The EXACT strategy i use to rank for ANY KEYWORD!

by 654 replies
826


Hi guys,

I’ve seen a lot of talk about SEO and link building strategies lately, and thought I’d chip in and give you guys the EXACT SEO strategy I personally use to rank my own websites.

Using my strategy, you work on only ONE keyword at a time. I work in SEO “cycles” each cycle targets and builds links for that ONE keyword. When the cycle is completed, I target the next keyword in another cycle dedicated to that keyword. The point here is not to target more than one keyword at a time in the same SEO Cycle.

Each cycle takes a considerable amount of time, and although it’s possible to do it entirely on your own I HIGHLY recommend you outsource the work. If you attempt to do everything yourself, you will burn yourself out within a few weeks, and will probably want to give up on IM completely!

So as soon as you can afford it, get others to complete this work for you.





This is how I get these results:


STEP 1: Pick a keyword

Pick ONE keyword on your site to target in the SEO cycle. If it’s a very difficult keyword, first add a new article to your site. If it’s easy to moderate competition, then this is not necessary.

STEP 2: Creating PROMO Content

Here you need to create all the content you will be using in the SEO cycle.

1. Start with an article related to your niche. This article does NOT have to target the keyword you are trying to rank for; it just needs to be about something relating to your niche. Then add spin syntax to the article (The Best spinner or Magic Article Re-writer works good). If you do not have money to buy one of these, I think there is a free version of spinner chief that will do the job.

NOTE: DO NOT automatically spin this article!! You need to manually spin each word so that the article is at least 60% unique. The idea is that when you generate a unique article, that it is the type of quality you would be willing to put on your website or submit to ezine articles (It must be THAT Good!) An article that does not read easy or make proper sense will NOT DO! (Trust me, I have extensively tested this)

Also remember to spin the title well – multiple titles all spun together works best.

Add two links in the article. Normally my one link goes to the page with the target keyword (The keyword is used as anchor text). My other link is normally linked to my home page (where my site’s main keyword is used as anchor text). Make sure that each time you spin the article the links are left intact.

2. Generate 2 unique versions of your promo article. Use these 2 articles and create 1 PDF file and 1 Power Point Slide show. Remember to add plenty of pictures.

3. Use Animoto, and create a video based on the article. The video must be at least 1min to 2min long. The easiest way to do this is to read the article, and pick a few facts you want to bring across in the video. Then spread the facts over a few text modules and simply add relevant pictures in between.

Remember to watermark your site URL at the bottom of the video.

You will need at least an Animoto Plus account to create full length videos – I think this only costs about $30 a year now.

STEP 3: Unleash the Promo content to the world!

As you submit your content to the various sites, it would be a good idea to copy each page’s URL that you create into a text document. You will be using these URL’s later.

1. Firstly, create a YouTube account and submit the Video to YouTube. Remember to start the video description with the full page URL of the target page you are trying to rank for. Ex. http://www.yoursite.com/target_page.html

2. Create accounts on Scribd and SlideShare. Submit the PDF file to Scribd. Then submit the Power Point Slide Show to Slide Share

3. Manual Web2.0 submission – Create accounts on the following web2.0 sites: Squidoo, Weebly, Wikia, Wetpaint, Wikispaces, Posterous, Tumblr, Wordpress, Blogspot, Zimbio, Skyrock and MyLivePage.

Then MANUALLY submit UNIQUE versions of your promo article to each one. BUT, , and include AT LEAST one relevant picture.

Sometimes some of the web2.0’s will delete your pages – but it’s still well worth the effort trying to submit to them.

This is probably the most boring and time consuming part of the entire SEO cycle. In the beginning I created a bot using UBOT to sign up to all these sites for me. But now days I got people working for me in the Philippines that take care of this.

4. Blog Networks. There are 8 Blog networks that I submit my Promo article to. Some may require you to remove the links from the body, and put them in a resource box instead. My article is submitted to the following networks: Article Blueprint, Distribute Your Articles, Blog Blueprint, Authority Link Network, Article Ranks, Free Traffic system, My Article Network and SEO Extreme.

5. SenukeX Campaign: I then run an automated web2.0 campaign using SenukeX (“Social Network” Campaign in SenukeX). I use the same Promo article as content, with links in the article body. I DO NOT submit to the same sites I already submitted to manually (Those where the YouTube video was embedded). This normally gives me additional 25 or 26 properties with my article and links.

6. Article Marketing Robot campaign. I have over 15k article directories in my AMR, just got the lists for free on the internet and added them as I got them. Out of these I successfully submit to about 1,500 sites and get about 300 to 400 which auto approve my article.

Again, if you are targeting a difficult keyword then . But for Medium to easy competition keywords this is not necessary.

Do not include links in your content body for AMR blasts. They need to be in a resource box. I normally include two keywords in my resource box – one to my site (target keyword as anchor text) and the other to a random URL of the manual web2.0 sites, including the Docstoc, SlideShare, Scribd and YouTube URL’s or an inner page of your site. This can all be randomized using spin syntax.

STEP 4: Strengthen your links!

This part is often overlooked by so many marketers, yet it is to getting results. Do not quit your SEO cycle half way through; else you will be greatly disappointed with your results.

1. Thorough Social Bookmarking campaign. Use SenukeX or Book Marking Demon and social bookmark the following URL’s to all the Social Bookmarking sites:
a. All Manually Created Web2.0 pages
b. YouTube Video URL
c. SlideShare, Docstoc and Scribd pages

2.
Quick Social Bookmarking campaign. Again use SenukeX or Book Marking Demon and bookmark the AMR links. This does not have to be thorough. The idea is simply to bookmark each AMR URL on at least three social bookmarking sites.

3. RSS Feeds. Use html2rss.com and add the following URL’s to multiple RSS feeds.
a. All Manually Created Web2.0 pages
b. YouTube Video
c. SlideShare and Scribd pages
d. AMR URL’s

NOTE: Each feed should only contain about 50 URLS. You should have about 4 or 5 RSS feeds after all the URL’s are added into feeds.

Then use SenukeX and submit these RSS feeds to all the RSS aggregators. And use the Pinger module in SenukeX to Ping all the RSS feeds as well.

4. ScrapeBox Blast. Use scrapebox and blast the following urls:
a. All Manually created web2.0 pages
b. All SenukeX created web2.0 pages
c. All AMR created pages
d. Money Site (Only if it is well aged)

I have simply searched the internet for free auto-approve lists. I normally blast to about 60K to 100k blogs.

And there you have it! That marks the end of one SEO cycle, and it means you should get started with the next!

Regarding Accounts, I only ever create new accounts when I start working on a new site. Some sites have 10+ SEO cycles done on them already, and the same set of accounts was used! I always use proxies, sometimes private, paid proxies and other times just free scraped proxies from scrapebox.

I have NEVER EVER had ANY kind of penalty using this strategy.

Feel free to adjust this strategy to your own needs.

Once you have done this a couple of times, one person should be able to complete 2 to 3 of these cycles a week. Each of my assistants in the Philippines can complete 2 cycles a week, and get started on the third!

It’s a TON of work for one person, but if you are willing to put in the work you will definitely see great results. I hope this strategy will be useful to at least some of you.

Remember, if you like the post don’t forget to hit THANKS!

Regards

Nick



#search engine optimization #exact #keyword #rank #strategy
  • [DELETED]
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks for sharing this bro. I've just started learning SEO and with the launch of my new website this surely will come in handy.

      Cheers mate
  • Great post Nick. I love learning about the techniques of others and trying to see what I can fit into my own strategies.

    Definitely pressing the "thanks" button.
    • [1] reply
    • A very interesting read. Always looking for new ideas when it comes to SEO and this provided some.
      Thanks
  • Love the details. Thanks, for the share!

    I will definitely make some alterations to my usual link campaigns.

    Urgh, SEnuke would be so nice to have but it's so expensive!
    • [2] replies
    • Magic Submitter is better and it is only half the price.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • Agree with this. Anyway, still nice sharing
  • Great tips. You need backlinks to help you rank for your keywords.
  • Wonderful post. This needs a lot of patience and effort. The hard part is to find the right person that can do the quality work in proper manner and deliver the results on time.
    • [1] reply
    • I will have to try some one these techniques on my site. Thanks.
  • You must be targeting kws with a LOT of competition to go to this effort
    • [1] reply
    • I agree. I love to read about other people's SEO strategies...always interesting to see someone else's take on things. And a lot of the time I learn a neat little trick I didnt think of before.

      Agreed, thats why i hire a team of outsources to run through this for me...

      What forum would that be buddy? No way in hell this was copied from another forum...took me like an hour staring at my SEO whiteboard in my office to write this post out!

      Like mentioned elsewhere, it may be worth a try to give Magic Submitter a go. I had both for a while, but I always seemed to get better results with Senuke.

      Another option would be to simply pay someone with Senuke to run this part of the campaign for you. Fiverr has got tons of Senuke campaigns for $5...

      Yes, you are correct...takes time and effort, but in the end it all pays off. The secret about getting someone else to do this for you, is to build a relationship with them. You will never ever be able to get the random freelancer to do this for you whenever you feel like it.

      Some of my guys took up to a month to get into things properly...only then, when they become productive does it become profitable.

      Also, it helps to spread the tasks over multiple people. Have one person creating accounts, another writing content and then two or three posting the content.

      Not necessarily...once you get into it, its not that much effort. And the easy to medium keywords rank almost instantly...within a few days...
      • [1] reply
  • i wanted to mention something about the Blog networks...

    I realize not everyone has the money to invest right away to use that many blog networks...but if you can, get started with at least one of the good networks.

    Or you could simply pay someone on Fiverr $5 to post your content to the blog network for you...
    • [1] reply
    • Tons of work and content; one of the best posts I've seen on this forum. I don't like the idea of spinning articles. Google prefers that we add original content so that's what I'm going to stick to.
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Hi Nick, thanks for this great post.
    I don't have the time to do all this work. You mentioned outsourcing. Can you tell me how much it will cost to outsource one cycle and where I can find good people who can do this job.

    Sincerely, Duc
    • [1] reply
    • Hi there, fantastic thread NickWatson, just what i was looking for, thank you.
      Can I also enquire about the outsourcing resources?
      Might I expect a MP too?
      • [1] reply
  • This is a thread for subscribing to. Good well laid out content.

    Actually, its better than some WSO's I've seen, seriously

    Thanks to Mr NickWatson for the share!
    • [1] reply
    • Nick, I couldn't agree more, and Jordy, you nailed it!
      Thank you warrior brother for meticulously laying this out. It helps both the newbie as well as the veteran.

      You have a fan in me!

      Tevis
      • [1] reply
  • Hi !

    I have create PDF of my article and post to Scribd and Docstoc, When I check ranking, the PDF in Scribd and Docstoc high ranking than my article, #2 and #5 on Top 10 and my article is #9 . Should I post on Scribd or not ?
    • [1] reply
    • Sent you a pm...

      Thanks a ton, hope it helps some people out!

      Yes i always submit to Scribd and Docstoc...im not sure i understand your question though? Did you put the same article on your website? Because you should NOT put the same content on your website, the content you submit to these sites should be totally different.

      But anyway, you will always have some of these properties ranking as well...but that is fine, because they get traffic, people click on the links and visit your site too...

      This is one of the reasons I DO NOT target my target keyword in the promo content - i dont want the web2.0 properties competing with my site...so just make the promo articles about anything else in your niche...as long as its related to your niche you will be fine...
      • [2] replies
  • Thanks for this great resource!

    A few questions. How long should these articles be? Also, you say to use spin syntax, I assume that it's OK it manually rewrite these articles as well, right?

    For the manual web2.0 submissions, I need to use a unique article for each submission, correct?

    Now, for steps 4, 5, and 6, do I need to use a unique article for each step, or can I blast the same article to all the blog networks, senuke 2.0, and amr blast? Should this article be unique from the others submitted to the manual 2.0s, or can it be a non-unique one?

    Thanks for the great post!
    • [1] reply
    • I always make the articles at least 500 words in length, some longer. It would be ok to re-write the entire article as well,but this would take A LOT longer. And if you MANUALLY spin an article you end up with a decent article. Make sure they are at least 60% unique.

      Yes, that is correct. Each time you submit an article to a web2.0 property, first spin a unique version of it. Remember to embed your YouTube video and add pictures.

      If it's an easy, long tail keyword I simply use the same article. Thats why you need to make sure it is spun properly. I also write out at least 4 different titles, and then spin then all individually and spin them so it uses on of them randomly.

      If it is a difficult keyword though, it's best to have a new article written for submission to these sites though...but you will also need to spin this new article - you NEVER EVER want the EXACT same article going to all these sites...it must always be at least 60% spun content...


      Hope this clears things up...
      • [1] reply
  • Good solid write up man, im gonna try it and see how it works with one of my sites.
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Yeah but you running into problems with duplicate content there buddy...the articles on your site should be top notch, giving the user exactly what they searched for. The articles you write for PDF's etc must be totally different, and can just be about anything relating to your niche. The idea with them is only to get the link pointing to your site...

      Good Luck...come back to use and let us know how it worked for you..
  • This is a detailed explanation (which could have been released in a WSO! ) and I must say I am impressed. You have made a good outline in keyword research and I do hope that it will be effective for me too.

    My keyword research techniques is not as detailed as this so I will give this a try.

    Thank you!
    Ryuchi
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks for the kind words buddy, but i definitely think you should read the post again...its got absolutely NOTHING to do with keyword research. It's actually a backlinking campaign to get your website pages to rank in Google...
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
  • This is one thorough and complete SEO "cycle"...awesome.

    Pair this with a "little" authority site (a site which is well structured with categories, tags etc.)...you will be able to rank high for almost any keyword for sure.

    Edit:

    I want to add some more. If you do such complex campaigns with a LARGE number of links, you MUST make sure to vary your anchor texts.

    --> Do not use only your "keyword" as anchor texts, use your keyword and one or two closely related keyword(s) in maybe 50% of your anchors, but DO NOT BE AFRAID to use blank URLS and also words like "here" etc. as anchor texts.

    Do not make the mistake and blast 10.000 links which all have a keyword, this might back-fire.

    --> If you submit your articles with Senuke and the various blog networks, don't hesitate to ALSO link to authority sites and other related sites together with YOUR link in your article. It is my personal "belief" that such links are stronger and it also looks more natural if a link comes with other, related links. The fact that you also link to wkipedia etc. does NOT make your link "weaker".

    The same applies to bookmarks. When you bookmark, don't hesitate to make your bookmarking account look natural. Link to the latest news on the web, whatever everyone is talking about...AND your sites. Don't just "spoil" a bookmarking account by linking only to your own sites.
    • [ 4 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks buddy, some great input here...and i totally agree. I'll be honest though, my anchor text is always either my target keyword or an LSI keyword.

      With regards to linking to other sites, i TOTALLY agree with this. ESPECIALLY if you link to some authority sites...The same goes for the actual content on your website, give the searcher EXACTLY what they are looking for, and sometimes that even means giving them a link of another site...so be it...
  • Nick, thanks for taking the time to share this. I am going to try this strategy.

    A quick question regarding blog networks:

    Since I don't have the money to invest in all of them at once, which one would you recommend I start with? Is there ONE that stands above the rest for a noobie?
    • [1] reply
    • Good luck, come back to us in a week or two and let everyone here know about your progress. I would love to read how well this works for you.

      With regards to a blog network, I would use Article Ranks if i could only use one...
      • [1] reply
  • Great post OP! Very detailed and thorough.

    I vote this for a sticky! I think this is the perfect reference guide for all to return to while running our own seo 'cycles'

    I am doing something vaguely similar to this. i think im going to apply your strategy more fully on my site and see where it takes me!
    • [1] reply
    • Wow thanks! Glad you enjoyed the read...get back to us in a week or two and let us know what kind of results you have had with this...will be very interesting to see.
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
  • Great post... anyone reading this can do this for me?
  • This is an excellent post! I may have to outsource this and compare it to my current SEO results. Thanks for the share!
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Nick,

    Really appreciate you taking the time to share your strategy. I think this is a very good strategy to incorporate into what I'm already doing and an excellent way to learn more about SEO and other alternative sources for traffic.

    @WikiWarrior, I would also like to know what you find out about the Scribd issue and MMO.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks buddy, and that will be great. As i said earlier, get back to this thread and let us all know the kind of results you are getting...especially compared to your own SEO strategy (maybe we can swap notes ) - I'm always keen to expand my own strategy or try new things...so will be interesting to read your results...

      Thanks buddy, hope it helps.
  • Great write-up Nick, I'm a HUGE fan of scrapebox myself. I always backlink my backlinks. I'm glad to see such a thorough a !
  • you have really explained great things to rank high in google SERP, but i create a blog and get it on the first page of google within a week..just collect ten to 15 high pr backlinks and all free..i do not find any use of these software program.. most of my blogger blogs on first page of google(some have 1st ranking and get around 100 daily unique visits)
    • [1] reply
    • hello kick ,can you please also so send me the information on outsourcing you backlinking strategy please. thankyou
  • Fine SEO strategy. I love your backlinking tactics, too.
  • I have NO doubt that this works, but implementing it looks expensive. Between SeNukeX, 8 private blog networks, Scrapebox, spinning software, Article Marketing Robot and virtual assistants to out-source to, we're talking serious money. Is it safe to assume you're going after some super high profit keywords to be putting in this much effort and only doing 2-3 cycles/week??
  • Banned
    I think if anyone want to get keyword ranking then from starting, from at the time of choice of keyword one has to be aware in choice of keyword and have to choose such which used more by people as per their need in your field. And then after the first step of choice of keyword, you need to provide better content with targeting that keyword. And then measure your results, you definitely get the better ranking for your keyword.
  • Excellent post Nick, well laid out. The best park about this post is that anyone having trouble ranking KW's would copy this and send it to a VA and tell them to copy it .
    • [1] reply
    • This could be done a lot cheaper...most of the tasks could be individually outsourced to Fiverr for $5 a piece.

      And im doing 2 to 3 cycles a weeks PER VA ;-)

      Thanks.

      I would highly recommend NOT doing that though. I never have any single VA knowing my entire cycle.

      I always have at least two or three different guys working on the same cycle. One guy does the content, the other the manual account creation and some submissions, and another would do the rest of the submissions and the social bookmarking.

      Then all the strengthening link stuff, and AMR submisison I always do myself.

      I may just be too paranoid...but since these guys are already doing all the work, whats to stop them from quitting to work for me and simply doing it for themselves?
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • SEO CYCLE CASE STUDY:

    Ok so i thought it would be a good idea to show you guys how quickly and easily this method works.

    About the keyword:

    I selected a long tail keyword in the baby/pregnancy niche...this keyword consists of 4 words

    It gets 2,400 BROAD monthly searches and 1,600 EXACT monthly searches according to the Google keyword tool

    About the competition:

    I used market samurai to analyse the top 10 - mostly PR 2 and 3 pages. Mostly authority sites that are 5 years plus in age. Most PAGES have little backlinks though...we looking at under 500...except for two sites that have over 2,000...NONE of the sites have .Edu or .Gov links.

    5 of the sites are listed in Yahoo Dir and Dmoz. Onsite opimization is not great, but there is some.

    About my site:

    I bought an exact match domain...and added one 700 word article to the site with some pics. And also a Contact us page and a Privacy policy page...nothing else.

    I built a sitemap and submitted to Google webmaster tools, and added Google analytics and statcounter code.

    The site is built on a wordpress platform.

    The site build, contact page, and privacy policy page was done 3 days ago. And yesterday when i checked the site was already indexed in Google...(With no backlinking whatsoever) If it was not, a simple social bookmarking campaign would get it indexed

    The site was still not ranked in the top 500 for my target keyword.

    What Ive done so far (yesterday - after checking if it's indexed):
    1. Added the 700 word article
    2. You tube video
    3. All manual Web2.0's (with video embedded)
    4. Scribd, Docstoc and slideshare links
    This was done yesterday.

    Results so far:
    This morning when i checked the site was ranked in position 292 in Google for my keyword.

    What im doing today:
    1. AMR blast
    2. Blog network submission
    3. SenukeX automated web2.0 campaign
    4. Social Bookmarking ALL yesterday's links.
    • [4] replies
    • Wonderful post!
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • I greatly appreciate the example Thank you !
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • web 2.0 question : you mean UNIQUE articles , so I need to have 20 unique articles if want to submit to 20 web 2.0? that's tired..

    • hi I noticed you mentioned you target a long tail keyword of four words or more. what do you think about targeting a short tail keyword, say of about 2 words. For instance. I have a site a bout vacuum cleaners. Am I in for a real difficult time if I want to target a keyword like "vaccuum cleaner reviews" or like "portable vacuums"
      • [1] reply
  • Hi Nick,
    thanks for this great post. Thanks for sharing all the details on your campaign strategy. Would you mind to give some recommendations on outsourcing?
    • [1] reply
    • Impressive results!

      Then MANUALLY submit UNIQUE versions of your promo article to each one. BUT, , and include AT LEAST one relevant picture.


      when you said UNIQUE.. do you mean the :

      2. Generate 3 unique versions of your promo article. Use these 3 articles and create 2 PDF files and 1 Power Point Slide show. Remember to add plenty of pictures.

      I am kind of confused here.. do we need to create another unique articles for the web 2.0 or we used the 3 that we already have..

