WEB 2.0 back linking question

by 8 replies
10
If I'm going to hire some warriors to build some "ok" back links to my website Should I use a buffer like an already established Web 2.0 with some anchor text on it pointing to my site and just have the link I purchase on here to point to the Web 2.0 which in turn points to me??? I just don't wanna get sand boxed, because half of the links have NO FREAKING PR. The main site (the home page of the site might have a PR of 4 but the inner pg where my anchor text or link to my site has an (N/A OR PR 0). So just to be safe should I only give out sites that point to me.


THANKS
#search engine optimization #back #linking #question #web #web 2.0 backlinks
  • Depends on the links, it's simple high pr ----> your website.

    Low pr and spammy ----> web 2.0 -----> your website
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • The only problem was .. I didn't know before hand. I was promised high PR and most look spammy to me.
    • [1] reply
    • If they aren't what you were promised I would ask for a refund.
  • Ask for a refund, that's why if I find a good source for backlinks I stick to it, too many guys out there who don't give what they promised.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • With proper well written content posted on Web 2.0 you can get quality backlinks that really worth a lot - But you have to get backlinks to your web 2.0 sites as well to make them getting index and to add some values. To do so, Give link from web 2.0 to your site (Make sure you use various anchor text, including click here, URL and etc.. to be away from over anchor text optimization) and then link to web 2.0 using some bookmarks - That would work better... - Once again, make sure you have well written content, for your web 2.0
  • If you were told you were going to get high PR links, and instead you're getting low or no PR links from inner pages, than I'd definitely say something and likely ask for a refund. But what's done is done so hard to take back those links even if they are a bit spammy.

    As a general rule, I would never recommend allowing someone to do mass link building to a money site directly unless I had previous experience with them. And then only for a few specific reasons like anchor text variation. It's always safer to do mass linking to something like a 2.0 and then link to your site from there. And if those links turn out to be super spammy than you can just dump the 2.0 and start over again. Hard to dump your money site.
  • Outsource to a more experience person and let him do his job.

    On several occasion i still run web 2.0, wikis, blogs, hubpage, squidoo directly on my site but they all have limit to what i do with them.

    Also, for you to see any major impact in ranking you will need to build tier links.
  • Perhaps it is best to hire a freelancer who knows how to do web 2.0/link wheel properly- meaning he knows how to write good content, do several link wheels (basic and the two-tier or multi-tier wheels), then of course optimize/build links to these web 2.0 sites as well.
Join the discussion

Next Topics on Trending Feed

  • 10

    WEB 2.0 back linking question

    If I'm going to hire some warriors to build some "ok" back links to my website Should I use a buffer like an already established Web 2.0 with some anchor text on it pointing to my site and just have the link I purchase on here to point to the Web 2.0 which in turn points to me??? I just don't wanna get sand boxed, because half of the links have NO FREAKING PR. The main site (the home page of the site might have a PR of 4 but the inner pg where my anchor text or link to my site has an (N/A OR PR 0). So just to be safe should I only give out sites that point to me.