The #1 copyright error with a sad story at the end

by donhx
8 replies
Before I start, let me provide a couple definitions for newbies:

Copyright: The right you have in the U.S., guaranteed by the Constitution, to control who makes copies of your original Intellectual Property (text, images, etc). Copyright is the right you have to say who can make copies of your work.

Copywriter: A type of writer who writes sales copy. Has nothing to do with the control of Intellectual Property mentioned above.

Now, on with my story....

In another thread a newbie was pondering whether or not to use something that might be copyrighted. He concluded by saying,

"I'm not sure how to proceed. Some say its better to ask forgiveness than permission...."

That is the #1 Copyright error... proceeding without being sure if the text, image of other intellectual property you want to use is copyrighted or not. No, I'm not a lawyer, but as a writer and publisher of long standing I know the ropes. After reading this general information, you may wish to consult a lawyer.

Some Copyright Basics

1. According to the U.S. Copyright Office there are some things that cannot be copyrighted.... like titles, names, slogans, ideas and facts. This page is worth reading: U.S. Copyright Office - What Does Copyright Protect? (FAQ).

Remember, however, that some of these things can be Trademarked, so you want to check trademark registrations before using one. You can check trademark registrations here: http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/search/

2. There are some things free for all, like Intellectual Property in the Public Domain (everything before 1923 and lots of stuff afterward, but you need to verify each item after 1923 with the U.S. Copyright Office)... and everything created by the U.S.Government (including military)... but not by U.S. Government Contractors.

3. People can use copyrighted material under the "Fair Use Doctrine" However, that is not a license to steal Intellectual Property, but a legal defense if you are challenged. There are tight rules governing such use which are outlined here: U.S. Copyright Office - Fair Use

4. Everything anyone creates is automatically copyrighted, and you don't need a copyright bug (c) on it. However, if you ever want to bring a copyright infringement case against someone [edited- and get punitive damages, not just actual damages], you must have registered your copyright, which you can do online here: U.S. Copyright Office - Online Services (eCO: Electronic Copyright Office)


The Sad Story

So should you seek forgiveness instead of getting permission?
NO! Take a look at the sad story of these professional Copywriters... they used just ONE PHOTO without permission and had to pay $4,000 for copyright infringement.

Read the whole story here: Legal Lesson Learned: Copywriter Pays $4,000 for $10 Photo | Webcopyplus Web Copywriter Blog


What This Means

Next time you are tempted to grab text off a web site or an image from the Google image search, think twice. Lawyers now have a "Business model" based on shaking down the unwary. Here is a story about their tactics: Righthaven gives no warning to copyright infringers - Intellectual Property Lawyer Blog

Many IM people are copying stuff. It is far better to exercise your own creativity in writing, and to purchase, and keep records of, royalty-free images you purchase.

If you hire work done, be sure to get a release from the vendor that it is 100% original work.

If if use copyrighted materials, you may become the target of one of these new Intellectual Property lawyers who are out to get you if you cross the line. Copying one copyrighted paragraph, or one image, could be very expensive.

As I mentioned, it used to be that copyrighted items needed a copyright notice (c) so people would know, but that hasn't been the law for about 20 years now. Unmarked items may still be under copyright and it's your responsibility to check. Yes--it is impossible to check many things, and that's a Catch 22. Be careful.
#copyright #end #error #sad #story
  • Profile picture of the author Capitalist_Pig
    The First Amendment - and all of the Bill of Rights - are mere limits on governmental power, and have nothing to do with copyright law.

    Authority to grant Patents and enforce intellectual property rights is granted in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Consitution:

    To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3393596].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author donhx
      Originally Posted by Capitalist_Pig View Post

      The First Amendment - and all of the Bill of Rights - are mere limits on governmental power, and have nothing to do with copyright law.

      Authority to grant Patents and enforce intellectual property rights is granted in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution:

      You are correct. Thanks for the clarification. I am editing my post to reflect this.
      Signature
      Quality content to beat the competition. Personalized Author Services
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3393631].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Capitalist_Pig
    One more point - this portion is also incorrect:

    However, if you ever want to bring a copyright infringement case against someone, you must have registered your copyright, which you can do online here:
    You can bring suit against anyone who is using your work without your consent - you *own* it. However, if your copyright is not a registered work, then you may only be awarded compensatory damages - i.e., you must show what actual, material harm their usage of your work has caused you, and you will only be award that amount.

