Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 05:23 AM   #851
Active Warrior
 
Join Date: 2010
Posts: 45
Thanks: 24
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by vetteran View Post

Study the user manual!
You missed some info in there.

By all means ask again if not clear. Good info from Casey a few posts above this.
I want to make sure I have the optimum settings for my specific domain/keword numbers that's why I was asking.

When I asked the question I hadn't seen the post above. Still not my specific numbers though.
RobynRed is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 05:30 AM   #852
Amazon Content Authority!
War Room Member
 
michaelmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2007
Location: The Emerald Isle
Posts: 2,550
Thanks: 1,031
Thanked 818 Times in 570 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by caseyallen View Post


-----------------------

@Michael, Just emailed you! =)

For 6 urls/5kws each/3se's .. you'd be safe with a Min: 5 Max: 15.

------------------------
Casey,

Just checking with you, the above setting on my app. has been running for approx. 9 hours and from what i can make out it is just about now finishing the first url completely. Would that be accurate; i think i still have the same
loop count displayed on my app.

Thanks,

Michael
michaelmac is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 05:39 AM   #853
Amazon Content Authority!
War Room Member
 
michaelmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2007
Location: The Emerald Isle
Posts: 2,550
Thanks: 1,031
Thanked 818 Times in 570 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Casey,

Maybe a crazy idea, i'm not sure but have you considered a Pause function to allow us to change proxies during a particularly large operation?

Just thinking aloud.

Michael
michaelmac is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 06:41 AM   #854
Travel, Discover & Learn!
 
TessaOmimaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 127
Thanks: 7
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Hi there

Haven't got my download link. Google order number: 414574915837374

Could you please let me know?

Thanks
TessaOmimaro is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 07:28 AM   #855
Fairly Idle Warrior
 
vetteran's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: EY UK
Posts: 54
Thanks: 12
Thanked 169 Times in 136 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

@TessaOmimaro
Give Casey a chance!

Loop time will be thus, if I understand correctly -

If Xn = domains
Yn = keywords
Z = number of search engine
A = no. threads

Therefore for n domains we get

(X1*Y1 + X2*Y2 . . Xn*Yn)*Z/A*min = total minimum time

and (X1*Y1 + X2*Y2 . . Xn*Yn)*Z/A*max = total maximum time

Actual time will depend then upon how fast and if the proxies
work, the response time in the SE, dwell time if in Sniper mode.
vetteran is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to vetteran For This Useful Post:
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 08:48 AM   #856
HyperActive Warrior
War Room Member
 
frodo77's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: Toronto/Jomtien
Posts: 126
Thanks: 89
Thanked 70 Times in 50 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Just bought.
Transaction ID: 0J416006LE991812L

Thanks, Jason.
frodo77 is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 09:19 AM   #857
David Ashenfelder
War Room Member
 
einfohound's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2008
Posts: 116
Thanks: 8
Thanked 52 Times in 35 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by caseyallen View Post

OK I gotcha! =)
So you have:
1 url & 3 kws = 3 searches
1 url & 2 kws = 2 searches
1 url & 1 kw = 1 search
1 url & 1 kw = 1 search
1 url & 1 kw = 1 search
So that's 8 searches.

Then you have:
Min: 5
Max: 10

That means it'll perform each search every 5-10 minutes.
So it'll run 8 searches with 5-10 minutes between each search.
So that's 40-80 minutes for those 8 searches.
Then you're running this across 8 threads.
So that's 1 search every 5-10 minutes.
BUT then you're doing this on 8 search engines.
So that'll take 40-80 minutes.

And for sites that take a few seconds to load, that can definitely take 1-2 hours PER Loop.
Casey,

I will have to continue this conversation until I have a good grasp of it - and I still do not (sorry for my "thick head").

The scenario that you answered here took 2 hours and 15 minutes. This still seems too long (based on this math). Maybe it is due to "slow" proxies. I don't think so. The proxies I am using are pretty good.

The second example I gave was for only THREE search engines and it still took 1 1/2 hours.

