Life After Penguin - The Seven Types of SEO

10 replies
  • SEO
  • |
OK, so the dust is starting to settle a little bit about Google's Penguin update.

It looks like one of the key factors going forward is diversity. Diversity of links, diversity of anchor text, diversity of methods. I especially appreciated an article that SupaH and dmtaylor247 pointed out: Penguin analysis: SEO isnt dead, but you need to act smarter (and 5 easy ways to do so)

I recommend using all seven different types of SEO:

1. Off-Site SEO

This consists mostly of off-site links you make or pay for. If you pay for them, then make sure that the outsourcer follows your instructions closely. Some of the places for off-site links include:
  • Press releases
  • Blog comments
  • Guest blogging (HIGHLY recommended, keep everything original and choose on-topic blogs)
  • Articles (but NO spinning!)
  • Document sharing sites (again, NO spinning!)
Remember what the article pointed out - you need a variety of link anchors, and keep your links on the sites which are on-topic.

2. Viral SEO

This is where you get other folks to link to you. In the old days we called it "link baiting" but the concept is very similar. Viral content can be:
  • Funny
  • Bold and Brash (opinionated expert)
  • Give something away
  • Write about something happening now
  • Produce reference material (101 ways to ....)

3. Social SEO

Participate in the various social sites and social bookmarking sites, AND make it especially easy for your users to share your content through those sites easily. Biggest sites to consider:
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon

4. Site-Wide SEO

Do those things that count for your entire site:
  • Get a good domain name (not necessarily an exact match domain (EMD), but one with the primary keyword in it)
  • If possible, domain should be a couple years old, and should have an expiration point as far as possible in the future
  • Use subdomains for loosely related topics, and subdirectories for tightly related feeder topics
  • Make your site as fast as possible
  • Use sitemap.xml and robots.txt files as well as a sitemap page for humans

5. On-Page SEO

The idea is to be Google-friendly, not trying to "fool" Google. WRITE FOR HUMANS, not Google. Don't write every page as SEO perfect - vary what you do a bit.
  • Target a specific keyword for each page. Ideally, these are related to and support the overall keyword for the site
  • Put the targeted keyword in the URL and Page Title (but both should sound natural to humans)
  • Use a keyword density of about 2%
  • Use LSI words in your articles (great source Latent Semantic Indexing)
  • Put the keyword in h1, h2, and h3 tags
  • Use images (put the keyword in the alt tag with other natural text)
  • Use videos

6. Local SEO

This (obviously) doesn't apply to everyone, but is important for a local presence.
  • Use your locality (city) in your domain name and URL
  • If targeting multiple localities, put up microsites with localized info as feeder sites to your main site
  • Use Google Places
  • Use local review sites such as epinions
  • Consider using Groupon

7. Search Results SEO

Make your search results look attractive. Typically, Google will use the page title as the text for the link, and the Meta Description tag for the description. Keep both short and sweet, and attractive for humans.

Using a variety of methods will multiply your effectiveness and will keep your site statistics looking more normal to Google.
#7 types of seo #penguin #post #seo #types
  • Profile picture of the author paulgl
    If your point is to dust yourself off and get to work,
    I'm in.

    But a lot of you stuff is not SEO.
    You should not even label it as SEO.

    And some of it is not correct.
    Like most of your site wide SEO.

    If people concentrated on a unique, great
    visitor experience, and getting traffic other than
    from a search engine, the rest actually follows.

    If that's your point, then leave the stuff that
    does that. But talking about domans, subdomains,
    age, etc. is just really outdated.

    What you really have is half of a list for anti-SEO, the art
    of getting traffic, google ignored.

    The viral and social is good, just not SEO. That's what
    people in 2013 should be looking forward to.

    Paul
    Signature

    If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6170369].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Leo Wadsworth
    I define SEO broadly -- as anything that can affect your rankings in Google. For example - I recently had a client whose site ranked page one on a long-tail keyword only because of his domain name - so it may not be trendy, but it still has effect. <grin>

    Also, I see the ultimate goal of SEO broadly as well. For me, the goal is targeted organic traffic, not just rankings in Google. That's why I care about what the search results look like, not just where they appear.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6170427].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author unclebuck
    Leo,
    Thanks for taking the time to write all that out for us- traffic is traffic and getting it from several different places is better than relying on one source anyway.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6171160].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Leo Wadsworth
    Thanks!

    By the way, I do have my reasons for including "Social SEO and Viral SEO." Both of these produce a primary and a secondary effect. Both of these produce their own traffic to your site -- but they ALSO produce a secondary effect of helping you with your Google ranking.

    Social SEO - Google has specifically said that they are considering "Social Signals" -- i.e. people sharing your stuff on Social websites.

    Viral SEO - While much of viral SEO has direct results because of email sharing, a good deal of sharing is produced through backlinks of a great variety of kinds.

    By adopting variety in all of its forms, we can put the nasty penguin to sleep!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6173454].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mustbecrap
    I agree with what leo and paulgl both have to say..

    leo you have brought up some great examples, some are very valid, but like paul I dont necessarily agree with some of it, and I dont think some of it is correct either - but thats just me.... But I also use the term seo in a broad sense, I use it for everything I do that is related to the net..

    seo is "search engine optimization" and we know this is what google dont want..

    I think social triggers are the focus for now..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6188497].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Leo Wadsworth
    Yes, social signals are very important, but that's just one aspect of a complete SEO effort. Google is looking for a complete, varied picture. Using a full range of efforts will generate much better results than focusing on any single aspect.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6188529].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author AnmolJ
    Yes, Man! Pure White Hat!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6189757].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dmtaylor247
    Apparently too many incoming sidewide links and an unnatural boost of links from authority domains where also to blame for alot of sites going down.

    Here read this;

    How To Survive Google's Unnatural Links Warnings & Avoid Over-optimisation | SEOmoz
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6189792].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Leo Wadsworth
      Originally Posted by dmtaylor247 View Post

      Apparently too many incoming sidewide links and an unnatural boost of links from authority domains where also to blame for alot of sites going down.

      Here read this;

      How To Survive Google's Unnatural Links Warnings & Avoid Over-optimisation | SEOmoz
      Absolutely. Google is making life more "interesting" by really looking for variety. Variety happens naturally when people link to you themselves, so it is a good indicator for Google.

      Variety of link anchor text
      Variety in the types of places links are coming from
      Variety in the pages on our sites that are being linked to

      Google changes, we adapt.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6406897].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Leo Wadsworth
    While I agree that quality is very important, and I'd love to see more of it, I would claim that currently VARIETY is more important. It is much harder for Google's software to really judge "quality" -- but it certainly can easily look for a wide variety. Certainly Google is getting smarter about detecting poorly spun duplicate content, but it just takes too much computing time for Google to really run deep grammar checking against a wide swath of content.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6434499].message }}

Trending Topics