Are there NO good WEB 2.O submitters out there????? Take my money NOW!!

Banned 11 years ago

Have you tried ArticleWyz, the posting module is semi-decent, often it's a bit buggy so then you have to wait a day or 2 till it's fixed.

It does not create the web2.0's, it is able to post to a whole bunch of them. I don't know exact numbers as I only use it to post to my tier 2 network and forget about the web2.0's function all the time, my workers just build them naturally.

You can buy the web2.0 accounts for about $0,10-0,15 btw and then they set them up in your account for you.

Another option is LinkWheel Bandit, I heard that some people had great success with them, not the cheapest option I believe but still worth a try. EDIT: Maybe I remembered it wrong but it only costs $47/month.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7963566].message }}

EdwardDennis

11 years ago

LWB hasnt been updated since forever!

Mike, have you tried Uberblogcreator? Also, there's a new web 2.0 submitter from SER. It's called SEREngines.

[ 2 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7963904].message }}

Vikram73

11 years ago

You know I asked this same question on another forum after closely evaluating all this software - UD, Magic, SENuke etc. And the conclusion was to just hire a VA for 20 hrs a week.

No such animal exists.

So I have a VA handle my Tier1. All content is unique, very readable and sent on a schedule straight to my VA who updates the Tier1's and in some images/video links etc..

Then I can use other tools to build up some link juice (Scrapebox, GSA etc. etc.) to those Tier1's.

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964047].message }}

MikeFriedman

11 years ago

Has anyone tried that UberBlog Creator 2 and can give a non-affiliate review on it? If it is any good and kept up to date, I'll buy the lifetime license yesterday.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

SaaS SEO Consultant

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964127].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by MikeFriedman

Has anyone tried that UberBlog Creator 2 and can give a non-affiliate review on it? If it is any good and kept up to date, I'll buy the lifetime license yesterday.

I don't have high hopes for it but I found a coupon for the monthly version so I will fire it up and give it a go. Seems like the support is far from stellar. Let you know tomorrow or over the weekend what my experience was. If it works enough for me to use it while I wait on Lciorne to update their recorder then it will be fine.

I think the only way web 2.0s will work and continue to work is if the users don't have to wait on developers to fix them - which is why software with recording tools will win over all the others.

Thanks

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964579].message }}

nik0

Banned 11 years ago

What I see from the screenshots is that it only supports 16 platforms.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964173].message }}

MikeFriedman

11 years ago

Originally Posted by nik0

What I see from the screenshots is that it only supports 16 platforms.

If it is 16 of the custom platforms and works 90% of the time or better, I'm fine with that to be honest.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

SaaS SEO Consultant

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964178].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by nik0

Have you tried ArticleWyz, the posting module is semi-decent, often it's a bit buggy so then you have to wait a day or 2 till it's fixed.

yeah they are the same as rankwyz right. I intend to give them a try but looking for the creator first.

Another option is LinkWheel Bandit, I heard that some people had great success with them, not the cheapest option I believe but still worth a try. EDIT: Maybe I remembered it wrong but it only costs $47/month.

From everything I have read version 2.0 is buggy and poorlly developed

Originally Posted by EdwardDennis

Mike, have you tried Uberblogcreator? Also, there's a new web 2.0 submitter from SER. It's called SEREngines.

Awww there you go . NO never heard of them and I am off to look at them.

Originally Posted by MikeFriedman

If it is 16 of the custom platforms and works 90% of the time or better, I'm fine with that to be honest.

Yep know what you mean. There is a big market for something that works even if that all it gives. Only thing is its gotta work. If its going to have 16 and 10 fail then forget it.

Thanks

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964296].message }}

MikeFriedman

11 years ago

I can vouch for LWB being all F'd up. Tried it for 60 days. Only supported 8 or 9 2.0 sites and was buggy as hell. There is potential there, and I love the self-healing idea, but it just didn't work well.

Basically it will set up pyramids and you tell it how many properties on each tier. Problem is that only 4-5 of the 2.0 sites were submitting successfully at any given time so you just end up with a lot of blogs on the same couple of 2.0 sites being created over and over again.

If it ever expanded to 30-40 2.0's and worked well, I would love it.

Thanks

Signature

SaaS SEO Consultant

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964305].message }}

nik0

Banned 11 years ago

You ever tried Zennoposter, perhaps they have a community where they trade / sell scripts/profiles to create web2.0's.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964611].message }}

EdwardDennis 11 years ago

Originally Posted by nik0

You ever tried Zennoposter, perhaps they have a community where they trade / sell scripts/profiles to create web2.0's.

He has tried Zenno nik. We exchanged PMs about this a few months back.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964617].message }}

Clyde

11 years ago

Hi Mike,

Not sure if you've bought any of my software but SE Demon is launching soon and we update the custom Web 2.0 on a daily basis maintaining a 70-80% success rate.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Generate Unlimited Number of Micro Niche Keywords, Multi-threaded EMD Finder PLUS More!

50% OFF WSO.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964621].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Clyde

Hi Mike,

Not sure if you've bought any of my software but SE Demon is launching soon and we update the custom Web 2.0 on a daily basis maintaining a 70-80% success rate.

I've seen you mention it before but if it isn't launched yet how do we know you update it regularly? Part of the problem is that developers always SAY they will but the experience so far has not been the case. I think developers mean to but once they get busy with fixing other things for users they can't keep up - especially when their users start to hammer a site and the site gets very good at changing things constantly to combat the signups.

anyway for Mike and others fired up uberblogcreator and it immediately annoyed me. Won't work with hotmail or outlook accounts or any service but fastmail and Gmail. However I will see how the rest of it goes.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964685].message }}

nik0

Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

anyway for Mike and others fired up uberblogcreator and it immediately annoyed me. Won't work with hotmail or outlook accounts or any service but fastmail and Gmail. However I will see how the rest of it goes.

Lol what's that for an argument, you can buy lists of 1000 gmail addresses for a few bucks at BHW.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7965504].message }}

Mike Anthony 11 years ago

Originally Posted by nik0

Lol what's that for an argument, you can buy lists of 1000 gmail addresses for a few bucks at BHW.

Yo NIk!

I know that bro thats why I called it an annoyance not a deal breaker. I already have my setup for getting email addresses and gmail was not one of them. First piece of software I have ever used that did not allow you to setup any email services you wish.

Now onto the real deal breakers.

Multiple failures.
The owner has actually attempted to sell the business on Flippa
Captcha problems which the developer is aware of and blames on deathby cpatcha (but I have never seen such a high mistake rate on deathbycaptcha with any other software) PLUS when I set it to manual it presents some of the images WITH no box to fill them out.

THats what I have encountered so far. Will report further. No way I would buy a lifetime license though.

Frankly the winners on this for me seem to be SEO link Robot and Magic submitter (SEOLR wins on price and simplicity) but I need to stress all I really want is something that sets them up. I will be trying rankwyz but I have some Zennoposter templates setup so I can modify things I have to do posting anyway.
- Thanks
Signature
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7965919].message }}
dennis09 11 years ago

Originally Posted by nik0

Lol what's that for an argument, you can buy lists of 1000 gmail addresses for a few bucks at BHW.

Or you can just use mailnesia and never have to worry about emails again. No signups. Even clicks all email links for you, and its free.

As for web 2.0s ive had great success with rankwyz and still use it quite often. The only downside is that, since it's only for web 2.0s, you'll end up having to use other programs for support links like video, doc sharing, infographics etc.

Typically I prefer one interface, like MS, that allows me to manage everything in one place. But unfortunately I hate the way it handles web 2.0s, especially the link reporting.
- [ 2 ] Thanks
Signature

There is no elevator to success, you have to take the stairs
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966282].message }}

EdwardDennis

11 years ago

One more thing mike. Not sure if I recall this correctly or not, but if you were to use spun articles, you have to prepare them one by one. By this I mean, you have to have every single article in different doc file, which annoys me. Some other tools allow you to copy paste a "mother" spun article, which can be spun into hundreds individual articles, but that's not the case with UBC. Not sure if they've changed this or not.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964715].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by EdwardDennis

One more thing mike. Not sure if I recall this correctly or not, but if you were to use spun articles, you have to prepare them one by one. By this I mean, you have to have every single article in different doc file, which annoys me.

Actually thats closer to how I do things. I am less into spinning than I am in to rewriting (which is basically sentence spinning) and then I use a script to break them out into separate files and load them in. One of my minor beefs with all submitters is that they assume everyone wants to word spin at every property. MS you can load individual articles but you have to really dig into it to find that features - like its an after thought.

Thanks

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7965941].message }}

mohsinmallik

11 years ago

Hey @Mike Anthony, looks like you have tried a lot of software. Are you interested in manual web 2.0 creation service?

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964738].message }}

seoace 11 years ago

In the sicksubmitter forums, there is a web 2.0 template with 50-60 web 2.0 sites.

Most important factor in a web 2.0 tool is to make sure it gets updated regularly. 90% of those "web 2.0" tools just dies off after the 1st few months.
- Thanks
Signature
Who else needs a SEO Client Dashboard for their SEO services ?
Let your clients monitor their SEO campaigns (Rankings, Backlinks and Work Done)
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7964874].message }}

nest28

11 years ago

What's a custom web 2.0? Are you talking about Blogger, Wordpress, Typepad, Posterous, Squidoo, Gather etc?

How do you avoid this ? ( yes I am on record that one day probably this year those who over do it are going to be crying in their teddies )

I know in the past people used tiered link building to backlink web 2.0 sites and I said that Google will probably attempt to stop this method because it's so widely used.

So how do you build links to these properties without drawing attention from Google?
I don't plan on building links ever again, I rather just pay Mike, or someone else trust worthy, but I'd still like to know just in case I ever wanted to try it.

Also I was one of the so called "purist" who said stop building links all together. But I believe that would be a mistake, it also depend on what you need links for and what kind of site your building. I still would try to market my site and get natural links, but until that happens I would pay for hr links just to get the ball rolling on receiving organic traffic.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7965986].message }}

Mike Anthony 11 years ago

Originally Posted by nest28

What's a custom web 2.0? Are you talking about Blogger, Wordpress, Typepad, Posterous, Squidoo, Gather etc?

Pretty much. Basically any site that is coded individually for that site (not people running bought scripts) and allows you to publish. Usually also is a well known brand.
- [ 1 ] Thanks
Signature
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966054].message }}

dennis09

11 years ago

Frankly Mike I'm surprised you're surprised that there are no good web 2.0 creators around. They can be a b*tch to keep updated. Time is money, and aint nobody got time for dat.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

There is no elevator to success, you have to take the stairs

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966293].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by dennis09

Frankly Mike I'm surprised you're surprised that there are no good web 2.0 creators around. They can be a b*tch to keep updated. Time is money, and aint nobody got time for dat.