I have several questions that I would like answered that you seem to keep skipping over:

1.) What is the display across the bottom actually showing? If I have eight threads running, why does it only show one being processed at a time? The program shows one "loop" complete when the display at the bottom "loops" thru one complete set of urls/kw.

2.) Say it is taking 2 hours for the program to perform one "loop" for a run with eight keywords set up (like this one). This means that each keyword is only being "searched" for by the program 12 times in a given day (if the program is run constantly). I don't think this is enough times to affect how Google will rank a site. Look at the following example:

kw1 - gets 10,000 searches/month (exact) from Google
kw1 - this equals 333 searches/day

The #1 ranked site is going to get (on avg) 40% CTR. This means that the #1 site is going to get clicked on 133 times each day from "natural" search.

The #10 ranked site is going to get (on avg) 4% CTR. This means that the #10 site is going to get clicked on 13 times each day from "natural" search.

If the program is only simulating 12 clicks/day to my site, how is Google going to ever think my site should rank higher than #10 (let alone #1).

Sure, if you are trying to rank for a term that only gets 1,000 searches per month, this may work. But what if you are trying to rank for a term that get 100,000 searches per month. The amount of clicks that you are simulating is a drop in the bucket compared to what the sites that are ranked are already getting.
einfohound is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 09:26 AM   #858
Fairly Idle Warrior
 
vetteran's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: EY UK
Posts: 54
Thanks: 12
Thanked 169 Times in 136 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

@einfohound

I'd expect that you'd set your min, max and thread number to mimic, and perhaps slightly exceed, the expected search rate for that keyword.
vetteran is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to vetteran For This Useful Post:
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 09:33 AM   #859
Active Warrior
 
Join Date: 2009
Posts: 0
Thanks: 15
Thanked 64 Times in 32 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by einfohound View Post

Casey,

I will have to continue this conversation until I have a good grasp of it - and I still do not (sorry for my "thick head").

The scenario that you answered here took 2 hours and 15 minutes. This still seems too long (based on this math). Maybe it is due to "slow" proxies. I don't think so. The proxies I am using are pretty good.

The second example I gave was for only THREE search engines and it still took 1 1/2 hours.

I have several questions that I would like answered that you seem to keep skipping over:

1.) What is the display across the bottom actually showing? If I have eight threads running, why does it only show one being processed at a time? The program shows one "loop" complete when the display at the bottom "loops" thru one complete set of urls/kw.

2.) Say it is taking 2 hours for the program to perform one "loop" for a run with eight keywords set up (like this one). This means that each keyword is only being "searched" for by the program 12 times in a given day (if the program is run constantly). I don't think this is enough times to affect how Google will rank a site. Look at the following example:

kw1 - gets 10,000 searches/month (exact) from Google
kw1 - this equals 333 searches/day

The #1 ranked site is going to get (on avg) 40% CTR. This means that the #1 site is going to get clicked on 133 times each day from "natural" search.

The #10 ranked site is going to get (on avg) 4% CTR. This means that the #10 site is going to get clicked on 13 times each day from "natural" search.

If the program is only simulating 12 clicks/day to my site, how is Google going to ever think my site should rank higher than #10 (let alone #1).

Sure, if you are trying to rank for a term that only gets 1,000 searches per month, this may work. But what if you are trying to rank for a term that get 100,000 searches per month. The amount of clicks that you are simulating is a drop in the bucket compared to what the sites that are ranked are already getting.
I would say because it is getting 12 MORE clicks per day on top of the 13 it already gets? Perhaps that has something to do with it.
JustLookin is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to JustLookin For This Useful Post:
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 10:07 AM   #860
David Ashenfelder
War Room Member
 
einfohound's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2008
Posts: 116
Thanks: 8
Thanked 52 Times in 35 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by JustLookin View Post

I would say because it is getting 12 MORE clicks per day on top of the 13 it already gets? Perhaps that has something to do with it.
That only would apply if I (or you) had the #10 listed site. What if your site is #15 and you are only getting 1-2 clicks a day?
einfohound is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 10:17 AM   #861
David Ashenfelder
War Room Member
 
einfohound's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2008
Posts: 116
Thanks: 8
Thanked 52 Times in 35 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by vetteran View Post

@einfohound

I'd expect that you'd set your min, max and thread number to mimic, and perhaps slightly exceed, the expected search rate for that keyword.
That is kind of what I was insinuating (partly) with my questions. It seems like, if you were trying to rank for a search term with 10,000 searches/month, you would almost have to run SESniper with only one domain and one keyword and set your max at under 10 minutes. 10 minutes would give you 6/hour or 72/day (again for a term that the #1 site is getting 133 clicks/day).

