Googles Next Slap Coming - But Ist It REALLY A Slap?

by 85 replies
109
Hi,
We all know the blog link networks are getting de-indexed or already are. But was that really a slap?

Google's next BIG change is coming really fast. But is that a slap?

Hear me out.

First lets set the ground rules:
1. Google is not the Government, it's a business.
2. Marketers and guys with huge PPC spends on adwords are not Google's customers.
3. Google's customers are the searchers. Because they know if they have enough searchers (eyeballs with wallets) you will trip all over yourself getting as many of those eyeballs on your pages looking at your stuff as possible.
4. Google does not care about the marketer, nor should it. Google cares about the searcher and their experience, end of story.

So, pretend you're Google for a moment. And you have a bunch a little hair brained Nintendo playin, reddit surfin marketers gaming your BUSINESS by putting up crap spun content that pollutes your serps with junk that ticks off your customers.

They then load this crappy spun spam with links to push crappy thinly built affiliate sites up your serps so that the top of your serps no longer give your customer what they want.

If you were Google and this was happening what would you do. You would de-index that crap out of your serps and make your customers happy.

Like it, don't like it, if you were Google you would do it wouldn't you? Be honest!

Google's new slap is on it's way.

Again in this scenario you're Google.

The marketers can't be beat just by spankin their links. These guys are like a swarm of Bee's, they just keep coming until they find a weak spot and pow, they all run in and sting that spot like crazy.

So, these marketers are really good at SEO. They are on page maniacs. They piss meta tags and fart EMD's.

Now remember your Google and these guys are taking up nearly every single niche with their marketing and affiliate sites. These sites (the majority) don't have your adsense ads on them, so they make you no money and you're a business your job is to make money.

What do you do?

You adjust your content algorithm to deliver what the searcher (your customer) wants but that defeats these pesky marketers.

You do this with a new algo that does not rely on the exact keyword typed in but instead relies on the cumulative meaning of the page and other factors.



If you spend a lot of time in KW research (as you should) you've seen it. You know what I'm talking about. Stuffs ranking that makes you look at it and go "What the?"
You are seeing it more and more. You may even see stuff outranking some of your younger not so stable sites that stops you in your tracks cause you can't figure out why this would be above your site if the old rules were still in place.

This is the tip of the iceberg of what lies ahead.

But is it really a slap?

If you're Google, no it's just business.

Don't worry too much. If you're Google you still have to rely on a very few things to produce relevant serps.
1. Quality relevant content (the above is just a new way of determining relevance is all).
2. Social proof in the form of social signals.
3. Back links (votes, basically another form of social proof).

Here's my advice and you can take it or leave it (if you don't know me you'll likely leave it).

Immediately stop spamming the internet by running to buy every new wiki assassin blaster, or blog comment rocket spam blaster or whatever the latest spam blaster WSO is.

I did a test of 20 pages all for keywords that should rank pretty easy I put the first word of each title into a hat and pulled ten for this group and ten for that.

I ranked them all using the same exact links 25 auto approved high on page pr with 20 or less obls per page.

Group A I posted all the links buy hand and made relevant content posts.
Group B I used a super popular blog blaster software that was a big WSO here on the WF.

Results:
With the hand posted sites every single one of the pages is on page one of G with 5 in the top 5 (remember, these were easy pages to rank).

With the blog blaster group using the exact same links not one is on page 1 and most are not even on page 2.

My conclusion (although I cannot prove it but have suspected it for a while now) is that Google can identify the footprint some how of our blasting softwares? I know that sounds weird so I asked a friend who is Symfony certified who is an avid developer of Git and a pretty slick hacker on the weekends if this was possible or do I need an adjustment to my brain housing group resolution settings? (sorry, I'm a former Marine turned SEO Geek).
He said it is entirely possible and more than likely probable.

So, to wrap this up:

Google's not slapping you, they don't even care about you. They are making business decisions. We the marketers have kicked our own butts spamming the internet.

The sad, sad part is; when we need more link juice or whatever we then jump onto the NEXT spammy crappy blastomatic time bomb that the OTHER marketers sell us with our own fear.

For all our sakes could we please just stop.
Stop buying all the blastomatic spam shooters, stop buying all the new and improved auto bloggers now renamed as X because if they told you they were just the same crap with different name you wouldn't give them your money

Then, just quit spamming the internet, your not going to last long..

