To zip or not to zip?

by 11 replies
13
I've got 19 mp3 files, total of 120 megs, to send as an audiobook demo download. If I post all the links individually on a webpage with instructions to right-click download, that's a lot of individual downloads.

The upside of that is that people don't have to deal with a zip file - zip of course would be easier to deal with for people with a certain level of computer knowledge.

Another advantage of the zip file would be that it all would be extracted as folder with files automatically numbered in the folder

- I'm thinking that if the files were just laid out on a web page to download, such as:

1.link.mp3
2.link.mp3
3.link.mp3

Etc.

- a lot of people will either inadvertently skip files, or else left-click the file and thus it would stream on the web (or it would attempt to stream) instead.

What do you think?
#website design #audio downloads #zip
  • A self-extracting Zip file maybe your answer.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Yes, I agree, it would - however most firewalls and antivirus systems tend to throw up all kinds of flags when there is an executable file, and it would be best not to have to explain over and over again that it is just a unzip that is executing.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Yeah, that's way to many.
    Just zip them up.
    120mb is nothing, but you could separate them into 2 or 3 parts if you wanted.
    The self-extracting zip that topnichewebsites mentioned is a great idea, but as Matthew Shelton said, it will likely cause an issue for many people.
    Just create a regular zip.
    Nearly everyone has zip capability on their computer, and it's free if they don't and you can even get portable so it doesn't have to be installed.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Ok, I've had fun (what a geek:rolleyes: ) creating the zip file - created it with cutezip and tested opening it with 7zip.
    Realized that I had to drag the zip folder into the archive window so the archive when unzipping would open as a folder as I wanted.

    Also, to make the files open in the zip in the order they should be played, I named them 00001_filename, 00002_filename, etc.
    It's compressed to 112 megs now.
  • Zip file is best it reduce the file size and it is easy to send.
    • [1] reply
    • Yes it is easy to send and people recognize it.

      112 megabytes is too big to send as an attachment for most email systems though so I've ended up putting the zip file on the web in the form of site.com/folder/thezipfile.zip
      - that way when someone clicks on the link in an email or on a web page, the download process will begin immediately. Of course I tested it and it works (wouldn't believe how many people don't test their links).

      Sometimes for downloads I get .7zip files instead of .zip files, and sometimes even .rar files - in my opinion it is much more standard and accepted still to use .zip - anything that makes the process easier and more accepted and less resistance to unzipping the file, that is what I want to use! Zip (file format) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      • [1] reply
  • Offer a choice of downloading either all the files in a regular zip file, or original mp3 files one-by-one manually.
    • [2] replies
    • I agree with Chosen, give people options and let them choose whatever format they are comfortable with.
      • [1] reply
    • Thanks for your ideas - usually this would be a good way to go, but , and unless you use a download plugin like Downloadhelper there's a good chance of missing one of the files (there are 19!) and/or getting them out of order

      - so by giving them the one zip file that will open in a folder (helps for organization) and also the files are numbered so the files will display in the correct sequence, then it should be listened to without anything getting lost or listened to out of order.

      The file numbering thing within the zip file is turning out to be really important - if I just named the files like this:

      thestorybegins.mp3
      thestorybuilds.mp3
      thestorygetsmoreinteresting.mp3
      thezombietriestosignupforhealthcare.mp3
      thebigmeh.mp3
      anotherbitjustbeforetheend.mp3

      - you can see that most computers will automatically alphabetize the files, so that anotherbitjustbeforetheend.mp3 would display first even though it is supposed to be listened to near the end of the audiobook

      - that's another reason why I've decided to give only the one zip file, already zipped into a folder, just to keep things in order
  • [DELETED]
Join the discussion

Next Topics on Trending Feed

  • 13

    To zip or not to zip?

    I've got 19 mp3 files, total of 120 megs, to send as an audiobook demo download. If I post all the links individually on a webpage with instructions to right-click download, that's a lot of individual downloads. The upside of that is that people don't have to deal with a zip file - zip of course would be easier to deal with for people with a certain level of computer knowledge.