That might make sense if developers did not charge upwards of $150 a month To each customer. With hundreds and even thousands of users its ridiculous to claim that they cannot hire people whose time IS paid for by users.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966319].message }}

SCarter

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

That might make sense if developers did not charge upwards of $150 a month To each customer. With hundreds and even thousands of users its ridiculous to claim that they cannot hire people whose time IS paid for by users.

Exactly! This would not even be a issue if the prices we lower. Platform sites are not hard to find because anyone could use ScrapeBox or another scraper so adding more of those takes no time at all. Its true Web 2.0 sites requires work to keep updated, but that is what I feel the monthly should be for. The rest of the updates are really not worth a monthly fee. As I said before, these software's charging a monthly should be Web 2.0 Kings.

Originally Posted by dennis09

Frankly Mike I'm surprised you're surprised that there are no good web 2.0 creators around. They can be a b*tch to keep updated. Time is money, and aint nobody got time for dat.

They have the time to take our money. At $150 a month and thousands of users there is 0 reason not to have Web 2.0 in the bag. Simply pay some guy $1500-2000 a month and I am sure he would keep them updated.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966362].message }}

GGpaul

11 years ago

Damn, I need to get into web 2.0's as well? Whatever you do Mike and Mike Friedman, I'm following you guys LOL. Take my damn PAYCHECK.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966304].message }}

Mike Anthony 11 years ago

Originally Posted by GGpaul

Damn, I need to get into web 2.0's as well? Whatever you do Mike and Mike Friedman, I'm following you guys LOL. Take my damn PAYCHECK.

Too much hassle so we would have to charge you a paper processing fee if you go that route. Will send you an automatic bank draft form. Fill in your name, entire salary after taxes down to the cent along with the date of your paycheck clearance and we will be good.

Originally Posted by dennis09

Or you can just use mailnesia and never have to worry about emails again. No signups. Even clicks all email links for you, and its free..

Some web 2.0 webmasters are very good at smelling out free email services
- Thanks
Signature
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966479].message }}

GodMode52

11 years ago

Rank/article WYZ is probably the one with bigger hopes , I had to quit my subscription because their support sucks and the whole system was very buggy , but looks like they are putting a lot of work into this and many web 2.0 are supported.

Uberblog creator is decent but a lot of bugs there too plus a very small number of blogs are supported.

Zennoposter is probably the best as you can fix it in real time and create custom templates for every site you like but it's not super easy to use and not sure if it's worth paying full software just for web 2.0's.

VA's , personally after big $$ spent on all those softwares this is the cheapest and most llegit looking solution I have found.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Want Google Page ONE Rankings? [YES] [NO]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966322].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by GodMode52

Zennoposter is probably the best as you can fix it in real time and create custom templates for every site you like but it's not super easy to use and not sure if it's worth paying full software just for web 2.0's..

Thats the route I have gone but not for WEb 2.0s (I will now however). I automate DNS changes, site setup and integrate it with other online tools (since it handles anything web based). Shucks it allows for you to open exe files which means with my favorite automation company's tool - winautomation - I can even trigger an exe that opens any tool and fills it out. Thats how I used to fill out MS when i used it. click one button and done -WA I mean ZP is garbage for windows automation.

I just have never felt free to be gung ho about ZP because the owner is just horrible to deal with - Curses out his customers, calls them names, all kinds on nonsense plus the support by way of training sucks. You pretty much have to rely on customers if you are an English speaking customer. Its not that hard because of this guy

DexLab SEO - YouTube

Guy single handedly made ZP thousands of dollar but still in the forum the head developer cursed him out for complaining about bugs etc. Appreciate the work so much I sought him out for his Paypal address. He thought I was joking until he received my donation (wasn't anything much mind you just a thank you)

Winautomation on the other hand has its next version coming out soon and at that point I hope to have everything done with their software. If they had a simpler way of doing captcha, proxies and multithreading in the present version I would end looking at all other software. Top notch professional company from top to bottom and their support is always top notch plus their software just works but they are not in the IM niche exclusively so the program has not had those features I mentioned out of the box.

Thanks

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966443].message }}

dannyl

11 years ago

Has anybody tested the new GSA add-in which you pay monthly for that is aimed at web 2.0s? I think it was released this week so can't find much about it yet but by the sounds of things its an add-in that is maintained by a different company aimed at being constantly updated to work with some of the better web 2.0 sites.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966740].message }}

Lanx

11 years ago

man this is a good thread, too bad it got buried.

i've used everything like the op
UBC is "sometimes" updated, but it's like the most inane, preschool coded program to work with, they DO have the best looking logo imo, lol but, still broken web2's (but the best option imo)

gsa new sebots or whatever 15-20$ monthly, no reviews yet, if they gave a list of supported web2's i'd sign up right away, currently i'm doing answer bot... no idea if that's helping ha

article kevo, i told the creator of the web2 issues a while ago and even got him to remove posterous (they closed doors a while ago), and only wordpress seems to be made easily

licorne web2's ha!

again i can't complain about licorne or even ubc, i got in when they're lifetime (licorne will be monthly soon) so even with ubc2 being inane, at least it's not sucking out monthly.

i stopped using senukex/magics/ud when they all sucked ass for creating web2's

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966846].message }}

SCarter

11 years ago

The Web 2.0's supported by SEREngines are:

albawaba
autisable
blogymate
bravenet
dailystrength
datingish
datingisHK
Flixya
fotki
friendsite
gghanaweb
healthkicker
ireallylikefood
jigsy
livejournal
lovelyish
lovelyisHK
mancouch
momaroo
mywapblog
netlog
nexopia
postbit
revelife
skyrock
tblog
wallingside
weeklyvolcano
wordpress
xanga
xfire
Citeulike
technorati
rediff

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966879].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

I don't recognize at least half of those. Are they any good?

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7966997].message }}

Boricua

11 years ago

It just has to Submit to custom web 2.0s not platform garbage. NOTHING ELSE I- s there any out there? The market is going into all these features and addons and tools all in one but its not going to work. Sometimes you just need ONE TOOL that concentrates on one or two things (which if you think about it is what makes scrapebox what it is)

So what have I missed? I admit when it comes to submission software I am not as into it as many here.

Surprise to conclude you're disappointed by having tried all those tools and likely by what it seems, not getting the wanted results Mike. I've started to pour down big time $and time into rankwyz system and taking advantage of the $0.15 account creation option. I'm sure it will also be solid in a few months for me.

As you know lots of those tools are one time fees and that's it, my take, RUN!
If there's no monthly fee for those type of services there's huge probabilities updates to the software will eventually float!! Exception here and there, but man time always tell.

I really don't know why rankwyz wouldn't be a good option for getting you real good results mate. Perhaps having tried all of those softwares you're just testing and wanting to find a tool that's 100% rate for web 2.0?

I just have never felt free to be gung ho about ZP because the owner is just horrible to deal with - Curses out his customers, calls them names, all kinds on nonsense plus the support by way of training sucks. You pretty much have to rely on customers if you are an English speaking customer. Its not that hard because of this guy

Good to know about this one, but no surprise also..one time fees and people probably never get the 6 month update fees. Confident rankwyz will keep improving, no longer having big issues as before

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7967513].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Boricua

I really don't know why rankwyz wouldn't be a good option for getting you real good results mate. Perhaps having tried all of those softwares you're just testing and wanting to find a tool that's 100% rate for web 2.0?

Dude come on.. You are a regular here. Only newbies comment without reading threads. Already said I am going to give Rankwyzz a try in this thread but I sure would not mind a good creator as well. Why Not? Between SEOLR and my in house stuff I think I am about set but If I find one more then that saves me a bit of time

taking advantage of the $0.15 account creation option. I'm sure it will also be solid in a few months for me.

Good for you but do the maths. For every 100 customers with say 50 web 2.0 accounts (lower higher depending on link profile) thats $750 per tier. Some guys here are even heavier into web 2.0s. Plus You'll always lose some and have to replace too. Now okay operational cost but seriously think Rankwyzz isn't using some of the said software?Surprise they are.

So why shell out cash forever when you could be using some of the same software. Now yeah if you are just working your own sites its a no brainer but thats not the case with quite a few in this thread.

I've heard mixed things about Rankwyzz but like I said earlier in the thread I will try them out for posting

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7967711].message }}

nik0

Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Good for you but do the maths. For every 100 customers with say 50 web 2.0 accounts (lower higher depending on link profile) thats $750 per tier. Some guys here are even heavier into web 2.0s. Plus You'll always lose some and have to replace too. Now okay operational cost but seriously think Rankwyzz isn't using some of the said software?Surprise they are.

So why shell out cash forever when you could be using some of the same software. Now yeah if you are just working your own sites its a no brainer but thats not the case with quite a few in this thread.

I've heard mixed things about Rankwyzz but like I said earlier in the thread I will try them out for posting

I use rankwyz only for my tier 2 link building and in case of churn & burn try outs. It allows you to setup several networks inside the dashboard.

So I have one network that I named: tier2 private network
and another network named: web2.0 blog network

They also have an option to scrape content and images and in about 5 minutes I've scheduled like 400-500 posts on both networks.

In your case when having to setup sets of web2.0's for multiple clients it might not be that useful but for tiered linking where you don't have to worry too much about the quality then it's very useful.

Out of the 400 web2.0's on about 12 different platforms (yes I was an early user when they didn't support many yet, right now they have about 50 platforms) there are always about 50-100 blogs that I can not post too.

Now I have those 400 web2.0's for quite some time already and never replaced a single one so the fact that 325 of them (on average) are still alive is not too terrible.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7967720].message }}

Boricua

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Dude come on.. You are a regular here. Only newbies comment without reading threads. Already said I am going to give Rankwyzz a try in this thread but I sure would not mind a good creator as well. Why Not? Between SEOLR and my in house stuff I think I am about set but If I find one more then that saves me a bit of time

Good for you but do the maths. For every 100 customers with say 50 web 2.0 accounts (lower higher depending on link profile) thats $750 per tier. Some guys here are even heavier into web 2.0s. Plus You'll always lose some and have to replace too. Now okay operational cost but seriously think Rankwyzz isn't using some of the said software?Surprise they are.

So why shell out cash forever when you could be using some of the same software. Now yeah if you are just working your own sites its a no brainer but thats not the case with quite a few in this thread.