      Thanks
  • Bookmarked and following your results closely
    • [4] replies
    • Yes, how does one find good support in the Philippines? What sites do you go to besides Odesk to find reliable people? Or is Odesk the best site for outsourcing?
      • [1] reply
    • with your senuke campaigns, are you running individual projects each day or monthly campaigns?
      • [1] reply
    • Do not include links in your content body for AMR blasts. They need to be in a resource box. I normally include two keywords in my resource box - one to my site (target keyword as anchor text) and the other to a random URL of the manual web2.0 sites, including the Docstoc, SlideShare, Scribd and YouTube URL's or an inner page of your site. This can all be randomized using spin syntax.
      • [1] reply
    • Great advice, thanks for sharing.
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks guys, hope it helps some of you out...

      As for outsourcing, it's best to go with a company that specializes in Virtual Assistants. Search google for "seo virtual assistant philippines" or similar...I prefer working with guys in the philippines...cheap and they always eager to please.

      You can get a full time VA working 5 days a week for you for anywhere between $300 and $800 a month...If you cannot afford it, it might be worth outsourcing the individual tasks to fiverr or similar...
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Hi Nick,

    Nice to read your post and great strategy. I'm just starting out for now and have got 2 sites built to date with another 10 planned for this year.

    When researching the niche with market samurai, google trends etc, I have used the following:

    (i) low average PR competing pages of <2
    (ii) traffic recommendation is minimum SEO Traffic 80 per day.
    (iii) moderate exact searches per month (preferably 4k+), and
    (iv) around 20k all in title and all in url quote competition.
    (v) adwords CPC of minimum $0.80

    Is the above appropriate? Please advise from your experience how I can use market samurai effectively to enter into niche markets. I have several written down, just not sure how to assess and pick the right ones.
    • [1] reply
    • This seems like good criteria...but you in the end the ONLY thing thats going to work is for YOU to test and see what works. If you are battling to rank your pages, either add better content or select easier keywords. But the criteria you have mentioned above would be fairly easy to rank for...BUT you did not look at the amount and quality of your competitors backlinks or their on page optimization.

      The way I personally do it, is to totally forget about number of competing pages etc... (I have had keywords with well over 250k "in quote" competing pages rank within a week!)

      i simply look at who is currently in the top 10 positions, for a normal (non-quoted search) of my keyword. Then I analyze the PAGES (NOT Domain) that is ranking. And i decide if i would be able to do better than any of them.

      Generally these are the criteria I personally look at:
      1. PR of pages - majority should be 2 and under - none over 3
      2. Number of backlinks for the PAGE (not the domain) - anything under 500 is pretty good
      3. .Edu or .Gov backlinks - preferably 0 - but if one or two pages have a couple thats ok. But I dont want all the pages to have 10+ if you get my drift
      4. Dmoz and YDir listing - Again preferably none! If 2 or 3 sites are listed id still consider it. But their listing here is normally a sign that they are considered authority sites
      5. Onsite optimization - generally I prefer to target keywords where the competition are not well optimized. If a page is 100% well optimized, id check it's links etc... to get a better idea of what id need to do to over throw them.

      I also look at the sites that are ranking...videos, article directories or any other web 2.0's are generally a sign that the keyword will be very easy to rank for

      I do not care about site age either...ive created free blogger blogs with a single article on it that ranks number 2..all my competitors are older than 8 years!!

      But again, this sort of thing is personal preference and i dont think there are really any set-in-stone type of rules. Just go with what you have, and test till you find what works best for you.

      Hope this helps
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
      • [2] replies
  • Hi Nick,

    Thanks for another reply. This is exactly what I was wondering: You answered it perfectly. You see, I'm new new to spinning and did not know that you could create a spin syntax and set SenukeX and AMR to submit a different spin to every article directory and every web 2.0. Now I understand after reading the following: I think we've got everything cleared up (at least for now, lol.)!

    Also, thanks for doing a case-study as well. I was just thinking that this would be a fun thing to do with this method.

    I'll be looking forward to reading about your results!
  • CASE STUDY UPDATE:

    Ok so our case study is off to a really rocky start...the VA I had working on this cycle yesterday, got ill half way through the day and was sent home...a fact that I only found out about this morning!

    So, the only work actually completed yesterday was the AMR blast...

    The SenukeX and the Manual Web2.0 campaigns will only be completed today.

    So before we even really got started we are already an entire day behind! But unfortunately these things happen, and we will have to deal with it - hence the Sat work!

    Tasks for today:
    1. SenukeX automated Web2.0 campaign
    2. Manual Web2.0 campaign
    3. Blog network submissions
    4. Thorough Social Bookmarking campaign
    5. Quick Social bookmarking campaign of AMR links

    Tasks for tomorrow:
    1. Create all RSS feeds
    2. Ping All RSS feeds and Submit to RSS Directories using SenukeX
    3. ScrapeBox blast

    Results so far:
    Checked the site this morning and it moved up to position 289.
    Obviously I was not expecting any fantastic results, as it's only been one day and no real link building has been done.


    EDIT: I also just wanted to let you guys know, I have added one video to the site. Nothing special...just a random YouTube video on the topic, and simply embedded it in the article
    • [1] reply
    • I love reading case studies and yours looks fantastic! So much information and so detailed, thank you for all the time that you are putting into this and for sharing with us.

      I also have 3 blogs that I'm working on right now. The bad part about all of them is that I've started to work on all of them almost half a year ago and kind of forgotten about them until about 2 weeks ago. My hosting was also closed due to the fact that I didn't pay for it, therefore one of my sites some of my pages which had PR of 2, 3 and even 4 now all have PR 0..., while other site has gained PR from 0 to 2 and 3. I think its funny, but I don't know what happened there.

      Right now I'm trying to figure out what to do with them. All of them have some backlinking done, mostly social bookmarking of pages and home page. One of them, that has PR 2-3, has over 2k backlinks. When I was building this site (its a wordpress blog with 5 articles and a few videos and pics) I paid for some backlinking services and I guess now I'm seeing some results. I actually have 2 of my kws on page 1, ranking 1 and 2, but the funny part is I have no traffic whatsoever, still trying to figure out what is going on with that.

      After reading your posts I think what I will do is I will definitely join one of the blog networks, then I will submit spun versions of one of my article to article directories don't have AMR so will have to do it manually for now, probably will choose around 10 for now and see how it goes), create more Web 2.0 profiles and submit articles to them, social bookmark all the links, create RSS feeds, submit them to RSS aggregators and ping. Don't know how to create videos yet, but I will work on them this month.

      I know that my post is a mess but I got motivated after I read your case study and just wanted to share some things that I have on my plate right now. I will probably do my own case study on my blog and will share it later to let you know how I'm doing. Thank you again for your great input!

      Viktor.
  • Wow. This is a nice post. I only do no. 3 and no. 4 for most of my seo campaigns and it works.

    But I think if I do everything from your 1 cycle, I believe it has the power to rank almost any keywords. Though, for more competitive niches, several cycles will be needed.
    • [1] reply
    • Great stuff! Would love to see a case study from you as well...I think the biggest secret in this industry is consistency! Stick to it and you will definitely see SOME kind of results SOMEWHERE!

      As for videos, check out Animoto.com - thats what i use

      Thanks bud...and if what you do works for you, then why change it right! As we all know, SEO is not an exact science and if you can get results with less effort then why not!
      • [1] reply
  • Interesting strategy. I will have to try this out with one of my sites. I'll come back to share my results. Thanks for the great share.
  • This is an excellent post!
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • OUTSOURCING

    Ok guys i've been getting a lot of PM's lately about outsourcing. I don't feel i recommend any specific company without being biased. So here are a few tips.

    1. If you can afford it, hire a full time Virtual Assistant (VA) - ideally from the Philippines. This will cost you between $400 and $800 a month. Train them well and never let a single VA know your entire seo cycle.

    2. To find a company offering VA's - simply search google for "SEO VA philippines" or similar. There are plenty companies that offer VA's of this type. It will also be useful if you can get a VA that has some training in SEO and has some SEO tools available to him - this saves you from needing to buy these tools yourself

    3. Avoid using odesk or similar - some of these guys may have the same hourly rate, but they work from home. They are not in an office with someone to supervise them (As with a VA from a company). So generally they tend to be less productive

    4. DO NOT give the individual tasks to freelancers to do on a once-off basis. Firstly it will cost you a fortune - they charge $30 to $40 JUST for the manual web2.0 submission! AND they are not trained by you, doing it everyday, so they are VERY unproductive with your time...Small mistakes can be VERY COSTLY Time-wise

    5. If you really cannot afford help, it may be worth turning to Fiverr to help you complete the labour-intensive work. But again, this must be seen only as a way to HELP you complete the cycles - to outsource everything to Fiverr may also be quite costly/cycle

    6. DON'T be afraid to do some work yourself! Even today still with a whole team of VA's to help me, i still do some of the cycle work myself. They just take care of all the tedious boring stuff. Do not expect to get a VA and just drop the entire SEO cycle into their lap - you will be disappointed!

    Hope these practical tips are useful for some of you...

    Nick
    • [ 5 ] Thanks
  • CASE STUDY UPDATE

    WHAT WAS DONE YESTERDAY:
    1. Blog Network Submission
    2. SenukeX campaign
    3. Manual Web2.0 campaign
    4. SOME of the thorough social bookmarking campaign

    I got caught up yesterday with other work, and did not have time to complete the quick social bookmakarking of the AMR campaign. Also my VA didn't have time to complete the the entire Thorough social bookmarking campaign - this will be completed on monday.

    Tasks for MONDAY:
    1. Create all RSS feeds
    2. Ping All RSS feeds and Submit to RSS Directories using SenukeX
    3. ScrapeBox blast
    4. Quick social bookmarking of AMR urls
    5. Completion of the thorough social bookmarking

    I know I said i was going to complete these tasks today - but i totally forgot it's my girlfriends birthday...And i dont think she will appreciate it too much if im in my office working all day on her special day! So im rather going to spend some quality time with her today and complete the work on monday.

    Results so far:
    Checked the site this morning, and it has moved up to position 23
    This is not bad, especially considering we have only been working on links for about 3 days. BUT with this type of keyword i really was expecting it to be closer to the top 10 by this stage...I think it may be bit more of a struggle because the competing pages are fairly large authorities in the niche...

    It may be a little early to tell, and still got to do the Google dance, but I think one more SEO Cycle and we will be where we need to be for this site. IF we are VERY lucky, after this cycle is completed we may be placed in the top 10...

    Moving Forward:
    For now I just want to fully complete this first cycle for the site, and give it a couple of days to give chance for the Google dance and to see where we floating around.
    Once this cycle is completed, im going to add another Youtube video to the article and maybe some additional pictures with paragraph-long descriptions. The reason for this is I want google to see a constantly updated page while deciding on where to place me in the rankings.

    If by thursday or so next week we are still not in the top 10 I will commence a second SEO cycle for this site...
  • This is a nice twist strategy you got there pal. Good thing that you shared this, because its another goldmine that SEO specialists and internet marketers are looking for. Well, since this is so effective I might give this a shot....and to my friend as well.
  • Awesome thread, keep up the good work man!
    • [1] reply
    • Yeah, glad i could have helped. Sad thing is, many internet marketers will not put this to practice. But for those of you that do,you will definitely see some great results.

      Will be great if you get back to the thread with some results...will make for an interesting read..

      Thanks bud, hope it helps...
  • CASE STUDY UPDATE:

    I was actually NOT going to post an update today as it's Sunday...but i just could not help myself...

    Results so far:
    This morning I checked my site and I had started receiving like 3 or 4 unique visitors...So i checked the ranking and it has moved up to position 14...

    The site is also now ranked position 377 for a very broad term in the same niche...

    This is great news, as it means We might even hit the first page just by completing the first SEO cycle...

    Strategy for the site stays the same...on monday we will complete the SEO cycle, add some additional pics and a youtube video embed...then wait till thursday to see where we stand. At that point, I will decide whether or not to start on a second cycle..
  • [DELETED]
  • Some golden information here, Thanks
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • By authority sites I don't mean YouTube...YouTube videos would fall in the same category as Web2.0's (for me anyway)...By authority sites I mean sites that have a couple hundred pages at least of content, they are well aged, high pr...just a general "authority" in the niche...this is especially true when the page ranking is highly optimized for the keyword. I'm not saying you can not outrank them...im just saying it's normally a sign of a difficult keyword and a long struggle ahead of you to get to the top..

      But I do agree with you on the YouTube videos though...very easy to outrank...sames goes for any article directory pages, EMD "sniper-type" sites, web2.0's like blogger, wordpress.com, weebly, squidoo etc etc...

      News sites on the other hand I don't even bother trying to outrank. If I see a term where the top 5 competitors are CNN, Fox etc... i stay FAR AWAY.

      Thanks bud, hope it helps

      Definitely. I actually done a test on this a while back. And when unique, well-spun content was used for backlinking the pages generally ranked pretty quickly.

      But when we used duplicate content, we had great difficulty getting anywhere with the rankings. And whats more, when eventually we did start building proper links to these pages...it STILL took ages to get them ranked. It's as if the duplicate content links destroyed the site's "reputation" or something..
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • How do I do to get the "All AMR created pages"' please?

    "4. ScrapeBox Blast. Use scrapebox and blast the following urls:
    a. All Manually created web2.0 pages
    b. All SenukeX created web2.0 pages
    c. All AMR created pages
    d. Money Site (Only if it is well aged)

    I have simply searched the internet for free auto-approve lists. I normally blast to about 60K blogs...."


    Regards

    Nick[/QUOTE]
    • [1] reply
    • You can get the urls by right clicking on the list of directories and selecting "Live Links". Than save the file.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Nickwatson, What is your opinion on link velocity, do you repeat the process above every single week?
  • God, this must be one of the most valuable post in the WF seo section so far in this year. And its free, thank you for the awesome share of your seo techniques.

    However, its undeniable that you have so many paid services included in your method, probably makes it much more expensive. Any cheaper alternatives for recommendation?
  • Hi regarding your seo , do you know someone who i can outsource to and approx what should be the cost per keyword
    • [1] reply
    • Yeah please come back and post your results, will be great to see

      Yes, but for different sites. Normally I'd complete one full cycle for a site, then give it a few days to see where it lays in the SERP's. If necessary I'll start another cycle for that site.

      There is not much maintenance to be done once you have got the rankings. Most of my sites are well over a year old and still going strong, without any additional effort from myself.

      If you were targeting a very difficult keyword, with loads of competition, this might be a different story though. And you might need to constantly add new content to your site, and run the odd cycle to keep it up in the SERPS..

      But for regular medium to easy keywords, i literally just run SEO Cycles until I got the ranking I want...then stop..and move onto the next project...

      Thanks, and the only "cheaper" alternative i could think of is to pay someone who has the tools to do it for you. Check out Fiverr...

      Also check out my outsourcing tips higher in this thread.

      Check the outsourcing tips above in this thread buddy...
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Great share! What I like about this is its very straight to the point and it does not add some more mumbo jumbo. You are told what to do and how to do it. Plus it also comes with a matching case study.

    Thanks added and thread subscribed.
  • Awesome resource Nick! I have learned so much from this post. Thank you so much for the share.
  • Nick, Thanks for sharing such detailed information. It is easy to see that your SEO efforts are covering all the bases. The case for outsourcing is made. It is going to be time consuming but I will be incorporating some of your methods into my work. Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks guys, makes it all worth it if it truly helps some of you. If any of you put this to work for yourselves, come back and post your results here...we would all love to read about it!
  • SEO CASE STUDY UPDATE


    What was done today:
    1.
    2 new pics added to my site, each with a paragraph-long description.
    2. Thorough social bookmarking campaign completed
    3. RSS feeds created, submitted and pinged
    4. Quick Social bookmarking campaign of AMR urls
    5. ScrapeBox blast is running as I type this...will be complete in a couple of hours

    This marks the end of one full SEO cycle.

    Moving Forward:
    As I mentioned before, all I want to do now is give this site a few days and see what it does in the SERP's. On thursday if I'm not happy with the ranking I might start a second SEO Cycle..

    The Results:
    First thing this morning I checked and I was NO WHERE in the TOP 500!!
    Checked at about lunch time and I had moved into position 10 (YEAH! First page!)
    I checked now just before posting this update, and I had moved up to position 8 for my main target keyword and from position 377 to position 20 for a very general broad term in the niche.

    So I think it's safe to say i am officially engaged in the all-popular Google dance! The big question now, is where am i going to be placed when the dust settles?

    For my main target keyword (The longtail one) I think I will settle in the top 10 after the cycle has completed and left to stand for a few days. If i wanted to rank for the broad term (currently #20), I think I would need at least one or two additional cycles concentrating on only on that keyword.

    Through all the ups and downs of the Google dance today, the site managed to get 12 unique visitors!

    My Views:
    All in all I am happy with the results so far. If you consider, only 4 days ago the content was first added to the site, and the SEO cycle officially began...AND we had a day delay because my VA was unexpectedly ill...

    And now, only 4 days later the site is already hovering on the first page (Albeit in the google dance). This alone SHOULD give you guys some idea of how powerful this SEO strategy REALLY is!

    Don't be lazy, put it to work for yourself and you will be seeing similar results...

    Nick
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Hi Nick, thanks for keeping us all updated on this, I will keep visiting to see how it settles.
      May I ask what you are using to track the movements of your keywords?
      • [1] reply
  • Will try it out, what happens after the months though, do you see a dignificant drop or gradual decline?
  • Nice post Nick thanks for sharing. Would you mind sharing where you got the AMR list?
  • Hey Nick,
    Nice strategy, I do some things similar, particularly with the blog networks. I also use backlinks energizer to boost all my links instead of going through the hassle of creating RSS feeds, it's a great plugin, and a massive time saver, you should give it a try if you haven't already.
    I have AMR, but have not been using it much. You say you do AMR blasts, so you're blasting one article out to over 1,500 article directories and getting all your links? or are you adding spin syntax in the article in order for AMR to automatically spin for each submission? Just wondering, because otherwise does this not count as 300-400 links with duplicate content?

    Also, you say you can do a couple of cycles a week. i am assuming you do not follow this strategy for new sites? Surely Google is not going to favour you for blasting that many links at a brand new site?

    Either way, nice post mate.
  • Hey man, first off great post I appreciate all the time and effort you put into helping the community. Straight up!

    I have a few questions, please bear with me I'm still kinda sorta new to this.
    When you mention in step 2 at the end of number 1 to add two links to the article, can we just add one link?

    I'm asking because you mentioned one goes to a link to the homepage and one to the page that's targeting the keywords.. on my sites I only have the homepage, contact us, and the posts page. And then like 10 posts.
    Or do I link a post using that posts kw as anchor plus another anchor using the homepages kw?

    Next I'm wondering what you mean @ step 3 right before number 1 you state to copy each pages url that you create into a text document.

    Thanks! I am going to try this out on my sites since I have not been able to come up with a plan.
    • [1] reply
    • I can't remember the exact place. I literally just searched google for it. I got various lists of directories and imported them all into AMR.

      AMR will automaticall add it to its list if its a directory it can submit to...else it will ignore it if its already in the list or if its not supported.

      Thanks bud. With regards to AMR, I use the article in spin syntax, spun to at least 50% to 60% unqiue. I do this manually with the help of The Best Spinner. So there's no real worry of duplicate content here..also I blast the article immediately to all available directories..i never "drip feed" anything.

      And you wrong about not wanting to use this strategy for a new site bud. Read the case posts I made above. It was a brand new site, and within 4 days got it ranked in position 8 with only one cycle.

      I have never had any of my sites sandboxed, or penalized in any way using this strategy - even brand new sites. The only thing i do is make sure the site is indexed in Google before running a cycle.

      hey and thanks.

      Yes you can simply add one link if you wish. But what id do instead is add two links to the same page using different anchor texts. Maybe use an LSI keyword for the other.

      You could also just use the other link to randomly link to one of your other web2.0 properties already done. Like the YouTube video, Weebly page etc...

      The only reason i say to add each page's URL into a text document, is because if you follow the cycle - you will need the urls later on in the cycle. For example, after creating the manual web2.0 properties, you need those URL's when doing a social bookmarking campaign to them, or when adding them to an rss feed...it's simply to make it easier for you down the road...

      Regards

      Nick
  • Nick, you posted that you use proxies.

    Could you elaborate more on this? How do you use them, in what way? That is, what do you use them for? Have you ever noticed any difference between using them and not using them?

    Thanks for expounding upon this a bit more.
    • [1] reply
    • I use private proxies for creating accounts and submitting content to the sites. I also use CCLEANER to clear the computer's cache and history each time before creating new accounts.

      The reason I use them is so that the sites i constantly submit content to (under various accounts) dont see that there are 500 accounts all from the same IP address - they will simply ban all the accounts associated with the same ip and ill lose ALL my backlinks.

      Also, when using software like SenukeX it's essential to use your own private proxies else your success rate is really low...
      • [2] replies
  • Nice plagiarism you got going there. Glad you were inspired by cash202's strategy to take some action, but why claim it as your own some 8 months later? Needing some attention?...dick. Give credit where it's due!

    Can't post a link yet but the original is on Black Hat World Forum titled "My Seo Blueprint (SENuke, AMR, BMD, Xrumer, Scrapebox)".
  • [DELETED]
  • similar to cash202's post on a different forum

    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Ya'll fools that keep popping up randomly to hate on this guy should just get over yourselves, geez no one cares if he did or didn't get this from anyone else.

