Unnatural Links

by 18 replies
21
We were notified by google because of having so many unnatural links. Then, we took action to remove all of them. However, we could achieve to remove only some of them. We have still have a lot of unnatural links that we don't have control over. Our previous seo companies refused to remove them.Now, we are planning to inform google that we are not able to control over and remove 2000 unnatural links. Do you think if it's good idea to send that amount of links to google for reconsideration?
#search engine optimization #linjks #unnatural
  • You've got nothing to lose

    I could be wrong but I think they said it has to appear if you're trying (Shot in the dark just have a feeling I remember hearing this somewhere)

    I'm not sure how seriously they take that if it's just a couple hundred or more than 60% of your links need to be gone

    But hey if you get the penalty lifted you get it lifted.

    If it stays you're exactly where you are now so... Not much to lose
  • I had the same issue with one of my sites and it turned out I was penalised for unnatural links on my site, not inbound links. So I stripped all my links and informed Google.

    Problem solved.

    Remember that Google has to take into consideration possible competitor negative SEO. So their first consideration for unnatural content and links, will be your site. Unless of course your are a massive company generating literally millions of spammy inbound links. That just stinks of black hatters.

    Good luck
    • [2] replies
    • I agree with this. I don't even know how sites are allowed to get away with negative SEO. I still don't understand how one company could do that to another. As I said about this issue before, Karma is a b#tch. Pardon my censored expletive. LOL
    • What would be considered an unnatural link onsite?
  • a diversified link profile can beat that
  • Unnatural links are those links which are coming from the irrelevant sites.Unnatural links may harmful for a website.You see in Google penguin only those sites are come in effects which having the unnatural links or links created with the help of black hart techniques.
    • [1] reply
    • I wish I have received an unnatural links warn from WMT, before getting hit by Penguin (6 months before Penguin - perhaps november 2011).
      I then should be able to save and fix my site from Penguin.
  • You can collect the email ids of the particular websites from where you are unable to remove the unnatural links and write an mail to the administrator requesting to remove the unwanted links.
  • If you cant remove the links then just try and dilute them out with good quality links... however GWT will be releasing a tool soon that means you can discredit the links....

    That should help fight against Negative SEO :-)

    Danny

    PS also mixing up your anchor text will do you wonders :-)
  • For sure man!

    You need to prove to Google that you have done what you can to clean up your backlinks. Then, show them what actions you've taken. And be sure to include the correspondence with your SEO company detailing how they won't remove them (or likely can't).

    Google wants to know that you have taken serious action to clean up your links. Sometimes it takes a few requests to have them to lift any penalties. I had trouble cleaning up my links at first and then employed LinkDelete to do it for me, after my work + their report I got my penalty lifted.
  • I think you should build quality links with varied anchor text to make your link pattern look natural. I think building quality links will be better option than wasting time on removing links. Google also understand about negative SEO and I really think that Google is smart enough to give you credit for good links and ignore about bad links because anybody can build crap links for you.
    • [1] reply
    • You couldn't give worse advice. Really.

      If a site receives an unnatural link warning, they MUST clean up their backlinks if they want to get out of the penalty. This isn't some "algo" update that you can fix, you need to clean up your links regardless of who built them.

      Adding more artificially created links, regardless of quality, is asking to get further ***** slapped by Google and kiss your chances of ranking good-bye.
      • [1] reply
  • You can do one thing, make the links nofollow which are going from your website.
    And, the link which are coming from other websites have very less impact on your rankings.
  • You can already do that on the Bing webmaster panel. If Google does this it would be a step in the right direction, but a couple of things come to mind:
    1) GWT does not show all the backlinks that it has indexed.
    2) If someone spams your site with 200,000 links from Xrumer every month, then removing them from GWT would be a never ending and potentially impossible task.

    I'd much rather Google just ignore the spam links rather than penalising people for it.

    Anyway, back to the original post:
    It's worth advising Google of the situation, and in the mean time, just work on building more high quality back links with diverse anchor text.
    • [1] reply
    • I totally agree with you with this. If I remember correctly google mentioned before that no off page tactic will hurt a site.

      But this seems change after the penguin update. If this is the case then we will see in the future that most SEO practitioner will shift to become bad SEO people.

      Matt Cutts mentioned that penguin update is more on Manual Penalty, does this mean that they will then review every site that will be attack by SEON?
  • pardon me, what is unnatural link?
  • If all your links are stuffed with keywords (especially the same keywords), then it looks suspicious to Google.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]

Next Topics on Trending Feed

  • 21

    We were notified by google because of having so many unnatural links. Then, we took action to remove all of them. However, we could achieve to remove only some of them. We have still have a lot of unnatural links that we don't have control over. Our previous seo companies refused to remove them.Now, we are planning to inform google that we are not able to control over and remove 2000 unnatural links. Do you think if it's good idea to send that amount of links to google for reconsideration?