9 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
9 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

Loosing position after getting to the top

by La Padre
7 replies
  • SEO
    • |
Dear Warriors, could you stop for a moment and try to answer on my questions?

My 2-3 month sites loosing their positions after getting to the top1-5, i'm trying to use natural slow link building, however i'm used to post to bmr when the site positions are stable at top10-20. usually i'm posting 10 but up to 15 posts, and the sites getting to the top1-5. however soon after that they loosing their positions and moving +30 positions back in average, or they could gone forever (they are indexed, but it's not possible to find the pages by their keywords).

now i've a dilemma, should i continue to work on link building for these sites or should i leave they as is?

there is also a logical question - should i make bmr posts for 2-3 month old sites, they seems to be very brittle at this age?
#loosing #position #top
  • Profile picture of the author kkchoon
    I think your site still in the index, but Google seems to de-rank them by discounting some of your backlinks, I guess you should try other backlink source and continue to move it up.

    What backlink service / method are you using now?
    Signature

    Powerful Indexer That Makes Your Backlinks Count ==> Nuclear Link Indexer

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5270028].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author La Padre
      Originally Posted by kkchoon View Post

      I think your site still in the index, but Google seems to de-rank them by discounting some of your backlinks, I guess you should try other backlink source and continue to move it up.

      What backlink service / method are you using now?
      yes, the sites are definitely indexed, but they got some penalties. i found bmr is good tool to bump sites on top, some of them still keeping the ranks, some not. personally i believe bmr is not a quality link source, since the links are going out of blog's main pages fast.

      i'm used some manually picked social bookmark sites to push the crawler to the new sites. when the pages got stable positions i'm using articles as well as bmr. i'm going to try put an emphasis on articles instead. will see how this could help, the articles seems having more quality in general.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5270615].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kkchoon
    It doesn't matter if you've trigger manual reviews, but I think there are great chances you are being filter by the bot automatically, not by human.

    You should try Linkvana or AMA, they are good source of backlinks.
    Signature

    Powerful Indexer That Makes Your Backlinks Count ==> Nuclear Link Indexer

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5274779].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Juvv2096
    Diversify your backlinks just like kkchoon has said. Doing 1 type of backlinking can make your site a bit "flimsy" and move up and down a lot. Diversifying the type of backlinks solidifies your platform a bit better and can really help keep SERPS stable.
    Signature
    Web 2.0 Explosion - Hand Made Web 2.0's
    Ranks Drop After Blog Network Crash? Get Them Back!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5274855].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author guitarjosh
    Originally Posted by La Padre View Post

    Dear Warriors, could you stop for a moment and try to answer on my questions?

    My 2-3 month sites loosing their positions after getting to the top1-5, i'm trying to use natural slow link building, however i'm used to post to bmr when the site positions are stable at top10-20. usually i'm posting 10 but up to 15 posts, and the sites getting to the top1-5. however soon after that they loosing their positions and moving +30 positions back in average, or they could gone forever (they are indexed, but it's not possible to find the pages by their keywords).

    now i've a dilemma, should i continue to work on link building for these sites or should i leave they as is?

    there is also a logical question - should i make bmr posts for 2-3 month old sites, they seems to be very brittle at this age?
    You're "losing" your position.. not "loosing". Loose is the opposite of tight. Losing is the opposite of winning.

    Sorry dude.. pet peeve.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5275030].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author La Padre
      Originally Posted by guitarjosh View Post

      You're "losing" your position.. not "loosing". Loose is the opposite of tight. Losing is the opposite of winning.

      Sorry dude.. pet peeve.
      great, thanks for public flogging.

      you was absolutely correct, but absolutely not on the topic =)

      personally i don't believe it was a manual review, they shouldn't waste such resources on such a tiny issues.

      i like the idea about discounted links, since bmr posts moving from main pages very quickly. the twinkling links could looks spammy.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5284262].message }}

Trending Topics