On top of that, you would need to make sure you are using a bunch of proxies.

And how would you handle a search term that is getting 50-100K searches/month. You would have to run it with Max set to 1-2 minutes. Will this even work? How would multiple threads work with one url & one kw? Will the program start another instance with another IP (proxy) and simulate multiple searches at the same time?
einfohound is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 10:45 AM   #862
Active Warrior
War Room Member
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: Athens
Posts: 25
Thanks: 12
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Had the same issue this morning like @Amod (registration info).
I have to say that Casey gives a GREAT customer support.
He was there till we found the solution.

Last edited on 11th Dec 2010 at 10:48 AM. Reason: update info
goykos is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to goykos For This Useful Post:
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 10:45 AM   #863
David Ashenfelder
War Room Member
 
einfohound's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2008
Posts: 116
Thanks: 8
Thanked 52 Times in 35 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

I just ran another test. 1 URL, 3 keywords, 1 thread, min 5, max 10. It took 1:35 (one hour and 35 minutes) to complete. It seems like this should complete in 30-45 minutes.

I have to apologize to everyone (including Casey) for "taking over" this thread with this question/problem. I just need to know if I have something set wrong, or if I am understanding things wrong, or if I have wrong expectations for this program.

I have been running SESniper about 15-20 hours/day for the past 4-5 days on 4 sites (5 urls) for search terms that get 3,000-20,000 searches per month. None of them have moved up (one has dropped 2 positions). I don't expect "miracles", I just want to know that I am going down the right road. I don't mind waiting a couple weeks (or more) for results, but I don't want to get 2-3 weeks down the road to find out I have been running things wrong.

Thanks for your patience!
einfohound is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 11:15 AM   #864
Active Warrior
 
Join Date: 2010
Posts: 61
Thanks: 44
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by michaelmac View Post

Casey,

Maybe a crazy idea, i'm not sure but have you considered a Pause function to allow us to change proxies during a particularly large operation?

Just thinking aloud.

Michael
Hi Michael,
There are few people having same request as yours, including me
Casey did mentioned will take into consideration and add this feature in the update version of this program.

Hi Casey,
May I know when you plan to release the update version?

I already re-install the program. Unfortunately the auto-file generated at desktop issue didn't solve. As I keep on increase number of instances, now my desktop full of auto-generated files. Perhaps the update version can address this issue...
winsonong is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 11:25 AM   #865
Fairly Idle Warrior
 
vetteran's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: EY UK
Posts: 54
Thanks: 12
Thanked 169 Times in 136 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

It appears to accept a fresh list of proxies 'on the fly'.

einfohound, how many search engines?

I just tried 1 url, 8 SE, 7 kw, 10 threads, 10 min & 25 min. If my calc is right that's 56 min to 140 min. Actual loop time was 450 min. On second now, will be interesting to see the next time.
vetteran is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 11:42 AM   #866
Active Warrior
 
Join Date: 2010
Posts: 61
Thanks: 44
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Hi Casey,
You did mentioned that Sniper Mode searches for defined keyword, and finds particular domain in the serps and clicks on it.

I just would like to clarify that google analytic won't count the click whenever the program clicked on domain in serps?
winsonong is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 11:52 AM   #867
IM Software Guy
War Room Member
 
Ed H's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 77
Thanks: 29
Thanked 25 Times in 12 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

This looks interesting. I have a question - several of the reviews here say that this software was able to pull un-indexed, dropped, and sandboxed sites back into the first few pages of the SERPs.

