post). These links do need a little help for G to find them, I use backlinkindexer (not an affiliate) to do this. This is in conjunction with building quality links, all done in a consistent pace and amount. This seems to work. Well. Anyways what do I know.
  • Personally I let them get indexed naturally. IMO looks more organic to the se's.
  • About Indexing - Here are some backlinks that are very easy to get index:

    1. High PR - The higher the PR, the higher the index rate. If a site post content too fast, Google will not be able to index them all in time, but with a simple ping or RSS submission, these links are very easy to get index.

    2. Unique content - Backlink page with unique content and anchor link between those content is extremely easy to get index, even with low PR like PR0 and PR N/A. But these type of low PR site are crawl much slower, without indexing system in place, most backlinks will not be discovered.

    Here are some backlinks that are super hard to get index:

    1. Direct link (site wide link or any link without anchor text), like phpbb kind of profile links.
    2. Bookmarking sites like Pligg platform.
    3. Backlinks with unique content but anchor link at the beginning of a paragraph or end of a paragraph, this seems to leave a big footprint for Google to filter them out.

    It doesn't matter if you are using high PR or low PR domain links, the question if you need indexing or let it index naturally will greatly depends on your backlink quality and if you are posting tons of those backlinks in your network - faster than Google bot can visit!
  • Talk all you want mike, you are the one who contradict your own believes.

    Every can talk, but not everyone can "rank".
    • [1] reply
    • And some in this thread do nothing but talk of ranking even claiming they can rank for "backlinks" but then run away when its chosen.
  • KK, please go rank a brand new blog (you don't even have to buy a domain) for "backlinks". I know you can do it buddy!

    Actually, I don't but I think it would be fun seeing if you could break in the top 50.
    • [1] reply

    • Man, why do you guys stalk him across threads? That's nutty. I'd love to see your test, though.

      We've ranked a vanity SEO keyword just today with 40 high PR articles published two days ago. And in the past we've ranked a site with zero "indexed" backlinks for 6 or 8 terms.

      Both high quality and unindexed quality methods will work. Unfortunately for us SEOs, it's a very inexact science and there is a lot of room for hand waving. We find the best results when blending the cheap stuff (for IP diversity) with the good stuff (for power).
  • I have seen SERP improvements for my websites with Linklicious.

    This tool is very useful especially for those cheap and crappy forum profile links and blog comments. Most of these cheap links are not even crawled by Google. Linklicious will make sure they are crawled by Google. This is enough for SERP improvement.

    I have a fiverr gig on linklicious. Please search for my username on fiverr (i.e) iyerkedar.
    • [1] reply
    • So why not just get better links?????

      If you have to force google with a service to look at some links how long are they going to stay in the index anyway? People may point to the short term gains (if you call them that because the links are still crappy even when Google finds them), but once you stop backing up your drop dead weak links they are going to go off Google's radar in no time.
  • Haha this would have to be the funniest thread I've come across in the warrior forum.

    It's funny that someone can consistently try and back their claims up with absolutley no proof and continue to do so over and over again...

    Just accept the challenge and put your money where your mouth is!!
  • I have not being interested in getting my backlinks crawled until recently when my mentor told me she uses linklicious. She said over time her rankings have gone up more so than before using linklicious. So soon i might decide to use a service that helps your links get noticed when i have got my head around a backlinking strategy and this thread has being a blast to read by the way.
    • [1] reply
    • 4MoreReferrals - I have been trying to find out more info about Backlink Energizer and tried replying on 2 other threads about your service (no answers, yet). Can you tell me where I can find the latest and if you have any comparisons with others? I just signed up for Backlinks Indexer but am interested if yours works just as well as far as percentage of links getting indexed. I like the idea of no monthly fees. Thank you. (PM me if it is better for you.)

      Cindy P.

      p.s. sorry to hijack this thread but I'm not getting answers in other threads that are supposed to be on this subject....
  • So what was recommended to use for the original posted question LOL?
  • This thread - LOL!
  • [DELETED]
  • Holy crap you guys! I leave for a few weeks and look at the mess!

    Honestly... there are different ways to link build, let's at least agree on that. KK's method does yield results, but I am sure a manual, more organic method (slower, more work) may work as well if not better, but time is always an issue. RSS / Pinging DOES help, this cannot be discredited.

    To each his own
    • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
  • Super late bump...

    But what happened next??!! Did KK even try it?
    • [1] reply
    • No he unsurprisingly wussed out...I will say that I eventually did find one use for link indexers - To have great but old link pages recrawled. Nowadays people are hoping their spammy links don't get found.
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
Join the discussion

Next Topics on Trending Feed