How to make backlinks with web 2.0

28 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Hello guys, I'm thinking to make some backlinks with web 2.0, so here is my plan:


- Open 10-15 profiles in different platforms (squidoo,hubpages,blogger,etc)
- Each platform will be like category (I think google will see as spam if I use the name of my site on it)
ex: my site - bestwaytolooseweight.com
web 2.0 - hxxp://squidoo.com/bestwaytolooseweight
My plan is not follow this method above!
Instead, I wanna make it a category/authority platform:
ex: my site - bestwaytolooseweight.com
web 2.0 - hxxp://squidoo.com/healthnews
This way I can use this platform for every site about health: diet, cure, workout, symptoms , you name it.
This way google will see this platform as authority and not as spam
- So if I have 5 sites about heath I will add 1 article 350-500 words backlinking to each site, everything on the same platform.
So let's assume I built 1 site named bestwaytolooseweight.com and now I wanna make some backlinks:
- hxxp://squidoo.com/heathnews
- hxxp://weebly.com/healthnews
- hxxp://wordpress.com/healthnews
keep going until I have 10-15 platform with 350-500 articles backlinking to my site and then if results are good, do the same thing for others sites on the same health niche using the same 10-15 platforms. :rolleyes:

My plan is post 1 article per day for each platform, so within 2 weeks all job is done for this backlink strategy for each site.
Now your thoughts
Could you post your web 2.0 strategy that is pushing your site to the first page on google?
Which kind of anchor text would you do if you would follow my plan?
Could you list the best web 2.0 platform you think work great to rank your site on 2012 pos panda & penguin?
I know we can find loads of web 2.0 thread on here, so you can list on this thread as well.
Best regards,
#backlinks #seo #seo 2.0 #web #web 2.0
  • Profile picture of the author edpudol1973
    Nice plan, if you don't like to use your main keyword as sub/page name of your web 2.0 entry to avoid footprint why not use related keyword instead.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6951870].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Greenfatman
      Thanks.

      Well, my plan is keep those web 2.0 for future posts with different sites on the same niche that's why I will try a broad way to build web 2.0 I think will be less foot print as well.

      Regards.
      Originally Posted by edpudol1973 View Post

      Nice plan, if you don't like to use your main keyword as sub/page name of your web 2.0 entry to avoid footprint why not use related keyword instead.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6951899].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DNAWRealm
    Banned
    Here's an example of what you can do:

    15 Tier 1 articles (Squidoo etc pointing to your domain)
    5 Tier 2 articles (with 3links per article pointing to Tier 1)
    Then use Scrapebox and SeNuke to BLAST each Tier 2 article with thousands of backlinks. Buy a fiverr gig for each Tier 2 article. Some will give you 30k+ backlinks.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6951889].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Greenfatman
      Thanks for your input
      My only worry about your strategy is build to many backlinks fast with software tools

      Do you have great results following this plan you mentioned?
      If so how long would you take to do all that?

      Regards,
      Originally Posted by DNAWRealm View Post

      Here's an example of what you can do:

      15 Tier 1 articles (Squidoo etc pointing to your domain)
      5 Tier 2 articles (with 3links per article pointing to Tier 1)
      Then use Scrapebox and SeNuke to BLAST each Tier 2 article with thousands of backlinks. Buy a fiverr gig for each Tier 2 article. Some will give you 30k+ backlinks.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6951913].message }}
  • I am going to ask a very simple question as a beginner. Does 2 tier, 3 tier backlink building is important to achieve better ranking in search engines? Most of the people just do not understand and not used to with such backlink building methods. Please clarify.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6951956].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Greenfatman
    Bonita great question

    I'd like to know that too.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6952070].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MikeWike
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6952254].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Greenfatman
      Yes, next day I will make a different article to another web 2.0 always linking to my site.
      Originally Posted by MikeWike View Post

      Could you elaborate? Do you make 1 article and add it to squidoo. Next day, you write another article and add it to another web2.0? OR you make 1 article per day and add it to 15 web2.0's (same article?)
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6952411].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author artse
        If you`re interested in doing web 2.0 profiles let me know
        I can also help you with Social Network Accounts
        Prices are the cheapest on the market
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6953859].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author refreshg
    hello. i interested if i build 15 web 2 .0 and write 2 articles per month per web2.0. . but need promotions this web2.0 site yes? if there is no traffic is there any reason to build it?

    as i understand for this 15 web2.0 need traffic to get traffic on you site. how it mus do? can you also explane it?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6955136].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Greenfatman
      The reason I will do that is to get backlinks and rank, it's not for traffic, so after doing that I'll need to index the posts as soon as possible, maybe the web 2.0s will get traffic in the future as I will use them for more sites. Is that makes sense? :rolleyes:
      Originally Posted by refreshg View Post

      hello. i interested if i build 15 web 2 .0 and write 2 articles per month per web2.0. . but need promotions this web2.0 site yes? if there is no traffic is there any reason to build it?