Thank you very much for reading.

Patrick
#search engine optimization #coming #googles #slap
  • best way is to just focus on great content and use link building methods such as guest posting
    articles, social bookmarking and social media and blog comments

    these are long term methods

    i think and agree that link building software is becoming more and more risky as google tweak and improve there algo

    paul
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • LOL @ 2. Marketers and guys with huge PPC spends on adwords are not Google's customers.

    Sorry but you are giving Google too much credit, I know they are a business and they need to make money, alot of users have spammed the web with the spamming / whatever tools they use so I have to agree on that...

    Google fills the first page with ads and you are telling me they don't care about PPC customers? I know they need people to use their services but they have already established that, now its the time where they force their policies on you, they tell you take it or leave it..

    I have done few tests and I can tell you Google cannot tell if the content is quality or no, this is all BS to scare people to write good content, the keyword density they mentioned is BS too, after I thought my website was overly optimized with 24% keyword density, I fixed it and boom! I lost my rank, my other site has the same keyword density and its climbing to the top positions every week...

    Long story short, Google cannot control the quality of the content so they tell you they will value it , you should write quality content for your users not for Google but you could be out ranked by sites that do not offer anything, sad but true.
    • [3] replies
    • You are correct that you can be outranked by junk content, that is true. And I think you are correct in saying that Google's algo's cannot YET determine if it's good or bad.

      But yes, I am telling you that Google's customers are not the adwords advertisers, they are in fact the searcher.

      G knows that if they have millions of people who want to buy stuff, there will ALWAYS be people who want to sell stuff.

      And yes, you are again correct with saying you should write quality for your users (Google's and your customers). But that is precisely the point of my entire page above.

      Patrick
      • [1] reply
    • Leave it? Maybe for Bing? Google has a big competitor with deep pockets. They have no such luxury you are suggesting. Not at all. Certainly not in 2012.

      You forgot one key word - YET
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • Actually, getting ranked well in the search engines isn't just about satisfying its algorithm. There's a human aspect to it, too. Google actually has people that work to verify the quality of content that stays atop the search engines.

      Joey
      • [1] reply
  • Since Google makes changes / modifications / improvements to it's algo more than 100 times per year, that's a lot slapping!

    RoD
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Banned




      Exactly. Anyone who is still convincing themselves otherwise are going to be in for a rough time. Sooner rather than later too.


      This too. If there is no one to click on those ads, they aren't going to bring in much money now are they? Having the reader there to click on them in the first place takes precedence.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
      • [2] replies
  • I think you can still call it a slap from Google-

    It's slapping your business down because it's not delivering quality content to Google's customers- people typing in the search term.

    Is it "just business"? Yes- but this "just business" decision is still a huge slap in the face to many people's sites.

    I agree with your post- all of this auto-crap isn't going to keep working. Real businesses have to deliver solid content- end of story.

    I'm just saying that you can still call it a slap, because that's what it is...
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • Agreed. My reasoning for wanting to view it differently is that people take slaps personally.

      I wanted people to step back from it and see it from a logical perspective. That's why I said "you're Google".

      When they do this, it is my hope at least that they will extrapolate and then execute their newly formed espousal with reason rather than an emotionally developed response.

      So yes, it is a slap. However, I was attempting to have people think instead of react. Which is not directed at your statement but rather directed at the fact that Rome for all her advancements is still very much the Mob.

      Patrick
    • Agreed Justin,

      Solid original content, and hand-generated links will go A LOT farther then auto-generated nonsense now. The consumers are catching on, and Google is forced to keep their reputation strong - by any means necessary.

      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    But...but it just couldn't be as simple as that. There just has to be a secret, an exact sequence/density/amount of fairy dust that Google wants to ensure your ranking!
    • [2] replies
    • Ah, I see You and Ken are from the same Society!

      Patrick
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • Yes, there is! And for $27 I'll share it with you! Just check out my sig!
      • [2] replies
  • Google slaps aren't as drastic as they claim from everything I've noticed. Just be aware of them and adapt!
  • Google makes changes in order to maximize profits.
    • [1] reply
    • Posting original content, guest posting, blog comments that make sense, and social media interactions is definitely the right answer. The problem is all of this is excruciating tedious work and that is why a lot of marketers use softwares. The only other real alternative is finding Good outsourcers to manually to this work...
      • [1] reply
  • Hello Patrick,

    You know what? When I scan the new posts and run across a one sentence question, then I SUSPECT the sender!



