7 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
7 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

A .edu Do-follow profile backlink is 'BAD'? | A PR-4 'IRRELEVANT' Backlink is 'BAD'?

by Arav
5 replies
  • SEO
    • |
Now a days hearing a lot about 'Penguin'. Indeed, suddenly this sea bird has become 'Famous' in the Cyber World.
Anyway, what is the definition of 'BAD' backlinks? Like a .edu do-follow forum profile backlink or a Irrelevant PR-4 blog comment can be 'BAD'? From what type of links we need to be stayed away?
#backlink #bad #dofollow #irrelevant #pr4 #profile
  • Profile picture of the author retsek
    Originally Posted by Arav View Post

    From what type of links we need to be stayed away?
    Everything that can be gotten easily or cheaply.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6158848].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author akazzz
    Forum profiles & blog comments on high OBL blogs are bad. Other than that, I consider links as low-value or high-value links.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6158881].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JSProjects
    Profiles & comments blasted out to thousands of posts = bad.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6158911].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author natashajane
    Yes i think it is bad because it is not relevant and google can consider it as spamming therefore we should avoid it and should go some natural resource to get do-follow and high page rank backlinks.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6158966].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author addlinkweb
    irrelevant niche links are always bad, even they are high page ranked but Google still consider them bad. and too many profile links is also not a good sign
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6159124].message }}

Trending Topics