I've heard mixed things about Rankwyzz but like I said earlier in the thread I will try them out for posting

You surely got me there, instant response the moment I read it..what d heck its Friday right

I'll definitely see the results received for my sites and go from there with rankwyz, sticking to the basics as it seems simpler with them. Keeping it simple with my offers is working well, slow and steady with the basics is still a winner/safe/good enough here. And $750 Mike..oh no way dude..my amount of elite customers can now be counted with 2 hands, but will test and see + very likely report back. Spending a bit more for the sake of simplicity, will avoid the above mentioned software for now. Good discussion.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7967923].message }}

dennis09

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Boricua

You surely got me there, instant response the moment I read it..what d heck its Friday right

I'll definitely see the results received for my sites and go from there with rankwyz, sticking to the basics as it seems simpler with them. Keeping it simple with my offers is working well, slow and steady with the basics is still a winner/safe/good enough here. And $750 Mike..oh no way dude..my amount of elite customers can now be counted with 2 hands, but will test and see + very likely report back. Spending a bit more for the sake of simplicity, will avoid the above mentioned software for now. Good discussion.

If you are concerned about the cost of Rankwyz web 2.0 accounts then they do allow you to import them. Head on over to Fiverr and simply buy in bulk.

I know actually buying accounts kind of negates the point of the service, but I still like it because of the network interface/setup. I separate my networks into nodes and it makes management a lot easier. Excel gets a bit messy.

Thanks

Signature

There is no elevator to success, you have to take the stairs

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7967962].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Boricua

Good to know about this one, but no surprise also..one time fees and people probably never get the 6 month update fees. Confident rankwyz will keep improving, no longer having big issues as before

??????? You've never heard of Zennoposter??

Not sure where you got that response from or maybe if you just didn't read the thread again but in fairness to Zennoposter I have to correct that. ZP is about three years old and solid. You are mixing apples with oranges. They are not a Web 2.0 submitter. they automate ANYTHING in a browser.

They sure do get their 6 month update fees because frankly what I said was about their customer relations skills NOT the value of their software. They are very good programmers. However they don't give updates on Web 2.0s because thats not what the product is. They update the web automation features of the software and then you can use it to record your own sites.

Different beast entirely. ZP could never get updated again and it would work for years to come basically until web technology changed. Some people are still using ZP3 which is like two years old and actually prefer it. No downside of paying a one time fee for that kind of software but yeah on things like web 2.o submissions I would agree you need subscription fees.

Thanks

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7967747].message }}

dennis09

11 years ago

Hate to further derail, but Mike how big of a learning curve would you give ZP?

It's ironic that iv'e tested d@m near every piece of crap software on the market but never given it a go. Not sure if you've tinkered with it, but is it anything similar to the programmer in MagicSubmitter?

edit: I'm checking out WinAutomation now too. You pretty much killed my entire weeked.

#toys

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

There is no elevator to success, you have to take the stairs

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7967793].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by dennis09

Hate to further derail, but Mike how big of a learning curve would you give ZP?

It's ironic that iv'e tested d@m near every piece of crap software on the market but never given it a go. Not sure if you've tinkered with it, but is it anything similar to the programmer in MagicSubmitter?

Lot more to it than Magic SUbmitter. With power comes great responsibility/learning curve but its not too bad. If you don't make some programming terms like variables and Get put commands discourage then you can get the hang of it. I might put up a video of me doing a Wordpress account signup with it. Technically you could do sign up, submission, email verification the works with it but the key to me is not trying to reinvent the wheel.

edit: I'm checking out WinAutomation now too. You pretty much killed my entire weeked.

#toys

Wouldn't worry about it yet.Its a general automation tool. I use it toward that end to do alot of the repetitive tasks. Though it was offered in a WSO a while back it does not have easily integrated Internet marketing features like captcha support, proxies etc. If enough feature requests are honored it may have them in version 5 which is due out in 1-3 months.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7967920].message }}

dennis09

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Lot more to it than Magic SUbmitter. With power comes great responsibility/learning curve but its not too bad. If you don't make some programming terms like variables and Get put commands discourage then you can get the hang of it. I might put up a video of me doing a Wordpress account signup with it. Technically you could do sign up, submission, email verification the works with it but the key to me is not trying to reinvent the wheel.

Power, responsibility....careful there Mike *evilgrin

I actually have a bit of experience with c++, html, and php but I prefer to hand it over to someone more experienced in that domain. Better things to do with time and I never seem to have enough of it.

What I've found is that most, and I really mean most, programs are great in the beginning and then slowly die over time. They either completely stop working or become abandoned by the creator, so ZP is looking pretty attractive at the moment.

Besides that, I hate being the last one to the party.

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Wouldn't worry about it yet.Its a general automation tool. I use it toward that end to do alot of the repetitive tasks. Though it was offered in a WSO a while back it does not have easily integrated Internet marketing features like captcha support, proxies etc. If enough feature requests are honored it may have them in version 5 which is due out in 1-3 months.

Well that sucks, I got all giddy inside at the idea of running ZP & WA side by side. Especially if the two would play nice together on a VPS. Hell all I need is a few hours with that and someone might be out of a job lol.

Thanks

Signature

There is no elevator to success, you have to take the stairs

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7967949].message }}

jackrice

11 years ago

Rankwyzz i was thinking of making a purchase but still going to wait a bit until the op comes with his findings

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7971088].message }}

neil_patmore

11 years ago

I use a great one. It submits to all the custom sites, puts images and video in if I want. Links on various pages, submits unique content, not spun shite and the results are excellent.

I found him on Elance

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7971202].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

after trying out uberblogcreator2 I pass. High enough failure rate not to distinguish it from any other out there. Seems to have support issues, have to use specific emails and was recently up for sale on Flippa. Seems to take forever to get updates as well so it fails all the criteria.

Not worth the hassle.

So having tried out even more solutions I am coming back around to Magic submitter (which I had suspended using for a few months) and surprisingly (to me) SEOLR (different kind of interface that just looks straightforward to me). I'll probably reach out to Steve to see if he can add more Web 2.0s.

I doubt seriously I will be using MS past two months when I sign back up unless they push their software forward. I have a certain amount of confidence Licorne will be my main tool in 3-6 months.

Definitely will not be buying any lifetime licenses of anything until Licorne comes out of beta. In fact if the recorder (Cosmic) is good enough at this next release I will be picking up some more licenses.

What I learned a little before this thread and now am even more convinced of is that NO SOFTWARE will remain updated like we want and the chances are even less for lifetime licensed software.

The best solution seems to be software packages where you do not have to wait at all for updates because you can go in and make the changes necessary yourself. Then the next step is to form usergroups where there are incentives for others to help updating the services.

Toward that end I fired up Zenno for wordpress which was failing in other packages I was using.

In ten minutes I had a template for wordpress almost ready to go. Captcha integration and writing log in info to a text file (will change that to write to an excel file) inncluded. Will probably spend another ten minutes tweaking it today. Works fine and if you have to make changes its relatively simple to rerecord any part that has changed and merge it into the template without starting out all over again.

Hopefully Licorne's recorder will be an additional option. I don't think Licorne will come close to ZP because the recorder in ZP is not an add on to the program. Its the entire focus of it. Plus making changes to anything but Zenno would probably require complete rerecording (for example in ZEnno you can take a piece of a template out of one template and apply it to another completely different template - so its modular)

anyway long and short is I think I am set. Whatever isn't working for me even at present I can set up in Zenno. To save time I will probably stay on with SEOLR and as I said utilize licorne but I can then fill in the rest with Zenno and then automate merging all table info into one.

Rankwyzz I will try in the next few days. After that I get to hook it all up to what I have been working on for awhile (having all the tools - like scrapebox, GSA, MS ZP etc. work together in concert automatically)

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7972346].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Alright if anyone talks to me on skype or the phone and can't understand what I am saying its because Alex of Magic Submitter unknowingly made me eat my hat and I am still chewing it. Thing runs much smoother on my VPS

Just fired it up and it seems in my short absence they upgraded to Firefox and made a number of other changes( designer still needs an overhaul though).

WEb 2.0s gave me about a 60% success rate but in a rare twist for software of this kind the failures were almost all services I didn't know and didn't care about.

I got around 45 web 2.0s accounts set up .

So for right now the answer to the question in my OP is Magic submitter but remains to be seen if that will last. IF it does then its worth the $57-$67 a month. IF I do about 15 others I want in ZP (no one really has the those in a submission package because they are not good for blasting) I'm good.

[ 1 ] Thanks
2 replies

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7973213].message }}

SCarter 11 years ago

Thanks for taking the time to test out these services. Might have to give Magic Submitter another try.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7973246].message }}

MikeFriedman

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

WEb 2.0s gave me about a 60% success rate but in a rare twist for software of this kind the failures were almost all services I didn't know and didn't care about.

Hey Mike, would you mind posting a list of 2.0's it is successfully posting to? I'd like to see that before I go ahead and re-up with them.

Thanks.

Thanks

Signature

SaaS SEO Consultant

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7976426].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

NO problem Mike but two things

A) I was talking signup. I only tried to submission to a couple and all seemed alright.
B) Waiting to hear back from Alex on a strange issue I am having. Some passwords are showing as incorrect when I manually log in but within MS I can work with them just fine (thinking a bug of some kind but it may be something on my end)

anywhere here are the successes

zimbio.com
livejournal.com
jimdo.com
zoho.com
bravenet.com
webnode.com
blog.tumblr.com
wordpress.com
communitywalk.com
soup.io
dailystrength.org
ghanaweb.com
wallinside.com
xanga.com
ziki.com
blog.bitcomet.com
blog.com
iamsport.org
jigsy.com
mywapblog.com
purevolume.com
webgarden.com
23hq.com
academia.edu
allvoices.com
awebcafe.com
bcz.com
blogymate.com
centerblog.net
devhub.com
diigo.com (Blogs)
enexpress.net
eyeuser.com
fc2.com
fotki.com
jazztimes.com (Blogs)
kiwibox.com
meemi.com
modwedding.com
nexopia.com
pusha.se
quizilla.teennick.com
skyrock.com
thoughts.com
travellerspoint.com (browser-mode)
unblog.fr
weddingwindow.com
wikidot.com (browser-mode)
wordpressy.pl
yola.com
yourtrainings.com

[ 3 ] Thanks
2 replies

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7976590].message }}

discustipated

11 years ago

KnowEm Username Search: Social Media, Domains and Trademarks - it's not a software, but It should do the trick.. if that's what you're looking for.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7992196].message }}

patadeperro

11 years ago

Originally Posted by discustipated

KnowEm Username Search: Social Media, Domains and Trademarks - it's not a software, but It should do the trick.. if that's what you're looking for.

