The Biggest SEO Mistake - Why You Don't Rank NO 1

14 replies
  • SEO
  • |
From all (small and big) of my SEO clients I can see that they don't use they brain at all when setting linking campaigns.

They learned basic SEO theory that is written everywhere and that tells you to make keyword reach titles, H tags, anchor texts.
Then they just try to follow all those steps without thinking or doing any experiments.

Here I want to talk about Natural Link Building.

But mostly about anchor text - one of important SEO elements that can give you negative SEO score if is not done properly.

In one sentence - anchor text need to look natural!
You can not have 99% of links coming to your site with your keyword as that is not natural.

I'm not talking here about some long tail keywords with low competition where you could easily rank with few links here and there and few months domain age, but about top terms that are making big money.
Game is a little bit different in this case.

What I see when small clients are submitting project to us is that they submit just main and/or long tail keywords.
Big clients did the same in past when were using cheap outsourced link building, then we need to fix all that in our monthly SEO service.

Sit down and think how would your anchors look like if you have really good site, with top quality content written by top expert in your field.
Look around how others on internet link to some sites when they mention it on their sites, on forums, on social sites.
Analyze first page of google for your competitors and what they use in anchor and in what percentage (use majesticseo,ahrefs or opensiteexplorer).

You will see big number of anchors like:

- this page
- here
- this
- visit here
- full URL as anchor
- domain name as anchor
- company name
- misspelled company name!


Think about this next time when you are ordering some link building service.


Build property with main keyword in title, high keyword density article with over 700 words, few images that have name of image file with keyword (keyword-here.jpg, keywordhere.jpg)...linking from such page with anchor "here" or any other random (non keyword text) is passing link from relative content and looks very natural in eyes of google.


Your site mentioned on other sites without link (just domain name or url without link) is also important factor.
Look how many times Facebeook, Amazon, Youtube are mentioned without linking to it.
What about your site name?


This is just small part of big SEO puzzle.
Still you need to think, analyze and do experiments
about onpage SEO, how frequently to build links and in what volume, links from main site language sites vs foreign languages sites and anchors...etc...etc.

Hope this will help to those of you who are selling SEO services or promoting your personal sites.



Cheers,
Nikola
#biggest #mistake #rank #seo
  • Profile picture of the author funeral
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768049].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author thebitbotdotcom
    @nikolaaa,

    That is very good advice and probably the best I have run across in terms of natural linking.

    I make articles on my site available for syndication directly on my site and I injected code that spins the resource links and anchor text on demand so that each re-published copy gets unique anchor text.

    So far it has worked pretty well, because I commonly land search queries for most of them without any additional SEO efforts.

    Interesting points about non-keyword-based anchor text. I haven't been doing that, but it actually seems like a necessary thing now that you point it out.

    Mark
    Signature
    Do Your Copywriting Skills Suck?

    Let Us Help You Develop Your Writing Skills!

    Submit Guest Posts With [ TheBitBot.Com ]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768142].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author chetankm
    Thanks for the information.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768156].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mangomedia
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768624].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nikolaaa
      Originally Posted by funeral View Post

      Thanks for the informative post.
      Originally Posted by chetankm View Post

      Thanks for the information.
      Originally Posted by mangomedia View Post

      thanks for sharing this techniques .
      I hope admins will ban this kind of users.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768650].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author outwest
        Originally Posted by nikolaaa View Post

        I hope admins will ban this kind of users.
        why? I often thank op's in a similar fashion
        Signature
        Tech article writing .Native English Speaker(with Proof)
        specializing in SmartPhones , Internet security, high tech gadgets, search engines, tech shows, digital cameras.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768663].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author nikolaaa
          Originally Posted by outwest View Post

          why? I often thank op's in a similar fashion
          I think there is Thanks button that is more useful then to just write empty comment with "thank you".
          With "thank you" posts you are not contributing to community and on the same time just making post longer and less readable for those who really want to discuss about subject.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768695].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author outwest
    Dont assume people who say, Thanks very much. are upping their post count or being insincere

    The only time I hit the thanks button is if the poster REALLY puts something unusual that affected me in an abnormal way. I do thank you for the post though
    Signature
    Tech article writing .Native English Speaker(with Proof)
    specializing in SmartPhones , Internet security, high tech gadgets, search engines, tech shows, digital cameras.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768715].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nicktyler
      Originally Posted by outwest View Post

      The only time I hit the thanks button is if the poster REALLY puts something unusual that affected me in an abnormal way.
      That can be read the wrong way, or maybe the right way depending on what your into

      Signature

      1000's of IT jobs in the UK online now at Dice

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768752].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cagliostro
      Originally Posted by outwest View Post

      Dont assume people who say, Thanks very much. are upping their post count or being insincere

      The only time I hit the thanks button is if the poster REALLY puts something unusual that affected me in an abnormal way. I do thank you for the post though
      No. Saying Thanks etc etc is just Forum Polution. Eats valuable SPACE and TIME from all of us.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768838].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nicktyler
    Saying thankyou in a post rather than hitting the button bumps your thread and gives your post more credibility from the forum front page due to the reply nubmer. Also it is a bit harsh to have a go at people who are thanking you.

    Of course many do it to up their post count but you cant just assume.

    Anyway it is a good topic and an informative post. I don't know how many times I have written the words "diversity" and "natural" in the same sentance on this forum.

    So instead of using the button I will now type thankyou and hope I don't get banned.
    Signature

    1000's of IT jobs in the UK online now at Dice

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768742].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ronnyroll
    Yes, the mistakes are numerous. People don’t have basically natural link building prosses.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768787].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author slix
    Hey Nikola,

    in what percentage you think it would be natural to use random keywords phrases instead of exact ones? From what you've said it turns out we would be better off with majority of non-related anchor keywords, but we all know this can't be true?

    Slix
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768848].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jovykhan
      Me is different. I will rank first my target keywords before I vary my anchor text. This way I'm sending message to Google saying hey this is me and this is how you will perceive me.
      Signature
      LocalFinder.net Australia's Leading Online Business Directory
      Australian Local Citation Service
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5768931].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nikolaaa
      Originally Posted by slix View Post

      Hey Nikola,

      in what percentage you think it would be natural to use random keywords phrases instead of exact ones? From what you've said it turns out we would be better off with majority of non-related anchor keywords, but we all know this can't be true?

      Slix
      Analyze top competitors for your KW and you will know %.

      There is related links and non related link.
      Related link is coming from related page.
      It means that page where is "click here" anchor link should have Title, Tags, Content with your Keyword.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5775579].message }}

Trending Topics