SEO Experts: Is This Site Truly Crawlable?

16 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Hi Warriors,

I've developing a large travel site. The homepage is AJAX, and I'm not sure the search engines can crawl through it.

I submitted an XML to Google and it seems to index all the pages fine.

BUT I'm concerned that if we build links to the homepage, the "Google Juice" won't flow through to the article pages (which we really, really want).

Is the site OK for crawling? Or should we make a change?

The site is trekity . com (not sure if posting links is kosher).

Thanks for your help!

Coz
#crawlable #experts #seo #site
  • Profile picture of the author linkvana
    AJAX crawling is a tricky subject. It might be easier for you to consider using a more basic strategy for the homepage content, but you can learn everything you need to know straight from Google themselves here: https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-crawling/
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5716101].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cozandeffect
      Thanks for your input.

      I'd really, really like to keep the homepage the way it is (if you take a look you'll see how user-friendly it is).

      Would it help if I placed xml sitemaps in the footer? That way the search engines could crawl them that way? Or does that fail to properly let the "Google Juice" flow throughout the site?

      -Coz
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5716142].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Nguyen
    Site is not crawlable

    This is how Google views your site:

    Trekity.com: Find, Plan & Share Your Next Adventure

    Great concept but Ajax is too advance for Google at the moment
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5716162].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cozandeffect
      Bummer.

      Is there a workaround so search engines can crawl through to the article pages?

      For example:

      adding a sitemap in the footer
      using window.history.pushState() (I don't really understand this, but read about it here: Create Crawlable, Link-Friendly AJAX Websites Using pushState() | SEOmoz

      Or any other ideas which I may have missed?

      (btw the way, thank you for all your help!)
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5716195].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Michael Nguyen
        Outside my skill set but what about creating a dynamic "tag cloud" with links to each post that can be placed on the left or the side. Each cloud could be
        a location, mood etc. And can link to a category. Use meta robots noindex follow to avoid duplication.

        Originally Posted by cozandeffect View Post

        Bummer.

        Is there a workaround so search engines can crawl through to the article pages?

        For example:

        adding a sitemap in the footer
        using window.history.pushState() (I don't really understand this, but read about it here: Create Crawlable, Link-Friendly AJAX Websites Using pushState() | SEOmoz

        Or any other ideas which I may have missed?

        (btw the way, thank you for all your help!)
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5716283].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author cozandeffect
          Interesting idea... though I'm not sure it would scale.

          We currently have over 500 pages of content, and will be doubling that in the next two months.

          There are three separate taxonomies (you can see them on the left hand side) which means there are a lot of links to go through.

          I REALLY appreciate your feedback, and if you - or anyone else - has other ideas I would love to hear them.

          -Coz
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5716304].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Michael Nguyen
            Sure it would scale. The tag cloud would be random, combination of latest post, most popular destination etc. Fact is, not all pages will get the link juice you want it to but, but what you can do is make sure all pages get a chance of being index by using the homepage to link to it via the cloud.

            Originally Posted by cozandeffect View Post

            Interesting idea... though I'm not sure it would scale.

            We currently have over 500 pages of content, and will be doubling that in the next two months.

            There are three separate taxonomies (you can see them on the left hand side) which means there are a lot of links to go through.

            I REALLY appreciate your feedback, and if you - or anyone else - has other ideas I would love to hear them.

            -Coz
            Signature
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5716358].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Michael Nguyen View Post

      Site is not crawlable

      This is how Google views your site:

      Trekity.com: Find, Plan & Share Your Next Adventure

      Great concept but Ajax is too advance for Google at the moment
      Here is your answer.

      What you see on the cache page (text-version) is what Google is looking at.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5717105].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cozandeffect
    Ah, good point. So you'd suggest a tag cloud over a sitemap in the footer? Or would both work well together?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5716381].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Nguyen
      Originally Posted by cozandeffect View Post

      Ah, good point. So you'd suggest a tag cloud over a sitemap in the footer? Or would both work well together?
      I would use the tag cloud because as a general rule, a page should have no more than 100 links. As your site grows, it will have more than 100 pages. What would really help with the tag cloud is if you built an xml sitemap and directly submit to Google webmasters.

      The first think you should do with a site is to remove all barriers to improve your sites indexation ie, make it easy for the search engine spiders to crawl your site. The spiders have only a certain amount of crawling resource before it will decide to move on.
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5716705].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author cozandeffect
        Originally Posted by Michael Nguyen View Post

        I would use the tag cloud because as a general rule, a page should have no more than 100 links. As your site grows, it will have more than 100 pages. What would really help with the tag cloud is if you built an xml sitemap and directly submit to Google webmasters.

        The first think you should do with a site is to remove all barriers to improve your sites indexation ie, make it easy for the search engine spiders to crawl your site. The spiders have only a certain amount of crawling resource before it will decide to move on.
        Hi Michael,

        Yep, I created an XML sitemap (http://trekity.com/sitemap_index.xml) and submitted to Google and Bing.

        So the pages are indeed indexed.

        My concern is that - given the use of AJAX on the homepage - any links to the homepage won't pass any SEO goodness to deeper article pages (like those featured on the homepage).

        The tag cloud seems like a possible solution. Would you suggest adding the sitemap to the footer in conjunction with the tag cloud? Sorry if this sounds dense, I'm decent with SEO but new to Wordpress and development.

        And once again - thank you for your brain and willingness to lend a hand

        -Coz
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5717172].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Michael Nguyen
          Originally Posted by cozandeffect View Post

          Hi Michael,

          Yep, I created an XML sitemap (http://trekity.com/sitemap_index.xml) and submitted to Google and Bing.

          So the pages are indeed indexed.

          My concern is that - given the use of AJAX on the homepage - any links to the homepage won't pass any SEO goodness to deeper article pages (like those featured on the homepage).

          The tag cloud seems like a possible solution. Would you suggest adding the sitemap to the footer in conjunction with the tag cloud? Sorry if this sounds dense, I'm decent with SEO but new to Wordpress and development.

          And once again - thank you for your brain and willingness to lend a hand

          -Coz
          If it's the xml sitemap you're talking about then IMO there's no need as you've submitted it to webmasters but it doesn't hurt to do so.

          Your homepage looks like it will continually update with new posts so the deeper links will never benefit long term. You will have to manually places the link somewhere or on side bar if you want a deep link to benefit.

          BTW

          http://trekity.com/post_tag-sitemap.xml

          these pages throw up errors. Empty pages so no much value to google. I would suggest go into your plugins section and noindex follow the tags section at that level.
          Signature
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5717363].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author cozandeffect
            Thanks for catching the tags sitemap - I'll be sure to noindex them.

            So if I place a sitemap in the footer, wouldn't that help with deep linking?
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5719930].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author AskJon
              I know you're trying to make it works, but if you don't know what you're doing with ajax (I don't!) I really would recommend you to switch to a more google friendly website with html/css. Your website is great btw, and could easily be done in html so I would take that option instead, but that's just my opinion!
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5720283].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TheFBGuy
    Sorry, have ask, why Ajax if you are going to rely on search engine traffic?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5716679].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cozandeffect
      Originally Posted by TheFBGuy View Post

      Sorry, have ask, why Ajax if you are going to rely on search engine traffic?
      It's a great question. As far as I knew, the articles would be able to be crawled from the homepage.

      Sadly, that's not the case.

      Still, I'm very happy with the front-end... it's very user-friendly, just not search engine friendly.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5717138].message }}

Trending Topics