I am not sure you read the entire thread, but the point of the OP is that there is not a software that distributes (syndicates) information through the web 2.0 properties, not a software that allows you to search certain phrase or name.

In that case there is this iste as well Check Username Availability at Multiple Social Networking Sites it gives you the same service than the software you posted but for free.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Start Banking Hard With The Adult Evergreen Method!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7992545].message }}

bigdan79

11 years ago

Hello,

I am the developer of ShareMacro - Automated Social Bookmarker , a web 2 social bookmarking submitter. It does registration, verification, submission. Only white hat methods, nothing black hat.

I am finishing up final beta tests, and the results look promising. The tool is already open to the public. ShareMacro runs entirely Firefox.

I thrown out tons of Pligg and Scuttle sites as most of them are dead and worthless, and decided to focus on the top sites like chime.in, delicious.com etc. that get you real results.

Pricing will be per project, with $1 per project. Registrations are free. Would love for you guys to give it a shot

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7995041].message }}

YorkieBoy

11 years ago

Originally Posted by bigdan79

Hello,

I am the developer of ShareMacro - Automated Social Bookmarker , a web 2 social bookmarking submitter. It does registration, verification, submission. Only white hat methods, nothing black hat.

I am finishing up final beta tests, and the results look promising. The tool is already open to the public. ShareMacro runs entirely Firefox.

I thrown out tons of Pligg and Scuttle sites as most of them are dead and worthless, and decided to focus on the top sites like chime.in, delicious.com etc. that get you real results.

Pricing will be per project, with $1 per project. Registrations are free. Would love for you guys to give it a shot

I gave it a try and would advise anyone wanting to preserve their sanity to keep well clear of this piece of junk. They ought to be laws against inflicting this garbage upon people

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8349976].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Thought I would give a final update

After months of testing I have been EXTREMELY satisfied with FCS Networker and it is now my choice for creating web 2.0s when I need to. The failure rate is the lowest on the market and I can now say that the answer to my question is Yes. FCS Networker is a solid Web 2.0 creation application. Still trying the online management system but creation is simple, solid and reliable.

I should add that I am not a mass blaster user but since tier ones should be done with more care I find no big issues with FCS not creating hundreds in a minute

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8327564].message }}

Fernando1954

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Thought I would give a final update

After months of testing I have been EXTREMELY satisfied with FCS Networker and it is now my choice for creating web 2.0s when I need to. The failure rate is the lowest on the market and I can now say that the answer to my question is Yes. FCS Networker is a solid Web 2.0 creation application. Still trying the online management system but creation is simple, solid and reliable.

I should add that I am not a mass blaster user but since tier ones should be done with more care I find no big issues with FCS not creating hundreds in a minute

I'll second that, been using FCS for a couple of months now and the success rate and the control over web 2 setup is great. The auto login and being able to go in and customize the tier 1 sites saves loads of time.

I like the fact it is really easy to use, have tried GSA, Licorne AOI etc and didn't really get on with them, like you i'm not a heavy user and never get near my months quota. But it's well worth it for ease of use and success rate and time saved setting up quality tier 1 web 2's.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8330272].message }}

ningning

11 years ago

There is one alternative that you have missed. Probably because it is new and still not know to many.

It is called Autofill Magic.

I am the developer.

Autofill Magic is a semi automated tool, so you still have to do some manual work. It was designed to create high quality 1 tier web 2.0 props and to give the user 100% control with 80% automation. The user base is growing steadily and we are getting some pretty good feedback. If you post quality content you can get a 95% success and stick rate.

Autofill Magic supports a list of 120 (and growing) custom sites.

Feel free to check it out. I will properly get a sales thread here soon and offer some good discounts.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8331724].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by ningning

There is one alternative that you have missed. Probably because it is new and still not know to many.

It is called Autofill Magic.

I am the developer.

Autofill Magic is a semi automated tool, so you still have to do some manual work. It was designed to create high quality 1 tier web 2.0 props and to give the user 100% control with 80% automation. The user base is growing steadily and we are getting some pretty good feedback. If you post quality content you can get a 95% success and stick rate.

Autofill Magic supports a list of 120 (and growing) custom sites.

Feel free to check it out. I will properly get a sales thread here soon and offer some good discounts.

This one looks very good. Keeps you in more control of things. Wondering if you can pre-load multiple articles for it to choose from, instead of just one spun articles. And also set user/blog names instead of *random. But with the free trial, I guess I will give it a spin and find out soon enough.

Thanks
3 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8342762].message }}

Fernando1954

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

This one looks very good. Keeps you in more control of things. Wondering if you can pre-load multiple articles for it to choose from, instead of just one spun articles. And also set user/blog names instead of *random. But with the free trial, I guess I will give it a spin and find out soon enough.

You can do all of those things with FCS. You upload article sets and it pulls from the set when posting, User name you can have auto generate or insert your own in spintax

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8345661].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Fernando1954

You can do all of those things with FCS. You upload article sets and it pulls from the set when posting, User name you can have auto generate or insert your own in spintax

Thanks. Yeah, my simple mind just puts a { at the start and a | in between each article, then a } at the end of them all. And pow, multi articles.

I got a bit distracted from testing that macro magicfill last night. But from what I have done with it.
It would take a bit of time to set up everything perfectly, but from a Whitehat SEO prospective, would still keep you above the fold of darkness.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8345761].message }}

burton4550

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

This one looks very good. Keeps you in more control of things. Wondering if you can pre-load multiple articles for it to choose from, instead of just one spun articles. And also set user/blog names instead of *random. But with the free trial, I guess I will give it a spin and find out soon enough.

How would this compare to Rankwyz or Fight Back Network? Just wondering which one is best to use that's not going to get sites banned

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8346716].message }}

Michael Carlin

11 years ago

Originally Posted by burton4550

How would this compare to Rankwyz or Fight Back Network? Just wondering which one is best to use that's not going to get sites banned

Hi. I own FightBack Networks. It's a WP blog network platform (peer to peer networks). It's in a different sphere of SEO altogether. It won't help you with web2.0s so it's not relevant to this thread.

Now about web2.0 tools.

Rankwyz and FCS are more manager type tools. I consider these to be the next generation of the "submitter" tools like SeNukeX, Ultimate Demon and Magic submitter.

All tools will end up with some banned accounts, eventually sites clock on to patterns. You can negate this by making your first posts non-spammy. This is what makes web2.0 managers better than one-time submitters. The web2.0s become assests rather than one hit wonders that are never looked at or used again, and are much more likely to be banned.

The biggest thing is keeping these tools up to date which I imagine is an absolute nightmare for developers.

I have FCS and Rankwyz, and I like different parts of each. The processes for both are very different. FCS also has some kick ass stuff in the forum and is cheaper... so maybe start there if you're new.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Original and unique CMS Footprint tool for finding brand new backlink-targets.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8347779].message }}

burton4550

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Michael Carlin

Hi. I own FightBack Networks. It's a WP blog network platform (peer to peer networks). It's in a different sphere of SEO altogether. It won't help you with web2.0s so it's not relevant to this thread.

Now about web2.0 tools.

Rankwyz and FCS are more manager type tools. I consider these to be the next generation of the "submitter" tools like SeNukeX, Ultimate Demon and Magic submitter.

All tools will end up with some banned accounts, eventually sites clock on to patterns. You can negate this by making your first posts non-spammy. This is what makes web2.0 managers better than one-time submitters. The web2.0s become assests rather than one hit wonders that are never looked at or used again, and are much more likely to be banned.

The biggest thing is keeping these tools up to date which I imagine is an absolute nightmare for developers.

I have FCS and Rankwyz, and I like different parts of each. The processes for both are very different. FCS also has some kick ass stuff in the forum and is cheaper... so maybe start there if you're new.

Yeah I thought about that after I replied on this thread, about putting FBN in here. Was definitely irrelevant to this thread.

But from what I've been told using Rankwyz for your 2.0's and FBN together give you some really great results right? As long as your diversifying everything that is with other links, such as press releases, videos, socialization ect..

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8347858].message }}

Michael Carlin

11 years ago

Originally Posted by burton4550

Yeah I thought about that after I replied on this thread, about putting FBN in here. Was definitely irrelevant to this thread.

But from what I've been told using Rankwyz for your 2.0's and FBN together give you some really great results right? As long as your diversifying everything that is with other links, such as press releases, videos, socialization ect..

I'll send you a PM since this is off topic. Cheers.

Thanks

Signature

Original and unique CMS Footprint tool for finding brand new backlink-targets.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8349746].message }}

ningning

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

This one looks very good. Keeps you in more control of things. enough.

Thanks. That is exactly the point of Autofill Magic. I created it because I was not satisfied with the stick rate, success rate and quality that automated tools provide.

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

Wondering if you can pre-load multiple articles for it to choose from, instead of just one spun articles.

You can. There is an 'article from folder' feature where you point to a folder and Autofill Magic picks an article every time you post. You can set how many times each article can be used, see a log of the used articles and delete a submission from the log to 'free' the article so it can be submitted again.

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

And also set user/blog names instead of *random. But with the free trial, I guess I will give it a spin and find out soon

You can set what ever you like and spin it your self if your want. Autofill Magic keeps track of your all your usernames and sub domains.

Originally Posted by burton4550

How would this compare to Rankwyz or Fight Back Network? Just wondering which one is best to use that's not going to get sites banned

I am not the one to compare it to other tools... But I know that several of our users use Autofill Magic to create accounts for other tools like Rankwyz.

Creating accounts is often the trickiest part of automation. You have several steps, captchas and email confirmations, so a lot can go wrong.

With Autofill Magic you are 100% in control and can react to small changes in the sites, question captchas and other hard to automate details. It takes a little work on your end but the success rate is very close to 100%

Feel free to PM me or contact me through the contact form. I will be glad to answer any questions.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8347738].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by ningning

With Autofill Magic you are 100% in control and can react to small changes in the sites, question captchas and other hard to automate details. It takes a little work on your end but the success rate is very close to 100%

Ning I tried this and will be cancelling. I initially thought this was like a suped up roboform that would record the sites I filled out but can't find anywhere where it does this. Essentially you have to fill out the details and then it also doesn't seem to have anywhere to add additional fields.

I can see nothing this offers over tools out there already. its the beginning of something but for a monthly subscription as well? for a firefox plugin? Not seeing it. Its got to do more.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8372945].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Unfortunately recently FCS Networker which I reported on and still do like has fallen badly off its good fail rate. Have had runs recently where it did closer to 50% fail rate.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8430413].message }}

MikeFriedman

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Unfortunately recently FCS Networker which I reported on and still do like has fallen badly off its good fail rate. Have had runs recently where it did closer to 50% fail rate.

