Creating my Own Private PR Blog Network

Have fun with your SEO.

First and foremost, DANIELLEFAITH.ME is NOT the money site! That would be the stupidest thing if it was.

DanielleFaith.me is an entirely different tale that is a social expermiment. It makes $0 in profit. It was built by me as an attempt to get traffic from sources outside of Google, or from social media and word of mouth essentially. The site has done fairly okay for minimal effort it gets updated once a day, requires little to no maintenance and reports an okay amount of traffic.

More importantantly DanielleFaith.ME led to its sister site MySecretStash.ME which makes a pretty penny on Fiverr. Its nothing exciting, but an extra $500 monthly from a site that isn't ranking in Google and has nothing on it but has clever adverts and endorsements is pretty good IMHO. Not to mention the organic traffic is decent and I never once spent time doing any off page SEO for it.

DanielleFaith.me and MySecretStash.me were created as a way for me to express myself. They originally had no purpose on the web except to be like a diary of sorts for me. They turned into something other than that, so if you are going to critique my methods used with them please keep this information in mind.

Now, my latest project is going to be based on a leadership, beauty, and empowerment website. Its method for gathering traffic is going to be very SEO based vs. social media based. You see, if I can get traffic from Google and Social Media in an effective manner that is rinse and repeatable - there is no reason I cannot duplicate my efforts and pocketbook.

Of course, this takes times; energy, effort and sometimes money up front. I also believe it would be very immature/shortsighted/a huge mistake if I cut out one of the major sources for traffic, which is, GOOGLE! The same would be if I entirely depended on Google.

I'm thinking my private blog network would be more like a collection of mini-sites in the niche that could easily go from mini-site to authority site if I ever choose to change the purpose of a supporting site. Using these mini-niche private blog network sites aren't the only way I'll be driving traffic to my money site but it is the first way I will be and the method I am currently working on mastering.

Besides, having these secondary sites could be good if I ever wanted to conduct an experiment in the niche but not wanted to risk things with my money site.

The only reason I want PR - ready sites is because eventually I'll probably end up flipping them for profit and people are more apt to buy a well done mini-site that has the potential to become an authority if its PR is high. I don't know, there is still an audience that believes in the importance of Page Rank for SEO.

Also my rule is no RUBBISH! All articles no matter what the site is, needs to be of a decent length, unique, relevant and well written.

Does that make my intent more clear? Does it help you see that this is the next series in a set of experiments I've been conducting since March 2012?

I obviously don't want to lose the Page Rank because, it would interferre with the outcome and I want to see what happens in three different scenarios maintain the PR, increase PR, drop PR. Hence my original question about the number of articles.

xxx,

Jaysmyne

Can not agree more than this.

People who use only one traffic source is stupid. Yet, the stupidest thing is to leave a well targeted & quality flow of SE traffic aside, I swear.

If you want to fight in SERP with the giant/huge competitors, it's not worth the time, money and effort.

PBN is very effective in SERP, especially, when the diversification are upright. But, one must do it carefully; otherwise, it'll be a waste.

There's no relationship with how many posts that would take care of the PR. It's the matter of incoming links which are having higher PRs.

As an IMer, the whole game does not only having Google but also other traffic generation methods out there, so it wise to see if your sites are most comfortable with which methods.
For instance, 3 of my small niche sites are easy and based entirely on search engine traffic to generate some bucks daily. Yet, it's not working with social & other traffic at all.
In contrast, one of my authority site is really working so good with general traffic methods beside SEO; therefore, I'd not let my hand dirty with Google anymore for this site.

That tends to happen only to people who depend, directly or indirectly, on Google for their incomes.

It does indeed.

And as can be seen by spending some time reading through the SEO forum here (or elsewhere), it seems that almost invariably the big losers are the people who were willing to risk depending on SEO traffic. In the long run, for huge numbers of people, it just doesn't pay. Call me risk-averse if you really want to, but I have a mortgage and bills to pay every month, and I can't afford to depend on search engine traffic. You're never really in control, that way. I know there are always people whose friends' cousins and cousins' friends allegedly make money that way, but to many of us, it makes no real sense at all. I'm building up a long-term, financially sound business, here, and in my opinion Danielle would be well advised to try do the same, rather than this nonsense designed temporarily to manipulate Google's algorithms, for the sake of a bit of SEO traffic, which is typically about the worst-quality traffic you can ever attract anyway.

Only if you're stupid enough to be single source dependent.

Hey Joe - add the words 'for now' to your post, okay? So far you haven't been wacked by Google. That's because you're too much of a small fry and aren't on their radar. But Google slaps for PBNs are happening every single day and this has been going on for months.

Link penalties are real and they're a case of 'game over.' There are much better strategies out there that work and drive real targeted buyers to sites. Your day will come - same as it has for everyone else. Linking to your main site from a self created network of dropped domains is as artificial as it gets. It's a high-risk, potentially potentially low reward practice that is dangerous.

Valid? I wouldn't want to out the sites but there are some legal blog networks out there that bring lawyers some serious leads and cash. The sites in the network are killer real solid content networks that look and ARE solid sites in their own right - mind you NOT ten dollar articles. People here have no idea of how premium these network sites can get. I only was able to specify the networks because a lawyer aware of them pointed thwm out to me.

I was going to create WF largest multiquote post and file it under retard. .

But then I thought nah, The misinformation mills are helping me rank, time and time again. Keep them running scared big G. The more you confuse these fools, the more I'm getting paid.

The only part that I can kind of agree with is that most IM'ers fail terribly with Google. For many it's not as easy as it used to be and 95% of the IM'ers are seeking short cuts and always will.

From that point of view they would fail just as hard with getting traffic from other sources as that would require a lot of hard work and dedication while most people think that it's easy to get rich online.

Those people can better just give up and not get involved with internet marketing at all.