    I stay in trouble in certain of my favorite hangouts for blasting Google. Ha! I blast em because some folks take Google at their word and believe that Google has everyone's best interest at heart when in reality Google has Google's best interest at heart. They are one of the most ruthless businesses to come down the pike since business was invented. JP Morgan should smile.

    Having said that, it is their business, and they demand that we play by their rules, which if not nice, is fair.

    My problem with this whole thing is that if the Group A way is the only way to get your pages to the top, then everyone is truly equal, which makes a Sunday blogger equal to me, a guy trying to make some dough by doing whatever extra I can to get my results to the top.

    Google is going to take their cut either way, you see, but it sort of puts the whole old fashioned Internet marketing industry into the questionable category for a viable biz model.

    Therefore, I have decided to back away from oldthink. Pushbutton is out and good old fashioned get it and dig it work is back in. I'm looking at new ways, and one in old way particular that I have used since 2002, that is Google proof and Panda proof, but one that requires more brain work and key pounding than these silly link blasters. Definitely hands on and not set it and forget it.

    It hurts me to see folks down in that barrel still in the old rut of snapping up the next great new gimmick based on the old SEO paradigm that will only lead to heartache. Many, thinner, and used up, give up and just vanish through the cracks at the bottom of the barrel.

    It's a new IM world out there now, and love it or hate it we have to deal with it if we're going to keep working it.

    Norm


    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • We need to build solid businesses not the kind that even have to worry about a slap.

      So, I agree 100% with where you are saying your headed.

      Patrick
      • [1] reply
  • Searchers are not Google's customers - They're the product being sold.

    Advertisers are Google's customers - Defined as who Google is trying to make money from.

    Yes, Google cares about searchers because they like to offer advertisers a quality product, but priorities will always be like so...

    Google's List of Priorities:
    1. Brand
    2. Money
    3. Search
    This is just how it is; they're a business first and foremost. Anyone who says otherwise is just bein' silly.
    • [1] reply
    • I disagree. Search is #1. It always has been. And if they let it drift too far from the #1 spot, the brand and money pile goes to hell in a hand basket. They have a multi-billion dollar corporation (Microsoft) on their heels. What will let Bing pass them is if their search engine delivers up poor search results.

      That and that alone will give Bing the advantage.

      There is no brand and no money without the search. Search is the horse that goes before the cart. And they can't screw it up - 'cause Bing will take their brand and their money if they do.

      But I'm just silly like that.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply


  • Nah, Google has a good strangle hold. In business, they are looking to get more money for it. They don't care as much about innovating and improving search.
    • [2] replies
    • Banned
      It is because they want more money that they have to innovate and improve their search engine and it's algorithm. It's simple: poor results means no users. No users means no one for advertisers to sell to. If advertisers have no one to sell to they stop advertising. If advertisers stop advertising Google makes no money.

      Why is this such a difficult concept for people to wrap their heads around. :confused:
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • Well, a little, itty bitty corporation called Microsoft disagrees. In fact, they have millions upon millions wrapped up in the notion that Google's stranglehold is anything but permanent. Do you not see that if they rest on their laurels concerning their search engine that they will lose advertising money to Bing?

      Bing sees it. I see it. But you don't?
  • I think you articulated very accurately the reality of what Google is attempting and ultimately will be successful in doing and that is providing relevant and trusted information and resources to its users. Thanks! I now know what I need to do to be successful!
  • I was reading an interesting comment on a dmoz blog post the other day that mentioned that you really have to wonder how worthwhile increasing the effectiveness of the search algorithm is as a ROI. If most of the money is coming from their adsense business, and google search is doing okay, but not actually making any money (other than a place to place the ads), how much money can be justifiably spent on it? I thought that was a good question.
    • [1] reply
    • Banned
      I couldn't tell you whether Adwords ads or Adsense ads bring in more money for Google, I wouldn't know. What I do know though is that if they allow their search results to go to crap, it won't really matter.