My understanding is that this software works by doing a regular search, and then clicking the link in the SERPS to 'register' a site visit. In the un-indexed/dropped/sandboxed claims, how is this possible? How is the software able to get the term to even show up in a SERP so it can 'click' it?
Ed H is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 12:32 PM   #868
Active Warrior
 
Join Date: 2010
Posts: 61
Thanks: 44
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Hi Casey,
me again.

Suppose the proxy list given by Proxy Sniper contains 155 good proxy and we load to the program and run it.

After few hours, we run Proxy Sniper and this time we got 150 good proxy. What happen to the program if we do not load the latest proxy list?

Will the program skip those 5 proxies which are not in the good proxy list?
winsonong is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 12:46 PM   #869
David Ashenfelder
War Room Member
 
einfohound's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2008
Posts: 116
Thanks: 8
Thanked 52 Times in 35 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by vetteran View Post

It appears to accept a fresh list of proxies 'on the fly'.

einfohound, how many search engines?

I just tried 1 url, 8 SE, 7 kw, 10 threads, 10 min & 25 min. If my calc is right that's 56 min to 140 min. Actual loop time was 450 min. On second now, will be interesting to see the next time.
The last run I did was 1 url, 3kw, 3 search engines, 1 thread, and it took 1:35.

In the case you just stated above, that means you are only simulating 3-4 searches for each kw each day (if you leave it running constantly). Simulating this amount of activity would seem very insignificant.
einfohound is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 12:52 PM   #870
David Ashenfelder
War Room Member
 
einfohound's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2008
Posts: 116
Thanks: 8
Thanked 52 Times in 35 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by winsonong View Post

Hi Casey,
You did mentioned that Sniper Mode searches for defined keyword, and finds particular domain in the serps and clicks on it.

I just would like to clarify that google analytic won't count the click whenever the program clicked on domain in serps?
#1 - Yes, in "Sniper" mode, this is what it does. When in "Get Popular" mode it searches for BOTH the kw and the URL. This will ensure that it will find your site.

#2 - The current release of the program WILL NOT be tracked by most analytics programs (including Google Analytics) because it uses Java script and most analytics programs can't track Java. A future version will allow you to change to program so that analytics will register a "visit".
einfohound is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to einfohound For This Useful Post:
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 12:55 PM   #871
David Ashenfelder
War Room Member
 
einfohound's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2008
Posts: 116
Thanks: 8
Thanked 52 Times in 35 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by vans View Post

This looks interesting. I have a question - several of the reviews here say that this software was able to pull un-indexed, dropped, and sandboxed sites back into the first few pages of the SERPs.

My understanding is that this software works by doing a regular search, and then clicking the link in the SERPS to 'register' a site visit. In the un-indexed/dropped/sandboxed claims, how is this possible? How is the software able to get the term to even show up in a SERP so it can 'click' it?
vans...

I don't think that this program (or any) will be able to help a site that is not indexed. If Google doesn't know about your site, it doesn't matter what you search for, it is not going to show up.

Being sandboxed and not being indexed are different. Google may have your site penalized and this program may be able to help get that penalty removed. But, I don't think using this program on a site will produce any results if the site is not indexed.
einfohound is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 02:01 PM   #872
Active Warrior
 
Join Date: 2010
Posts: 24
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

I've been keeping daily logs of my Rank Checker CSV's and today I had a strange problem that has never happened before. Rank Checker didn't pull rank for any of my sites or keywords on google. Bing and yahoo worked but not google. I've never seen this happen. Has anyone else experienced this issue? I searched for my sites manually and found them listed but Rank Checker did not.

I'd like to know if this is normal or a major issue on my end.

Thanks
Top10Edge is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 02:16 PM   #873
SEO Expert
War Room Member
 
caseyallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 12
Thanks: 563
Thanked 84 Times in 59 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

@ Michael, How many threads are you running?

For 6 urls
5 kw's
3se's

That is 90 searches with 5-15 minutes in between each search.

If you're on 1 thread that would take 450 - 1350 minutes.

So I recommend running at least 5 threads.

The pause button is in an upcoming version! =) Not a crazy idea at all! Actually quite clever!

A few other users suggested it... Great minds think alike! =)
---------------------

@Tessa, You should've received it by now, let me know if you haven't.

