100 out of 100 times they either:
- have a real poor back link profile
- fairly new site with cloaked affiliate links
I haven't had a single client that complained without one of these 2 things in common so pretty much proves the fact that cloaking is wrong right? I mean why would all the other people not complain. I rank 100+ sites a month so I guess the data set is large enough to draw conclusions.
The argument I often hear is "My other sites are still ranking fine and there the links are cloaked as well", this are always older sites btw so maybe Google treats them differently?
Would love to hear your opinion on this matter!