      You think because a crap site has Adsense slapped onto it that it is suddenly an asset to Google? Quite the opposite, really. Users will be less likely to click the ads and more likely to click the back button. If the content on the web page was poor, readers won't want to know what kind of advertisements are willingly associated with it.

      Google's survival depends on top quality search results. There is no other way around it and no other way to rationalize it. If you intend to pull in traffic through the search engine, you are going to have to get on board.
  • Google like the rest of us look for ways to stop what is tantamount to spamming in any flavour or variety.
    If you take up space in online real estate and fill it with mindless data, it gives the rest of us a small sigh of relief every time they find a new algorithum to knock them down. Our clients sites usually move up in ranks with each new slap because we do not use spam black hat tactics.. Its like the real world, if you cheat you usually get found out eventually.
  • I agree completely that at the end of the day the original content is king, and social interaction is becoming more and more so. Yes it does take time to write good content that people will be interested in, as well as to set a good footprint in social interaction to get the word out there about your product/service, but I believe if you put the time in to it it will pay off in the long run. Quick link blasting may get you there quicker, but how long will it last, we shall see. Because it takes a long time to process all this work, a better solution may be a an outsourcing for an article writing as well as manual link building vs. the blasting services.
  • Google does not care about the marketer, thats hurt my heart
  • Algorithms can't identify quality very well but people can.
    Google has thousands of people that manually comb the search results:
    Work from Home as a Google Quality Rater - WAHM.com
  • I would say that google should avoid spammers and content coming from automated software as they added no value to the Internet users. Think as a search engine user, what would you expect as a search result? Is that crap or original, valuable and reliable information.

    I have seen some of hot niches, you get different list of search results, but finally ended up landing on a same affiliate link. so what value you are getting ???
    • [DELETED]
      • [1] reply
  • Advertisers are google's customers..that is clear. Google cannot be against manual link building, because there currently isn't a site on the net that ranks with natural links...only a very few (tim ferriss blog and sites of that type) and they do not offer 'normal' information - people link to them because they offer unique and weird approaches to things..not what the average user is looking for. Try and find a website that currently ranks page one for a big search and has even 10% naturally created links - you won't be able to. It's all blog networks, web2s and comments (which are still pretty powerful..go figure). The only type of natural link so far are forums.

    Think about big searches - insurance, health, viagra, so on. What was the last time you linked to those things? And yea, when I buy viagra online I for sure post the website on my facebook or my high authority personal blog so that everyone will know my d*** isnt working...Are you joking?? And of course if you are fat and you bought a new weight loss book you will link to that too and post on your fb wall...GTFO

    There were 87k domains registered in the last 24 hours...good luck reviewing them manually. And are new sites now dependent on stupid fat stay at home moms who work as manual reviewers, whos opinion is absolutely biased not to mention they are probably complete idiots because they don't have another job and stay at home all day..yea right. To rate a website you;d have to have at least 10 people reviewing it and averaging the votes..good luck with that.

    G doesn't have to make all those amazing changes.. they just have to better than bing. That's all.

    The thing g is currently doing to counter spammy sites is they artificially disappear and reappear the site a f**** ton during the first month in an effort to discourage marketers. Just ignore that and keep building spammy comments and AMR blasts to your site..you will be page one in a month or two. And do not ever have your site in the WebMaster tools.. it always boggles my mind how may people still do that.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    Of course, Google is working for the society, for the searchers it tries to supply relevant search result.

    We should understand that we have to quality work for better result.
  • Google is definitely not JUST about the marketers who pay them using PPC. I have used it extensively, I paid them £6000 one month (about $10,000 at the time), then one day - BAM!

    I got the message "your adwords account has been permanently banned"

    According to Google some of my ads were to "low quality content" and that was that - no way to appeal, no one to talk to, just out on my ear and no more paid advertising.

    It does feel like they're attacking site owners, maybe thats because most of the site owners hit are trying to make a living and putting that above quality for the visitors?
  • Well if Google gonna start to penalize site that overuse SEO then no site will be safe so anybody can hurt your site ranking using negative SEO , if you are think that Google decision is good to penalize site for overuse SEO to provide users better experience which you think it will help you to rank your site higher if you have better quality content then your competition, if you think like that then you are definitely out of your mind because if your site is ranked higher then your competition, then somebody can easily just sent couple of thousands spammy links to your single page using same anchor and Google will penalize you for over optimization regardless how good and quality your site is to the users you still gonna be penalized for overuse SEO ...
    Google has forced the relevance of negative SEO, If Google wants to be aggressive and careless with their penalties, then we need to show them this is easier to exploit than link building manipulation...stupid decision by Googles recent algorithm change, If they're willing to penalize sites so easily, this is what the SEO will turn into...
  • Fact:

    It's still all about the links in Google (spammy or otherwise).

