I Have Just Made My Competitor Disappear In The SERPs

Well back in 1998 he was lol. I just always like that line do dirt get dirt, basically another way of saying what goes around comes around.

I feel a little weird discussing my favorite rapper on the warrior forum

Whats wrong with web 2.0 site article directories and blogs christ ?? If your building good web 2.0 propertys and adding videos and pics, nicely written or submitting to ezine articles not saying that ezine is anything special but whats wrong with these two forms of backlinks surely its not all about private blog backlinks today is it ?

I've never been one to argue and I'm not about to start now but it is marketers like you that google really dislikes and so do I. People like you see other sites in their way and instead of working hard like they did you want the easy way/fast way to the top by using slimmy underhanded methods.


At least I can be proud of the way I make my money. I can't believe no one else has a problem with this. This is the guy who will get your site banned yet no one said anything about it.

It's like I always say, get links or die trying...

Well it depends what are the rules of the sport are. It is OK to tackle somebody to the ground in Rugby or American football, but you can not do that in cricket, baseball or soccer without suffering a penalty. I am not legally trained, but I have not heard of any law in the U.S or anywhere that says that negative SEO is illegal. I did not ask Google to index my site or index the thousands of links to my competitors by the way.

Was it OK for John McCain to say bad things about Obama's record in the election in '08? Was it OK for Steve Jobs to publicly insinuate how poor MS products were? Was it OK for Pepsi and Coke to say bad things about each other? Was it OK for Ali to mock how ugly Frazier was in an effort to ruin his confidence pre-fight? Even God himself mocked Goliath before he had David kill him.

Ensuring that my competitors went down so as to leave my other site at the top is just good business. The competitors should have protected themselves too.

I do not care too much if I lose my rankings as I already built another site to replace the current one and also have a reasonably responsive list. This is all just good business sense. If my competitors were silly enough to rely on Google for the family grocery money, than I think Darwin coined a term for that. Hopefully "most" WF members are learned enough not to be so naive.

Relying on Google for traffic is as foolish as relying on Adsense for your mortgage. Google traffic and Adsense should just be treated as bonuses within a more concrete marketing plan.

Being angry at negative SEO is like deciding to enter Chicago politics and then being upset that your fling with a transexual and recreational cocaine habit have been exposed by the media.

Another old rapper said something like, "All is fair in love and war".
If you do not share that mindset yet, sooner or later somebody else who does will usurp your rankings...guaranteed. By the way, have you noticed the name of this forum? Why do you think it is called that way and not something like the "picnic" forum?

I have received a lot of PMs asking me which services I used and how I did it. This tells me that what Google have allowed possible will have serious consequences. All of you who want us WF members to hold hands and sing Kumbaya can pretty much kiss your organic traffic goodbye forever if negative SEO is confirmed by the "experts" to be a permanent reality.