    We're just trying to learn here!
    Anyways thanks for answering my questions man, I'm doing this method with a few mods to see if it'll work for me!
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • no need to get ur panties in a knot. I simply stated it was similar to another users strategy. didn't accuse him of anything.
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • No probs...glad to see SOMEONE appreciates them!

      If its a fairly old site, add some new content to your target pages first...you should see some great results. Get back to us and let us know how it works for you...

      nick
      • [1] reply
  • Ha, you should commend yourself on being so helpful to your fellow warriors - this thread was more useful than 80% of the WSOs out there..and all for free.

    Keep it up
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Thanks a lot, Nick, for elaborating more about using proxies. That makes a lot of sense why you use them, I never thought about loosing my accts. and all of my backlinks a long with them!

    When you add more content to your site, do you add it to the same page you are backlinking? So, you keep adding more content to the same page, is that it; or do you add more pages to the site?

    Also, have you ever noticed a difference between ranking a 1 page site, and ranking 1 page of a larger site?

    Thanks for keeping the thread going and answering all of our questions!
  • Thanks very good explanation
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Haters pls go find a shield...some warriors are trying to learn something that works here!

    #Just thinking aloud...#
    @NICK
    I'm sure its possible to out source some of this on fiverr or dont you think?

    Thanks 4 sharing man
  • Sorry bud, from the north west, about 2hr drive from JHB...but it might be worth starting a thread here, ive spoken to other guys on here from your area...

    I normally add content to the same page im currently running a cycle for. When i start running another cycle for a different page and keyword i would start adding new content to that page.

    It's generally easier to rank 1 page of a larger site...especially if you been adding new content at least 3 to 4 times a week. At first it takes some time to get rolling, but once Google is used to the site being updated often, it's pretty quick to get a new page ranked, as apposed to ranking a brand new site with one page.

    Also remember to update your sitemap and submit to Google webmaster tools each time you add new content..

    Yes definitely...check out my outsourcing tips on page 2 of this thread. But if you constantly need to be running these cycles then in the end it's going to cost you much more per cycle than simply hiring a full time VA for $400 a month. But I think fiverr is a good option if you run the odd cycle here and there.

    Ha ha...no need for an ebook buddy, you should have all the info you need right here in this thread.
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply

    • I guess we will need a Warrior convention at Sun City then - can't be far from you
      • [1] reply
  • CASE STUDY UPDATE:

    So currently the site is involved in the Google dance...floating around between positions 7 and 13...The broad keyword is between positions 17 and 22

    I don't wanna start another SEO cycle on it right now becuase I wana give some time for the dust to settle...(Plus all my VA's are busy on other projects ;-) ). So i think a few more days to see where it lies, but to be honest i think I am going to need at least another cycle to move it up to a comfortable page 1 ranking.

    What i've done:
    I added some new content to the target page...nothing major, some pics and about 3 paragraphs of content. And then I ran some additional social bookmarking campaigns on my AMR links...The idea is just to have the site "busy" with links and new updates while in the Google dance...

    Will post another update next week...
  • Hi Nick,

    What VA service do you use, if you don't mind me asking? I can't find any for around that price.

    Jeff
  • Hi Nick, fantastic thread you have here, many thanks for the information, it has to be the best thing I've red on any SEO forum. Might I ask how much you would charge me to run one cycle if I was to supply the first article? (I did try to pm you but I am new here).

    Many thanks,
    B
  • Thanks a lot Nick! This is very useful. You could launch this as WSO but you giveaway for free. You're really nice.
    • [1] reply
    • Hey bud, im sorry but at the moment im not running any cycles for anyone. I have had a lot of PM's asking me to do this, so i might consider setting up a team and start offering this as a service at a later stage.

      Thanks bud, hope it helps. As i've said to everyone on here, if you try it out come back and post about any results you may have...will be an interesting read...
  • Thanks for the post. This is really some excellent information.
  • Great thread and great share, thanks. I employ very similar strategies in my SEO campaigns.
    • [1] reply
    • Great, hope you are able to put some of it to action...

      What kind of results have you been seeing?
  • Very interesting thread. Thank you!
    • [1] reply
  • CASE STUDY UPDATE

    Ok guys, so I've left the site for a few more days to see what it does while in the Google dance...at the moment it is hovering between position 7 and 9 for it's main target keyword and between positions 17 and 21 for a secondary. broad keyword.



    Results:

    I am receiving about 50 unique visitors a day from it's current ranking, and I have no doubt that when I hit the top 3 i will receive well over 100 uniques a day. Not bad going for a site that has so far only cost me about 4 days work

    I think I underestimated the power of my top 10 competitors one this one, (as they are mainly authority-type sites). I really thought I would have a comfortable top 5 ranking after one cycle. But now, after watching the site closely for about a week, I have decided to go ahead and run another SEO cycle on it - targeting once again only my main target keyword. I hope to lock in a decent top 5 ranking at least with this cycle.

    What's being done today:
    1. Promo article creation
    2. YouTube Video creation
    3. Manual Web2.0 submisison
    4. Blog Network Submission
    5. SlideShow and PDF's creation and submissions
    6. AMR blast

    I've got 2 VA's on this right now, and I hope to complete the cycle fully by end of day tomorrow.

    I will keep you guys updated on the progress of the cycle and of the sites ranking and traffic...
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • I love this. you are complete guide the warriors. you are the real Warrior
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • No probs guys, hope it helps some of you. But just a word or warning though...don't get too caught up in MY case studies, or in what I AM doing. The only way you are going to see any kind of results at all is if you create your own case studies!

      Take action guys!
  • Thanks for your thread. My SEO strategy is different but that work for me.
    • [1] reply
    • Hey MARK ;-) - I mean uniquely spun articles. Use just ONE article, that you spin into 20 unique versions.

      If you get results why not...
  • That's quite a ranking strategy. Way too complicated for me!!!! There is definitely an easier way. Too many people make it so complicated!! I'm able to rank competitve keyword phrases with 50 - 60 backlinks and in about 3 months. Blog network backlinks are the best I've used.
  • Great advice and special thanks for sharing something about Video posting and sharing.
    It is sure that anyone cannot deny that Web 2.0 sites are very important in a SEO Strategy in order to get top ranks on Google
  • Some great stuff there Nick... Thanks

    James Scholes
    • [1] reply
    • Good for you bud, as i said before if you guys can do it with less effort then why not.

      I have developed this strategy as it give me results quick, and they last...

      Definitely, web2.0 is a great way to help diversify your links, as well as provide content so that the search engines have a better idea of what your site is about...

      Thanks James...
  • thanks for your answer Nick! Can you share the manual web 2.0 list here?
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • It's in the opening post mate..Step3 number 3...

      ????
  • Dude this is awesome. I will definitely be trying it and posting a case study.
    • [1] reply
    • That will be great, will be awesome if you come back and post any results you may (or may not) be getting...
  • Hey Nick,

    Great share, bravo!

    I've done quite a bit of SEO over the years and though I've tried many of the techniques you have mentioned, I don't think I have done them in the specific order and "cycle" in which you say you have been doing it.

    So I decided to give it a shot. I have an authority site in a B2B niche for which I am trying to rank for 2 main keywords. These keywords are fiercely competitive (similar to let's say the likes of "make money online"). My main keyword had been stuck at #9ish for the past few months, and the secondary keyword around #38ish. I achieved these positions over a couple of years mainly by slow, automated link building (with a few 'adrenaline injections' every so often), and lately I had not done much and noticed my rankings were kind of slipping and competitors were slowly inching above me. I also jumped into this market for a 3rd highly competitive KW about a month ago and had managed to push into the 40's as well, mainly due to the authority and age of the site itself with some small linkbuilding.

    So I went ahead and ran one of your 'cycles' for fun and here's what I got:

    Keyword 1 (Main Keyword):

    Before: Position #9 on Google
    After: #6 a couple of days ago, #5 as of today

    Keyword 2 (Secondary Keyword):

    Before: #38ish
    Now: #19-20ish

    Keyword 3 (New Keyword):

    Before: #40's
    Now: #20's with sightings in the teens here and there.

    The 'cycle' is not even fully complete yet, as I'm always juggling a million things and am pretty lazy at the same time (lol), so I still have to completely the final few steps (Bookmarking AMR articles, rss'ing them, and some other stuff, but the meat of the cycle was done).

    I'll probably be running another cycle on these keywords and I'm sure a 2nd cycle would land me top 3, if not #1, for my main KW, with significant jumps in other KW's as well. Once I get the hang of the process myself I will figure out an efficient and safe manner to outsource it like you have.

    Again thanks for the share buddy and PM me if I can be of any assistance.
    • [1] reply
    • This is fantastic! You are the first person to pop back to the thread and post your results...I hope you not the first to have actually taken action! Good on ya!

      The results you are seeing are pretty typical for these cycles...hopefully you see some more movement after you complete the cycle. But another 1 or 2 cycles and you should be exactly where you want to be!

      For very competitive keywords like what you are targeting, there's just three things I would do slightly differently:

      1. Make sure you add new content to the page before running the cycle

      2. When running the cycle, use a promo article that is much longer than the traditional 400 or 500 word article. I just ran a cycle for a very competitive keyword using a 980 word article, spun about 76% unique, and seeing great results.

      3. Use a different article for the AMR blast...


      But it's nice to read about your results, makes all the time and effort i put into this thread well worth it...Thanks for posting
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Nick just read the whole thread and have started to use your case study on the site. I don't have AMR but is it possible for you to share the list of the Auto approve directories ?

    Thanks.
  • Amazing post, will try it out myself!
  • So much good stuff in this thread alone! Learned so much already. I can't afford to outsource yet but I will be applying some of these tactics very soon!
    • [1] reply
    • Hey bud, literally all i did was search google for it. A whole bunch of lists come up and just import them all in AMR...the software will automatically add the new directories that it is able to post to...all the others will simply be discarded.

      If you get some results, come share them with us...will be great to read some more positive results

      Good, but don't wait too long else you will never get around to it! Come back with any results you may be seeing..we would all love to read about it
      • [2] replies
  • On top of what You do, I always add a twitter and facebook account on the mix.
  • Hi Nick,

    Thanks for sharing this extremely valuable blueprint for SEO link building.

    I'm just curious, though, as to whether you've tried doing press releases as part of your strategy?

    Barry
    • [1] reply
    • I personally don't use them, but that does not mean that they do not work. The best way to find out is to test it yourself!

      Thats great, and if you know what you doing you could gain a lot of viral traffic just from those sources alone. How do these types of links affect SEO though? Have you seen the backlinks from social networking sites be counted in Google webmaster tools?

      I have, and they work great. But I have found that the cycle as I do it works just as good...And with my strategy I dont need to worry about a third piece of content.(the press release)

      But if you are targeting a difficult keyword, I can't see any harm in adding Press release links to your site too - it will give you even more link diversity.
      • [1] reply
  • Hey Nick,

    You're a man with a plan. Thanks for sticking in even though some idiots feel like they need to degrade your efforts. Too often contributors give up because of a few bozos, who spend their off time from their boring real job, surfing the WF and being belligerent.

    Out of curiosity, since you're obviously have a successful, replicable plan in place, what types of websites do you construct to take advantage of all this SEO juice (adsense, review, offline, etc)?

    Thanks again for your outstanding post. I agree with others. It could easily be a WSO (and worth more than most).
    • [1] reply
    • Ok.

      They're not "bozos". They're pointing something out on this thread that I had previously done in a private message to the OP, namely that this strategy is virtually identical to that of another guy who posted the same strategy on another forum but eight months earlier. The structure is the same, the terminology is identical in some places and way too many other instances that the OP could honestly claim this to be his own original plan.

      I don't want to get into an argument about whether they're not 100% identical or not as I don't need a weather man to tell me it's raining

      That being said, Nick obviously knows what he's talking about and if the fact that many people in this thread were unaware of this strategy on another forum is argument enough that Nick is providing value for WF members by creating this thread here in the first place.

      In an attempt to bring this thread back on track can I ask Nick if you recommend other forms of backlinking other than this strategy ?

      If I adhere only to creating web 2.0's that point back to my money site then I will only end up with around 20-30 sites linking back to my site.

      I'm concerned that even low to medium competition keywords can have a few hundred or thousand backlinks pointing back to the money site.

      Should I supplement this strategy with other forms of backlinking ?
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Very good of you to post your methods here.

    What you are doing is very effective.

    Of cos there are many others ways too. =)
    But yours is one good one for sure!

    Cheers mate.!
  • Thanks for sharing..
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks, and as we all know SEO is not an exact science...so im sure there are plenty of other link building strategies that work great too...and as i said, if you guys get the same results with less effort, then why not, right?

      Good on ya for taking action!

      No probs bud, glad you find it useful.

      As for the types of sites i personally build - I normally do adsense sites or affiliate (list building) sites. Sometimes I start with adsense, then when the site is up and running nicely I would incorporate list building and promote affiliate products via the list...

      Yeah I don't see any reason at all why you can not add other types of links to your strategy as well - after all, the more diverse your links are the better. As mentioned earlier by another member, a great idea would be to use Press Release links too...

      This strategy is simply what I personally use to rank my own sites. You guys can all modify it as you please to find what works for you. In the end of the day though, you are going to need to test different strategies over time till you find something that suites you better...

      The only thing I want to say about this is, if you are building other types of links to your money site as well, always make sure it's done in great quality content. Never leave your links in content that is poorly spun and blatantly "spammy"

      No prob
  • CASE STUDY UPDATE

    Where we currently stand
    Ok guys so on Monday i said I want to complete another cycle for the site by the end of tuesday...unfortunately that did not happen as my VA's had system problems and got very little work done.

    I know it seems my VA's are extremely unreliable but overall they really not bad at all - it just so happens that the two hiccups I had this month with them were both on this case study site!

    What has been done
    1. YouTube Video
    2. AMR blast
    3. SOME manual web 2.0's
    4. SOME Senuke Web 2.0's

    So all in all not a very successful week at all regarding this site. Not much progress has been made.

    The plan
    Hopefully my VA's will have their systems sorted by tomorrow or so...then the two VA's I had on this cycle will be put on to other projects I have running to get those back on track.

    I will try to use 1 VA sometime when I get a gap to complete this cycle - im hoping to complete this 2nd cycle for this site by the end of the week.

    Results so far
    Not much has changed here guys. The site is floating around position 7 and 8 for the main keyword and around position 17 and 20 for a much broader secondary keyword.

    For monday and Tuesday the site was pretty much at position 7 the entire time and I saw quite a nice increase in traffic - Monday got 119 uniques and Tues got 107 Uniques. I think this is due it's consistency in being the one position for such a long time and not hopping around to page 2 for half the day!

    For today, I noticed the site has been at position 8 pretty much the whole day, and so far for the day I got 61 Uniques - coincidence? I don't know...

    When I started this case study site, I didn't really put too much thought into it. I thought if i get it to page 1 I'd be happy and leave it at that...it was built purely for the sake of the case study.

    But judging from the traffic for the last few days, I'm starting to think i should pull this site off the "side line" and dedicate some resources to get it to the top 3. I originally thought the top 3 would bring in about 100 / 120 unique visitors, but im getting that at position 7! So at position 2 or 3 I might see between 300 and 500 uniques a day - which I think is very good for a small, one-page niche site!

    I will post an update again soon, probably next week after the 2nd cycle has been completed and I see some movement in the SERPS
    • [1] reply
    • Im wondering, with such a "thin" site, do expect that it will stay on page 1 for long. Or since you said you might put some extra effort into it. Are you planning on building the site out with lots more content, and if you are, how many pages do you add before your confident that its going to hold its ranking.
  • Excellent thread Nick! Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge with us!

    I sent you a PM.

    Thanks again.
  • thank you Nick for taking the time and sharing all this valuable live example with us.
  • Nick, I'm glad to see you still have this going and haven't abandoned it like some folks do who start case-studies like this.

    I have a question about why you open separate web2.0 accounts for each site you so a cycle on. Do you find that it helps them to rank better this way, or do you just do it so that you aren't putting all of your eggs in one basket, so to speak?
    • [1] reply
    • Yes, I thought this goes without saying...but you make a good point. There's absolutely NO USE putting in all this effort to run these cycles if your page itself is not well optimized for the keyword.

      As for the social networking, normally all i do is use addthis.com to put in a Facebook, Twitter and Google+1 button in my sidebar at the top. Normally people start clicking these on their own once I start getting traffic. If you targeting a difficult keyword though, may be worth purchasing FB likes and Google+1's from fiverr...but i never do this

      Normally, I start my sites with at least 8 pages of content. Then as time goes by i'll target additional keywords on more pages.

      As for the case study site...it should stay on the first page. The only thing thats bothering me a little is that most of my competitors are authority-type sites with hundreds of pages of content. So this might cause problems later on...

      It might be worth adding additional content to the site on other pages, but this is going to be a little difficult to do while keeping everything relevant as the site is an EMD...ill pretty much have to expand on my current keyword - maybe target the LSI keywords on additional pages. Will still ponder on this one! But you make a good point - thanks!

      I start new site's cycles on new accounts for two reasons:

      1. As you say, I don't want to put all my "eggs in one basket". If all my site's links were under a single account, and they decide to ban my account - then ALL my links will be lost with it. And here and there accounts DO get banned!

      2. Some of the sites (Like weebly) require you to upgrade to a pro account account after a certain amount of posts. To avoid having to keep upgrading to paid accounts I simply open another account and post again.
      • [1] reply
  • Thanks man, I found this post and I liked your strategy I will try it for my website and tell you if I get result, thanks once more you are cool
    • [1] reply
    • I have followed your thread and liked what you documented here. I have one question. How do you get a backlink from document sites (like scribd) since the embedded links in the document do not get counted?

      Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Thank you for sharing this case study. Awesome results in such a short time.
    • [1] reply
    • No probs buddy...when things settle down, i might do another, more detailed case study on a new thread...will see how things go
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Interesting concepts Nick. It sounds like there is a life cycle to the SEO value of these links. Am I right in saying the SEO value is in the diversity and Theme of the sites providing the links?

    Also, I have seen where adding backlinks to articles will prolong the SEO value (indexing) of the article. Thoughts?

    Love the case study and thanks for posting.
  • Hey, thanks for getting back to me. I guess that it's really just being naive to think that your account will never get banned. I can see now that using proxies and multiple accts. just goes hand in hand.

    By the way, I like your signature...it really sums things up, lol!
  • Ah, I get it, concentrate your point of attack. An effective stratagem.
  • Nice ranking blueprint/writeup. Some decent strategies in your post OP.
  • Great resource indeed. It is sure to be helpful. Thanks a bunch!
  • Has anyone else tried this method with any success?
  • Great thread here Nick, thanks a million for posting your strategy. Can't say I would have done the same.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Thanks for this post. I have bookmarked it!
  • blast 1000 AMR unique spin article in one day google wont penalty my site?
  • Great tips, i'm going to try to use your method.
  • This is fantastic news! And proof that real hard work in SEO pays off! Thanks for sharing your results...let us know what happens in the future after running multiple (full) cycles on your pages - would love to read more good news!
  • Thank you for sharing your method!
  • Great post. It seems that if you look for it, everything you need to know about all aspects of internet marketing is somewhere in this forum, however, I wonder how many people will actually take all these steps or will continually look for some non-existent fast way and pay hundred or thousands of dollars for something that doesn't work???
  • I have some keywords that already are on the first page of Google, but I want them to move to top 3. Should I use this exact method or is there anything different when it's already on page 1?

    Really great thread by the way! Great share :-)
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks. And unfortunately you are correct, many people will simply move on and look for their "magic button"!

      I would run one cycle (with good quality content) to get them moved into the top 3
  • When you run a cycle for a 2nd kw on same site, do you post to the same web 2.0 properties? If you do do you just make a new post with the new video and link to the KW?
    • [1] reply
    • Yes, all subsequent keywords from the same site are run on the same accounts. I don't just add a post, the idea is to create a new URL with new content which has your links in it. So a new page, lens, blog etc... will be created for the new cycle.

      Also something else worth mentioning here...there are some sites that require you to upgrade to paid membership before additional pages can be created. On these I simply create new accounts under new proxies and post again...
      • [1] reply
  • Hard and continious SEO work will surely payoff in the end if you chosen good keyword. It just needs a lot of work. My advice is that you should stricly follow this SEO blueprint. And most important, don`t give up!
    • [2] replies
    • Thanks bud...and you are correct. Hard, and CONSISTENT work in SEO WILL pay off...how quickly it will pay off all depends on the keywords you have chosen to rank for.
      • [1] reply
    • Great advice....none of this works if you "give up".

      Keep at it and you'll see results!

      Phil
      • [1] reply
  • Hi,

    Thanks for going to the effort to create this great thread. I have been using similar techniques for a while with some success. I just have a quick question if you don't mind.

    When you do an AMR blast to your main URL do you blast to 1,000 or so directories all at once, or do you drip-feed the submissions at a certain rate? Also at what rate do you build all other links?

    Sorry in advance if you have already answered this question somewhere.

    Thanks.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Interesting and helpful post thanks for suggestions and reliable info.
    • [1] reply
    • I simply place them within the PDF or SlideShow...the links become part of the content

      As far as I know you are correct, they are nofollow links. But that only means they dont pass on the PR link juice...Google still sees the links, and the content the links are placed in.

      You must remember, with our strategy here the idea is to get a diverse set of links...the more diverse it is the more natural it looks. And it would not look very natural if ALL your links are dofollow from high PR sites...