---------------------

@frodo77, Let me know if you haven't received it by now. =)

---------------------

@einfohound, Completely understand where you're coming from!

And I encourage you guys to ask questions.. So please don't think you're over-asking, or asking silly questions. There are no silly questions, only silly answers. (from me) lol =)

Start out slowly to mimic natural 'snowballing' activity. Then increase it. But don't go full force with 100 searches a day.. out of the blue. That will look suspicious I think. Although I have done it in testing, and didn't receive any dropped rankings.. but I won't recommend that.

Increase your search activity maybe 10-20 searches per day, until you get the ranking you desire, and then decrease slightly as you'll be getting natural inquiries.
---------------------

@winsonong, Yes Sniper mode Searches for your keyword, and finds your domain and clicks on it. SE Sniper doesn't 'allow' java in this version, so it won't count as a click on your analytics.

This is natural too, as alot of people don't allow javascript these days, especially with firefox. I have mine turned off as well unless I need it, as there's too many java exploits, and interruptions.

----------------------

@vans, The "Get Popular" mode is what gets them indexed, and un-sandboxed. It searches for "yourdomain + your keyword". It doesn't click on anything, so if your site needs indexing, re-indexing, de-sandboxed.. Get Popular will help you, then run Sniper Mode.

----------------------

@winsonong, The app will try the proxy, which takes some time, and if it isn't working it'll skip it.

So definitely good to always have fresh working proxies in there. Or the app could end up taking an extra hour on top of everything else.

-----------------------------

@Top10, must be a bug with Rank Checker. That happens sometimes. If you found your sites by manually searching, it's all good. =)
caseyallen is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 02:21 PM   #874
SEO Expert
War Room Member
 
caseyallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 12
Thanks: 563
Thanked 84 Times in 59 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Hey guys, it's errand day again, oh joy =) .. I'll be back about 7-8pm EST or earlier.

I have my phone with me, so orders & activation codes will be sent out immediately. But will wait to answer questions, etc til I return home. It's kinda hard to see on my dinosaur phone. Definitely need an upgrade. :/
caseyallen is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 02:54 PM   #875
Active Warrior
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: London , UK
Posts: 37
Thanks: 26
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Hi casey i need to buy this software how do i buy it.
Please let me know asap
samora22 is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 03:03 PM   #876
David Ashenfelder
War Room Member
 
einfohound's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2008
Posts: 116
Thanks: 8
Thanked 52 Times in 35 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by samora22 View Post

Hi casey i need to buy this software how do i buy it.
Please let me know asap
See very first post on first page.
einfohound is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to einfohound For This Useful Post:
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 03:15 PM   #877
HyperActive Warrior
 
ThisIsMyHealth's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Posts: 51
Thanks: 9
Thanked 72 Times in 36 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

So it seems (to me at least) like it would make sense to split your campaigns up by keyword search volume, in order to truly maximize the software's potential.

One group that has keywords with low search volume, fewer threads, and higher random times; and one that has keywords with high search volume, more threads, and lower random times [and even one or two in between if you want to go all crazy ;-)]

This would ensure that a keyword with low search volume doesn't suddenly get a hundred visits a day, while also ensuring that a keyword with high search volume doesn't waste away with only one or two hits a day.

Does this seem to be in line with your thinking einfohound?
ThisIsMyHealth is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 03:26 PM   #878
Active Warrior
 
Join Date: 2010
Posts: 12
Thanks: 8
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Just got the software, looks good, now let see if my ranking will improve
bratulic is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 04:20 PM   #879
Susan Velez
War Room Member
 
usfemail's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 563
Thanks: 61
Thanked 113 Times in 67 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

How many campaigns can you run at one time?
usfemail is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 04:24 PM   #880
David Ashenfelder
War Room Member
 
einfohound's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2008
Posts: 116
Thanks: 8
Thanked 52 Times in 35 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by ThisIsMyHealth View Post

So it seems (to me at least) like it would make sense to split your campaigns up by keyword search volume, in order to truly maximize the software's potential.