Damnit. I was finally about to get around to picking this up.

Back to the drawing board.

Thanks

Signature

SaaS SEO Consultant

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8430871].message }}

hop

11 years ago

[DELETED]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7978435].message }}

MikeFriedman

11 years ago

Alright, I have another contender to add to the list.

Has anyone tried FCS Networker? I've seen different reports with people claiming to get close to 100% success on account creation and submission. Looks like it also has a feature where it will go in and automatically change your theme on sites that allow it, making the site look even less like a half-assed thrown together site.

Any thoughts?

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

SaaS SEO Consultant

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7979504].message }}

Fernando1954

11 years ago

Have been looking at this tool myself, along with all the others, any thoughts on it.

Every time i decide on which tool to go with another option pops up.

Originally Posted by MikeFriedman

Alright, I have another contender to add to the list.

Has anyone tried FCS Networker? I've seen different reports with people claiming to get close to 100% success on account creation and submission. Looks like it also has a feature where it will go in and automatically change your theme on sites that allow it, making the site look even less like a half-assed thrown together site.

Any thoughts?

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7983226].message }}

dennis09

11 years ago

Originally Posted by MikeFriedman

Alright, I have another contender to add to the list.

Has anyone tried FCS Networker? I've seen different reports with people claiming to get close to 100% success on account creation and submission. Looks like it also has a feature where it will go in and automatically change your theme on sites that allow it, making the site look even less like a half-assed thrown together site.

Any thoughts?

Gave it a go and had a pretty bad experience with it. For one, it took roughly two weeks to get the thing installed and working properly because of a licensing issue. In the end Dan had to log into my VPS to debug and set everything up.

After finally getting it to run and create accounts I noticed another very critical problem...I could't find any way to actually submit content to the sites!!! Spent some time digging through the documentation and realized that it was outdated and applied to an older version of the program. Great. Touched basis with Dan again and he apologized and told me that they were switching to a web based submission process. So basically you create the accounts locally with the program and then upload them to the web based tool and use that to do submissions. HUGE drawback for me.

I haven't had a chance to really dig into the web based portion of the program (was still under development), but the separate creation and submission process was enough for me to cancel the subscription. Just don't have the time nor patience for it. I personally think he needs to either go full out web based or software based and not have users switching back and forth between the two.

p.s. Yes the account creator did give a near 100% success rate though.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

There is no elevator to success, you have to take the stairs

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7984022].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by dennis09

Just don't have the time nor patience for it. I personally think he needs to either go full out web based or software based and not have users switching back and forth between the two.

p.s. Yes the account creator did give a near 100% success rate though.

I'll give it a go and get back to this thread. As far as I heard it is now fully web based. The desktop program would have tended to suck because it was built with ubot

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7984374].message }}

dennis09

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

I'll give it a go and get back to this thread. As far as I heard it is now fully web based. The desktop program would have tended to suck because it was built with ubot

Sucked worse than rewinding an early 90s cassette tape.

Edit: I just checked and it seems that my login for the web version still works despite the cancellation. I'll give it another go tonight as well to see whats been updated. Dans a pretty cool guy and helped me through a few struggles so id hate to end this with a negative review.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

There is no elevator to success, you have to take the stairs

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7984822].message }}

Fernando1954

11 years ago

That would be great if you do, the documentation is a bit confusing as to what is web based and what is not.

Originally Posted by dennis09

Sucked worse than rewinding an early 90s cassette tape.

Edit: I just checked and it seems that my login for the web version still works despite the cancellation. I'll give it another go tonight as well to see whats been updated. Dans a pretty cool guy and helped me through a few struggles so id hate to end this with a negative review.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7986549].message }}

Mike Anthony 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Fernando1954

That would be great if you do, the documentation is a bit confusing as to what is web based and what is not.

Ahh..Yeah haven't tried it yet but I see now I misread the sales page. Apparently creation is done by the same ubot setup Dennis didn't like
- Thanks
Signature
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7988062].message }}

dennis09

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Fernando1954

That would be great if you do, the documentation is a bit confusing as to what is web based and what is not.

Yeah I just checked and you still have to create accounts with the program and then upload to the web based tool in order to work with them. I have to say though that despite being a ubot based program it still works very well with a high success rate.
Worth considering I guess if you only need the accounts created.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

There is no elevator to success, you have to take the stairs

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7988294].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by dennis09

Yeah I just checked and you still have to create accounts with the program and then upload to the web based tool in order to work with them. I have to say though that despite being a ubot based program it still works very well with a high success rate.
Worth considering I guess if you only need the accounts created.

can you export the data (logins and password) to CSV or excel?? If so I would go with it.

As an update - just in a matter of days MS success rate has fallen to less than 50% for me.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7988341].message }}

dennis09 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

can you export the data (logins and password) to CSV or excel?? If so I would go with it.

Yep, you can export no problem.

The new web 2.0 addon for GSA looks promising as well.
- Thanks
Signature

There is no elevator to success, you have to take the stairs
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7988558].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by hop

my ZENBLOG works fine with this platforms and has much more blogs and web 2.0 profiles. Cost is only $89 + zennoposter licence required.

Not entirely accurate. You also charge a monthly fee

Zenblog has better quality links than Senuke. Senuke is too popular and has many services spammed.

Well I tell you hop - I did take a look at Zenblog when it came out and three things stopped me.

A) Being built to work on top of ZP it just seems so clunky.

B) I just didn't and don't see (months later) your business model working. requiring people to buy one piece of software from one company (ZP) then buy your template which you sell mostly at forums ends up requiring the users to jump through two purchases and learning one software before they can use yours and then learning to use that too. Its awkward and since that limits sales I have strong doubts how long you will be around which leads to

C) You cannot compare Zenblog to Senuke,MS, Licorne etc. You lock off recording and editing features in ZB even though Zenno has the ability to record. Your reply to me when asked on ZP's forum about the possibility of editing was to say the Zenblog is not Open source. So when the client pays nearly $300 or more for ZP and ZB (which only runs in ZP) if a service is not updated they have to hope you will you update it because they can't use the recorder to fix it.

So since I have no confidence in your business model I would fear in any month I might have software that can only do one thing - take up space on my hard drive.

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7979676].message }}

hop

11 years ago

[DELETED]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7982821].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by hop

@Mike
Zenblog need subscription far updates but I know many clients use zenblog successfull without subscription or buy month subscrption $12 after 3 months without subscription. It helps with every day updates.

Did you read the OP? Web 2.0 sites change constantly. You lock up Zenblog so tight the users can make no changes so its ridiculous to claim that people can just pay $89 without paying additional subscription cash. If they don't they will end up with high failure rates like the OP refers to and eventually almost none will work. I don't wrong you for wanting subscription fees to update web 2.0s. I just think its wrong to claim $89 and thats it like you did. Plus I personally would find it annoying to buy a tool that can record and edit just to run another software (zenblog) which specifically stops me from recording and editing.

Links are higher quality from this software.

Hop you might have a few different sites (just as some other software has different ones too) but your list has many of the same sites. Software doesn't determine the quality of the links the sites do.

Thanks

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7982915].message }}

GGpaul

11 years ago

Dumb question but I must ask. What's the need of these web 2.0's if you have a high PR blog network of your own?

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7979756].message }}

Mike Anthony 11 years ago

Originally Posted by GGpaul

Dumb question but I must ask. What's the need of these web 2.0's if you have a high PR blog network of your own?

I would answer that question but its 10:30 Cali time and you should be at work not reading WF.

anyway one answer is for some diversity.
- [ 1 ] Thanks
Signature
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7979861].message }}

GGpaul

11 years ago

Haha. It's downtime. This job is super chill man. That of course, DON'T WANT TO GET FIRED. My boss wanted me to do blog commenting just to test if i knew about SEO. Afterwards, he said erase that. We're not doing blog commenting at all, but moreso link outreach. Sponsored sponsored sponsored sponsored.

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7980390].message }}

Slin

11 years ago

I know people already mentioned zenno but that's the first thing that comes to mind.

Other idea? Go to a college campus or search online and find a guy to make a program for you. It wouldn't be too hard, the hardest part would be multi-threading which is why i'd say zenno or magic submitter (which you already use)

I think someone down at BH was working on a web2.0 software that would submit to the top 10 web2.0 sites or something, but I dunno what happened to that.

Is Ubot any good? I never really checked it out. I've heard that zenno is better anyway.

But to be honest there isn't anything out there that fulfills your needs, you're completely right, if someone made such a program they'd make bank.

Hmm my roomate is a programmer...I wonder.

Thanks

Signature

search engine cloaking

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7988193].message }}

boosters

11 years ago

There is currently NO web2.0 submitter software released. You can try out online service like Rankwyz which i think they giving out 40+ high PR web 2.0 sites but you have to create accounts one by one their or pay the small amount to get the accounts.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7988206].message }}

Fernando1954

11 years ago

I took the plunge and bought his WSO for access to the full control seo private forum. I asked what does what with the 2 tools and he replied with this.

The software is for creating accounts and the web tool does the rest. Make sure you save your web account login details under the tools/settings menu in the software then you can have the accounts automatically added to the web tool as they get created.

Still not sure what he means by (the web tool does the rest) will have to study the videos more

[ 1 ] Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7990387].message }}

dp40oz

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Fernando1954

I took the plunge and bought his WSO for access to the full control seo private forum. I asked what does what with the 2 tools and he replied with this.

The software is for creating accounts and the web tool does the rest. Make sure you save your web account login details under the tools/settings menu in the software then you can have the accounts automatically added to the web tool as they get created.

Still not sure what he means by (the web tool does the rest) will have to study the videos more

Hey by that I meant the web tool does the submissions and everything associated with it (scheduling, linking, pics & videos ect..). It holds your articles, does the spinning, holds your link sets, your blurbs. It gives you access to the other SEO tools, allows you to use our auto-login plugin to login to your accounts with a click of a button. It does everything except create the accounts and the profile updating at the moment

Thanks

Signature

The Keyword Research Tool You've Been Waiting For!
Keyword Research - Competitor Analysis - Rank Tracking - Keyword Difficulty - White Label Reporting

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7991339].message }}

sciguy40

11 years ago

Now that it has been a few days - I am curious as to how your experience has been with these guys. If you don't mind sharing with us ...

Originally Posted by Fernando1954

I took the plunge and bought his WSO for access to the full control seo private forum. I asked what does what with the 2 tools and he replied with this.