      Yes that's exactly right...each time you submit new content to these sites it will be done on a new subdomain or page as you have mentioned:

      keyword1.eample.com then keyword2.example.com
      or
      example.com/keyword1 then example.com/keyword2

      Just depends on the site.

      With SenukeX I create new accounts each time I submit content, because the process is easy enough. But I think there is actually an option in Senukex where you can select to have it post to the same accounts - i never use it though...

      Will be great if you come back and post your results, will be a very interesting read for us all...

      Thanks bud, hope you put it to use
      • [1] reply
  • thanks for the blueprint nick

    im going to hire a link builder form odesk and run through this cycle for one of my keywords, see what it does for my ranking

    how much would you expect it to cost to run through the cycle?
    • [1] reply
    • 1. SenukeX
      2. a blog network subsrciption
      3. AMR

      BUT with these tools you still have the major problem of manually creating accounts to submit manual content to with your video embeded. So you have 3 options in this regard:

      1. Hire someone to do it (recommended)
      2. Do it yourself - very time consuming and tedious
      3. Buy uBot studio and create a bot to do it - VERY time consuming in the beginning - and requires constant effort to keep the bot working as sites change etc...

      Let us know what kind of results you get.

      I dedicated an entire post to outsourcing tips on page 2 of this thread...check it out
      • [1] reply
  • @NickWatson: Do you offer this as a complete service? If so, I would like to place an order for a cycle
    • [1] reply
    • I am glad I found this thread. I have followed two other methods of seo that have not worked for me. Thanks for saying "not to auto spin articles". I am now convinced that this is one of my problems. All that time and effort for nothing. Although I have to say, yahoo search does not seem as critical. My first site was slapped by the big G but is still #3 with yahoo. Go figure.

      I already started a cycle on a new domain. Time and money will not allow me to complete cycles very quickly. I am hoping to complete the first one with in two weeks. For articles, I will not use TBS this time. I just ordered all original ones and will use them. I can keep updating here as time goes by.
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • So I uploaded some PDFs with working links in the files. Unfortunately, in the Scribd and DocStoc platform, the links in the PDF files are not clickable!

      Therefore, is it still worth even posting these?
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • yes, really its nice. I also waiting for some advice and guidance for same. if you have no mind.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • You are reading WAAAY too much into this buddy! Just add links to your site in your articles! I was simply stating the links i personally use in my articles! Sometimes I do it it differently depending on the site...

      If your main keyword is the home page, then build two links to your home page...1 using the main target keyword as anchor text and the other using a LSI keyword. Or just use one link in each article...does not really matter!!
      • [1] reply
  • THANK YOU for bringing this to my attention! I have been having my VA's chug along happily submitting content to Docstoc for a long time now - and MOST of my links are not clickable, just as you said!

    I checked through multiple results from past submissions and about 90% of the PDF's we submitted are non-clickable. Looks like this took affect in april 2010 already!

    I contacted them to find out why only some are clickable, and they said they do it on a case-by-case basis. If you want your links clickable now, you have to contact their support with your username and document name and they will consider making the links live.

    I've even checked the source of the pages the PDF's appear on...and they do not have a link ANYWHERE to your site. When someone downloads your document, the links are clickable to them on their computer...so this is the ONLY advantage i see of still submitting content to docstoc - you might get a little traffic from downloads of your files. But don't expect much!

    So as it stands, I dont see ANY SEO benefit of submitting content to docstoc...and they will be removed from future cycles.

    As for Scribd, all my links are working just fine. Can't see why yours are not? I know it sounds stupid, but you might want to double check that the links have actually been hyperlinked in your orginal PDF??
  • hi nick, im a full time follower of this thread, however i wants to know how to rank a website which doesnt have articles in it, i mean something like games download or music downloads? whats the seo method for that kind of websites
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks Phil, had a read through your blog...you got a nice case study going there as well..

      Firstly, i think you should REALLY, REALLY consider putting up some optimized content...for download pages you could provide information on what the person is downloading...

      It's going to be very difficult to rank a site without decent content...especially in the games / music download niche.

      Otherwise, the only other thing you can really do is make sure you optimize all your meta tags with your keyword, as well as your url...then simply keep building backlinks to your page using your keyword as anchor text...but you going to need a lot of links, and a lot of time...(and a big budget!)
  • thanks for your share, your campaign guide is very detail. thanks added ..
    • [1] reply
    • Nick, I have never used senukex before. When you do a social bookmark campaign with all the AMR links, do you have do them one at a time, or is there a way to import them and run them all in auto?

      Bill
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Good post.. Thanks for such a nice info.
    • [1] reply
    • No probs guys

      Hi Bill. You can put all the links in the software, then select for it to social bookmark randomly to X amount of URL's. If i have the man power, i get my guys to run a campaign on 5 URLs at a time, but set the software to bookmark any 2 each time at a social bookmarking site.

      Another tip when using SenukeX...get yourself some private proxies. Any other way will see poor to average success rates at best. I use SquidProxies for this...(If you use squidproxies - you need to email their support and tell them you want proxies that work with captcha - because some of theres dont)

      Just search google, you will find plenty lists to import into your AMR - te software will sort them automatically
  • Hey Nick,

    Are you still doing your case study, or are you letting the site dance for now? I looked, but I may have missed any updates about how your site is ranking. The last one I remember reading was after the first cycle and the site was around 7-8 on the first page.

    Have you done any more after this? Have your rankings changed now that you have stopped?
  • Thanks for an excellent post.
    Now, if I could just get you to do this for me ... life would be perfect

    LifeIsGood ~ It's About To Get Even Better!
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks..As i mentioned before, i have had tons of people ask me to do this for them...so i am in the process of training a new team of VA's...soon to be running cycles for warriors...so keep an eye out...life will be getting "perfect" soon!

  • CASE STUDY UPDATE

    Sorry guys, I should have updated you guys long ago on the status of this case study.

    Previously I was running the second cycle...this cycle was never quite completed as I got my VA's onto other projects and kinda forgot about the case study

    What's been done
    1. A total of one and a half SEO cycle's has been completed for this site.

    The Results
    1. Average Google position of between 5 and 6 - on the first page
    2. Currently traffic is between 65 and 120 unique visitors a day
    3. Adsense earnings: CTR of 0.77% and CPC of $1.07

    The Future and it's potential
    I could probably do a few things to increase traffic and earnings - but to be honest I am very busy working on other, more lucrative projects and will probably just leave this site as it is.

    The first thing I would do is look at its horrendous CTR, would try increase that by split testing various themes and ad layouts.

    The second thing that can be done is increase it's traffic by improving it's ranking. As a lot of it's competition is authority-type sites, I would do this by adding new content and then running another cycle.

    But as I said, I think I am just going to leave this site now to chug along...will probably try a few different ad layouts to get a higher CTR rate.


    No...I'll be honest I don't check it's rankings every day anymore...but when I checked it now before posting this it was sitting at position 5 on the first page.

    Also, the traffic is pretty consistent which makes me think the ranking are pretty steady too. The only time I see a significant drop in traffic is on Sundays...??
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • good explanation. But you have not added the links to main website in the powerpoint slide show and in pdf file. So what is the effect of these 2 on your website ranking.
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks, it's posts like this that make all the effort I put into this thread well worth it. I'm glad to know it's helping at least a few people.

      And thanks for the outsourcing tips...I have not used them myself, but looks like it can be a decent source for workers.

      You do have to have links in the PDF and SlideShow back to your site!
  • great info thanks
  • Hi Nick,
    Do you have any suggestions about lowering AMR cost? 1 blast cost $10 for captcha service and proxies get banned easily by recaptcher.
    Thanks,
    Keng
    • [1] reply
    • No probs...

      The only thing i can think of is to only submit to the directories that you have successfully submitted to. Do not submit to your entire list of directories...
      • [1] reply
  • Can anyone recommend a good Fiverr blog network submission service?
  • I am using similar stuff just for brand new sites,seems to work great
    • [1] reply
    • Great, im glad to hear you are seeing some good results
      • [1] reply
  • It´s a very good post. thanks!
  • eyefox, thanks for the post, hope you keep updating
    • [1] reply
    • No probs, hope it helps

      I agree..will be interesting to see how it turns out
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • I normally use a new private proxy for each cycle. But have a few proxies in use, and simply cycle trough them. meaning when I get to the end of the list i start at the top again and re-use the proxies for other cycles.

      The amount of proxies in my list depends on how many cycles im running and how often. I want a fairly long time to go by before I use a proxy again for a new cycle.

      As for the video, I recommend using at least a 1min video...you can not get much info into a 30sec video...

      I agree...I never use SenukeX on its own for building links. But i also dont use it to build link wheels. I rely heavily on manual submissions of content, and use SenukeX to support and strengthen those links

      Thanks bud, hope it helps
  • Anybody knows of a service in Fiverr that can mass bookmark multiple links? This for social bookmarking steps for AMR links.
  • Hi Nick. I see that you advise on spinning the article. I lot of people on the forum believe that spinning is a waste of time and article syndication is better. Can you tell my why you advocate spinning and why you think this is the best route?
    • [1] reply
    • What's your definition of "article syndication"?

      The reason I advise spinning the articles is to make them unique. This way, each time you submit the article to a web2.0 property or article directory, it will be unique (somewhat at least) to all the other links you are building.

      The only way to do better than this, is to actually have a new article written from scratch for EACH web2.0 property you want to submit content to. And to be honest, if you deep spin your article by spinning sentences as well as words, the cost of having ALL new articles written does not outweigh the benefit.

      I have also done thorough testing on simply using the exact same content when building links. But it is very clear that better results are seen much faster when unique / spun content is being used.

      Also note, when i say "spin" the content - i do NOT mean copy it into The Best Spinner and click the auto spin button! This always ends with poor quality content - which is no good!

      When i say spin, i mean MANUALLY spin the content (with the help of TBS) so that each spin is 100% readable and consists of good grammar.
      • [1] reply
  • Hi Nick, thanks for sharing your strategy plan!
    I want to ask you about SeNukeX usage. Do you use your money site URL when using SeNukeX? I read a lot that it'll risk your moneysite into a sandbox. Need your opinion here since I'm planning to use Senuke for my moneysite.
    • [1] reply
    • Hey jep, I to am searching to outsource the social bookmarking. No luck yet. I am in contact with a few odesk members at this point.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • This post is help full for us and It's always interesting to learn more.
  • Nick,

    Thanks for your posts.

    Please let me know what was the number for Exact Search for your keyword
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks, hope you put it to good use

      For the case study, the keyword got 2,400 BROAD searches and 1,600 EXACT monthly searches - this is from the Google keyword tool

      For anyone that's interested, the case study study site is still ranked on the first page of Google and receiving about 100UV's a day..
  • Thanks a lot for this, helps me a lot and gives a lot of insight
  • Thank you for great post
  • I think one thing not stressed enough in the this post and similar posts about the whole process is that if the ROI (return on investment) is not there this is all a moot point.

    People often get so obsessed with ranking they forget that the bottom line is you have to make more money than you spend. I see it all the time where someone goes crazy on getting ranked only to make a buck a day.

    I don't disagree with OP on methodology but the big point left out is that you should always do everything you can to make sure that the end result is worth the time, money, and effort.

    You can't have all winners but you need enough to cover the cost of the losers . So you need to spend some serious effort and time on picking the right horse to ride.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • This is so true, and to be honest a point I thought goes without saying. But you make a VERY Good point, no point hiring a VA, buying private proxies and a whole army of SEO tools and Blog Network subscriptions if you only making $10 a month.

      For each keyword you target, you must make sure that it's going to be worth your effort. And frankly this is pretty easy...you can get a very rough idea of the amount of traffic you can expect from number 1 rankings...and then work on all the standard CTR and conversion rates - all of which are available on this forum...and you can calculate an exact amount you think your page will make...this will allow you to buget more accurately when setting it up and getting it ranked.

      Another point worth mentioning, when calculating what a page is going to be worth to you, work on the most conservative figures available...it's always nice to see when you were expecting $100 a week from a particular page but it's bringing in $250...
    • This is true. People must also pay attention to factors on their sites that help to convert like Sales Copy, demand etc...

      Doing ranking just for the sake of ranking will not make you rich !
      • [1] reply
  • Great post ! Thank you very much.
  • Thanks for this post
    Yes, I find that this strategy works for pushing websites up the search engines.

    Most people try to push all the keywords at once and it is really frustrating if you put in a lot of work and do not see results instantly.

    For me I work with three keywords at a time. I also try to first concentrate on the main three links of my website that I consider important such as (home page, get-edu-backlinks.html,link-wheel-service.html)

    I then work on those and make sure the anchor text distribution is perfect for my target keyword. So my main keyword is buy backlinks and this points to my home page. The other two would still point to my home page and to their exact pages.

    This makes your link building look natural instead of having 100% of all links to your main page read as Buy backlinks.

    In all this, outsourcing will help you to avoid burning out and giving up.
    • [1] reply
    • No probs guys, hope you put it to good use!

      For the amount of links per cycle, I could not give you an exact figure. I get about 50 backlinks in total for the manual web2.0's, SenukeX campaign, YouTube video and PDF's + SlideShow.

      But then for the Blog Networks and the AMR campaign I could not give you an exact figure. The AMR campaign normally also gives between 30 and 50 backlinks that are auto approved, but the article is successfully submitted to between 1300 and 2000 directories...some of these will approve the article later, some of them won't.

      Same with the blog networks..some of these networks distribute the article to thousands of blogs...some of them drip feed the article to blogs over time....

      So im sorry, but there's just no way to give you an exact figure on this one!

      As for the "thorough social bookmarking" campaign. This is where multiple accounts are created on the social bookmarking sites, and only TWO URLS are bookmarked to one account. So for every TWO URLS, a new set of accounts is used.

      The campaigns are run on all the available sites in SenukeX. What happens here is each URL ends up receiving at least 1 link from EVERY social bookmarking site...but mostly on different accounts - so that if any one account is banned, only 2 bookmarks are lost.

      For the "quick random" social bookmarking on the AMR links, all the URLS are entered into SenukeX on only a handful accounts. Then the campaign is run to randomly bookmark two of the AMR links. What happens here, is that the links are basically spread over all the bookmarking sites...so each URL only gets 1 or 2 social bookmarks from only 1 or 2 social bookmarking sites.

      Glad you enjoyed the post and thanks for the tips, always interesting to read someone else's viewpoint on SEO strategy...
  • Another point to make is none of this matters at all if you don't get or don't plan to get your traffic from search engines.

    And since search engines can (and do) change all the time, even if you use this as a means to get traffic, you should have several other methods too so that you don't have everything on this one thing.
  • Great info, thanks for sharing your way of SEO.
  • I would like to point this strategy involve an EMD which is doing almost 70% from the SEO plan.
    The EMD plan is still a very easy way to rank on first page with very few links, doesn't matter which are the BIG websites on the first page, iimportant is the first 5 spots to not be also EMDs

    I don't know if the Nick strategy state for non EMD websites
  • Nick,

    When you create the feeds using HTML2RSS do you copy the .xml file and submit it via SEONuke? Can you please elaborate exactly what you with the HTML2RSS feed created for a newbie?

    Side Note: for anyone using TUMBLR, they are known to delete accounts frequently.
    • [1] reply
    • No probs buddy, hope you put it to good use.

      Yeah well I would have thought this goes without saying...What i have laid out is simply my link-building strategy...you still need to make sure your pages are well optimized for the keyword, add new content regularly...only THEN use my strategy to help you move up the SERPS...to get search engine traffic.

      I do also agree on diversification, and it's always a good idea to have multiple methods lined up...or at least 2 or 3 different income streams relying on different traffic techniques...but saying that though, 90% of my traffic is from SEO...


      Many of my websites are general domain names, only with the actual pages named after the keywords im targeting...and i see similar results with them too...

      As long as you are targeting the right keywords, and do on page SEO well too, the cycles should AT LEAST help you see some movement up the serps...for more difficult keywords, you will need multiple cycles ofcourse..

      Yes, thats exactly what i do. I only add about 50 URLS to each RSS feed...so I might end up with 4 or 5 RSS feeds for each cycle...then these are submitted with SenukeX and Pinged

      Yes, this is correct. In fact you need to be very vigilant when creating accounts and submitting your content. Always use CCLEANER to remove cookies and temporary internet files before creating adn submitting content. Also use proxies when creating accounts and submitting content...I aim not to use the same proxy more than once a week...

      On each cycle some of the web2.0's will delete your accounts, and others won't. Also, some (Like Bukisa) will not even accept your content - they do thorough duplicate content checks. But its still worth submitting to them, because when they are accepted its worth while
      • [1] reply
  • Well, this isn't anything new, there techniques have been around for a long time. Hasn't Google learnt how to detect then and penalize? Doesn't it seem unnatural for Google that so many back links show up at the same time?
    • [1] reply
    • I never said its new. I simply said this is what i use to rank my own websites, and laid it out for everyone to use (or not)

      I have never had ANY of my sites penalized using this strategy. If i run a cycle on a site, i ALWAYS see at least some improvement in ranking...and it lasts. Once my pages settle on page 1, very few of them move down again.

      Would you mind elaborating on YOUR SEO strategy? I'm curious to hear what approach you take.
  • I like the fact that NickWatson hasnt got spam in his signature, and is giving away this info to the newcomers for free.

    Some people might be scruitinizing it but at the end of the day, there is more info here than a lot of people would find on any other posts in this forum.

    I dont agree with a lot of it, but I think its a push in the right direction for any new person looking into SEO. (mainly seonuke I no likey)

    Well done Nick, I am sure there are heaps of people who have learn a lot from your posts mate.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • How do I do this in SENuke? I'm retarded I know it.
    • [2] replies
    • Fredrik: SeoNukeX has video tutorials... you also get a 14 day tutorial!

      Nick Watson: How many VA's do you have working on 1 cycle per week? Could you please tell me how long it takes your VA to create a Web 2.0 site for benchmarking purposes?

      How does you VA take to use SEONuke for pinging, bookmarking, feed submission?

      Benchmarking figures would be great and helpful so i can gauge the performance of my VA.
      • [1] reply
    • In SenukeX, i simply have my guys add all the AMR urls to the software...then simply tick the box to randomly select two of the URLS to bookmark at each bookmarking site. But only use one set of accounts
  • Hello Nick, I really appreciate your post. Thanks for sharing all the details on your campaign strategy.

    Take care!
    • [1] reply
    • If you want to test run senukex, the free trial is a good idea. If you get the hang of it, and want to use it, you can rent it off a server for $30 per month like I did. Not sure if this is legit or not. I do not plan on keeping the service. Easier to just outsource some tasks. Search 'senuke vps' to find providers.
  • [DELETED]
  • Hi, Nick
    Thanks for share your strategies. I have some questions as follow.


    • [1] reply
    • No they are not the same - normally.

      example of a possible guitar site:

      guitarsite.com - main keyword: play guitar
      guitarsite.com/guitar-chords - target keyword: guitar chords

      The site's main keyword is generally a little more competitive, and general. The internal pages target long tail keywords. The idea is to always be building links to your main site keyword as well, while building links to your internal pages. This way, your main page will always have a lot more backlinks than the individual pages - this looks more natural



      I don't know what is the "google positive policy"?

      If however you are talking about duplicate content, that is why we spin the article


      The reason for this is because AMR submits to article directories. And many of these directories do not allow articles to have links in the body.

      So there is a place at the end of the article, called the "author resource box" where you can write one or two paragraphs about the author who wrote the article. You may normally include one or two links in this resource box.

      An example of a simple resource box may look something like this (keeping to our guitarsite example);

      James Johnson is an expert in the field of guitar playing and repairing, and has been an avid enthusiast for 15 years. To learn more about how to , visit Jame's site for the best on the internet

      Notice how the blue wording...in a real resource box those would be the links to your site. The "play guitar" would link to guitarsite.com while the "guitar chords" would link to guitarsite.com/guitar-chords


      Hope this information enlightens you buddy...
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Thank you for providing such a thoughtful post, I really enjoyed it.
  • Hello Nick, I have a question, how many articles do you submit from AMR a day?
    and how many links do you make a day with scrapebox blasting?

    Thanks!
    • [1] reply
    • Sorry, missed this question!

      I normally blast to between 60k and 100k blogs. Normally there are a few thousand that are successfully submitted, but this varies greatly, depending on the list im blasting to, my comments, proxies etc etc...

      I have no idea how many are auto approved, and how many of them are moderated...i never check
  • nice strategy to get better SERPs on search engines and backlinking..
  • Nice post Nick, I may actually be able to fit this into my current link building strategy
  • Hi nick! So just wanted to say thanks again for a fantastic post! it has really made a big difference. i tested your seo cycle on a relatively old site of mine, site is about 2 years old. for my main keyword, it's been stuck in position 26 to 30 for the last few months. after doing a seo cycle last week, and after a little dancing its now moved to position 14! im well-chuffed, and best of all i didnt even complete an entire cycle - only pinged the links for the "link stregthening" phase (im lazy, i know!) ;-)
  • You must create a lot of web2.0 accts. How do you handle email creation fore each acct. and keep track of all the log-in details? Do you just let your VAs worry about that?
    • [1] reply
    • Thank you Nick :-)

      SENuke X does the job with emails and then I just use Last Pass to keep track of all log-ins.
      • [1] reply
  • Excellent post. Really helped me to rank few of my sites top Page 1. Thank you
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Excellent post, I must say this is much in detail than lots of WSO I have purchase out there. Just one question about the article networks? Can you give me detail on how you post it? I mean, you use 1 network per week or per day? Or are you using all 6 network at the same time? and how offten you post it per week? This will give you lots of backlinks, and don't you think Big G will notice it?