    If you have registered copyright, then you may also sue for punitive damages, and the sky is pretty much the limit there. If you use a photo that sold for $10 without paying, then you make $10,000 with it, if the photographer has a registered copyright they can argue that the judge rule to fine you the entire $10,000.

    I am not a lawyer, but I have been on both sides of copyright infringement cases as a photographer.

    Another thing not mentioned is that there is a fee for obtaining copyright - online, it's $35. If you had to copyright every work you created, that's a lot of money! Three blog posts per week, for a year, would be $5,460 to copyright individually. Photographers use a trick to get around this fee, though, and I see no reason why copywriters couldn't. I have a registered copyright for "Capitalist_Pig's Collected Photographic Works, 2010" - it cost me $35, and contains over 10,000 photos. Each photo is protected individually as part of the collection, too.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3393670].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author donhx
      Originally Posted by Capitalist_Pig View Post


      I am not a lawyer, but I have been on both sides of copyright infringement cases as a photographer.

      .
      So, this means you have been in court for copyright infringement yourself? No one knows the law like someone who has had to pay lawyers to defend them.
      Signature
      Quality content to beat the competition. Personalized Author Services
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3393797].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Capitalist_Pig
        Originally Posted by donhx View Post

        So, this means you have been in court for copyright infringement yourself? No one now the law like someone who has had to pay lawyers to defend them.
        I've been sued for copyright infringement, yes. I defended myself, though, lost the case and ended up paying about $350, the cost of the image through a stock site. As the plaintiff hadn't registered his work, that's all he could collect.

        The image was used by an employee of mine without my knowledge. It really wasn't a big deal - the photog demanded $1,500 compensation, and I knew he couldn't collect on that demand, and offered to buy it from the stock site he had it listed on. He thought he could do better in court, and the ruling ending up being the same as my initial offer to settle - which was far less than his court costs.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3393907].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author bengirwb
          Just trying to get my mind wrapped around what Capitalist Pig is saying here.

          He says he has copyrighted over 10,000 photos as ONE ( 1 ) copyright.
          Is this the same thing as copyrighting 10,000 paragraphs as ONE ( 1) book?
          And if this is the same concept, then can I use only 1 photo out of 10,000+ under the Fair Use Doctrine?
          After all, using one paragraph out of a book with 10,000 paragraphs, would be Fair Use.
          Just curious.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3394216].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author donhx
            Originally Posted by bengirwb View Post

            Just trying to get my mind wrapped around what Capitalist Pig is saying here.

            He says he has copyrighted over 10,000 photos as ONE ( 1 ) copyright.
            Is this the same thing as copyrighting 10,000 paragraphs as ONE ( 1) book?
            And if this is the same concept, then can I use only 1 photo out of 10,000+ under the Fair Use Doctrine?
            After all, using one paragraph out of a book with 10,000 paragraphs, would be Fair Use.
            Just curious.

            Not really. It is inaccurate to say that using just 1 paragraph out of 10,000 paragraphs is Fair Use.

            There have been several court cases that say Fair Use is based on the importance (value) of what you use, not just the number of words. The most well-known case is Campbell vs Acuff-Rose, which was a U.S. Supreme Court decision.

            Another famous case which places the focus on value of words rather than number of words used is Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters where Nation Enters was found in violation by using just 400 words of the Gerald Ford autobiography because it was deemed they were "the heart of the book."

            There are 4 factors that influence whether or not something is Fair Use. See the the details here: United States Code: Title 17,107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use | LII / Legal Information Institute
            Signature
            Quality content to beat the competition. Personalized Author Services
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3394456].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author prosaic
    You can also get your AdSense account shut down if you use a writer's article without permission (copyright violation) on a site with AdSense code. A DMCA complaint from the writer can lead to Google's shutting your account.

    Same with participation in many ad networks - if the writer complains to your ad networks and proves that he/she owns the copyright, the ad network may close your account.

    If you think it's better to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission, in the end you could be banned from AdSense and lose accounts on other networks. Not worth it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3394317].message }}

Trending Topics