One group that has keywords with low search volume, fewer threads, and higher random times; and one that has keywords with high search volume, more threads, and lower random times [and even one or two in between if you want to go all crazy ;-)]

This would ensure that a keyword with low search volume doesn't suddenly get a hundred visits a day, while also ensuring that a keyword with high search volume doesn't waste away with only one or two hits a day.

Does this seem to be in line with your thinking einfohound?
That's the way I'm leaning. I haven't tried running multiple instances of the program yet - until I get a better feel for how to "schedule" things.

I know Casey is working on a couple ideas to make this process easier in future releases (like possibly being able to schedule the #times/hour a url/kw would be processed, etc.).
einfohound is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 04:51 PM   #881
HyperActive Warrior
War Room Member
 
Join Date: 2007
Location: , , USA.
Posts: 193
Thanks: 15
Thanked 28 Times in 25 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by usfemail View Post

How many campaigns can you run at one time?
I am running 2 at 10 threads each comfortably!
rayray7 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to rayray7 For This Useful Post:
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 04:53 PM   #882
Susan Velez
War Room Member
 
usfemail's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 563
Thanks: 61
Thanked 113 Times in 67 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

How do you run more than one campaign at one time? Sorry I just got this yesterday and still trying to figure this out.

Thanks
usfemail is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 04:57 PM   #883
HyperActive Warrior
War Room Member
 
Join Date: 2007
Location: , , USA.
Posts: 193
Thanks: 15
Thanked 28 Times in 25 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by vans View Post

This looks interesting. I have a question - several of the reviews here say that this software was able to pull un-indexed, dropped, and sandboxed sites back into the first few pages of the SERPs.

My understanding is that this software works by doing a regular search, and then clicking the link in the SERPS to 'register' a site visit. In the un-indexed/dropped/sandboxed claims, how is this possible? How is the software able to get the term to even show up in a SERP so it can 'click' it?

You first have to run the "popular option" for several days first, to bring your site back into the results page!
rayray7 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to rayray7 For This Useful Post:
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 07:57 PM   #884
Ultraburner
War Room Member
 
ultraburner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 27
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Hey All,

I have been following this huge thread with some interest. This software sounds very cool; the simple ideas are always the best right.

Does anyone have any solid results that they can share?

Cassey, are you going to combine the proxy scraper and sesniper so that the proxies rotate automatically?

Cheers Si.
ultraburner is offline  
Unread 11th Dec 2010, 10:22 PM   #885
SEO Expert
War Room Member
 
caseyallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 12
Thanks: 563
Thanked 84 Times in 59 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

I'm baaaacckk!

@Thisismyhealth, that makes perfect sense!

---------------------

@bratulic, keep us posted!

---------------------

@usfemail, As many as you want. =)

Keep in mind how many threads you'll need to run those searches in the time frame that you want.
---------------------

@usfemail, create your campaigns, and then when you're ready to run them all, hit "Select all campaigns".

----------------------

@manosankar, Both modes have different purposes. If you're not indexed, or not in the top 15 pages, run Get Popular, if you're in the top 15 pages run Sniper mode, with a few Get Popular's every now and then, throughout the week.

It's as legitimate as other seo tactics. =)

If in doubt, or if you're unsure about what this does, I wouldn't recommend buying it.

-----------------------

@ultraburner, That's an idea... now to see if it's possible! =)

Also, there are lots of results/reviews throughout these 20 pages. I know it's quite long, but it's worth it. =)
caseyallen is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 12:26 AM   #886
HyperActive Warrior
 
Anna_O's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2009
Location: WA State
Posts: 118
Thanks: 9
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Okay, I have to try this out

Casey - my Paypal Transaction ID is: 43M86680E6575503H.

Thanks,
Anna
Anna_O is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 12:48 AM   #887
Amazon Content Authority!
War Room Member
 
michaelmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2007
Location: The Emerald Isle
Posts: 2,550
Thanks: 1,031
Thanked 818 Times in 570 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by caseyallen View Post

@ Michael, How many threads are you running?

For 6 urls
5 kw's
3se's

That is 90 searches with 5-15 minutes in between each search.