The software is for creating accounts and the web tool does the rest. Make sure you save your web account login details under the tools/settings menu in the software then you can have the accounts automatically added to the web tool as they get created.

Still not sure what he means by (the web tool does the rest) will have to study the videos more

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8011804].message }}

Fernando1954 11 years ago

Well i took the plunge and took out first month with the FCS Networker, there was a few problems getting things going at first.

They have been sorted now and the support was really good and fast sorting the problems. Have only managed to do 1 run of submitions at the moment 6 accounts created no problem.

Since then not had time, my sites on one host seem to have been hacked working with hosts trying to sort it think it might be this as i have on my sites.

http://blog.sucuri.net/2013/04/update-wp-super-cache-and-w3tc-immediately-remote-code-execution-vulnerability-disclosed.html

Then to top it off my ecommerce cubecart sites on another hosting stopped working after the hosting upgraded there servers, so been trying to get that sorted as well,im really naffed off at the moment.

Will update how its gone with FCS when i have everything sorted and get to spend a few hours working with it.

Originally Posted by sciguy40

Now that it has been a few days - I am curious as to how your experience has been with these guys. If you don't mind sharing with us ...
- [ 1 ] Thanks
- 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8012585].message }}
- Mike Anthony 11 years ago
  
  Initial Quick review of FCS Networker
  
  A little confusing signing up at the moment. Paypal gives you some passwords but they turn out to be useless and not what you need. Had a corrupted download a few times but third time was the charm and dug the real passwords out of my spam folder.
  
  I was prepare to like the web part of the setup and not like the account creator when I fired it up.
  
  However was surprised - Nowhere near as slow as I had been told it was (recent update). Probably the most drop down dead easy setup I have ever seen. You can actually get away with just naming the campaign and hitting auto generate for everything else. Haven't even cracked the manual yet and boom I was off making accounts.
  
  I counted about 42 Web 2.0s in all (most of the well known ones are in there)
  
  successfully created looks like 37. Even on My 2 gig memory VPS it had little problem - not the fastest but not painfully slow or anything.
  
  I like it. The fact that it is made in Ubot might turn some people off but I think its a plus that the company can train people on Ubot and then have them update the sites without needing programmers. It means its easier to update and faster.
  
  I still have to give Magic submitter the edge on some things. More features and capabilities plus you can go in and change the script yourself. However if they keep updating then for $27 its pretty good and will stay in my tool kit.
  
  Next I will try out the submission aspect with the web based part of it. Looking around in the panel seems a bit light. Don't see a whole lot of content integrations as compared to Rankwyzz but it has a whole lot more generous submissions and sites per month and comes in way cheaper at almost every level.
  
  Will dig more into that later but I would give the creator part of it good marks. It just bumped SEOLR completely out of the picture for me. WIth MS and this I think I am set with account creation.
  
  lol at this rate I will have to start that blog I been promising myself to - just to write these reviews.
  
  [ 2 ] Thanks
  
  Signature
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8021712].message }}

dp40oz

11 years ago

Hey guys just wanted to chime in as FCS Networker is my product and it seems there is a lot of confusion about it.

We have software that does account creation, theme updating ect… As other members have reported the software has great success rates. We update constantly and make sure that aside from some oddball issues, like slow server times or downed sites that our software is up to date. Is it the fastest software out there?… No… But we do believe we have consistently better success rates than any other web 2.0 software on the market. All you need to do is enter your web tool email & password into the software and it automatically loads your accounts right into the web tool after each account creation.

Our main focus has been the web interface which is about as cutting edge as you can get. You can login into any of your accounts, submit, schedule, create pyramids, link wheels ect… You can auto-link, auto add vids & pics, download your successful URL's, spin articles, import bulk accounts and bulk articles. It supports open platform sites like elgg, phpfox, mediawiki, dolphin, wordpress, wordpress mu plus over 50 web 2.0 sites like Tumblr, Livejournal, ect… We focused on this first because if users want to use other software to create accounts they can do that and then use our web tool to control their networks. We have continually upgraded and strive to be on top of the game so our account creator will see continued speed improvements as well.

The reason for the separation of the account creation and the web submissions is because of legal issues. Whether using proxies or not, having thousands of accounts created from our servers is not recommended by our lawyers. It puts us in a potentially rough position. We are trying to figure out the best way to make this happen though as we have already built a web based account creation system before we found out about the potential legal problems with doing this.

We just ended beta and are about done fixing the last few kinks. Then we will be really kicking off our promotion of this new tool. This tool has a lot to it so we've created tons of tutorials that you can view on any page of the web tool, plus a pdf and video tutorials for the software. We're working our butts off on it!

[ 3 ] Thanks

Signature

The Keyword Research Tool You've Been Waiting For!
Keyword Research - Competitor Analysis - Rank Tracking - Keyword Difficulty - White Label Reporting

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7991286].message }}

GGpaul

11 years ago

man why did you start this thread mike? I'm like figuring out what web 2.0 I should get. Seems like there's none as of yet

Thanks

Signature

RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7995055].message }}

Make Money Ninja

11 years ago

I use Rankwyz almost exclusively now, i have am now approaching 1000 blogs which i keep updated with spun content. Have over 50k indexed posts linking to my site from these.

Only downside is theres only a few hundred IP's, but beats just churning shit with SEnuke.

If someone made an industrial software that could either do what Rankwyz does, or, a web 2.0 submitter that did something like simplesolutions do. That would be super valuable to me also.

Right now the closest thing i have is a drupal mod for Xrumer that makes drupal blog posts.

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

The Ultimate Guide To Link Building
Get More Links - Generate More Traffic - Make More Money!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7995061].message }}

AugustineZ 11 years ago

Yea I'm, seriously considering RankWyz also. Looks good
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7997655].message }}

sciguy40

11 years ago

After checking out the Rankwyz site, I don't see where their system creates Web2.0 accounts. Am I reading this right?

Originally Posted by Make Money Ninja

I use Rankwyz almost exclusively now, i have am now approaching 1000 blogs which i keep updated with spun content. Have over 50k indexed posts linking to my site from these.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8011811].message }}

Mike Anthony 11 years ago

Originally Posted by sciguy40

After checking out the Rankwyz site, I don't see where their system creates Web2.0 accounts. Am I reading this right?

Yes you are reading it right. It doesn't. Quite a few people are just not bothering to read the OP. They will sell you premade ones but if you have a lot of projects and plan to have alot more the cost will run up very fast.
- [ 1 ] Thanks
Signature
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8012335].message }}

lucus81

11 years ago

Hi,
Anyone use weontech.com?

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7997331].message }}

bboyspyder

11 years ago

Ultimate Demon is the best for this task IMO.

I am selling my personal license for UD. If anybody is interested PM me.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8011878].message }}

Fernando1954

11 years ago

What type of proxies did you use to get the best account creation success.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8025055].message }}

Mike Anthony 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Fernando1954

What type of proxies did you use to get the best account creation success.

buyproxies semi private,

UPDATE - in further operations the UBOT limitation does show up. On just 4 threads it eats up a bit of memory and on some runs freezed up and had to be shut down. Put on two threads everything hummed along.

I am not a mass blaster so this might be too limiting to you if you are. You can set it to run multiple sets at a time so I just set that and left it to run on one of my VPS machines and came back in an hour or two.
- Thanks
Signature
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8028802].message }}

GGpaul

11 years ago

$34 a month? Cheap!

Thanks

Signature

RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8328897].message }}

nik0

Banned 11 years ago

Just tested the FCS Network submission tool on my self hosted sites and it does it's job very well so far (ok doesn't take rocket science but the posts look nice with the images automatically scraped and such).

Will test it later this week on web2.0 accounts.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8332237].message }}

donalld

11 years ago

Money Robot has 60 web 2.0 blogs supported in this moment (great succes rate). Any experiences with it?

Sent you a PM, Mike. Thank you

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8337121].message }}

danparks

11 years ago

Mike Anthony and Fernando1954 two strong recommendations for FCS Networker made me take the plunge. At $34 for a month not much of a gamble so I just signed up. Do you recommend looking over all the tutorial videos they supply, or just jumping in and messing around with it?

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8342532].message }}

Andrewsfm

11 years ago

FCS is pretty good, decided to try it and it lives up to its rep

Thanks

Signature

FREE WORKSHOP - "How To Earn Your First $1,000 In The Next 30 Days Minus All The Guesswork"

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8346468].message }}

GGpaul

11 years ago

I have some sites to mess around with. I'll give FCS a shot. Spinning necessary?

Thanks

Signature

RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8348018].message }}

andishm

11 years ago

SenukeX failure rate is high
Magic Submitter has similiar issues
GSA is really built around the idea of platforms and those footprints
Licorne which I really like has almost no custom web 2.0s because they had to yank all of them as not working
Kevo has like 9 and half for me fail.
Tried SEOLR which I did find refreshing direct and simple until it failed half the 30 web 2.0s it had. I was surprised at how much I like that simplicity and Steve is close to making the tool I and others need. IF he could just add like ten more good ones and make sure they work I'd be on board.

Give a try to "Money Robot Submitter" may be new name for you but atleast try their 7 days full free trial and use their web 2.0 blog features which contains real high PR web 20 blog sites and check and judge yourself

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Backup.Countryâ„¢ - Automated cloud backups for PC, Laptop & Servers
Logon to https://backup.country/
31% Off Coupon code: WORLDBACKUPDAY

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8349548].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by andishm

Give a try to "Money Robot Submitter" may be new name for you but atleast try their 7 days full free trial and use their web 2.0 blog features which contains real high PR web 20 blog sites and check and judge yourself

I am for now staying WAAAAAY away from Money robot submitter. Only people I see pushing it are people i never have seen before on the forums (except kevin) With them wanting $500 up front with the only real extra feature being web 2.0s that have a high success rate (which almost all new services claim and have at first) its a DEFINITE PASS.

Sure Magic submitter and UD and senukex have high yearly or lifetime fees but they are established. Clunking down $500 for software developers that have not proven they will be around is a recipe for flushing the money down the toilet. The seven day trial would not even help my number one concern. New software runs like gangbusters for a launch but Web 2.os take constant updates and thats where most fall down.

So I have no qualms with FCS and you can even find it for $27 a month through their WSO or discounts available on the net.

[ 2 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8350391].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

I am for now staying WAAAAAY away from Money robot submitter. Only people I see pushing it are people i never have seen before on the forums (except kevin) With them wanting $500 up front with the only real extra feature being web 2.0s that have a high success rate (which almost all new services claim and have at first) its a DEFINITE PASS.