    Thanks,
  • Sounds good, or you can skip a lot of the work by just buying some high PR links.
  • The youtube thing is huge. Since i've started about a month ago with SEO, i've found that if for a keyword I can make a video for it and link it or my site I get a nice bump in traffic.
    • [1] reply
    • Great! Care to elaborate on your results? We would all love to read about it. Glad my cycles have helped you see results

      No probs, im glad you enjoy the strategy. As for the blog networks, I post to all of them at same time - same day. Remember, we are running SEO "CYCLES" here. each cycle gets fully completed before moving on to the next.

      As for the big G noticing...im sure they do but I have never had a site penalized before using this strategy - even brand new sites.
      I think three things play a really big role here:
      1. We use HIGH QUALITY content
      2. There is a large diversity of links in each cycle
      3. Not all the links are seen by google on the same day...there are many links from AMR and from the blog networks that are left to be found by google over time as they get approved or indexed naturally

      Yeah, especially if you target longtail keywords in your videos - as these get picked up pretty quickly in the google search results...

      That would work, as long as the links are from diverse sources as well. BUT remember, the whole idea is to look natural in google's eyes - high PR links alone do not look natural
  • Update:

    I just finished the "manual creation" of the web 2.0 sites for this strategy. Since I have started the keyword that I was targetting has moved from 492 on google, to 12 yesterday, to #8 and first page on google! Now i will move on to the SEONuke stuff, I first need to learn the software

    Some lessons learned: Fiverr sucks... do not use fiverr. I have been trying to outsource the manual web 2.0 site creation to a filipino VA, and I am frustrated with the fact that most VA's can't follow instructions.

    Nick: How long did it take for you to train your VA to create web 2.0 sites?

    Sites to avoid: blogetary, tabulas, and docstoc.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • WOW...great results! Thanks for sharing. keep us updated on your progress. But remember to add additional pages to your site and keep some links going to it to prevent you from losing ranking - especially if you are targeting a fairly difficult keyword or having long breaks in between the various parts of the cycle

      To answer your questions:
      To be honest my VA's learn pretty quickly. Just to create the web 2.0 accounts properly (using proxy, clearing cache etc...) will take under a week - 2 or 3 days at most.

      But iv'e got various PDF's that I have created to help train my VA's - all with examples, expected time frames etc etc...

      It's well worth the time to create similar types of well laid-out training material for your VA's.

      Also, when starting with a new VA, it's worth spending a few hours each day with them on skype - constantly making sure they are on the right track. Because a lot of the time with a new VA they are not, and then maybe in half an hour you find out they are doing a task totally wrong - then you correct them. But if you were not on skype, you would have only found out at the end of the day that they spent all day doing it wrong!

      In total, a VA will work for me for about 3 weeks before he is at the performance par I need him to be at. This is mainly due to time management skills...

      Hope this helps!
  • Hey Nick, Is there a reason why you do not use "Article Blasting" via SEONukeX?
  • This is a great Presale for your WSO... Great sales tactic.
    • [1] reply
    • I don't think it would hurt, the only reason I don't do that is because there are already plenty of links being built via article directories with AMR...but feel free to add it to your own strategy - but as always, make sure you use decent content!

      Thanks, but when this thread was started there was no WSO on the horizon. The only reason I created the WSO is because of this thread - many people have been asking me to run cycles for them via PM - so i set up a small team to do just that!
  • high pr do follows will blow any sites that does this off the rankings good post tho
  • Thank you so much for posting this!
    • [1] reply
    • Matter of opinion, and choice of keywords being targeted.

      Personally, I prefer diverse links with from varied PR sources over just high PR links. But as I said before, do what works for you, we all know SEO is not an exact science!

      No probs, I hope you see some decent results
  • Great tips, Thanks you for the share!
    • [1] reply
    • No probs...hope you put it to use. If you do come back and share your results with us...
  • Very good tips and thanks for giving us a heads up that trying to do it all will cause IM burnout. I can certainly see why that would be the case. Thank you.
    • [1] reply
    • No probs. I hope you apply it an see some decent results
  • Nick, spinning articles seems to play a large role in your strategy. You say to manually spin your articles and just keep making new copies of one of your articles.

    The best spinner looks likes a great software, but for an alternative, would any spinner work since you are spinning manually anyway? Also, how thoroughly are you spinning your articles?

    Also how much are you paying each month for all of the blog networks that you are submitting your articles to? Are the essential to your strategy?

    Thanks for your help.
    • [1] reply
    • Yes, im sure any spinner will work just as good. I've personally used Magic Article rewriter and spinner chief as well - both work great. I only recommend TBS because i personally prefer it. It helps a lot when "hand spinning" the articles. You can hand spin an entire article by simply pointing and clicking.

      I do feel that blog networks are a vital part of my strategy...the simple reason for that is because they provide a great variety of links - from many different types of sites with different PR's.
  • Nick,

    Thank you for the wealth of information shared here. Quick question in regards to Scribd and SlideShare. So, both of these articles do need to be unique even though they are docs? Also, please let me know how to get a backlink from these 2 properties. I think I figured it out for Sribd but still unclear for SlideShare. I tried to put my url in the description on Slideshare but it is not a clickable hyperlink.

    Thank you in advance for any clarification.
    • [1] reply
    • Hi John,

      Your back links from slideshare will actually be in one of the slides. Just like a link in an article. When you insert text into one of the slides, just highlight it and hyperlink it. Similar to making a link in a word doc.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Awesome post! Thanks for sharing info with some real value. Always good to hear what are people are doing to get results!
    • [1] reply
    • This is exactly right...thanks dollar_bill

      Hi, im afraid there's no known way to get around the goolge dance...not that i know of anyway. I think the only thing you could try is to slowly start building links, then gradually increase the links over a few months as the traffic increases. In my opinion this SHOULD give you a slow and gradual increase in rankings - possibly with no google dance, and if there is one it SHOULD be small and of a short duration.

      But in most cases when building backlinks you will see some kind of Google dance, though most are not for 6 months! Generally when i build backlinks, i will see a nice jump in rankings within the first week, then after that the rankings will hop around a lot, sometimes falling off the SERPS completely...but then it normally settles near to where it jumped the first time, and gradually gets better from there.

      When the site starts in the google dance, I like to add fresh content to the site and then run another round of link building...this helps it settle in a much better position after the dance

      I hope this sheds some light buddy, good luck

      No probs! Glad you find the information useful, makes this thread all worthwhile
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Great thread. This is so useful for newbies. A very clear method.
    I also implement something similar but I tweak it a little.
    I will definalty have to check out one of your seminars. Interesting stuff
    • [1] reply
    • Yeah its worth a shot, but its fairly difficult to get a full cycle completed for niches such as gambling, alcohol, porn, drugs etc etc...

      The reason for this is because many of the sites you posting content to simply dont allow it

      Thanks buddy, but im not really the seminar kinda guy!
  • Is there any method you use to be able to post to all of those private blog networks at a cheaper rate, or do you pay full price for each one?
  • Great post! I Any insight on who you use to outsource your 700 word articles you start off with?
  • Great wealth of info... I must say I will re-read it over to understand completely.
  • Are you focusing mainly in Yahoo or Google?
  • First of, thanks for what looks like a good method/strategy.

    I have not read all pages yet, so sorry if this has been mentioned.

    If i plan to use this on a brand new niche site that I plan to monetize with amazon products. Should I build the complete site right way? With the amazon products and everything?

    Endre
    • [1] reply
    • I think if you use them on their own they will not be as effective. The idea with using them with my strategy is that they provide even more link diversity.

      Another very important thing to keep in mind is the quality of the content. If you submit poorly spun, un-readable gibberish then obviously you are not going to see good results.

      For me, these two pieces of software are very valuable to my overall strategy...

      Sorry, but you gonna have to pay the full price for each!

      I have a team of full-time writers working for me. Occasionally i would use freelance sites like textbroker or iwriter

      Thanks bud, hope you put it to some good use

      I focus mainly on google as thats where most of the traffic is. But Bing andYahoo normally follow suite pretty quickly...

      Hi Endre,

      I often use these cycles for brand new sites. BUT when the google dance comes into play I add fresh content to the site and then run another cycle on it...because a lot of times when i dont then either the site ends up on a fairly low position or it loses its rank quickly afterwards
      • [1] reply
  • Nick,

    Just one more quick question for you, do you put all your videos under 1 youtube account or create multiple accounts?

    Thanks again
  • Great thread. Thanks for posting Nick. I have been looking into doing my own ranking and this covers it. Appreciate you sharing this valuable information with the warriors.
    • [1] reply
    • Better than most paid courses.

      I'm getting ready to launch another site and am going to follow this as closely as possible. I'm already incorporating some of the techniques on others, but not the exact (or extremely close) method. Should be fun to see where it ends up.
      • [1] reply
  • thanks for sharing mate
  • A lot of site owners does not give time to pick keywords and they start working on content and how to get visitors by any mean but if they give a time for picking keywords, they will be surprised by the results.

    Your strategy is so important as one of the main reasons to get high ranks to get a lot of visitors to your site is to start from the scratch by picking the most suitable keyword to your site or by your way to add articles that contains rich keywords then you start to promote for the site content.
    • [1] reply
    • This is actually an EXTREMELY good point! Thanks for bringing it up.

      I know this has been mentioned before, but as it is THE MOST IMPORTANT part of any SEO effort - it is definitely worth talking about again.

      Guys, for ANY SEO strategy to work effectively (including mine) - you need to do your keyword research correctly.

      If you target a one-word keyword with 50 million, well-optimized authority competitors - you can bet your life one or two of my little cycles is probably not even going to get you indexed for the keyword!! Especially if you are trying to rank a one-page micro niche site!

      When doing your keyword research, there are always 3 basic things you need to look for:

      1. Amount of searches and hence, traffic - obviously its probably not going to be worth your while to target an 8-word longtail keyword that only 5 people search for every month! Make sure the keyword you want to target gets enough searches to be worth your while.

      2. Competition - Traditionally marketers look at the AMOUNT of competition. It issupposed to be used to reduce the time you take on keyword research. If a keyword has few competitors, generally its a sign of weak competition - and you can continue analyzing it. But if it has a lot of competitors, generally it means it's a tough keyword - and you can stop right there and move on to the next keyword.

      This can be a good starting point, but by no means THE point. You STILL need to go and analyze HOW STRONG that competition is. And this is where so many marketers fall short. They see a particular keyword only has 15,000 competing pages and they immediately target it - without first analyzing how strong that competition is.

      No point targeting a keyword because its only got 100 competing pages - but all these pages are PR8 - 10 authority sites! (Not that thats really possible, but you get the point!)

      At the same time, A LOT of competition does not ALWAYS mean the keyword is difficult to target. (Mostly it does, but not always). If your keyword has 10 million competing pages - but not a single one of them is in anyway optimized for your keyword, and they are all PR0 - then you could probably rank in the number 1 spot by simply optimizing your page well and building 5 backlinks!

      So always, always, always check the top 10 competitors - These are the guys currently ranking in the top 10 positions for the keyword in consideration. If you think you can outrank one of them, you got yourself a target keyword!

      3. Commercial Value (as they call it) - This is basically the value of the keyword, and means different things to different people. It all depends on what you want to use the keyword for and basically revolves around selecting relevant keywords for your projects.

      If you are an adsense marketer, make sure the keyword has a decent CPC, because you know you are going to get about 68% of that.

      If you are an affiliate marketer, make sure that people searching for that particular term are in the final stage of the buying cycle. i.e make sure they are done browsing for information, and they are now ready to buy! Most importantly, make sure they are not "freebie seekers" - no point getting 1,000 visitors a day to your website all looking for FREE software that you are selling for $500! you pretty sure not to get a single sale!

      If you are building a list, make sure that people searching for the term are interested in more information in your niche. So that when you entice them with the free report/ebook or whatever - they will gladly join your list to get it.


      Guys I know I kinda went on rambling here. But I hope you guys all see how important your keyword research is. It really is the foundation of any campaign. If you get any part of it wrong, some aspect of your campaign will not work properly - either you will not get traffic, or you will get too little, or your traffic wont convert etc... So spend enough time on your keyword research, and remember to carry out each step with a reason. NEVER EVER pick your keywords blindly and without a good reason.
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • I believe Nick uses the same accounts for each cycle per website. When he starts a new site then he creates new accounts. This way, you are posting relevant, similar content and videos to those accounts.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [2] replies
  • Nick, that's a great point you brought up!

    Keyword research is something that people spend a lot less time on than they should.

    If you don't mind me asking, what's the minimum exact searches per month (global or local?) that you look for before considering a keyword?

    Also, once you reach page one (and I know you probably have), has has the the amount of visitors you received differed from what was stated in the keyword search tool?
  • this tut is very much detailed, thanks for putting your effort to teach us this new trick.. You rock
  • Great post. I was doing most of the steps, but didn't try some things. It is time to do it now. Thanks
  • IMO once people have some experience in SEO they should pick a profitable but (relatively) hard KW and spend money on backlinks. Ranking cheap low-comp KWs isn't the way to become rich but it is a good way to start.

    Anyway, this strategy does work and I've been using it (or a variation of it) ever since I saw it on the BHW forum (it's originally by cash202). The key is link variety. Web 2.0s are awesome. By using large enough quantities of Web 2.0s you can rank for ANY KW.
    • [1] reply
    • Yeah, as i said keyword research is the foundation of your entire campaign..

      The keyword criteria i personally use depends largely on what my goals are for the site. But generally I try go for keywords with a least 1,600 exact global searches. These types of keywords NORMALLY (not always) give me about 100 visitors a day with page 1 rankings.

      And yes, i ALWAYS see differences in the amount of traffic I really get compared to the Adwords tool. In some instances the difference is HUGE...and can swing either way (more / or less - more often less) than the quoted amount on the adwords keyword tool. But its pretty much the only data we have to work with, so its what i use.

      To be honest I think the only way a person can really be sure before building the site is to set up an adwords campaign, bid high and be sure to be number 1 and then see for yourself over a few days how much traffic the keyword REALLY gets. For me though, this approach is too time-consuming and expensive for the long tails i target. It would be well worth it though if targeting difficult, high traffic, high value keywords.

      Not really a "new trick" but thanks.

      I totally agree, and i do the same thing. If start having too much content submitted with one account, i create another - even if its for the same site / campaign

      Thanks, and good luck. Be sure to post back with your results

      This is also a good approach, but not one that I totally agree with. Might be because I have never really targeted a very difficult / high value keyword before.

      But the problem in doing that, is that it becomes a lot more difficult to KEEP your rankings. You will always be up against authority sites, who are constantly getting fresh content to their sites everyday. It will take a lot more work, time, effort and money to KEEP your site ranked on page 1.

      And, your risk is higher. Not only because its easier to loose your rankings, but because most of your money will come from one site. If you loose your position - you loose most of your cash flow with it.

      Targeting easy to medium keywords overcomes all these issues.

      This is just my opinion anyway.
  • Thanks for your reply.

    If you don't mind me throwing up another question, what has your experience been unseating sites like Amazon, Walmart, etc. for products? Is it fairly easy, or does it take a lot of time and effort.

    The reason I ask is because although the sites are large, and have millions of backlinks, the PAGES you are competing against usually have very little in the way of backlinks, especially for the targeted kewords. What's you're take on this?
    • [1] reply
    • Again this normally depends on the other pages that are ranking as well. But generally i can out rank an amazon product page fairly easily...

      Quality optimized content, regular updates on your page, and good backlinks and you should be able to outrank them quite quickly
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Nick is right. Outranking Amazon, Walmart, etc, isn't as hard as you'd think. And actually, it's usually an indicator that Google has nothing better to show so it goes with the traditional authority sites. A properly optimized site / page can outrank these with a little bit of work.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Thanks a lot for that reply, Nick.

    I keep seeing you speak about regularly updating the page you are working one. I think this as another one of those things that is oftentimes overlooked. I think a lot of people put up a webpage and then just let it sit. From what you say, constantly updating your page with new content helps it to rank faster (and not dance as much). Perhaps this shows Google that you're not just spamming links, but are instead trying to build up the quality of your site.

    Now, when you update your content, do you remove the existing content, or just add to it? Doesn't it become impractical after a while? I mean, won't the page turn into a large wall of text on top of text? Do you make the additions look like separate articles, or to you make it look like you are adding onto existing articles?

    Thanks for elaborating more on this.
    • [1] reply
    • Good question. I'd also like to know this.

      Of course, the authority sites are always removing content and replacing it with new but I'm a little skittish about removing some of my own content,
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply

    • Firstly, it is definitely possible to add a single page of content to a site, do some decent link building and have that one page rank - and then you never have to touch it again.

      BUT, there are two things that play a role here:
      1. You rank much easier when first adding fresh content to your site. This is especially true when targeting more difficult keywords

      2. Adding fresh content helps you KEEP your current ranking! Again, especially true when targeting more difficult keywords. Because more difficult keywords naturally have more people trying to compete for them, so if you just got one page with the same old content ranking, then Google will probably give your position to the next guy that comes along with a page that gets a new article added once a week!


      Now, with me personally, i do not remove content from sites - ever

      Normally, id add a decent article with pics and maybe a video...do some link building, then add some more content - sometimes in the form of additional pics, or added YouTube videos - mostly accompanied by one or two paragraphs of fresh text - and then do some more link building.

      I would continue this process until ive got page 1 rankings. (Or give up!)

      Then i would have another page, on the same site where i do the same thing...and so I would carry on until i have targeted all my keywords.

      So one single page never really has endless amounts of information on it. I always stop before...but the site as a whole keeps getting updated with new content - so i keep getting "brownie points" with google.

      Once the site is done, and i feel i have targeted all the keywords i want to target...then i leave it just as it is...no added content or links. I might do the odd SEO cycle here and there to maintain rankings though, but thats it.

      If i were targeting more difficult keywords that would require more content, im sure my approach would be different...because i would need to add a whole lot more fresh content to my sites...but i dont have that problem because i target mostly easy to medium difficulty keywords

      I hope this makes, and helps clear up your concerns about fresh content
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I am agree with you. If we will do all the technique here you given and add more strategies. Then we can definitely achieve our target.
  • Ok so I've been following this thread with great interested since Nick started it and obviously I had to test his step by step system by myself. I'm going to provide my feedback and results so far, taking into account that I've just completed my first full cycle yesterday and results probably haven't fully kicked in yet.

    I chose to try and optimize my site for a highly competitive keyword and for a secondary less competitive one that has a lot of variations I could target all at once.

    These are the steps I took and my expenses for this cycle(minus cost of all required software):

    Content Creation:

    1. I had 2 original articles written for $5 each on Fiverr and I manually added spintax to them with the help of Spinner Chief (free version). Even though I do have AMR, I find Spinner Chief to be a better solution for manually adding syntax to your article. Both articles were manually spun to about 75% each.

    2. I had the first article read by a professional voice actor for $5 on Fiverr, resulting in a 2 minute recording. Then I hired another provider for $15 to add images and captions to that recording, thus making a 2 minute video out of it for my cycle.

    3. Next up was the content submission part of the Cycle. I manually uploaded the Youtube video, created the SlideShare and Scribd files, and each of the web 2.0 submissions, adding unique versions of the second article in each. I included 2 links in each submission, the first one with my main keyword to my main page, the second with my secondary keyword and secondary page. I also embeded the youtube vid in each. Out of all the manual web2.0 submissions, only squidoo and wikia deleted them so all in all I think it was a pretty good "stick" rate.

    4. For the Blog Network part of the cycle, I didn't want to subscribe to all those networks even though I know they are very good, I decided to pay two people on Fiverr to submit to one private Network with high PR posts (I got 80 of them) and another one to submit to ALN. This is basically the only step I didn't do 100% as Nick suggested, however I am currently paying someone $125 for a month long drip of article submissions to a private network with very high PR blogs.

    5. I registered with Senuke X and did the Social Network campagin, getting 14 properties in the process, a bit lower than I expected but it's still good. I also registered with Squidproxies for 10 private proxies at $24/month.

    6. For the AMR blast I used the first article(in spintax form obviously) which was the one I had used for the video creation. I wanted to have 2 different articles so that one of them was used for the manual web2.0 submission and also because this way the video and content on those properties wouldn't be basically the same thing. I managed to get 120 auto approved submissions from a list of 7k directories (after trimming it down from about 100k directories I found/payed for). I used the same 2 links in the resource as in my manual web 2.0 submissions, first one with my main keyword and main url, second with secondary keyword and URL.

    Link Strengthening:

    7. Did all the steps as explained by Nick. I thoroughly social bookmarked all manually created web2.0 properties plus the video and scribd and slide share files.

    8. I did a quick social bookmark of the AMR auto approved articles as well, and as an extra I did the same thing with the 80 blog network links that were created from that Fiverr gig.

    9. Created the RSS feeds, including the 80 blog network links as well, ended up with exactly 5 Feeds that I used in the RSS Senuke campagin.