If you're on 1 thread that would take 450 - 1350 minutes.

So I recommend running at least 5 threads.

The pause button is in an upcoming version! =) Not a crazy idea at all! Actually quite clever!

A few other users suggested it... Great minds think alike! =)
---------------------
Hey Casey,

I'm running it with 6 threads and we are only half way through the loop. I know the app is still running the loop because the kw's and SE's are changing. My only concern is that i'm still running on the same proxy list 36 hours into the campaign!

The pause button would be an awesome inclusion...thanks!

Michael
michaelmac is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 01:43 AM   #888
SEO Expert
War Room Member
 
caseyallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 12
Thanks: 563
Thanked 84 Times in 59 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

@Anna , welcome aboard. =)

-------------------

@Michael, Pause is coming.

Also, after 8+ hours, I think it's ok to hit stop, even though it'll start back at the beginning, but it would've looped back to the beginning anyway by that time, so stopping and loading in more is ok.

You'll always want to load in new, working proxies, as the app will run quite slow if alot of the proxies aren't working. It'll keep testing, skipping, etc.. which can add up, and make it run even longer.

--------------------

Hitting the sack for the night guys. =)
caseyallen is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to caseyallen For This Useful Post:
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 03:50 AM   #889
HyperActive Warrior
 
Join Date: 2009
Posts: 132
Thanks: 5
Thanked 118 Times in 93 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Hey Casey,

Am I right in thinking that there will be a price rise happening very shortly?

I just though I'd mention it in case any thread lurkers are considering buying - as it would be foolish for them to pay any more than needed.

Cheers,

C
Chris Baxter is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 06:06 AM   #890
Warrior Member
War Room Member
 
Join Date: 2009
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Looks like a great software, however i have a question:

Would this work for other domains than the google.com? For instance google.co.uk? I mean the proxys would have to be from the country that your targeting right? What happens if you use USA proxys for UK searches? Am i missing something here?
martinbunn is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 06:52 AM   #891
HyperActive Warrior
 
Join Date: 2009
Posts: 132
Thanks: 5
Thanked 118 Times in 93 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by martinbunn View Post

Looks like a great software, however i have a question:

Would this work for other domains than the google.com? For instance google.co.uk? I mean the proxys would have to be from the country that your targeting right? What happens if you use USA proxys for UK searches? Am i missing something here?
Martin,

It works for all the main search engines, plus local variants - e.g. google.co.uk, yahoo.co.uk.

And if a particular search engine isn't yet included, you can easily add it in yourself by opening one file in notepad.

And it doesn't really matter where the proxies are. But if you want, you can easily just add say UK or French proxies and you are good to go ;-)

HTH

C
Chris Baxter is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 07:02 AM   #892
Active Warrior
War Room Member
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: Athens
Posts: 25
Thanks: 12
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

I think that there is no "rules" for the min/max settings only according to how many domains and keywords you have in a campaign.

The first thing that you have to consider, is the "natural" daily exact searches that a keyword has. You can't treat the same way a keyword with 100 daily exact searches and one with 1000.
That's why I don't have my main and secondary keywords in the same campaign for a domain.

Just a thought.
goykos is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 07:33 AM   #893
Fairly Idle Warrior
 
vetteran's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: EY UK
Posts: 54
Thanks: 12
Thanked 169 Times in 136 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by martinbunn View Post

Looks like a great software, however i have a question:

Would this work for other domains than the google.com? For instance google.co.uk? I mean the proxys would have to be from the country that your targeting right? What happens if you use USA proxys for UK searches? Am i missing something here?
Google.co.uk can be selected in the SE list.

Proxies are irrelevant to where you are.
vetteran is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 07:36 AM   #894
Fairly Idle Warrior
 
vetteran's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: EY UK
Posts: 54
Thanks: 12
Thanked 169 Times in 136 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by goykos View Post

I think that there is no "rules" for the min/max settings only according to how many domains and keywords you have in a campaign.

The first thing that you have to consider, is the "natural" daily exact searches that a keyword has. You can treat the same way a keyword with 100 daily exact searches and one with 1000.
That's why I don't have my main and secondary keywords in the same campaign for a domain.