Sure Magic submitter and UD and senukex have high yearly or lifetime fees but they are established. Clunking down $500 for software developers that have not proven they will be around is a recipe for flushing the money down the toilet. The seven day trial would not even help my number one concern. New software runs like gangbusters for a launch but Web 2.os take constant updates and thats where most fall down.

So I have no qualms with FCS and you can even find it for $27 a month through their WSO or discounts available on the net.

That's real sweet of you, Disclaiming me

Check back tomorrow, opening a monthly sub on it. No software is established, until its established. But they all started at the same pricing.

I only played a consulting role in development. Trying to give people the quality Tier1's they really want to post to. And trying to give Nic and Rob a leg up in launching. Time will tell I guess, But from what I've seen under the hood. It will be an SEO software household name before long.

Others, especially Senuke have really gone downhill on the properties they are posting too. So even the most established are now neglecting their customers wishes, to save on programmer fees.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8350478].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

That's real sweet of you, Disclaiming me

and I thought i was claiming you

Check back tomorrow, opening a monthly sub on it. No software is established, until its established. But they all started at the same pricing.

Fair enough Kevin. From a new software I would take a look at a subscription and see how reliable over time the software is. Yeah got to admit I was even more suspicious when I saw it deleted but then just realized just about every tool here we have discussed will be either locked or deleted (FCS is already and seems GSA too)

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8350532].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

just about every tool here we have discussed will be either locked or deleted (FCS is already and seems GSA too)

Yeah IMO, not giving website visitors what they are looking for (Auto Software), is a dangerous path for long term WF user growth. But that's Allen's decision to make so.
Wondering now, if that new rule will pass through into the Link Sellers who offer services based around software submissions. That's a lot of WSO SEO packages that will get wiped out too. And a lot of peoples business's who have lived off WF traffic.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8350601].message }}

PerformanceMan

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

Yeah IMO, not giving website visitors what they are looking for (Auto Software), is a dangerous path for long term WF user growth. But that's Allen's decision to make so.
Wondering now, if that new rule will pass through into the Link Sellers who offer services based around software submissions. That's a lot of WSO SEO packages that will get wiped out too. And a lot of peoples business's who have lived off WF traffic.

Welcome to modern reality. Those Google Guidelines are pretty clear now. If WF wants to remain in Google's index, they'll have to tow the line - just like everyone else.

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

Free Special Report on Mindset - Level Up with Positive Thinking

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8350642].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by PerformanceMan

Welcome to modern reality. Those Google Guidelines are pretty clear now. If WF wants to remain in Google's index, they'll have to tow the line - just like everyone else.

Please spare us your nonsense at least for a day. Google has never deindexed a forum for allowing others to sell software of any kind and the seller sites of the software not only are not deindexed many of them are ranked for appropriate keywords.

Meanwhile WF still offers many things that do not fit into Google guidelines. The rules only indicate software that is used for spamming. So much to your horror - seo services, Seo network building and even training others on how to use them

are still very much within the rules as stated.

As usual this is more about what you want reality to be not what it really is.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8350756].message }}

PerformanceMan

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Please spare us your nonsense at least for a day. Google has never deindexed a forum for allowing others to sell software of any kind and the seller sites of the software not only are not deindexed many of them are ranked for appropriate keywords.

Meanwhile WF still offers many things that do not fit into Google guidelines. The rules only indicate software that is used for spamming. So much to your horror - seo services, Seo network building and even training others on how to use them

are still very much within the rules as stated.

As usual this is more about what you want reality to be not what it really is.

Oh yeah, great logic there. Since Google has 'never' deindexed a forum, they 'never' will.

Man, Aristotle is rolling over in his grave when he sees what happened to his invention of deductive reasoning.

Anthony (lol, great name), you need to stop posting these ridiculous garbage Black Hat threads. Warrior Forum is a place for decent folk. They've tolerated trash like you for long enough.

All you do is advocate breaking Google's rules. You charge morons to help them break the rules too. What a parasitic business model you have.

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

Free Special Report on Mindset - Level Up with Positive Thinking

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8353814].message }}

Mike Anthony 11 years ago

Originally Posted by PerformanceMan

some clown from Ireland

They've tolerated trash like you for long enough.

Since I see many other members on this forum now see the complete nonsense of your posts I need not bother with you too much but keep up with the personal name calling and we can make sure you know what exactly a WSO feels like when it is banned.

Among other things you are now demonstrating your hypocrisy. Two months ago you were crying a river because you got slapped for BUYING links. Anyone can see your business model go down in flames here

http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...-link-ads.html

so basically you are chiding people for buying domains while you used to buy links :rolleyes: and most of your rants are based on very little experience doing social. Business model? You dare bring up business model when you have none? but by all means bash The WF part of business. It always gets people to take a look at my sig resulting in more sales.

THANKS!

P.S. Meanwhile on my training forum just had a conversation with one of my students where his network was ranking his new sit quite nicely.
- Thanks
- 1 reply
Signature
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8354428].message }}
- Mike Anthony 11 years ago
  
  Kevin I have added to my review something I meant to say earlier and that is I think the program has potential. Its not horrible. its one of the easiest to get started (as you implied it does not even need a manual). I just think it needs more for that price point. Good luck to you and PM me if they are open to suggestions
  
  [ 1 ] Thanks
  
  Signature
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8354478].message }}
Mike Anthony 11 years ago

Originally Posted by PerformanceMan

Oh yeah, great logic there. Since Google has 'never' deindexed a forum, they 'never' will.

Missed this gem of logic before. No I am saying that daydreaming that they will deindex a forum doesn't mean they ever will. Got it now?

but thanks for admitting to the board that they never have and you drew it up out of your imagination.
- Thanks
Signature
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8354614].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by PerformanceMan

Welcome to modern reality. Those Google Guidelines are pretty clear now. If WF wants to remain in Google's index, they'll have to tow the line - just like everyone else.

Sorry PerformanceMan, I do like you on the WF boards. But what you just said about welcoming me to modern reality. And WF risk getting de-indexed because they have SEO software sales threads.

Could only be described as the most dillusional assumption anyone could make, as to why WF are moving toward removing such threads. Where on earth did you pull that conclusion from?

WF have decided to not allow the promotion of automated SEO tools that may be "built for spam". In my opinion it would be a decision based on their own moderators spending hours a day, cleaning up such spam.

I'm starting to think your last bump on the head, has left your brain 2 Sandwiches short of a Picnic.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351075].message }}

yukon Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

In my opinion it would be a decision based on their own moderators spending hours a day, cleaning up such spam.

Yet WF leaves the front door wide open for spammers (no forum registration fee), which is the reason I stopped reporting spam that's obviously automated. Example, there's no reason to report stuff like this.

I don't have a problem reporting the IM spammers (usually not automated), but it's just stupid to be reporting the automated spam when nobody cares enough to stop the spam from happening in the first place. A simple $1 registration fee would stop most automated spam on this forum.

I'm not trying to be a prick about the automated spam, I just find it useless to report something that's basically allowed (front door open). It's like someone leaving the front door open on their house, then complaining when all the insects start going into the house (duh..., close the door).
- Thanks
- 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351115].message }}
- Kevin Maguire 11 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by yukon
  
  A simple $1 registration fee
  
  I had to pay $10 to Reg at WF. That's why I have that registered member thing beside my Avatar. They must have removed the fee since.
  
  Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351147].message }}

bluecoyotemedia

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

Yeah IMO, not giving website visitors what they are looking for (Auto Software), is a dangerous path for long term WF user growth. But that's Allen's decision to make so.
Wondering now, if that new rule will pass through into the Link Sellers who offer services based around software submissions. That's a lot of WSO SEO packages that will get wiped out too. And a lot of peoples business's who have lived off WF traffic.

Kevin

my man I keep asking.. do you have any tutorials for this program..??

thanks

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Skunkworks: noun. informal.

A clandestine group operating without any external intervention or oversight. Such groups achieve significant breakthroughs rarely discussed in public because they operate "outside the box".
https://short-stuff.com/-Mjk0fDExOA==

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8350974].message }}

Kevin Maguire 11 years ago

Originally Posted by bluecoyotemedia

Kevin

my man I keep asking.. do you have any tutorials for this program..??

thanks

Shit sorry fella, I forgot all about that pm. I will shoot you the link asap.
- Thanks
- 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351083].message }}
- Mike Anthony 11 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire
  
  I forgot all about that pm. I will shoot you the link asap.
  
  Send it over to me as well. Since you are going to a subscription in a few days I will give the trial a buzz.
  
  Thanks
  
  1 reply
  
  Signature
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351088].message }}
  
  Kevin Maguire 11 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony
  
  Send it over to me as well. Since you are going to a subscription in a few days I will give the trial a buzz.
  
  Link
  
  Installation
  
  An OG like you shouldn't need manuals
  
  Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351102].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

scratch what I said about WSO and I have edited my comments about Money robot.

Apparently software like that can no longer be sold here. Their (and some other WSOs) were locked with this notice

"You may not sell any product here that endorses, enables, or facilitates the sending of unsolicited bulk messages via email, private messaging systems, or other channels meant for one-to-one communication, or the spamming of forums, chat systems, or social networking sites.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8350436].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

scratch what I said about WSO and I have edited my comments about Money robot.

Apparently software like that can no longer be sold here. Their (and some other WSOs) were locked with this notice

Yep, Paul M choked me like a Chicken. Then deep fried a bunch of other software WSO's along with me. C'est la vie.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8350494].message }}

GGpaul

11 years ago

Kevin, you're like my new favorite guy here. An asshole but straight to the point and funny as hell. Need more of those!

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351108].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by GGpaul

Kevin, you're like my new favorite guy here. An asshole but straight to the point and funny as hell. Need more of those!

Can't believe I just thanked you for calling me an asshole. But we are all adults here, and should be able to accept each others opinions like such.

Also I noticed it would make my 600th post. Which is marking me as an upcoming WF addict.

Thanks GGP

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351129].message }}

yukon Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

Also I noticed it would make my 600th post. Which is marking me as an upcoming WF addict.

Grasshopper.
- [ 1 ] Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351133].message }}

GGpaul

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

Can't believe I just thanked you for calling me an asshole. But we are all adults here, and should be able to accept each others opinions like such.

Also I noticed it would make my 600th post. Which is marking me as an upcoming WF addict.

Thanks GGP

Hahahah. Your avatar was different back then was it not? Asshole in a good way though! (Not being sarcastic). My boss is an asshole but he pushed me to become better in SEO

.

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351192].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by GGpaul

Hahahah. Your avatar was different back then was it not? Asshole in a good way though! (Not being sarcastic). My boss is an asshole but he pushed me to become better in SEO

.

