Evergreen SEO rules? (SEO for the future)

by Eduard
20 replies
  • SEO
  • |
As we all know, Google constantly tweaks their ranking algorithms. But there also seem be things that don't change almost at all in time about their algorithms.

I'm thinking about this and I'm trying to figure out what are those evergreen rules and principles for good SEO? The ones that were applicable 5 years ago, are applicable today, and will probably still be applicable 10 years from now.

Because I don't want o build a site that ranks well today, gets me lots of traffic, and then one day, some minor Google algorithm change makes my ranking go down the drain, as well as my income. I want to get rankings I can trust (as much as it's reasonably possible) to stay high for years to come and not plummet one day all of a sudden. Even if it takes more time and effort.

I'd appreciate your input on this.

Eduard
#evergreen #future #rules #seo
  • Profile picture of the author Nelapsi
    I think the key is to create content that actually gets users to build links for you. Given the fact Google can make any number of changes this is about the only sure fire way to continue building your backlinks without you doing the work day in and day out.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7002324].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Eduard
      Originally Posted by Nelapsi View Post

      I think the key is to create content that actually gets users to build links for you. Given the fact Google can make any number of changes this is about the only sure fire way to continue building your backlinks without you doing the work day in and day out.
      Oh, I don't mind building backlinks. But I don't want those links to lose nearly all of their value all of a sudden one day and see my rankings plummet.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7002353].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Nelapsi
        Originally Posted by Eduard View Post

        Oh, I don't mind building backlinks. But I don't want those links to lose nearly all of their value all of a sudden one day and see my rankings plummet.
        Then without the ability to see into the future your question is kind of pointless to be honest. Just need to build smart and understand what a footprint is so you can leave as little as one as possible.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7002468].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author johnben1444
    Google has always and will continue to emphasize and also strive on the path of white hat SEO.

    They have said this over and over again.

    This page will help you - Webmaster Guidelines - Webmaster Tools Help
    Signature
    Grow your social media account, Spotify Streams, YT Views & IG Followers & More
    Software & Mobile APP Developer
    Buy Spotify, Facebook Bot & IG M/S Method
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7002429].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dp40oz
    Quality link building has remained effective for years now. If you look at link building logically its really not that hard or risky even if you're not necessarily playing by the rules. People get into trouble because they start buying into strategies without ever thinking if those strategies make any sense other than exploiting a current loop hole.

    For over a decade now Google's core algorithm has been based on links. The only changes are how they count those links. In my eyes they have and always will count "quality" links very highly. By quality I mean links that have a lot of juice behind them, with good content and don't blatantly look spammy.

    Also links that you are building to promote your site in the real world and aren't just being built for link building are always great. Brand your website/business, build web 2.0 sites that are branding your business. Seek out local niche forum sites and promote yourself. If you think logically and aren't just looking to find loopholes the whole thing becomes a lot easier.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7002477].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Eduard
      Originally Posted by dp40oz View Post

      Quality link building has remained effective for years now.
      Quite. Could you detail a bit more on what constitutes quality link building vs spammy link building?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7002901].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author FrankRumbauskas
    Quality link building always has been and always will be the one "evergreen" SEO method. High quality links from high quality sites: Guest posts on authority sites, back linking using high quality, hand written content from very high quality, and UNDETECTABLE high-quality private blog networks. Which means your own private blogs that you own, that are not interlinked, and that are updated with actual real content and not spun crap or articles from a Fiverr gig.
    Signature

    New York Times Best-Selling Author
    Certified Google Partner Company
    Fast Company's Top 30 Most Influential People Online

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7002507].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Sanket Patel
    One can never predict the changing algorithm of Google. There are basic three evergreen principles of seo and they are optimized on-site, fresh and valuable content and relationship building. These three principles do not let website to suffer with any changes in the Google algorithm.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7005226].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    Google Freshness algo.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7005530].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author vutshuvo
      It is very important topics.
      i think google changes few rules but most off rules is just same as previous.
      i believe that Quality content and unique content is the life for your web site .
      then do little bit quality link building and do social sharing .
      so , carry this way
      hope you will not affect by upcoming algorithm
      have a nice day
      Signature

      Never Pay Roaming and No roaming chargesthrough phone call

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7005629].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author engagedotscrm
    Really SEO is ever green , SEO goes one.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7005752].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author LiftMyRank
    Build a high quality site that both your visitors and google will love, that means loads of unique useful content, then create the same high quality unique useful content on 3rd party web properties pointing to your site...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7005784].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Eduard
      Originally Posted by John Moore View Post

      Build a high quality site that both your visitors and google will love, that means loads of unique useful content, then create the same high quality unique useful content on 3rd party web properties pointing to your site...
      I like it. It takes a lot more time than spamming the hell out of a bunch of blogs and websites, but I think it's worth it
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7008167].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kchanda
    OnPage SEO> Fresh content > Natural Link Building
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7008201].message }}
    • Update your website with quality content on a constant basis. Get relevant links from reputable sites in your niche. Provide compelling information that people will share and link to. Optimize your titles, pages, and content for search engines.
      Signature
      -> Get Profile Backlinks here
      -> #1 Virtual Assistant Service Hire Your Own Virtual Assistant To Work JUST For You
      -> Ezine Articles Service Let Us Build Your Article Portfolio Today!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7010792].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Enzo Ewens
    Originally Posted by Eduard View Post

    As we all know, Google constantly tweaks their ranking algorithms. But there also seem be things that don't change almost at all in time about their algorithms.