    Proof:

    How Google Makes Liars Out of the Good Guys in SEO | SEOmoz

    End of Story.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Hi Jonathan,

      I read your blog post when I got in my mail (I'm on your list and it's one of the few lists I enjoy being on).

      Yes, Google is about links. I don't see how they could adjust their algo to remove that factor completely.

      However, I have many times (so it was no accident) seen that low quality links (I tried setting up a video scraper link site once as an example) drop me like a hot potato in the serps and it can take months (if ever) to get my site back to page 1.

      I have seen this many times and kept records (I keep records of all the link types and counts to each of my sites).

      Yet I have taken a stubborn site sitting on page 1 #9 (as an example only) and moved it to #1 or #2 with one contextual, high on page PR, VERY low obl link.

      I have done this or similar many times as well.

      So quality does count.

      Patrick
  • Agree with the Op but I always get a laugh when a subject obviously starts in the main section and gets pushed to the SEO section. It is always filled with people who think they are so much better than people who spam google and yet we know some are this very week slamming their list mercilessly or holding a viewer hostage on a sale page with a popup " Wait don't go" with the latest make money online whiz bang product because the affiliate dollars look good.

    Its like they have no idea that outside of Internet marketing groups like this the wider population sees them exactly like they do the link spammers.
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • If I started the thread in the wrong area my apology. This is only my 2nd thread and so I may have been mistaken.

      I can assure you, I am not one of the list slamming link spammers ( I know you were not saying that I was) just sayin.

      Yes, most people in mainstream have an opinion about marketers that's for sure.

      Patrick
      • [1] reply
    • Banned
      Lol, don't forget with each new popup comes that ever degrading price reduction.

      That one is hilarious!

      I was on a squeeze page once (can't remember the CB product) & I swear the price went from something like $97 down to $19, or something similar, the page had 3 or 4 popups that kept reducing the price each time I tried to leave the page.

      Classic fail!
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Thanks for reading. I'm glad you like what you're getting.

    We are certainly in agreement on this point.

    Yes, quality counts. I'm not arguing with that.

    My beef is with people who think that things like bounce rates and social signals play a significant part in the SERPs right now. They don't.

    Will they in the future? Perhaps. But Google's been making claims for years that their next algo change will improve this-or-that, remove SPAM, etc., and yet the sites I follow who just cannon-blast their sites with all manner of links from all manner of sites still rank well. In fact, many of them are doing better post-Panda than they were before.

    The deindexing of the big link networks like BMR was manual. It was not algorithmic. I use many other link networks that have staying-properties that BMR did not (such as the blogs being owned and hosted by the users) that still rank my sites and pages quite well.

    Studies like the one I linked to at SEOMoz prove what some in this thread have rightfully stated: Google cannot tell the difference between quality and spam. It uses the link profile to determine that, and link profiles can be gamed.

    Dan Anton of BackLinksIndexer.com fame (which I highly recommend) said to me recently, "Google's most powerful algorithm is the one they pretend the have."

    True words.

    Jon
    • [1] reply
    • I agree with the above and in no way made reference otherwise.

      As far as stuff ranking that's spamming, again agreed. But it shouldn't be.
      Yes, I know, should or shouldn't doesn't matter it is ranking.

      Example: I use 1 way links and have for years. You have human reviewers (I know I have had a couple of articles I've had to redo) but most do not.

      There are so many crappy link farms it's insane.

      So my beef is with using the crappy ones then they get taken down and then they jump on the next crappy one until it goes down. (Ok, that was only one of my points, but one of my main ones).

      In all things truth and quality endure. (yeah, that may be complete horse pucky but I wish it were true).

      Patrick
  • When those link farms stop working, people will stop using them.