    10. Did a 140k Scrape Box blast to all the manually created pages, senuke created pages, all the AMR links and 80 blog network links. I didn't do a blast directly to the money site as I really doubt that would have benefited my website. Even though the domain is 4 years old with a PR of 2, I was trying to rank 2 article pages basically in this cycle and was afraid of getting sandboxed.

    So that's all I did for the cycle, it took me a bit over 1 week to complete it but that was only because it was my first cycle and I had to learn and understand how to do everything, also I had to look for and trim down lists of article directories and scrape box lists and that took me a while as well.

    Now for the results. Let me mention that the main article page with the main keyword was a new page and the keyword highly competitive, while the secondary page was a few months old and it was standing on the second page of Google for that keyword and 4 other variations.

    The main keyword at the time of this writing is only sitting on page 18. This is not really unexpected, I didn't believe it would work its way up that fast considering the competition, about 100k in quotes for the main keyword. I'm also aware that I didn't complete the Blog Network part of the cycle and that I've just ordered the month long drip to the private blog network I mentioned - I expect the site to continue moving up though.

    The secondary keyword and it's variations however are ALL on the first page of Google, they moved there 2 days ago when I was about to finish my cycle. They are currently standing between #4 - #8 and even though these keywords don't receive as much traffic as my main one, it's still a nice increase in rankings and traffic. I was trying to get these keywords on the first page for a while now, nice to see them finally taking their rightful place.

    So bottom line, the cycle works very well for medium to low competition keywords, you can probably reach the first page with just one cycle, exactly as Nick mentioned throughout this thread. For highly competitive keywords however you definitely need more than one as it is to be expected. Here's how the competition looks for my main keyword(top 10 sites):



    Spots #3 and #4 don't look that hard to beat according to the numbers, also notice that only 2 out of 10 websites have the keyword in their title and url. I assume the high PR blog drip + one or two more cycles will get me to the first page, what do you think?

    I am satisfied with the results I got and now will await to see how the rankings evolve over the next couple of weeks.

    Hope you guys find this feedback valuable, as I have found Nick's thorough advice. Thanks again for posting this, you really helped a lot of people get closer to the first page of Google :-).

    If there's anything I did wrong or could have done better, I would really appreciate your feedback Nick.

    Edit: I just realized my site moved up to the first page for my main keyword on Yahoo. Nice!
    • [ 5 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • WOW! What a great post! Thank you so much for coming back and sharing your results in so much detail, im sure many here apprciate it - i sure do

      Razvan, you ask "If there's anything I did wrong or could have done better" - the answer, there's not! As a matter of fact you over delivered in every way, and to be honest you doing the cycles even more thoroughly than I am!!

      You must remember, the main goal with these cycles are to create link diversity and link velocity. Both of which, i think, you have successfully done. There's no RIGHT or WRONG...so i think you did a fantastic job...and you will definitely reap the rewards of your hard work...

      Good on ya for taking action!

      Nick
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Neat. Saved the thread.
  • Thanks a lot, Nick, for going in-depth on what you do as far as adding content goes. You explained a lot and described exactly what you do and to what degree you do it. Now I see what you mean by updating your content.
  • Thanks, Nick. That really helped alot. I forgot about the fact that Google doesn't' see every link as soon as it's created.

    You mentioned that you use AMR, is that the best article submission software you've found, or haven't you tried any others?

    Thanks for staying so dedicated to this thread. Also, thanks for the tips on outsourcing. I think that is really where you will start to see large scale results with this technique.
    • [1] reply
    • yeah no worries, as long as the thread ends up helping a few people (which i know it has) - it makes it all worth while.

      As for article distribution software, i have only really worked with AMR - i did briefly try out Magic Article Submitter, but personally i prefer AMR. The only reason being iv'e become so accustomed to using it...im sure MAS is just as good a tool in capable hands...
  • You mentioned outsourcing. Can you tell me how much it will cost to outsource one cycle and where I can find good people who can do this job.
    • [1] reply

    • Yeah, check out my sig

      I also posted all the outsourcing tips on page 2 of this thread, may be worth checking out
  • Nice post but requires a lot of time and effort. I know when it is done the right way as suggested above, you can rank high for your target keywords. I think it will need an outsourcing campaign.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Yeah definitely, you would burn yourself out in no time trying to complete these cycles by yourself...the only way to do this in a sustainable manner is to outsource it.

      This is also a strategy...and i dont see any reason it will not work..
      • [1] reply
  • I'm new to this thread and I'm bookmarking this thread for future use... thanks for this golden piece of information...
    • [1] reply
    • No buddy im afraid not...thats like saying the number 1 spot is a .net domain so its gota be low competition.

      I would do keyword research exactly the same as i normally would.


      Hope you put the info to good use!
  • I will have to try some one these techniques on my site.
    much appreciate
    • [1] reply
    • Yeah give it a shot, be sure to come back and post some results with the rest of us!
  • Great article! Thank you Watson.
    • [1] reply
    • Your exact strategy really !!!

      This is the exact same strategy just changed titles as a highly reputable guy posted on BHW a year back.

      Talk about taking someones glory, by all means post it but don't take all the credit
  • Some really good reading in this thread
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks guys, glad you enjoy the thread
  • CASE STUDY UPDATE

    Hi guys, so its been a little over a month since I last updated everyone on the case study we did.


    Quick Re-cap
    For those of you that have not been following the case study, I thought I'd just give a very brief run down.

    Basically I created a 1 page EMD site in the pregnancy niche. The site is based on word press, contains one page of content, and then all the standard privacy policy etc...pages

    It is targeting 2 keywords...the one is a fairly easy longtail keyword consisting of 4 words, and the other is a much broader phrase of the same term, with a lot more competition

    When we first built this site, we ran ONE cycle on it, and within 4 days it reached page 1 in google. I kinda got started with another cycle, but then pulled my guys off of it to work on other projects.

    If you would like more details, just go back in the thread and read the case study updates.

    Performance
    Right guys, about a month ago when posted the last update, the site was at about position 5 to 6 for the main keyword. I was getting between 60 and 120 uniques a day

    The other day I noticed I had a nice little increase in traffic, I was getting a consistent 150 to 170 uniques a day. So i checked my rankings. The site is now hovering between position 3 and 4 for its main target keyword. And there's no doubt in my mind that another full cycle will push me right to the top!




    If i were to run a cycle targeting the secondary keyword, and got that to the first page as well, im sure ill get tons more traffic as its a very broad term.

    If you guys want more details about this case study, please go back in the thread and read the case study updates
  • Sorry if this isn't a good post or if it's been answered... I'm sure I could probably find the answer somewhere, but when you say spun to atleast 50% uniqueness what exactly does that mean and how do I check that. That's the main part I'm confused about.

    Also, in regards to the youtube video. Should the youtube video be targeting our keyword or no?
  • [DELETED]
  • Alright I'm back with my results, but only because I know Nick wants it and he sure helped me ;-)

    My keyword was already on the first page of Google at position 7, but I didn't really get any visitors from it, so I asked Nick what I should do if it already was on the first page of Google and he quickly replied, where he told me what to do.

    So I made a full cycle about a month ago, except for some of the blog networks I couldn't afford.

    After I made the cycle I basically just waited and I'm here now one month later and my current result is from position 7 to position 1.



    So guys, this really works just put some time and effort in it and I'm sure you'll see results too :-)
    • [1] reply
    • Fantastic results buddy! Thank you so much for sharing it with us all! I'm sure it will be an inspiration for many members here.
  • I started my cycle today (very competitive KW and I currently am stuck at #5) and it is a lot of work, let me tell you but I know it will be worth it. It actually feels good to be doing all this manually again...been so long since I did anything manual. This is nice to be able to build all these web 2.0 sites the way I want them built and making them look good. Using software you cant really achieve this, I have senukex and it doesn't build them as good as I can manually build them.

    I created a video and it is already ranked #8 for videos (in just 2 hours) for very competitive word. I also did the pdf, PowerPoint, and posted to 3 web 2 sites. Still have lots more to do.

    I will post my results in a few weeks! Thank you very much for this amazing post, you could have easily sold this strategy for $10-$20 but I know you are already successful and don't need to. Thanks again for awesome info and strategy!!!

    Note---If you do sell a product I will be there to buy it
    Tip---Spinner Chief is the best manual spinner on the market.(free version is awesome) I have several others and they all have something they are the best at. In this case, my software I use for one-click spins that makes articles probably 85% readable was not used. I am doing exactly what Nick says to do.
  • Nick, when you do a manual spin to 50% uniqueness, how many times do you think you can spin the article until you start to lose that 50% uniqueness? I mean, how many copies do you get out of one article? Also, do you spin sentences, phrases, or individual sentences?

    Thanks a lot.
    • [1] reply
    • I got no idea on how many you can actually get out of one article like that...ive never tested it. I Only use it for one cycle, never more.

      But if you include it in the AMR blast, then you will probably get some articles that are very similar...

      I spin at the word / phrase level. And then I write out 3 titles for the article and spin each individually at word level - then spin them together. So at any point, either of the 3 versions are used...this way your titles tend to stay quite unique.

      Something worth mentioning about this as well...if you want to outsource, dont just assume that the writer can effctively spin your content. I've had plenty of writers that say they will hand spin the content, but when I receive it back it looks as if it was simply put through TBS and 5 synonyms were chosen...most of the article doesnt make sense when you spin it...So test your writers carefully
  • Very interesting I read this exact method on another forum. Must be the new thing to do.
  • Read and bookmarked.

    Thanks bro. I will try this out on one of my sites and see how well it works
  • Senuke X is popular but the price is too high.
    • [2] replies
    • If you can't afford the crazy price you can always use something like roboform to make the 2.0s. It will be more time consuming but you can setup a full profile, change a lot of the default looks and still do the same thing!
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • SenukeX has 2 week free trial version with all features except Indexer if I am not wrong.

      You can do a lot during these 2 weeks

      • [2] replies
  • Nick, you noticing any changes with recent Panda 3.3 updates on blog networks?
    • [2] replies
    • Hi Nick,

      I did apply your strategy to the T. I wanted to know if you experience a drop in your rankings after 2 weeks? My keywords were in the 3rd to 4th page of Google and is more than a year with a lot of unique contents. After 2 weeks, the rankings dropped and they are now in the 10th and 11th page.

      I'm really worried, but is this something you've experience before?

      Any feedback will be highly appreciated.
      • [1] reply
    • Glad you find it useful...be sure to pop back and post any results you may be having...

      True, Senuke is pricey...but should be able to make your money back within a month or two if you use it properly. Or you can do as mentioned above, use roboform to create accounts etc...

      If you have the time to invest, it might even be worth getting uBot...and then simply create your own bots to create accounts and post content...its very time consuming though...especially to maintain it to ensure it keeps working when sites change things around...

      So far not. I have not received any messages of unnatural links on any of my sites. I do think though that the variety of links helps in this regard.

      But i think as time progresses we are all going to need to spend more time and money in covering our tracks with our SEO efforts, and making our backlinks look more natural. Google is becoming smarter by the minute...and i think a very important aspect in this regard is the anchor text we use.

      Normally a link building campaign concentrates purely on our target keywords as anchor text...but i think in the future we will need to start including random other anchor texts like "CLICK HERE"...or "THIS SITE"...and even put some effort into getting links from no follow sources as well...all this makes the linking structure look more natural...


      Just my 2cents
  • great techniques but a lot of work, definitely
    • [1] reply
    • As with most anything, work = success.

      No shortcuts. Took me awhile to figure that out myself. But once you do, you'll starting seeing success.
  • Hi Nick

    great thread
    Did I read earlier on you are offerring this as a service?

    could you repost or direct me please j
    • [1] reply
    • Hi Ana,

      Yeah you should see some decent improvement soon. Make sure the content you are using is quality!

      Yup, but sustainable results take work!
  • hi, yeah check my sig! ;-)
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Um just a quick question, is it worth it to create a powerpoint, pdf, and youtube video and post them to scribd, slide share, and youtube. I tried it recently and had a hard time adding links to my site in the article description. Also a large majority of them seem to be nofollow. Is this step more for organic traffic or what reason?
  • I have got some traffic from scribd, so it can be useful.
    • [1] reply
    • You might get some traffic from these sources, but not only that...they are meant to diversify your links even more. And by embedding the video in the web2.0 properties, you also have better quality content on the web 2.0 properties - this is good, because your links are in this content.
  • Damn I still have so much to learn, hope that I can learn from your post and better my self in this area. Gotta love linkbuilding lol
  • Nick,

    With all the deindexing on the private blog network what do you recommend on doing to supplement that void?
    • [2] replies
    • Hey Nick, I will be buying some of your cycles soon (the offer you have in your sig).

      Just a quick question:

      Is the offer in your sig the same exact process that you talked about & laid out in the first post of this thread?

      Also, how many cycles would you say it usually takes on average, to rank for a low-medium competition keyword?

      Also, one last very important question:

      Do you rank more than one inner page on a site? Or do you just target 1 main keyword on each site?

      I was thinking about doing a site with 3-5 main keywords, and each main keyword would be a subpage/inner page. Does this actually work? Or would I end up building too many links to a site that way, and sandboxing the heck out of it?

      Do you ever do that? Or do you just have 1 main keyword per site, then target lower competition/volume keywords on the rest of the subpages?
      • [1] reply
    • If the blog networks that you use are being deindexed, then it might be worth trying multiple other networks - or maybe doing press releases, or even some profile links.

      The main idea is just to keep a diverse range of links. So do not just go and build more web2.0's for example in the place of your deindexed blog network. Rather, build something that is different to what you already do.

      Just be careful with spammy links - link forum profiles, or blog comments. Do not build too many of these types of links.
  • I think I'll be buying soon! For a competitive keyword, how effective is one of these cycles and in your opinion how many cycles would be needed to start ranking for more difficult keywords?

    How long does it take for one to see SERPs improvements materialize?

    Thanks.
    • [1] reply
    • Read the above post buddy...its impossible to tell how many cycles you will need, as there just too many variables.

      Normally we start seeing SERP movements within a day or do, but most of the time this is the Google dance...to actually settle in nicely could up to a month or two...

      But again, it all depends on your site, competition, target keywords etc etc...
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Great post Nick! I'm working on a similar cycle using nichedog's seo method that utilizes many of the key principles that you employ. However his is far less detailed than your method, so I think I might adopt your strategies. Thanks for taking the time to post your seo strategies, keep up the good work.
    • [1] reply
    • Hey Nick, when we use your SEO Cycle service (the one in your sig), do you give us most of the URLs for the links created for the cycle?

      That way we can further strengthen the links
  • Wow, i got tired just reading that! How much do you charge for it?
  • Your the man Nick! Thanks for making SEO bearable.

    How much do you charge to implement the SEO procedures for any website?
  • This is an excellent post. As a newbie to SEO this is a step by step road map to success. Thanks for sharing such a great amount of your hard earned knowledge.
    • [1] reply
    • No Problem, I'm glad it can be put to good use. Let us know what kind of results you are seeing!

      Guys...thanks for you interest in my service. BUT i really, really do not want this thread to become some kind of support / sales thread for my service.

      Can we please keep any questions relating to my service on my WSO sales thread - the link is in my sig. Just post there, or send me a pm

      I would really like to keep this thread just full of good information


      No problem - now put it to use and come back and post some results

      I think SenukeX is best run a VPS or Dedi because it frees up your office PC. And, many times a VPS / Dedi has got a much faster connection than one would have on your local office machine - i know mine does anyway.
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
  • I hope you guys aren't using adsense with these blasted sites, good way to get banned.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • I am just curious, I used a bunch of SEO "tools" over the past several years. What I noticed is that the learning curve for most is anywhere from pretty easy to "who came up with this scripting language!!!!" i have been a programmer for several years and in the beginning it took a little while to learn languages like C and C#, but with all the built in help these days, it should be just as quick for a newbie to learn some programming and do their own scripts rather than use something like Zenno or Ubot. I just wrote a Proxy Switcher and put it on the market, it took less than one hour to complete and was(in my opinion) just as easy as doing a bot from software. Why is it people are so willing to pay upwards of $75 for Ubot or Zenno and still have to learn all the scripting?
    • [1] reply
    • I know what you're saying.

      But Ubot appeals to most people who don't know how to program, and those who don't want to have to learn a programming language.

      Me, however, I've got mad QBasic skills.
  • Nick, thanks for taking the time to share this. I am going to try this strategy.
  • wow... it is great post i have ever read about seo tactic and strategies, will need more time, money and other... but that is normal for great seo strategy and will get great result on serp... Thanks a lot for the share very usefull
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks guys, im glad you all find it useful!

      How long did it take you to learn and practice C and C# before you could use it effectively? A year? Maybe more?

      I have used uBot in the past (With no previous programming experience) - and within a few days I had a couple of very useful bots up and running.

      uBot and the like will appeal to people with little programming knowledge and who dont particularly want to learn an entire programming language.
  • Hello Nick!
    As you know i have already ordered one of your cycle as a test (wasnt delivered yet) but i wanted went trough the process at least once, so i though i could share my results with you an others.

    My keyword has 19 000 exact month searches with 1$ CPC.

    I have started with one page (1200 word) and added two post (500 word each yesterday)

    I did 18 manual web 2.0 with uniquely written (cheap 1,5$ but readable, 50 score on grammarly) articles + youtube video + pics + scribd + slideshare. I did thorough social bookmarking campaign for 10 of them till now ( i always wait till they are indexed). Also did RSS and submit to 15 aggregators.

    After this was completed, my site ranks 23 for main keyword after 3 days.

    I did AMR blast yesterday and using Magic Submitter succesfully submit 30+ web 2.0s (manually spinned article).

    I have ordered 20 PR1-PR6 on site comments from trustworthy provider, they will be delivered in next days. Im also considering to do manual profile link wheel to add link diversity + some wiki edu links etc.

    Do you think that progress from nowhere to position 23 in google for 19 000 exact match keyword can be marked as SUCCESS considering other part of strategy like AMR etc. wasnt yet indexed?

    One more thing: If you Nick (or other guys) are interested i could post my progress here. So let me know, dont want to spam it here
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Lol. Wow ,as mentioned by others this is exactly the same in most part to "cash202" post on another forum.....there was a guy on that forum who happened to be the only member hating on the method then he got banned...just at the time of his banning this thread popped up.....the guy that was banned and hating on the thread went by the name of Nick too. Twilight do do do do. ;-)
  • P.s In no way am i trying to state you are the same guy i am just letting you know that perhaps you should change your username lol. In all seriousness great guide, have bookmarked as in secobd inspection it is different from that on the other forum. Keep up the good work ;-)
    • [1] reply
    • Hey buddy. Thanks for the results, and sure it would be great to read about your progress here. Feel free to post updates!

      Regarding your campaign, considering you went from no where to position 23 in 3 days - YES i do think the link building was a success! You must remember, it has not been very long for the rest of the links to get indexed...and your site still needs to go through the Google dance etc...

      Generally after 2 to 3 weeks you will be able to see the real position - but it's almost always better than the initial rankings (i.e. your 23). After this time if you are still not on page 1, add some more content and then build some more links!

      I like your way thinking by the way - always try and keep link diversity! Great link building buddy!

      Thanks - as for the username thing, thats just one too many coincidences. I'm pretty sure someone is out to sabotage me!

      Anyway, im glad you found the info useful
      • [2] replies
  • CASE STUDY UPDATE

    Guys I thought I would post an update on case study site we started earlier in this thread.


    Quick re-cap

    I started a small site in the pregnancy niche, and targeted 2 keywords - a long tail keyword (consisting of 4 words) and a shorter (more difficult) version of that long tail keyword (consisting of 2 words)

    I ran one cycle after the site was created and landed on page 1 for the long tail after 4 days.

    I got started on a second cycle, but never finished it. At the last update of this case study, I was at about position 4 for the long tail and position 12 or 13 for the more difficult keyword.


    What I've done since

    Since the last update, I went ahead and completed another full cycle for this site.

    So in total, I have completed 2 and a half cycles.

    For the last week or so, my rankings have improved drastically and I am number 1 for the long tail version of the keyword and number 3 for the more difficult keyword.



    My traffic has also seen a nice jump - where I was getting about 120 visitors a day before, I am now getting up to 400 visitors a day!

    At the moment it's too soon to tell how long I will keep these rankings, and there has not really been much of a Google dance. But im hoping that both the keywords stay at least top 5.

    If there are any significant changes, ill be sure to update you guys here
    .
    .
    .
    .
  • Thorough strategy.

    Have you tried it without using SENuke? I don't have it, and will not be getting it unless I can be convinced it really is worth $147 or whatever it is a month.

    The manual 2.0's are the strong properties, will it be effective without the additional 2.0's?

    I have other resources to bookmark url's, so wouldn't need it for that...I'm just wondering in your testing of your method if you've done it without using SENuke.



    ~Mike
    • [2] replies
    • Check out Magic Submitter. Some would say it's even better than SENuke. And @ $67 a month it's definitely much more affordable. There's also a $4.95 trial for the first month.
      • [1] reply
    • Mike, I have always used Senuke - but if you can get at least 20 or so web 2.0's I think you will see pretty much the same results. Or it might even be worth paying someone to do the Senuke campaigns for you
  • it's very excellent...I've just got very valuable SEO science...Thank you guys..U're very kind to share the secret to us..
  • Hello Nick..Sorry for asking you..I just want to know why we have to submit content to Scribd and SlideShare. Because i've done that and the backlinks from these sites not indexed by google neither alexa...
    • [1] reply
    • No problem guys, hope you put it to good use!

      the idea behind slideshare and scribd is just to give you more link diversity. Try running social bookmarks, scrapebox, rss feeds etc to try and get Google to index the document pages
  • Almost finished!