Just a thought.
The loop time calculated thus -


if Xn = domains
Yn = keywords
Z = number of search engine
A = no. threads

For n domains

(X1*Y1 + X2*Y2 . . Xn*Yn)*Z/A*min = total minimum time

and (X1*Y1 + X2*Y2 . . Xn*Yn)*Z/A*max = total maximum time

Actual time will depend upon how fast and if the proxies
work, the response time in the SE, dwell time if in Sniper mode.
vetteran is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 07:53 AM   #895
Amazon Content Authority!
War Room Member
 
michaelmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2007
Location: The Emerald Isle
Posts: 2,550
Thanks: 1,031
Thanked 818 Times in 570 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by vetteran View Post

Google.co.uk can be selected in the SE list.

Proxies are irrelevant to where you are.
Simon,

Didn't Casey email all purchasers an updated SE list recently?

Hope you are keeping well; at work today

Will YM you later for a chinwag.

Best,

Michael
michaelmac is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 08:21 AM   #896
HyperActive Warrior
War Room Member
 
frodo77's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: Toronto/Jomtien
Posts: 126
Thanks: 89
Thanked 70 Times in 50 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Simon,
Here is something I do not understand.
For n domains

(X1*Y1 + X2*Y2 . . Xn*Yn)*Z/A*min = total minimum time

and (X1*Y1 + X2*Y2 . . Xn*Yn)*Z/A*max = total maximum time

Your 2 equations look the same to me - am I missing something?
Thanks, Jason.
frodo77 is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 08:21 AM   #897
Active Warrior
 
Join Date: 2010
Posts: 12
Thanks: 8
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

For future update, woud be nice to see once we load the proxies, we can see the number of proxies in the list. Would be nice to have a counter so after a few loops, we can see exactly how many proxies are still active and which are dead. Maybe the software can test the proxies twice and if no response , then it's dead and will not use it again. So after a few hours or loops, if we have lots of dead proxies on our list, we could change the proxy list. Would be handy too if we can set an alert if 50% or 75% proxies are dead, we get a pop up alert.
bratulic is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 08:34 AM   #898
Fairly Idle Warrior
 
vetteran's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: EY UK
Posts: 54
Thanks: 12
Thanked 169 Times in 136 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by frodo77 View Post

Simon,
Here is something I do not understand.
For n domains

(X1*Y1 + X2*Y2 . . Xn*Yn)*Z/A*min = total minimum time

and (X1*Y1 + X2*Y2 . . Xn*Yn)*Z/A*max = total maximum time

Your 2 equations look the same to me - am I missing something?
Thanks, Jason.
Yes you have, perhaps the equation is too brief.

First part multiplies by the minimum set time and the second the maximum.
That give the theoretical range. Not had a loop in that as there are other factors.
vetteran is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 08:36 AM   #899
Fairly Idle Warrior
 
vetteran's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2010
Location: EY UK
Posts: 54
Thanks: 12
Thanked 169 Times in 136 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

Originally Posted by michaelmac View Post

Simon,

Didn't Casey email all purchasers an updated SE list recently?

Hope you are keeping well; at work today

Will YM you later for a chinwag.

Best,

Michael
Yes he did.
Poor you, I'm nicely insulated against the world by a couple of glasses of a very acceptable Pinot Noir.
'K, talk later.
vetteran is offline  
Unread 12th Dec 2010, 09:24 AM   #900
www.MonsterResource.com
War Room Member
 
ronmojohny's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2007
Location: , , USA.
Posts: 150
Thanks: 15
Thanked 41 Times in 28 Posts
Default
Re: *SEO SOFTWARE gets top Google Rankings* RAVING REVIEWS & RESULTS |SE Sniper - Nothing else like
Share on: 
fb share twitter share gplus share more share

So what happens after your site is clicked? Does it open a page and let it "age" for a few seconds, or will Google count it as a "bounce"? (very important in my opinion)
ronmojohny is offline  
Closed Thread


Bookmarks

Tags
gamechanger, google, huge, market, rankings, seo, software, top
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 PM.