Review my design

by mafai44 49 replies
Need some critiques!

The first one I did I felt like it was too cheesy which is here : http://imgur.com/jAg6J

Then I re did most of it and this is what I got : http://imgur.com/fsr97
#website design #design #review
Avatar of Unregistered
  • Hello,

    Its a good and decent design
    good luck
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6505115].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author punchout
    Links down at the footer section?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6505754].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author KurBear
      Originally Posted by punchout View Post

      Links down at the footer section?
      I agree, I hadn't noticed but your second one doesn't seem to have any footer nav.

      Also! I like the first one! I would go for the logo and header in the second one, but stick with your 'plans' div - it's much more interesting.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6519447].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author managepro
    Neat design, looks like a Joomla Website...looks good
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6505765].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TolyZ
    I like the second one. Plain and simple, easy to navigate. Just add some link to the footer.
    Signature
    Professional SEO Company marketing1on1.com that gets results.
    BuyBacklinksCheap.com
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6507843].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author iCrawl
    I prefer the top one.. I like more complex layouts to simple and boring ones.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6507889].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Tj Style
    Nice and Clean, looks good
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6507989].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author thehazard
    I think the second is on the right path. I would suggest formatting the text as simple text can be boring. Use Header 2 for the main paragraph then perhaps header 4 for the rest. A big 'Buy Now' button works too. Remember clients spend maybe three second on the home page so grab their attention, but don't go crazy either. Tickle their imagination and make them click that "BUY NOW" button. That's my 2¢
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6508979].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author liliaha
    Looks really nice. Great work!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6509317].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mayankgangwal
    The first one is cool in design. But the second one is having a professional look as a designer i would go for second one as it appeals and will attract more then first
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6511060].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dirocket
    your design looks good
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6511115].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cutegirl36
    It's very nice.
    Signature

    Source: friv

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6516624].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seowrite
    Nice design! Are you using some platform like WP or something? But my idea for you is move the testimonial position next to the package that you're selling or advertising..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6516865].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Absolute Logo
    I like the first link you provided. I don't think it is cheesy at all. I like the simplicity of it but it is not too simple. I think its a lot better than the second link!!
    Signature
    Absolute Logo Perfect for your small business!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6517835].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DanielDuffo
    Yes, Looks like good, but now every one try make design lik this.
    I mean you can find a lot of website with same design. Nothing unique, nothing new.
    Signature

    Fidelity Media Brand Safe Remnant Traffic Network
    www.fidelity-media.com
    Email:info@fidelity-media.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6517914].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JhonKilly
    That's looking nice try using some social media icon at header or footer, it will help visitors to like you on social media sites. and also add quick contact forms.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6518438].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author satinderbal
    Quite professional and decent design. Seems you work hard on it.
    Great job.keep Up
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6518588].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author guptaarun
    hey how u do that first ever i have never seen such website... its great man
    i wish u ll do it much better all the best !
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6518740].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author grayghost
    what is the width of the website when you design it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6519836].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CyborgX
    Nice and tidy. Among the two I liked the first one more.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6520645].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mafai44
    Thanks for all the responses, great help.. and grayghost my the width is 1300 pixels.

    Made an edit to the second one since the client likes that one more : http://mafai44.deviantart.com/#/d55pjqc

    just changed the header color for the most part.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6531093].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mmrumii
    I like the site design and the domain name you have chosen. I think the only area that needs improvement has been mentioned. It's like professional and looking fresh.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6531151].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author hamzidosh
    First desgn is better in my own opinion but it seems it consumes more Bandwidth.
    Second design looks quite simple even though it kinda looks more corporate and takes less bandwidth too...I'd with the second for the sake of BANDWIDTH only.
    My Opinion
    Signature

    For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. - Jeremiah 29:11

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6531553].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author teguhyuliantos
    I have visit your site. It's very good design with matching theme. You can modify using some widget as your blog accessories. Also, your speed of loading still too slow. But overall is good.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6532054].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author anna14
    First design is better than second one
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6532509].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author antac
    Banned
    On the home page I was kind of wondering what the site was about while I was reading the first two paragraphs.
    By the third paragraph I knew. Its a matter of preference, but you might want to lose the first 2 paragraphs.
    Overall, it's a great layout and I like the colors. It's neat and looks impressive.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6532832].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mikedex
    2nd design is very attractive in comparison to first one. Instead of Black color if you could change to Sky color then it would be more attractive. This is my personal opinion.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6534162].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Marcdl53
    I believe your best design layout will be a combination of both designs. The first one you focus to much on displaying your services and plans and the second you don't at all. A combination of both I think would be best.