    How many random links per bookmarking site do we use in the senuke bookmark settings? (default is 2)

    Edit: just watched a senuke video and it said not to bookmark more than 3 websites per bookmarking site, as most bookmarking sites don't allow anymore than that, and I have 40 urls from the web 2.0 properties. Any suggestions?
    • [1] reply
    • This is so true! Work hard, stick to a proven plan and you WILL see success! Problem with IM is that people think its the "easy" way out!

      I don't usually try to up the ranks on my individual YT videos. But if you were doing video marketing, and targeting a specific keyword in your video etc...I would imagine just using the YT video URL and build links to it.

      But then again YT rankings could be a whole other ball game, as you have to consider comments, likes etc...you you could also embed the video in as much viewed content as possible etc etc...

      But as i said, im no video marketer - so im sure there's a lot more to this game than these few things

      When doing social bookmarking I would copy a whole bunch in, but then leave it at the default to only bookmark 2 of the URL's at any given site
  • Hi Nick,

    How the strategy is working now with the new panda update, hitting over seo-ed websites?

    Taking into account you use the same keyword for every cycle
    • [1] reply
    • As long as you don't go overboard on the links pointing directly to your site you should be fine.
      • [1] reply
  • I don't really think it's the amount of links that's the issue. I think it's the diversity and quality. 50,000 forum profile links straight to your main site is probably a bad idea.
    • [1] reply

    • So far the new panda updates have not really affected me - and we still submitting content to about 10 blog networks. I believe that because each cycle consists of such a wide variety of links, google does not pick up on the fact that blog networks are used - and if they do then they do not really seem to care! Not ALL the links to the site come from one particular blog network. If I build links exclusively using the blog networks im pretty sure I will get the boot by Google

      As mentioned above, I think the thing that most matters is the diversity and quality of the links. And I really think that moving forward we are going to need to start paying more attention to our anchor texts and spending more money making it "look natural" ("click here", "read this" etc etc)

      Another thing I think is inevitable in the future - is that Google is going to tighten up even more on what it considers a natural link profile for your site - anchor text as well as link types

      So if your site is in the health niche for example - I believe google will know and see the link profile of all the sites currently in that niche - it might have averages. e.g. 10% Forum links 45% content links and say 45% bookmarks.

      Then if you go and build a site and build say 80% forum links and 20% social network links for example, google will see that your site does not conform to the "normal" link profile of your niche and simply not rank you.
      Same goes for anchor texts...

      I do believe they do this already, but I think it is going to become the only way to do SEO in the future. Each time you build a site, you will first need to survey what is considered a "normal" link profile for the niche, and then build links accordingly making sure your site conforms to the same "norm"
      • [1] reply
  • I looked at your fiverr gig and what you are selling will result in the buyer violating google adsense TOS
  • Hey, friends may be bookmarking with targeting keywords, article posting with unique content, forum posting with targeting keywords its may be useful for rank any keywords.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Agreed.

      You've GOT to be detailed oriented to succeed in IM. The downside of that is the amount of spreadsheets and text files I have cluttering my computer & the cloud.
      • [1] reply
  • Hello Nick. I saw your other thread offering to do the cycles for us. Do you think it is cheaper to purchase a cycle from you than outsourcing the tasks to others? Thanks!
    • [1] reply
    • I am also interested to know what you charge to run your cycles for others.
      • [1] reply
  • Nick

    Thanks for sharing. A question. Not sure if this has been asked before. But what are the reasons for the MANUAL Web 2.0 campaign? Emphasis being MANUAL, since you later do a SENUKE Web 2.0 campaign. Thanks.
  • great, it would be very much helpful for me and the others who are new on seo working
  • WoW, thanks for sharing your strategy, Nick . Some really good stuff here.
  • Finished the web 2.0s, social bookmarking, pinging and now at the AMR stage.

    For the AMR blast, are you skipping sites that require captcha?
    I just imported a huge list of 200k urls (took 2 feckin days!) and 60k of those were a success.. maybe a little too much now I am thinking.

    Also for a new site, would you recommend drip feeding it or just submit now using the same article?

    The only backlinks I have to my site are the ones through this cycle (I've been using this and cash202 cycle combined to get the best of both).
    • [1] reply

    • WOW

      Yeah id say 60k is a little much! How many live links do you actually get from that? I normally get about 200 live links - and submit to all of them at once. But if you doing 60k you might want to drip feed that over a few weeks!
      • [1] reply
  • 60,000 backlinks at once? Now that's a natural linking pattern if ever there was one.

    No doubt totally organic websites get 60,000 links at one time. LOL
    • [1] reply
    • The only other instance is when a site goes viral.

      But it's obviously VERY easy to tell the difference between backlinks from going viral and 60k automated links.
      • [2] replies
  • Good point thanks!

    Right now out of the 60k list only 6-7k have been successfully signed up to.. crazy!
    But my site is new so it's probably for the best and I'll probably submit to 1000 of them a day and hope 10% of them work.

    Would you advise doing a new AMR account for each 1000 blast or just do the full thing on the one account for same article?
    • [1] reply
    • Well if you are submitting to new article directories each time - just use the same account. Coz you would have created accounts at all 6-7k - so i assume you will select 1k of those and submit. And then the next day select the next 1k and submit??

      So obviously each time you are posting you are using the account for the first time at that particular directory.

      But even if you weren't - I use the same account and submit about 10 different articles. Only then do I create a new set of accounts...
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Very good information!
  • Nice Share bro.......Good Job...
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Hmmmmm great to know, thanks!
  • Hello great worriors

    Iam very pleased to be here at this forum with you
    Sorry about the off top but i have message to thi thread author:

    Nick PM me your email cause I want to buy your seo cycle but I am a new user so i cant PM to you. Please
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks guys - glad you all enjoy the thread

      Thanks for your interest - anyone with questions on my service can email me here: support [A-t] nickwatsonseo <DOT> c0m or simply visit my sales thread - the link is in my sig

      But unfortunately I am not taking on new orders right now. I will probably open up for business again next week...
      • [1] reply
  • Thanks for sharing the strategy, really makes me look into my own and add a few things! Cheers
    • [1] reply
    • robofx, if you already have a video, image, and text. It would be best to add more text to the bottom of your page and update it at least once a week. You could put a new 500+ word article pertaining to your niche there once per week. I do something similar with blog sites, I put my 'sales' post in sticky status so it is always on the top of the home page. Then when ever I add a new post with fresh content it goes below that. This shows search engines that I have fresh content on a weekly basis.
      • [1] reply
  • That's pretty much how I do it. Add new content on the inner pages.

    I'm usually terrified to touch the homepage content once I've got it ranking well for a term I'm targeting.
  • Hey,

    Did anyone see any problem with the latest google algo change? Or things are still fine by you guys end. Just wondering if this strategy is still as good.

    M
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Just ran across the awesome share...thank you so much for the detailed information....
    • [1] reply
    • Curious how this method is working now after the recent algo changes at G. I've just started implementing it on a few sites but haven't noticed significant movement (still inside of 2 weeks so verdict is withheld).

      Anyone have some rankings to share for before/after yesterday's algo updates?
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • If you run this with magic submitter instead of senile you'll be able to automate more of the process. Just a little food for thought.


  • @Mosa
    Hey Mosa, first of all, love your blog! Very inspiring :-) Second, which parts of the process can Magic Submitter automate, that SENuke can't?
    • [1] reply
    • I've only infrequently had the chance to use SENuke and have had more experience with Magic Submitter. And from my experience I can say that MS is a LOT more stable and a much better deal.
      • [1] reply
  • Yes, I'd be interested to find out how you would use Magic Submitter to automate these processes too. Thanks.
  • Thanks for the great post nick
    • [1] reply
    • No problem, I hope it helps you out...
  • Some questions for your nick:

    Do you always use the same accounts for your SENUKE and manually created WEB 2.0? I guess if you're doing a few SEO runs for the same site, you'll use the same web 2.0 accounts right? And when you move on to other sites, you create new web 2.0 accounts (both manually and through SENUKE)? Am I right? So some of these manually and SENUKE created Web 2.0 accounts/sites have very few posts in total right?

    (Or do you try to put all the posts to sites in the same niche on the same Web 2.0 accounts?)

    Thanks.
    • [1] reply
    • Generally, because they are so easy to create, in SenukeX I always create new accounts. Every time I submit content I will do so on new accounts...

      For the manual work, I tend to use the same accounts for each niche OR site - depending on how many cycles I do for a particular site. Generally though I never submit more than about 10 articles per account - then move onto new accounts - even if it is in the same niche.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • THanks, glad you enjoy the thread.

      This is like asking: "how long does it take to a rank a keyword"

      It all depends on the keyword you target - how much competition does it have, how strong is the competition, do the competing pages get updated frequently, how many new competitors are entering the market...etc etc...

      The more difficult the keyword is, the shorter it's stay in the top 10 - unless maintenance work is done (i.e. updated content, new backlinks etc etc...)

      Generally though I target easy to medium competition keywords and once I get them to the top 10 they require no further work. Some stay ranked for a long time (I have some pages that have had the same rankings for over 3 years now - right through all the Google changes) And others fall right off the SERPS while others even gain rankings over time...

      So if you are planning on targeting difficult keywords, be prepared to keep updating your site and building links. If you are targeting 4 or 5 word long tails you will probably stay ranked for a very long time...
  • Thanks Nick for this AWESOME thread

    My eyes are bleeding after reading through 8 pages continuously! Just kidding lol, but I actually can't keep my eyes off it. This thread is by far the most helpful one I've read since the first day I joined WF

    And the more I read it, the more it pushes me to taking actions. I can't wait to see results on my own after seeing so many success stories from fellow warriors!

    But before I finally go implementing it, I just want to ask you a few questions. Hope you don't mind explain them to us all.

    As you know, Google is going frenzy these days with Panda, Penguin, Lion, Tiger, etc. updates. And many sites got hit both white hat legitimate and black hat ones. Actually, I've created 6 sites so far and only one of them made its way to the final destination. It used to make me some money before. But after those crazy updates, it got hit badly. That means my little money machine is broken now

    What I did with that site was to build links solely from blog networks (ALN and Link Authority to be specific). About 80-90% of my links are from them. And I know it's not a good idea to put almost all my eggs in one (bad?) basket.

    That's also the reason why I've been searching for an effective link building method to implement with my future sites. And this "layered" link building appears to work really well.

    OK, enough with my stuff. Here are my questions:

    - According to your own experience, has your strategy changed after those Google updates especially the Penguin which targeted "over-optimization" sites?
    - In your opinion, what are the "over-SEOed" factors to take into consideration? According to my observation, too many exact anchor text links coming from only a few sources might be a problem.
    - And if, for example, you could only have access to AMR and 3 free blog networks (say ALN, Article Ranks, Free Traffic System), there is no SeNukeX, no Scrapebox, what would your cycle look like?

    Again, thanks a million times Nick for creating this awesome thread, you're my SEO idol

    Duy.
    • [1] reply

    • I'm glad my thread is helping you take action - be sure to pop back here and post your results for us all to read about!

      Regarding your questions:

      1. Yes - I am now incorporating a lot more generic words for anchor text (click here, resource, site, this site etc etc...) Also, even though I have not personally seen a huge difference, I am considering submitting to less blog networks and maybe substituting with another link type. From what I've seen Unique Article Wizard still seems to be working good.

      2. You exactly right about the over-optimized SEO - personally I have not seen too much of a difference. But many people I have spoken to have taken HUGE knocks in the SERPS.

      In my opinion, the reason my own sites have not been hit too bad is because of the quality of the content - we always use hand spun, RELEVANT content. And secondly because of the wide variety of links we build.

      As mentioned before, the only thing I want to start concentrating more on is using generic anchor text.

      My own observations are pretty much in line with this article from Micro Site Masters - these guys analyzed tons of data to see what affect the Penguin update had on what type of sites - you can read about it here:

      Penguin Analysis: SEO Isn't Dead, But You Need to Act Smarter | Microsite Masters

      3. If I did not have access to Senuke and ScrapeBox, I would either hire someone to do this work for me, or I would sit and manually create ALL the web 2.0's which SenukeX would normally do. But even so, I would still need someone to do the Social Bookmarking and ScrapeBox work...

      Hope this gives you some direction buddy!
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I read your article again and again, thx very much.
    I have a question for the target keyword.
    You mean target a keyword one time, is it safe now?
    Could you give me some advice for medium niche
    site? i dont think i need so much work for a medium-small niche site.
  • This is a mind blowing post for a noob like me thats still getting to grips with ranking keywords ect.. hope one day I will be able to implement this campain into my own.
  • You can you use senuke services from experienced person..
    To run senuke experienced person is needed..
    i am also offering senuke x service in lowest prices because i get orders in bulk.
    Thanks,
    Rajinder Ricky
    • [1] reply
    • Not sure what's going on with this the latest 'animal update'. I hope it's just a new dance going on. My site was holding #5 for a few weeks and now it's gone off the map. I used all original articles for each of my manual submits, then manual bookmarks and rss feeds to link to them. I also outsourced some bookmarks and rss's to these sites. I only used two article directory submits with manual spun content. I post a fresh original article on my blog once per week. I thought for sure I was being really white hat with my backlinks.

      I am trying to figure out why a site like this would be in position #9. The home page is just a list of webpages. Most are 404 errors. 2/3's of the backlinks for this site come from the same website and have the same key phrase stuffed anchor text. :confused:



      I sure hope this all settles out this week.
      • [1] reply
  • Nick, thanks for your response to me and others.

    1) You mentioned using UAW or trying it out. Let us know how it goes

    2) I'm assuming your quality content means that your spun article is done well - free of grammar mistakes and not automatically spun as you mentioned. You said 60% uniqueness. Is that good enough? Also, you seem to hint in the OP that you only spin words. You don't do sentences/paragraphs? Do you take extra precaution in terms of varying html (italics, bold, heading, alignment, etc.) when submitting your blasts (and even when manually submitting)?

    3) What do you mean by relevant content? Just that the content is relevant to your site and not like an article on health with a link to a car website right? Anything else?

    4) Do you think it's still good to use Scrapebox blasting after all that's happened - even if it's not directly to your money site?
    • [1] reply

    • 1) Currently testing UAW - if the results are good i might come back and do another case study for you guys

      2) Yes you are correct thats exactly what i mean. All the content I use is MANUALLY spun and each new spin is totally free from grammar and spelling errors.

      60% uniquess has worked well for me so far, but ill be honest sometimes we dont even go as high as 60% unique if it's going to affect the quality of the spun articles. I'd rather have QUALITY over UNIQUENESS

      And yeah mostly we only spin at word / phrase level. Here and there we might do entire sentences, but generally we don't.

      The only extra precautions I take is making sure the article is neatly spaced out into paragraphs and that there are NO italics, bolds etc... (Like what can sometimes get left behind after spinning)

      3) That's exactly what I mean by relevant. But it can be pretty broad too though - example, your site is about being 19 weeks pregnant. I would place that link in any article about being pregnant (generally) - the article being used for submitting does not have to be specifically about being 19 weeks pregnant..

      4) So far yes I do. The idea is just to get SOME link juice to the properties. Of course if you could afford a more diverse link structure to each property then that's even better!

      I hope this helps!
  • Cool post, Nick. Allow me to implement to my websites.

    Cheers.
  • Nick, thanks for your response to me and others.

    1) You mentioned using UAW or trying it out. Let us know how it goes

    2) I'm assuming your quality content means that your spun article is done well - free of grammar mistakes and not automatically spun as you mentioned. You said 60% uniqueness. Is that good enough? Also, you seem to hint in the OP that you only spin words. You don't do sentences/paragraphs? Do you take extra precaution in terms of varying html (italics, bold, heading, alignment, etc.) when submitting your blasts (and even when manually submitting)?

    3) What do you mean by relevant content? Just that the content is relevant to your site and not like an article on health with a link to a car website right? Anything else?

    4) Do you think it's still good to use Scrapebox blasting after all that's happened - even if it's not directly to your money site?
  • I would like to know if anyone test with Nick cycles for websites afected by Penguin.

    Would work to recover?

    I have almost 300 websites hit by penguin, most are EMD and the link strategy was link exchange. Used only one title for link, the money keyword
    • [2] replies
    • Unfortunately I don't even think my cycles will help you there.

      In my opinion, you are going to need to add some fresh content and build diverse links focusing on generic anchor texts to "even out" your link profile..
    • How does UAW work?

      I see a lot of fiver gigs asking for 1-3 articles (not in spintax format).

      Does UAW not accept spun content, and won't this mean the the 1-3 articles being submitted will just be duplicated 100's of times across all the sites UAW will submit too? (and are both your anchor links targeting your money site when submitting with these directory sites, or a mix of Tier1?)

      Thanks again
  • Thanks Nick for your elaboration

    I suddenly remembered you mentioned you before that you build the "cycle" every time you have some content updated (if I remember it right as I can't find the exact post, it might be buried deep down in this thread). Can you explain more about this for me?

    Let say, I initially built one cycle and my main keyword was pushed to number 7 on page 1. And now I want to build another cycle, what should I do? Create another page of content, get that new piece of content indexed and start building another cycle? Or updating the old content (add 150-200 words to the end of the old article) is enough?

    Also, have you tried to rank a "stable" website with your cycles before? I mean you publish all of your content at once, then start backlinking them with your cycles without the need of indexing those content first? I want to ask that because I've heard some people say that it's natural to Google to see a site having fresh content updated then links start to roll in (can be in higher volume than normal). What do you think about it?

    Thanks a lot buddy
    • [1] reply
    • If I am targeting a fairly difficult keyword, then yes I first update the content (on the same page i am targeting) and then roll out a cycle for it. If after 1 cycle the keyword is at number 7 and I wanted to get it even better, id add more content (to the end of the article) and then roll out another cycle. But I would probably add some additional pieces of content to the same page while busy with the cycle as well...

      I also go about it the other way as well - adding brand new content pages to the site and then building links to them. This work particularly well if the main target keyword of the site (homepage keyword) id very difficult and I have not seen positive movement in some time. Then while adding new pages and building links to them, I also target the homepage and build links to it as well in each cycle.

      This way the home page has got as many links to it as all the pages put together...so it looks more natural. This strategy does take longer to start working though, because you will only see movement on your main (homepage) keyword after Google starts seeing your entire site as an authority in the niche that is continually being updated...

      Regarding "stable" websites - I have and generally the results are also good - especially e-commerce sites for some reason...(with the little content they usually display)
      But generally if the site is "stable" and nothing has changed for a while, then it might be better to add some content to it before running a cycle - this gets it moving forward VERY quickly. And to be honest, older sites tend to be more stable in their rankings after all the linkbuilding (even the new pages)

      Hope this info helps!
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I have some newbie questions:

    #1: For the 12 Web 2.0 web site accounts, when we submit our unique article to each one, we only are linking to YouTube video? Not home site correct? (Giving some link juice to 2nd tier YouTube link)


    #2: For 8 Blog Networks and “Social Network” Campaign, you say to submit promo article...Is this just one unique article, and not spun? or Do you spin for each 8 blog networks,etc?


    #3: Out of the 12 Web 2.0 web sites you list, which are most likely to delete your account for duplicate content (ie; your spun article wasnt up to par)?
    • [1] reply
    • No, that's incorrect. You do link to your money site, but you embed the YouTube video into each article. The video is to make the content more "valuable" in Google's eyes, but it will also start receiving views meaning some of them will start getting more views in YT instelf - and since the video is marketing your site too (via a watermark and link in the description) you get even more exposure for your website



      The "promo article" should already be in spintax form - this you would do first. So each time you want to use the article you will have to create a "new spin" and use that. But most of the blog networks allow you to submit the article just like that in spintax, and so does Senuke for the social Network campaign



      If you create the accounts properly, and your content is spun well then most will not delete your account. But if I had to say, I would say Tumblr is probably the most likely to delete your account. Posterous and Squidoo also sometimes delete accounts easily though...
  • Great post, many thanks.
    • [1] reply
    • Hi Nick you're so generous!! thank you very much for your post! I'll try your method for my new site.
      • [1] reply
  • Hi Nick. I've been following your thread and have it bookmarked in fact. You provided some very valuable info here. I haven't seen... How is your method working post Penguin?
  • Question : Unless I've missed it, many of these blog networks have now been shut down. What now?

    Nick?
  • Hi Nick. Great informative post. Its probably some of the best "FREE" info I've read that could have even been a great wso. Love how you laid it all out step by step. I have a question tho regarding what you said about using blog networks-

    I read that google is going after all the blog networks and de-indexing sites using them, is that the case and is this still a good relevant strategy to use?

    Thanks.
    • [1] reply
    • I have seen a few pages here and there slip in rankings, but overall my rankings for my entire portfolio of websites is actually doing slightly BETTER after the the penguin update.

      As many of you already know, I was offering these cycles as a service and this gave me the luxury of seeing what the cycle's are doing to my client's sites as well after the penguin update - and unfortunately many of them have not seen the same positive results I have seen. Many of my clients have had their sites drop drastically, and many others have seen a drastic increase. I have not seen any clear pattern (I probably will if i look deeper though). So at this point my conclusion is that the cycles definitely still work - but you going to need to put in extra effort by varying the anchor text, updating your site often and using GOOD QUALITY, RELEVANT content when doing cycles.


