High Quality/Not So Relevant Links vs Low Quality/Highly Relevant Links
- SEO |
I'm noticing that many of my competitors have low quality backlinks.
Like 98% of their links are prNA or pr0.
However, I'm noticing that most of their links come from relevant .us or .info sites they set up themselves. The sites rank extremely low, but they seem to be using them just for relevant backlinks.
Like 1 of my competitors has at least 1000 of these types of links, then only *2* quality links, which are not relevant at all.
I'm trying to think in terms of how I can get an advantage here.
In my niche, there are NOT a lot of relevant high pr pages I can link to.
So I've been building up my own relevant low quality blogs, just to get some relevant links.
However, I'm still wondering whether it would be useful, to get some not so relevant, high quality links to my site?
Just because my competitors have all low quality links.
It seems they chose this path because there aren't many relevant high quality places they can link to. So they chose to do tons of relevant low quality links instead.
Should I follow what they're doing, and just get a bunch of relevant low quality links? Or would it be worth my time to get some high pr links, even if they're not so relevant.
Like say I'm doing mold remediation, and I find a high pr page for carpet cleaning or flood insurance, is it worth trying to get a link on pages like this?
Its just confusing because for 2 of my top competitors, the quality of their links suck but they are highly relevant. So that makes me assume that relevance is a more important factor for ranking than link quality.
Am I wrong about this or what?
Would really appreciate some feedback.
-Red
Like 98% of their links are prNA or pr0.
However, I'm noticing that most of their links come from relevant .us or .info sites they set up themselves. The sites rank extremely low, but they seem to be using them just for relevant backlinks.
Like 1 of my competitors has at least 1000 of these types of links, then only *2* quality links, which are not relevant at all.
I'm trying to think in terms of how I can get an advantage here.
In my niche, there are NOT a lot of relevant high pr pages I can link to.
So I've been building up my own relevant low quality blogs, just to get some relevant links.
However, I'm still wondering whether it would be useful, to get some not so relevant, high quality links to my site?
Just because my competitors have all low quality links.
It seems they chose this path because there aren't many relevant high quality places they can link to. So they chose to do tons of relevant low quality links instead.
Should I follow what they're doing, and just get a bunch of relevant low quality links? Or would it be worth my time to get some high pr links, even if they're not so relevant.
Like say I'm doing mold remediation, and I find a high pr page for carpet cleaning or flood insurance, is it worth trying to get a link on pages like this?
Its just confusing because for 2 of my top competitors, the quality of their links suck but they are highly relevant. So that makes me assume that relevance is a more important factor for ranking than link quality.
Am I wrong about this or what?
Would really appreciate some feedback.
-Red
Copy My $500 Per Day system
>>> VIDEO PROOF <<<