Yeah my first Ava was a pic of my kid. I think the "Gingers have Souls" guy suits me better.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351204].message }}

burton4550

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

Yeah my first Ava was a pic of my kid. I think the "Gingers have Souls" guy suits me better.

Is this a similar software to Rankwyz or is it better?

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351458].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by burton4550

Is this a similar software to Rankwyz or is it better?

One toy I've never played with so I don't know sorry. Rankwyz looks more like a blog management system. I really don't know sorry.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351929].message }}

burton4550

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

One toy I've never played with so I don't know sorry. Rankwyz looks more like a blog management system. I really don't know sorry.

Yeah that's what it is more of, I thought that's what yours was to, but I read up on it a little bit more and it differs quite a bit.

When are you guys going to roll out with the monthly fee for it?

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8352037].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by burton4550

Yeah that's what it is more of, I thought that's what yours was to, but I read up on it a little bit more and it differs quite a bit.

When are you guys going to roll out with the monthly fee for it?

Should be set up in the next 24 hours. But listen. This is not a sales thread for software so, its really not the place for pre-sales or customer support.
We'll both end up getting our asses smacked for turning this thread into one.

You'll catch Nic on Skype in the morning. username: Money.Robot

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8352059].message }}

burton4550

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

Should be set up in the next 24 hours. But listen. This is not a sales thread for software so, its really not the place for pre-sales or customer support.
We'll both end up getting our asses smacked for turning this thread into one.

You'll catch Nic on Skype in the morning. username: Money.Robot

Ok thanks Kevin, appreciate the info.

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8354548].message }}

yukon

Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by GGpaul

Hahahah. Your avatar was different back then was it not? Asshole in a good way though! (Not being sarcastic). My boss is an asshole but he pushed me to become better in SEO

.

Spaceballs- "Keep firing assholes!" -...

[ 3 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351217].message }}

GGpaul

11 years ago

Spaceballs. Awesome movie.

Thanks

Signature

RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351234].message }}

GGpaul

11 years ago

Anyways, I'll mess around with some of these 2.0's submitters on some of my crappy easy $$ sites. See how that goes lol.

Thanks

Signature

RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351275].message }}

donalld

11 years ago

Kevin, are you owner of Money Robot?

Thanks

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351419].message }}

donalld

11 years ago

Sent you a PM.

Thanks

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8351425].message }}

YorkieBoy

11 years ago

The money robot spinner is going for $67 a month or $497 lifetime.

There's no mention of success rates or the accounts that it will auto create. Has anyone tried this yet?

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8352194].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by daveg1960

The money robot spinner is going for $67 a month or $497 lifetime.

There's no mention of success rates or the accounts that it will auto create. Has anyone tried this yet?

Yes buttons up.
There's a Trail. So...Trail it and see..

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8352333].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

Originally Posted by daveg1960

There's no mention of success rates or the accounts that it will auto create. Has anyone tried this yet?

Took it for a run but so far can't see buying it - review so far

Good interface and pretty straightforward to use.
Web 2.0 list nothing special - nowhere near as impressive as advertised. (don't see tumblr or blogger for example)
Slow so far -slower than FCS for some reason.
Good success but FCS has more properties

Not seeing the price still. Magic submitter goes for that and has a lot more in there. To me this is like half the price or maybe one time price in the region of Article Kevo or Licorne. Will stick with FCS for now and see how it comes along.

HOWEVER let me add in fairness that I do think its a nice start for a piece of software that could be built into something very good.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8352490].message }}

YorkieBoy

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Took it for a run but so far can't see buying it - review so far

Good interface and pretty straightforward to use.
Web 2.0 list nothing special - nowhere near as impressive as advertised. (don't see tumblr or blogger for example)
Slow so far -slower than FCS for some reason.
Good success but FCS has more properties

Not seeing the price still. Magic submitter goes for that and has a lot more in there. To me this is like half the price or maybe one time price in the region of Article Kevo or Licorne. Will stick with FCS for now and see how it comes along.

Hi Mike
I've been taking note of your feedback, thanks for the updates
The money robot is $67 per month

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8352718].message }}

PerformanceMan

11 years ago

Originally Posted by daveg1960

Hi Mike
I've been taking note of your feedback, thanks for the updates
The money robot is $67 per month

Way too much for a piece of crap spam software created by some clown from Ireland. I mean, can we get serious here?

Wouldn't you rather spend that money on something fun? You really want to sit around for three months running that silly software 24 hours per day until your website is eventually banned? Go get a girlfriend instead is my advice.

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

Free Special Report on Mindset - Level Up with Positive Thinking

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8353820].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by PerformanceMan

Way too much for a piece of crap spam software created by some clown from Ireland. I mean, can we get serious here?

Wouldn't you rather spend that money on something fun? You really want to sit around for three months running that silly software 24 hours per day until your website is eventually banned? Go get a girlfriend instead is my advice.

Not my creation. But I do wear a Clown costume at my desk.

I also heard you went flat broke buying into TextLinkAds. Those Google rule breakers are evil folk altogether.

Any chance I can get your Fiverr Gig url? I need a couple of FB fanpages whipped up.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8353846].message }}

PerformanceMan

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

Not my creation. But I do wear a Clown costume at my desk.

Obviously. You must have been dreaming thinking you were going to get people to spend $497 on that substandard crap.

And then you got BANNED from the WSO section. LOL, the clown suit fits.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Free Special Report on Mindset - Level Up with Positive Thinking

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8353855].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by PerformanceMan

Obviously. You must have been dreaming thinking you were going to get people to spend $497 on that substandard crap.

And then you got BANNED from the WSO section. LOL, the clown suit fits.

No seriously now, I know my post on the other thread might have upset you, http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...ml#post8353568

But all that happened here was a recent change to WSO rules. They removed all submitter software. Even the ones, you have probably bought yourself. You can't even interpret information that's right in front correctly.

Your becoming so irrational and illogical, that your bordering on becoming female.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8353912].message }}

YorkieBoy

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

No seriously now, I know my post on the other thread might have upset you, http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...ml#post8353568

But all that happened here was a recent change to WSO rules. They removed all submitter software. Even the ones, you have probably bought yourself. You can't even interpret information that's right in front correctly.

Your becoming so irrational and illogical, that your bordering on becoming female.

Kevin, your trying to engage an unharmed man in a battle of wits. Just throw him a banana

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8354220].message }}

YorkieBoy

11 years ago

Originally Posted by PerformanceMan

Way too much for a piece of crap spam software created by some clown from Ireland. I mean, can we get serious here?

Wouldn't you rather spend that money on something fun? You really want to sit around for three months running that silly software 24 hours per day until your website is eventually banned? Go get a girlfriend instead is my advice.

2000 + quotes in 10 months and he tells me to get a girlfriend.

Actually I could very easily get a girlfriend but I doubt the wife would see the funny side. Some people have no sense of humor.

As you may know, humor is often inherited; obviously, sharing the same parentage with your wife means you will have many similarities, including being bedded by very same set of incestuous parents.

While we are on the subject of inbreeding, give my regards to your grandparents, all two of them.

Now run along and get your medication, all the evidence suggests it's more than a little overdue

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8354194].message }}

Michael Carlin

11 years ago

Originally Posted by daveg1960

Actually I could very easily get a girlfriend but I doubt the wife would see the funny side. Some people have no sense of humor.

Bahahahahhahahahahaha

Can't you ask her to make it your Christmas AND birthday present?

Sorry nothing constructive to add, just had to give a thumbs up to that.

PerformanceMan... I can't even make a start on the things you have said.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Original and unique CMS Footprint tool for finding brand new backlink-targets.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8356120].message }}

YorkieBoy

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

No seriously now, I know my post on the other thread might have upset you, http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...ml#post8353568

But all that happened here was a recent change to WSO rules. They removed all submitter software. Even the ones, you have probably bought yourself. You can't even interpret information that's right in front correctly.

Your becoming so irrational and illogical, that your bordering on becoming female.

Originally Posted by Michael Carlin

Bahahahahhahahahahaha

Can't you ask her to make it your Christmas AND birthday present?

Sorry nothing constructive to add, just had to give a thumbs up to that.

PerformanceMan... I can't even make a start on the things you have said.

Good point, and I wouldn't be greedy neither, I'd even offer to share

[ 2 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8357176].message }}

YorkieBoy

11 years ago

I've been using it once or twice a day it for about 10 days and getting 35 - 42 on a regular basis. Although I do get the occasional blip. My lowest was 20 out of 50

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8432366].message }}

Fernando1954

11 years ago

Originally Posted by daveg1960

I've been using it once or twice a day it for about 10 days and getting 35 - 42 on a regular basis. Although I do get the occasional blip. My lowest was 20 out of 50

Same here, getting 35 - 40 every run, last few runs been getting 40 every time.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8432705].message }}

Mike Anthony 11 years ago

Well will have to check proxies etc because I still am getting no better than 60%
- Thanks
- 1 reply
Signature
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8434097].message }}
- Mike Anthony 11 years ago
  
  Just to update - Yes there was something wrong . My captchas were not setup properly. Now I get 40 or so a run.
  
  Thanks
  
  Signature
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8456285].message }}

mramp

11 years ago

you can build your own with ubot

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Stop Sucking: http://skinnyrichguy.com

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8456309].message }}

Michael Carlin 11 years ago

Originally Posted by mramp

you can build your own with ubot

I've tried that before, but it's a killer to keep maintained. I ran 25 sites... and I dropped it 3 months later because I couldn't keep up.

I should add that is was 18 months ago... and I can only imagine it's even harder now.
- Thanks
Signature

Original and unique CMS Footprint tool for finding brand new backlink-targets.
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8469603].message }}

Matthew Anton

10 years ago

The real problem isn't with the software, it's with the list of sites submitted to which degrades their value and gets them spammed. This is why manual web2.0 services will always trump automation because you can simply register to more web2.0s and platforms that the software simply can't.

Thanks

Signature

BacklinksIndexer - automated index/bulk links
TwitterBacklinks - retweets service
Web2.0Backlinks - web2.0 creation/link building
Google+ Matthew Anton

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9094202].message }}

RedShifted

10 years ago

SER Engines for GSA. And there is a bot on BHW that submits to the most popular web2.0.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9097301].message }}

Are there NO good WEB 2.O submitters out there????? Take my money NOW!!

Trending Topics

Been a while! Any of you Old Timers here?

How much does the rebranding affect CR ?

Are billboards still effective in driving customers?

Boat and Jet Ski Rentals...... Door Hangers Effective?

A Very Strange Internet Problem