SerpAssist - any one use it?

Hi !
I wondered the same after having seen the sales video. The idea of planning your strategies visually is very good.
So, I am curious on opinions of users!

I guess no one out there is using this then

this is interesting, the video is very well made , thank you Sarah

I might give this a go but the limited list of supported sites is a deal breaker at the moment.Does anyone know their plans as regards to the size of sites supported?

I'll carry on with Evo 2 , but will keep an eye on this one.

This can be a great testing tool, once I know what I can get away with in google by using this tool after a month or so I will scale the hell out of it with senuke typically...

When i do it this way I tend to get way better results, when I would typically use senuke first on new domains I am forced to play in the sand...

best of luck.

Is it worth the $77/month? That's pretty steep for the lack of sites the service offers.

I see they are now offering a 7 day trial for $7.

Might be worth a try for that and see what it is like

I've been using it for just over a week.
There are pros and cons, I consider it just-better-than-borderline value for money right now but possibly heading towards greatness in the near future ... to be proven over time, of course.

Cons:
Limited number of properties, profile accounts and bookmarking accounts involved, limited number of email accounts that can be created each day, only a single page on most Web 2.0 properties (just introduced multiple pages on one or two properties in the past 48 hours or so) ... $77 a month (the discounted rate) isn't cheap.

200 decaptchas provided per month as part of the package is a pro, but you have to buy a key for one of the decaptcha services if you need more which might be considered a "con" by some. Proxies are provided as part of the processing by their Central server which is a pro but at the moment you can't plug-in your own if you want to, which might be a 'con" to some.

If you want to take RSS feeds and submit them to aggregators, that's a manual operation. A "project" right now is limited to 3 target pages on a domain, so there's an overhead with set-up ... for example, 3 projects to be created for a 9-page site. It's quick enough to set these up, just an irritation, and the developer is (I believe) going to expand this.

Pros:
I find the visual approach is fascinating and intuitive, opens the door for every link network to be entirely unique and as simple or complex as you want.

So for example, you can have several blogs linking to each other and to your target pages; bookmark your target pages and the blogs; create profile accounts that link to the blogs or to the target pages; have other blogs linking to each other and to the "first layer" of blogs; have these bookmarked, have profile accounts linking to these; etc. Then do it again, entirely differently, for some other pages or websites.

You can pre-schedule events like the creation and linking of properties; grow a network to a high degree of complexity step by step over time very easily; test all sorts of simple linking strategies on individual pages within a site. For me, it's a "pro" that the built-in spinner is compatible with The Best Spinner.

A major benefit from my perspective is that you work on the diagram on your desktop, press "submit" then walk away ... the creation is all handled on the vendor's "Central Server" approach, according to the schedule I set, through the range of proxies they provide.

The developer is very open about what it can and can't currently do, and fairly responsive in the Forum and to emails. He seems to be working on some very attractive enhancements.

While I'm taking advantage of it right now to add variety to my link-building and test some strategies, and I'm **only just** comfortable with the value for money ...this could easily be VERY good, quite soon. We'll see. I'm certainly not dropping EVO to replace it with SERPassist ... but I am using both, in combination with other services.

There's a $7 for 7 days trial at the moment; easy to get your money's worth out of that by building a network or a few.

Steve

@phmoisan
That would mean that it was an Google AD by SerpAssist

Any updates from anyone? I'm keen but I'd be happier paying $45 not $77 - I only have 6 small sites active at the moment while I'm learning the ropes. It seems like a lot of to pay each month.

Shame we can't tempt the developer here for a WSO :-)

I've been a member for about a month now. I have been using it and have also had one of my outsourcers learn to use it. I LOVE it!

There is so much to be said for being able to set these things up and literally "walk away"... meaning that once you set up your link diagram/strategy for your project, everything is then handled by the SerpAssist server - not me. I don't have to worry about accounts and profiles being created (or not), blog posting, links, bookmarking. It's all done and out of my hands.

Now that's worth some $$. And, yes - I am seeing results on the sites that I've used it on so far. I have many sites on Page 1 of Google - Is it because of SerpAssist or because I'm just a genius? I'd venture to give the bulk of the credit to Dave.

I'm wondering how this would compare to SEO Link Robot? It almost seems like the Robot would be a better value, assuming the developer keeps it current, which is always a question.

With SENUKES new features locking in the 127 seems like a good idea. Some reviews I have seen indicated very little results with serpassit.

I think SEO Link Robot does the same thing but for a one off payment.

Give it a shot!

I also would like to know if this is like SEO Link Robot as that is a one time payment compared to Link Assist's monthly payment

James

I have been using SerpAssist now for over 3 months. The tool looks visually great but is very slow at submissions. Have i seen a great improvement in my rankings, not really. Is it worth $77pm for me it is not. Recently i switched over to SEOLR, 1 time payment and does a similar job.

Regards
Jin