    I don't endorse using networks that allow spam and unreadable garbage, either, but the bottom line is that they do work. Google cannot tell the difference. My own analysis of the SERPs I work to rank for proves this again and again. There are certainly sites ranking for those keywords that have good quality link profiles, but mixed in among them are the ones with pure spam profiles -- and they still rank.

    If a person has a quality site with quality content, no matter how spammy their link profile is they can rank. Of course, those links have to be built at the right speed and in the right way, but it doesn't matter much where they come from.

    The only reason why the quality content matters at this point is that Google's human reviewers will deindexed or manually penalize low-quality sites that make it to the top of SERPs for significant keywords. But from what I am seeing in the SERPs they don't base the penalties on the link profile -- they base it on the content quality and to a lesser extent the on-page SEO (if it's too obviously over-optimized you might get penalized).

    I'd love it if I could just write high quality content and have it rank in Google. Google wants you to think that's all it takes, but what it really takes is links aimed at the content. And whose got time to sit around and wait for other people to do that for them? We're in business here.

    Jon
    • [2] replies
    • [DELETED]
    • Jonathan I agree with all you said.. but I am wondering if I have a good quality site ranked and somebody from competition sent thousands backlinks with the same anchor point to my site will Google penalize me for ? I just come across brand new news regarding coming Google over optimization penalty and it talking about that having many same kw anchor it will get you site penalized easy here's the article SEO News - SEO News - Over Optimization Penalty Is Coming



    • I actually agree with EVERY THING YOU JUST SAID!

      In my earlier post I also agreed with exactly what you just said (before you even said it).

      My statement was (in effect) I wish it wasn't true!

      Like you said G want's you to believe that you could write Great content and rank. Well, that's what I mean. That's what I wish was true.

      Patrick
  • I've read a few reports where people claimed that those kinds of links from competitors were bringing down their ranking, but after hashing it out with them it usually comes to light that there are other things causing the problem.

    Google would be starting a web-war if your competition could bring you down simply by flooding your site with spam links. There would be countless people working to bring down the sites that outrank them. The SERPs would look very different than they do now, I promise you that.

    Google is far from perfect, but the people who engineer it aren't stupid either. Who links TO you doesn't cause penalties. If you link out to "bad neighborhood" sites, that could certainly cause penalties. Or if the links bring you to the top of the SERPs and a manual review shows that your content quality is low or you use spammy on-page SEO, that can cause a penalty.

    Most of what you're reading about how people were "penalized" for getting links from blog networks, etc., isn't a penalty at all. It's really this:

    1. A site got links from blog networks. Those links caused them to rank well.

    2. Google deindexes the blog networks. Those links are no longer counted, and the site's ranking falls.

    3. The webmaster of the site posts at the forums that his site's been "penalized" when it hasn't -- it just lost the links that were ranking it.

    I hope that eases your fears a bit. Just focus on quality content, good (non-spammy) on-page SEO and getting lots and lots of links to your site.
  • Google administrator may think about some changes in the content,design and some others important issues.
    • [1] reply
    • The problem with what the OP says is that Google's #1 ranking factor is RELEVANCY.

      In the same way searchers are going to be pissed when they see a supermodel-thin affiliate site sitting at #1, they're going to be a wee bit upset when they see a page that is only tangentially relevant to their search.

      Google has ALWAYS put relevancy before authority and probably always will. Otherwise, Google, Facebook, and NYtimes.com would dominate every keyword.

      Long live EMDs, and single keyword-focused content!
      • [1] reply
  • Well with the last update in Google Webmaster their said they work hard to prevent good site get slap by competition you can check it here - Can competitors harm ranking? - Webmaster Tools Help
  • [DELETED]
  • however, i do believe in the quality, relevancy and originality of the content and i do apply the same in my websites to stay as google friendly one.
  • I couldn't agree more!! I feel like so many people just don't understand SEO and jump at the next big thing. But then again, i suppose that is the way business goes and some people make their living (sadly) off of people who fall in to temptation of outsmarting google only to realize that it doesn't work or it won't last forever. Either way, it is a breath of fresh air when you realize that that nonsense doesn't work and there has always been one way to do SEO and it still works today.

    The game hasn't changed, it is just clamping down on the rules that have already been set. Put yourself in google's shoes and you will leap to the top 5% of marketers when it comes to effective SEO.

Next Topics on Trending Feed