    In addition your second design layout when combined with targeted relevant home page content will maximize your organic SEO potential. Your first design seems as though it wouldn't have much home page text/content for SEO purposes as most of the content on that design seems to be graphic and not text.

    Hope this helps.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6540554].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author redexclub
    second is really good but I also like first one
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6540668].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author purpleviolet
    I feel the first one looks better.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6541071].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Devid1
    The second one is looking fresh.I think the first one is better for business.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6541152].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author lsargent
    I actually preferred the top one. I might have made some changes to not make it as "busy", but the graphics are well done.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6542743].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author grayghost
      You have the width to large by have it 1300 pixels. If you have the width at 1300 pixels it will make many user have to scroll left to right and many user do not want to that. I would change it to 1024 pixels wide so the user will not have to scroll left to right. There have be studies done on have user feel about having to scroll left to right.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6546745].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CovertecH
    Originally Posted by mafai44 View Post

    Need some critiques!

    The first one I did I felt like it was too cheesy which is here

    Then I re did most of it and this is what I got :
    First image is my favourite
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6550097].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jackbrown1
    Hi

    Its really good ... You are perfect..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6550646].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author teamheroic
    nice clean site, there are a few adjustments i would make, but hey, that's just me.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6557217].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Randize
    I'd say both side have potential. The first one maybe a bit too busy at some area, like the clipping images, the contrast that it can destroy the composition flow of your page. For some people, It may be hard for them to start looking. As for visually, I'm sure that it's more pleasing than the later.

    Second one, is simple but you can pretty much control where they will start looking. If you are relying copy to sell your stuff, second one might outperform the first. Sometimes less is more.

    For people who are saying the first design is better than the second, I think good design doesn't equate to complexity and beauty. It has to fit the purpose of your objective.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6558097].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jasonharris
    they look nice and simple. but i like the first one
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6578889].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Carl Potts
      The first one makes better use of White space, the second tries to cram too much in
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6580603].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sudhanshu013
    Originally Posted by mafai44 View Post

    Need some critiques!

    The first one I did I felt like it was too cheesy which is here : imgur: the simple image sharer

    Then I re did most of it and this is what I got : imgur: the simple image sharer
    Jpg format seem ok, what about html ?




    Go Solar
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6583488].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ericparke
    Originally Posted by mafai44 View Post

    Need some critiques!

    The first one I did I felt like it was too cheesy which is here : imgur: the simple image sharer

    Then I re did most of it and this is what I got : imgur: the simple image sharer


    Nice colours, Modern looking. I like it!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6592152].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JuneCelo
    I actually like the first one better. For me it looks cool and has that 'wow' factor. When I looked at the first one, it made me say 'Wow!'. When I looked at the second one, it made me say 'Okay, nothing new here.'

    That's just my opinion though. I like the more complex looking design but still looks clean.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6592248].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexx
    Nice overall design for both.

    For the second one:

    On the slider background, try reversing the blue gradient, it might look slightly better if the light blue is at the top.

    Have a look at some different fonts/text styles also. The black on the blue would probably look better if it was white on blue. Also try making the headers a few EM/PX's bigger.

    Looks good though
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6592528].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author weboasis
    IMO the first one is messy but the second is too much simple... I would try something different.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6595493].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author praneethmaddu
    Good Looking....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6596410].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jaasmit
    I think you are a pretty good designer. You have some good skills too. So keep it up your good job.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6596750].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mang0
    I prefer the second one, the first one seemed to have a lot going on. The second one is crisp and easier on the eyes. I don't feel overwhelmed with information. I do like the pricing boxes in the first one, those are really nice.

    When ever I'm looking for some design inspiration I head over to themeforest and browse their themes. I've gotten some really good ideas from some of the designers of there.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6598369].message }}
Avatar of Unregistered

Trending Topics