    I'm thinking about this and I'm trying to figure out what are those evergreen rules and principles for good SEO? The ones that were applicable 5 years ago, are applicable today, and will probably still be applicable 10 years from now.

    Because I don't want o build a site that ranks well today, gets me lots of traffic, and then one day, some minor Google algorithm change makes my ranking go down the drain, as well as my income. I want to get rankings I can trust (as much as it's reasonably possible) to stay high for years to come and not plummet one day all of a sudden. Even if it takes more time and effort.

    I'd appreciate your input on this.

    Eduard


    Build an authority site. A Brand and Drive PAID Traffic


    having more traffic gets more traffic
    Signature
    ***** Read My Complete SENUKE X CR Review *****
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7011040].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ojedarp
    Evergree rule if you ask me is to create sites for humans not for SE's. I learned this the hard way, but it works!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7011099].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jxam69
    Before we can work out what will work for SEO in the future, we first need to understand what a Search Engine is.

    I propose that they are currently information retrieval systems heading in the direction of becoming knowledge retrieval systems. They are also probabilistic - they try to return the best knowledge, or pointers to it, within tight time constraints - this means they have time to deliver results which are possibly quite good - but there's never a guarantee.

    Now let's zoom way out into the future where computers have become more intelligent than humans, and the information networks look nothing like the web today. We won't talk about links, but rather about methods for retrieving the best knowledge to satisfy the request at hand.

    If we assume that the amount of information to be considered as the best knowledge to return is going to always be too large to thoroughly examine in a short period of time, even super intelligent computers will still need to look for cues or signals as to what is likely to be most correct/applicable - they'll still need short cuts to work fast.

    Social Proof is an excellent short cut.

    Perhaps something better will be discovered by super smart computers (maybe even meat bags will do it), but I believe it's probably the main thing likely to survive the test of time.

    Social Proof includes:-
    • Citations - the more citations the more likely the information contains good knowledge
    • Intent - whether or not the citation is positive or negative will be understood by search engines
    • Authority - the more authoritative the source of citations, the better

    Of course Social Proof can be faked - but it gets harder to fake over time as detection methods get better.

    To bring that back to today, you should look to gain as much social proof from as many sources with as much authority as possible.

    In today's environment, and that of the relatively near future, that would include things like:-
    • Editorially placed links from websites which are themselves authorities on a topic you want to rank for
    • Social Mentions from authority figures

    This is, of course, just an opinion - but it's the one that I work to now and I'm ranking webpages working this way.
    Signature

    This space will be awarded to the first WSO owner who can prove they make Million$ from their methods.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7011223].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Eduard
      Originally Posted by jxam69 View Post

      Before we can work out what will work for SEO in the future, we first need to understand what a Search Engine is.

      I propose that they are currently information retrieval systems heading in the direction of becoming knowledge retrieval systems. They are also probabilistic - they try to return the best knowledge, or pointers to it, within tight time constraints - this means they have time to deliver results which are possibly quite good - but there's never a guarantee.

      Now let's zoom way out into the future where computers have become more intelligent than humans, and the information networks look nothing like the web today. We won't talk about links, but rather about methods for retrieving the best knowledge to satisfy the request at hand.

      If we assume that the amount of information to be considered as the best knowledge to return is going to always be too large to thoroughly examine in a short period of time, even super intelligent computers will still need to look for cues or signals as to what is likely to be most correct/applicable - they'll still need short cuts to work fast.

      Social Proof is an excellent short cut.

      Perhaps something better will be discovered by super smart computers (maybe even meat bags will do it), but I believe it's probably the main thing likely to survive the test of time.

      Social Proof includes:-
      • Citations - the more citations the more likely the information contains good knowledge
      • Intent - whether or not the citation is positive or negative will be understood by search engines
      • Authority - the more authoritative the source of citations, the better

      Of course Social Proof can be faked - but it gets harder to fake over time as detection methods get better.

      To bring that back to today, you should look to gain as much social proof from as many sources with as much authority as possible.

      In today's environment, and that of the relatively near future, that would include things like:-
      • Editorially placed links from websites which are themselves authorities on a topic you want to rank for
      • Social Mentions from authority figures

      This is, of course, just an opinion - but it's the one that I work to now and I'm ranking webpages working this way.
      This is very cool. I never thought about it in terms of social proof. I guess social proof is the broader theme beyond backlinks.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7013167].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author lich
    Having a good content is a good SEO forever!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7013295].message }}

Trending Topics