      No problem, glad you find it useful...As for the blog networks, I stopped using them altogether and replaced them with Unique Article Wizard - So far so good; I have only done cycles for 7 pages so far with this technique, and so far the results are pretty much what I'd expect from the cycles using all the blog networks as before. So at the moment, UAW seems to be a pretty decent replacement.

      For those of you that do not want to use Blog networks at all, that is fine, just find something to replace it with. The idea is just to keep your links diverse.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I got some idea - very good -

    Thank you very much
  • thanks for this great post. Thanks for sharing all the details on your campaign strategy. Would you mind to give some recommendations on outsourcing?
  • Nick I hope your service gets back up and running soon!

    The Warrior forum seems broken you can't post a new thread so I thought I'd say it here. It's about Ezine Articles! Is it worth using there service for back links.

    I've published plenty of articles with them but today one got rejected and the reviewer said stuff along the lines of my link site should not have exit pop ups, should be relevant, should not have excessive ads.

    I can't believe it, for starters I hate popups and have none, never have done never will, my content is not only unique but both relevant talking about the same topic and provides real value to whoever reads it as it helps people who have been treated badly. And all my sites have the same ad layout which have been previously approved no problems.

    Nothing more annoying then lack of consistency in approvals. Just wondering how other peoples experience with them has been. They take a while to approve your article as well. Do you recommend using them or using different article directories?
    • [1] reply
    • No problem - be sure to come back and post your results for us all to read about!

      No problem, glad you found it useful. On page 2 of this thread I give plenty of tips on outsourcing. I am also releasing a WSO soon on outsourcing the entire process easily and cheaply - it will include the details of all the freelancers and sellers I personally use and have set up agreements with to complete these cycles...So keep an eye out for that!

      Personally I think EZA links are very good - but not on their own. When you use them in a larger strategy and they are being used to help diversify
      your site's link structure, they can be very powerful. The only question is, are you willing to put in the effort for those links?

      Your experience is the EXACT reason I don't really use them anymore. I used to rely heavily on them for backlinks, but they are just too inconsistent when deciding on what is allowed and what is not...

      The next best thing in opinion would be ArticlesBase or Ideamarketers
  • Nick,
    thanks for the info. I use RSS for my SEO efforts and it is very effective for me...done manually though it takes a lot of time. Good Luck!
  • Hi Nick,

    I just want to ask a quick question about indexing your Web 2.0 properties. Have you found it hard recently to index your Web 2.0 sites (pages)? I've created about 15 Web 2.0 properties the last 3 days and built a lot of links from blog networks to them (I don't have access to BMR and Scrapebox so I have to utilize my blog network subscriptions).

    I've searched Google for the unique phrase I used to track those submitted articles and found out that about 100 indexed results. That means Google still indexes the articles from blog networks pretty well. And that also means they saw the links that point to my Web 2.0 sites as well. I also do some manual and automated Social bookmarking submissions with IMAutomator with links pointing to my Web 2.0

    But the result I've got so far is not that great. Only 5 out of 15 are indexed. Not long ago I find it pretty easy to index anything in Google. Just build some links from Social bookmarking sites and a few links from article submissions of blog networks could do the trick. But it's getting harder these days especially after the updates.

    Have you experienced the same thing? Also, do you have any suggestions for me?

    Thanks a lot for your help buddy
    • [1] reply

    • To be honest, we run so many cycles for various sites and projects I have not recently checked how many are actually getting indexed. Generally though, most get indexed...as we run a ScrapeBox campaign on them as well as add their links in an RSS feed, which then get's pinged, and submitted to a few RSS directories...
  • This has to be one of the best posts I have read here. It takes a disciplined and serious IM to follow this path. Nobody said making money was simple, but it can be easy when the right blueprint is provided.
    • [1] reply
    • Well everyone is entitled to their opinion i suppose - it still works for me.
      Their however been a few slight changes, I no longer use all the blog networks mentioned, I only submit to UAW. Also, instead of creating a PDF and a Slide Show I create only 2 slide shows - and submit 1 to Scribd and the other to Slide Share - this ensures the links stay live. One other thing that has changed is I use a lot more generic anchor text - as apposed to just using the keyword as before.

      Another thing that I have mentioned over and over again is this: The reason I think it is still working for me is the fact that we use GOOD QUALITY content (No auto spun junk), and create a diverse structure of links - without using spammy blog comments and profile links...

      Also, embedding the video and a pic in some of the web 2.0's also provides that extra quality component..

      This is just my 2 cents - SEO is not a science, and everyone should just be doing what works for them...

      Thanks guys, glad you found it useful
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Could you clarify this? Are these 2 slide shows the same or different? A unique version from a well spun spintax?

    Also, why does this ensure the links stay live? Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • The two slide shows are different - from the article that should be in spintax, simply create 2 new spins from it. Then use those two articles to create 2 slide shows.

      I usually create a Title page, with the heading of the title, and the the website name that I am promoting along with a pic. Then subsequent slides simply have 1 or 2 paragraphs with relevant pics next to each. Your links are placed in the content.

      I don't don't know why this makes sure the links stay live - but what I do know is that if the source document is a PDF and it is submitted to Scribd, a lot of the time the links will not be clickable. But when the source file is a Power Point slide show, the links are always clickable...
  • Great post have been looking for a way to get my MNS ranked, great stuff will give this a go
  • Is this strategy still effective after Penguin? I really hope so because I am making my move now. Thank you for sharing!
    • [1] reply
    • No problem...just make sure you use good quality content and diverse anchor texts and things should work...

      No problem guys. I would strongly advise against MNS though - once you find a winner, add more pages to the sites. In my opinion MNS is fast losing it's effectiveness - especially with all the latest google updates

      So far for me it's still working pretty good - I have made a few tweaks though (read above) - Just make sure you use good quality content, and diverse anchor texts and everything should work ok
  • It's still successful with a few small tweaks. Mainly focusing on quality over pure quantity.
    • [1] reply
    • This is exactly right - and also using a lot more generic anchor texts. I read a report about having only about 20% of your links use your keyword as the anchor text - the other 80% should just be generic "click here" type of links. And this information was based on TONS of data...
      • [1] reply
  • When you create these accounts do you do them all manually or do you use a specific automated software? Should they be created using different proxies?

    I know you touched on this before but can you be more clear as to what exactly you do now as an alternative to these blog networks?
  • Nick would you still recommend submitting to the blog networks?
    It's the only step I haven't done (along with scrapebox comments) but I have been seeing good results so far, although I have a feeling some high pr blog networks might push it further up but it might also be a bad idea now with google shutting down these networks slowly but surely?
    • [1] reply
    • The You Tube, Scribd and Slide Share accounts are created manually. Each SET of accounts will use a unique proxy. So you will end up using only 1 proxy for one cycle. When you move onto the next cycle, you will use a new proxy to create the new accounts

      As for the web2.0's - we used to do them manually, but the guy that does it for us now uses his own software.


      Guys I mentioned this a little further up in the thread; I no longer submit to all the blog networks. At the moment I am using only Unique Article Wizard and seeing good results. When the blog networks got hit so hard by Google, UAW did not lose all their sites. And now they stopped providing the URL's in their report so it makes it much harder for Google to mass-index their network.

      They are also constantly adding new sites to their network. Now im not saying they do not get sites de-indexed, but i really do think that they will not easily get ALL their site's de-indexed.

      I have HEARD that it's pretty much the same story with Article Marketing Automation, Article Ranks and My Article Network. I have yet to test these though...
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Thanks Nick. Not sure what you mean. Just to clarify. This means that say jondoe.wordpress.com may be used for keyword.com site. And you post 5-10 articles there with each article linking back to keyword.com (moneysite).

    If this is correct, wouldn't this be a bit fishy with all posts in that Web 2.0 pointing back to one moneysite alone - or you think it's OK?
    • [1] reply
    • They do accept spintax articles, but they also have a wizard that helps you spin each paragraph 3 times...this is probably what the guys on fiverr are doing...

      No, it means Jon Doe would have an account at wordpress.com - but he would have multiple blogs on his accounts, and each blog would have an article linking back to your money site:
      article1.wordpress.com
      article2.wordpress.com etc etc..

      But again, some of the sites you are unable to do this with and you will need a totally separate account for a new "site" or "page" or "blog" or whatever...

      Either way buddy, you are reading WWWAAYYY TOOO MUCH into how you should use your accounts. It's not going to effect your rankings - it's simple, the more you use one account the more at risk you are of losing many more links...simple.

      If you are willing to take more risk, create less accounts and use them more often. If you do not want to take a large risk, create more accounts...
  • Great port. Very helpful. Thanks a lot
  • You still recommending Animoto for your videos? It looks like for the $30 annual price they add their watermark. Do you still add your watermark?

    Also what software do you use for using different proxies to submit to web 2.0's,etc ?
  • Nick, your method is what i had planned and reading your post, i just saved a lot of testing time. I must say you have been generous in sharing what you know. I definitely learn quick a bit from your experience. Glad to know that this work for penguin too. lol...
    • [1] reply
    • No problem, hope you can put it to good use!

      I use the $37 Plus account, and they only add their logo to the end of the video. Many times I just leave it as it is, or I use camtasia and remove it manually. But if you really can't be bothered removing it, and you really don't want it there you will have to get their pro account.

      Normally my videos will start and end with a Text module mentioning the website name and URL. Sometimes I do watermark the video URL at the bottom of the video though - again, i use camtasia for this

      Regarding the proxies, because we only use one proxy for one cycle - all the accounts across the various sites will be created under the same proxy. So we don't really change proxies all that often, and we tend to simply manually change the proxy in the internet options of the browser.

      But if you are changing proxies fairly often, and would like some software to make it easier, you can use foxyproxy - it's a firefox addon and works great to help manage your proxies

      No problem, be sure to pop back and post some results! As for penguin, just make sure you use quality content and varied anchor text...
  • Nick, just wanted to thank you for your excellent post. I started on my first cycle last week, and already see some good results on the keyword I used. It ranked from nowhere to 14th at the moment when I have only completed step 1(social bookmark for web2.0 properties) and 2 (social bookmark for AMR links). I am very happy with the result.

    Also, I have a question regarding to SENUKE social bookmarking. I have noticed that the list on social bookmarking on SenukeX only contains 42 sites. So besides social bookmarking on Senuke, do you also use Social Bookmark Demon to make more bookmarkings? Is 42 bookmarkings considered enough for 1 cycle? Same question for the RSS submission on Senuke. The RSS list on Senuke is even shorter than Social bookmarkings.

    This is the one of the most valuable posts I have even read about SEO. Thank you for your sharing!
  • This is a great SEO strategy, thanks NickWatson for providing this. I was following some strategies and learn some new tactics here.
    • [1] reply
    • No problem, im glad you found it useful. Lately we have actually started using other means for social bookmarking...and I see no reason BMD won't work fine. Just be sure to bookmark to quality sites. Don't scrape some crappy pligg-type list that's full of PR0 bookmarking sites...As a matter of fact, all our social bookmarks are PR2 and above!

      The RSS feeds are purely to help get the backlinks indexed so that Google knows they are there. Same goes for the ScrapeBox campaign - except this also gives a little extra link juice.

      So personally I feel the RSS directories in Senuke are more than enough - lately I have only been submitting manually to Feedage.com and also seeing pretty decent results. We are also currently testing nuclear link indexer to help get the link indexed - looks pretty good so far.

      Congrats on the positive results so far! Be sure to keep us posted...

      No problem!
      • [1] reply
  • Thats great NickWatson, I will definitely try them.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks, be sure to come back and post your results!
  • Hey Nick,

    Thanks for your guide. For social bookmarking, did you bookmark all urls like web 2 and AMR, or just your money site to high PR sites? Does it matter if I want to bookmark other URLs at all in the eyes of google? Thanks for your reply.
    • [1] reply
    • I used to run a random Social Bookmarking campaign to all the URL's - the idea was just to get at least a few of them with a couple of SB links. But now days I simply run a high PR SB campaign to my money site only. I only use ScrapeBox for all the other links...

      If however you do bookmark other URLS as well, it will give those properties a little more "authority" in google's eyes, meaning if your link is on that page it will mean a little more for your rankings. (This is the theory of it anyways)
  • nick, I can't pm you because of my low post counts, but I have a question about the outsource guide I bought. Can you pm me via iquangtt at gmail.com? Thank you.
  • Hey Nick, Does this strategy still work after google penguin ?
  • cuimian it absolutely will work. Just remember to be smart when you implement any strategy and go for what looks natural. Anchor text variety, build links casually/gradually, etc.

    If you blast everything overnight (good luck!) then you may get undesirable results
    • [2] replies
    • Sent you an email buddy...

      Streamline is absolutely correct. This strategy still works well for us, but you need to make sure you use QUALITY, relevant content and also vary your anchor text to include general anchor texts like "click here" "this site" etc etc... As a matter of fact, I think read something about using your keyword as anchor text only about 25% of the time - which is what we do and its working well so far...
    • This.

      Space it out as much as possible and you'll be fine.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Great post thanks for the valuable information provided by you.
    I just love the backliking tips that you have mentioned,and yu have really explained great things to rank high in google SERP.
  • Anchor text diversity. If people are going to take note of that and not force the same keyword on all of the pages where they'll build their links, that's going to look unnatural. I would have to agree that you should use the general anchor texts, because we can consider those as strong calls to action, depending on how you've delivered those statements.
    • [2] replies
    • No problem..

      Yeah, especially after the Penguin updates - anchor text diversity as well as RELEVANT content are vitally important now...
    • Definitely. Diversity is really, really important now. Though I still lean towards having a higher # of anchor text backlinks. (55/45) No issues yet.
  • nick, hw is your sites going? how much penguin foil this strategy?
    • [1] reply
    • Really great thread, Thanks Nick.

      i was looking at doing this and submitting all links created to Linklicious...would there be any benefit in this?

      thanks
  • I believe Randomize and Diversify are the keywords here.

    Get links from the variety of sources and you'll be fine.
  • Is it possible to do two cycle for the same keyword? I want to target the same keyword and increase # of backlinks to it, but I am not sure how. Do I write a new unique article using the same keyword? or Do I add more content to the old article and do another cycle? I am concerned if google will penalize the site if I backlink the same keyword with no new content. Thanks!!
    • [1] reply
    • Awesome thread, I'm definitely using the strategies here and making sure my anchor text is very, very diversified.

      Question, though. I purchased the WSO, but it simply says to hire a guy to create accounts for the 40 web 2.0's. However, I want to do this on my own for a while, until I learn the system very well. After that, I'll outsource, but for now I want to know exactly how to do it myself.

      So, what are the top 40 web 2.0 sites we should be posting our spun articles to?

      Thanks.
  • [DELETED]
  • First, thank you for the wonderful post!

    Question: When you add two links in the promo article, do you manually add these links to each spun article? OR do you add these links in a syntax format (just like when you are adding a syntax to each word)?
  • Thanks,for this wonderfull post.I really appreciated with your points and information.I like it.Thanks for suggestions.
  • Nick you're the man, thanks for this post.

    Let me ask you this, so we can put it on the record, do you think you can see results if you skip step 5 and 6 the senukex and amr part?

    Also all the other automation? If I were to strengthen the links with social bookmarking and lets say blog commenting all manually, and I am in a low-med competition, would there still be results? Or is it a waste of time?

    Thanks,

    Mike
  • Great post very detailed information.I really appreciate on your efforts.Thanks a ton for sharing.
  • Hi Nick,

    Thank you for your post. I appreciate that this post is relatively new, however IM moves very quickly and I was wondering if you have made any further discoveries and/or changes as to how you would do things in addition to/instead of what is already written below.

    Thanks!

  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Hi Nick,
    Your post is full of information and its a good piece of detailed information to both new commers and experienced ones.You have given a lot of time explaining this.....good job.
  • Just thought I would post an update on what's done so far. Testing this on a site that is 2 years old and for a keyword which I reckon is medium to Hard difficulty.

    Completed all steps exactly as you have mentioned and my keyword has jumped from position 15 to position 6 on the first page! This is quite a surprise for me for the site to move up so quickly and this was within 4 days of completing the first cycle. I could have completed this cycle in 2 days or even 1 but been so busy with building out a clients site I thought it would be interesting to see what results I could get. What's even more surprising is that I hadn't even completed the scrapebox part as I wasn't sure as to how to blast the URLS.

    For example, I have a 200K auto approve list, do I do one submission to each URL mentioned with the full list or do I share all the URLS with the 200k list?

    I think I would get even greater results had I completed this step, I am going to move on to another keyword and see what happens with that. Impressed so far.

    P.S Forgive my grammer, I am sending this out from my iphone and I still can't get used to this on screen keyboard crap :-)
  • Great strategy, but I don't understand how to vary the anchor text post-penguin. I mean, if we are doing a blast about "spanish hotels", what percentage of the anchor text should actually have "spanish hotels" in it? 10% 20% 30% 100%?

    If we only do say 20% and fill it up with LSI and related keywords like "spanish weather, spanish accommodations, spanish travel, click here for the guide, etc" isn't this over-diluted and not effective for a competitive keyword like "spanish hotels"?
    • [1] reply
    • I don't know. I doubt if anyone really does. I read somewhere that about 25% of overall links should have the targret anchor with the rest made up of natural looking anchors like "click here", "www.yourdomain.com", "Company Name" and LSI keywords. Like I say, this could well be a load of bollox but it makes sense to me. If your link profile is made up entirely of exact match anchors my granny could tell you that those links aren't natural.
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
  • Hi nick... im still confused about web 2.0 manual submission... if you submit here an article do you use your old account? or do need to create again another account?
    • [1] reply
    • I think you stole this from another forum it is pretty much the same exact thing and wrote 1 year before you wrote yours Here
  • Hello there, have not completed reading the entire post. There is so much information here! Thank you

    I found this about a different way to use "linkwheels". Could this provide even further improvement to this SEO approach?

    hhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vTpw8FMMY0
    • [1] reply
    • Looks interesting. But keep in mind the date. The video is about a year and a half old. Things have changed massively since then.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Hey Nick, Is that Outsourcer Guide still for sale. Just let me know. Thanks Sean.
  • Does anyone have a outsourcer that can do the UAW part... The guy Nick recommends is no longer listed on fiverr.
  • To the person who sent me the private message, I appreciate the feedback. I can't sent private messages on here so if you would kindly send me the link, I would appreciate it... Thanks.
  • Banned
    Thanks,I've just started learning SEO and with the launch of my new website this surely will come in handy.
  • I sure wish this service was still being offered. I would burn out trying to do all these steps every week.
    • [1] reply
    • Things have changed a little since the recent Google updates. So keep that in mind.
  • Great info!
  • Any new updates in 2013?
  • I will try to complete on of the cycle to see what's happen. Does this method increase also the pr, it's depend of your on page seo?
  • Banned
    Great info when you have a time machine!
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • does it still work?
    or anything updated?
    thanks
    • [1] reply
    • It works like a charm, for negative SEO campaigns.
  • There is no diversification in the keyword used. There's no way this will work now. Completely violates what is set out in recent updates. I've never seen anything other than negative results from spinning articles.
  • Great Post.It will help me optimize my new site for hiring Filipino online workers
    Is bookmarking can also help?Please advice
    Thanks!
  • Thanks ! Thank you for sharing such an important information.
    This is really the way of getting to the top of the search results. All the points have been well explained and are still to the point.
  • Submitting in bulk articles will seriously hurt you and author bio should be diversified from getting penalized, Any ways its really a good post and was informative.
  • just my $0.02 but it seems like every google algo change is based on penalizing sites that are not providing something relatively valuable to the end user. This strategy provides a badly worded article (that probably cant even be read anymore its gone through so many spins) to thousands of users with a big fat link to the site/person who "wrote" said horrible article.

    basically you're providing horrible content and putting a big ole "look what I did" link on it.

    ...and people wonder why they get Google-slapped.

    Good content that actually is useful or informative (not spun, not junk, not copied) + natural traffic and NATURAL LINKBUILDING + reasonable monetization = profits.

    use that strategy and you'll never have to worry about google....try and manipulate it, speed it up, cheat the system....you're going to have problems. Its very simple.
    • [1] reply
    • But the thing is, we're in it for the money. If you can build 20 sites in a day, and then spend 2 days, and $50 worth of server time to post crap on the internet, and then you make money... then doing everything "nice" like you say isn't very appealing.

      Yeah sites get slapped, but if they cost $30 and one hour of your time, who cares? It's about ROI.

      Nothing is unethical unless you're doing something illegal or you're hurting people.

      If people don't want to buy stuff from your spammy site then they won't. You're not forcing them too. Plus, just because your SEO is spammy, doesn't mean you don't have a legit business, or a decent offer.

      And if you think we shouldn't force ourselves onto google to get free traffic and annoy people, then could you please contact the people who cold call me and post shit through my letterbox everyday. Cheers!
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • The Best thread i have ever read in this forum. Thanks.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • You can see my thread where I ranked a site, a case study http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...e-11-days.html
    • [1] reply
    • Yes and now your here pushing your case study on other threads. Things starting to add up now.


      The Sixth Sense: "I see dead people"
  • Hi NickWatson, are these all tools like SEOnuke,sick submitter,scrapebox going to be part of Blackhat SEO if I understand correctly...as all these tools you mentioned are mentioned in a blackhat forum bro...what's your say on this??
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]

Next Topics on Trending Feed