      as i understand for this 15 web2.0 need traffic to get traffic on you site. how it mus do? can you also explane it?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6958804].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author blackmoon
    What's the different between web2 tier1 and web2 tier 2?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6955255].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Jacob Sterbenk
      Originally Posted by blackmoon View Post

      What's the different between web2 tier1 and web2 tier 2?
      Difference is usually in the quality of the article - tier 2 articles are usually all duplicate or badly spun.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6955447].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Greenfatman
        With tier 2 the backlink it seems more natural in google's eyes, is like you are spreading info about your site over the internet and don't need to be bad spun article, it can be all original.

        Originally Posted by Jacob Sterbenk View Post

        Difference is usually in the quality of the article - tier 2 articles are usually all duplicate or badly spun.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6958886].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RyanLB
    You have a good plan. A few tips that I can offer, as I do a lot of Web 2.0 building for clients and companies;

    - Include random images and videos (hosted on the web 2.0s, not hosted elsewhere)

    - Each anchor text should be different post-penguin. These will be some relatively high quality backlinks, so you want to spread your anchor text out as much as possible.

    - Consider adding multiple-posts per property where it is allowed. It adds some juice to each link

    - Mix in some random links to authority pages (articles on popular news sites, wikipedia, yahoo answers, etc.). I figure this makes them hard to discredit, and having your site linked to alongside these sites makes them less likely to be taken down

    - Go back and add content to them on a semi-regular basis

    Those are the types of things I've had some SEO companies and clients ask for. When doing those things I have a really solid stick rate and have seen some pretty impressive ranking results
    Signature

    I'm a Freelance Copywriter that helps Agencies, Startups and Businesses Educate Their Audience and Grow Sales
    Skype Me: r.boze
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6959832].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jfambrini
      Originally Posted by RyanLB View Post

      You have a good plan. A few tips that I can offer, as I do a lot of Web 2.0 building for clients and companies;

      - Include random images and videos (hosted on the web 2.0s, not hosted elsewhere)

      - Each anchor text should be different post-penguin. These will be some relatively high quality backlinks, so you want to spread your anchor text out as much as possible.

      - Consider adding multiple-posts per property where it is allowed. It adds some juice to each link

      - Mix in some random links to authority pages (articles on popular news sites, wikipedia, yahoo answers, etc.). I figure this makes them hard to discredit, and having your site linked to alongside these sites makes them less likely to be taken down

      - Go back and add content to them on a semi-regular basis

      Those are the types of things I've had some SEO companies and clients ask for. When doing those things I have a really solid stick rate and have seen some pretty impressive ranking results
      Ryan:
      Wow! Thanks. Great specific suggestions. I consult for a car exporter. Let's say I want to promote them as the top Toyota Land Cruiser dealer and exporter. I would have to have Land Cruiser in every article's title throughout all Web 2.0 sites or am I missing something?

      Are their examples of how car dealers are using Web 2.0 to promote their sites. Competition for highly sought keywords is so high that one wants to give up even before starting. For instance keyword "used cars for sale" get 1.5 million hits but competition is so high and from such high powered companies that one cannot expect to win. "Toyota Prado" seems more manageable with only 246,000 queries but despite years of trying I have not managed to come even in the first 20 pages. Can Web 2.0 help here?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6959926].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jeffkeysar
      Originally Posted by RyanLB View Post

      You have a good plan. A few tips that I can offer, as I do a lot of Web 2.0 building for clients and companies;

      - Include random images and videos (hosted on the web 2.0s, not hosted elsewhere)

      - Each anchor text should be different post-penguin. These will be some relatively high quality backlinks, so you want to spread your anchor text out as much as possible.

      - Consider adding multiple-posts per property where it is allowed. It adds some juice to each link

      - Mix in some random links to authority pages (articles on popular news sites, wikipedia, yahoo answers, etc.). I figure this makes them hard to discredit, and having your site linked to alongside these sites makes them less likely to be taken down

      - Go back and add content to them on a semi-regular basis

      Those are the types of things I've had some SEO companies and clients ask for. When doing those things I have a really solid stick rate and have seen some pretty impressive ranking results

      Doesn't this kind of link building also leave a footprint that can be traced by to your money site via your IP address. I would think the 2.0 properties and the money site all coming from the same IP address would raise a flag somewhere.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7456754].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author refreshg
    Greenfatman

    thank you for answer
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6962282].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Theeban
    Originally Posted by Greenfatman View Post

    ex: my site - bestwaytolooseweight.com
    web 2.0 - hxxp://squidoo.com/bestwaytolooseweight
    My plan is not follow this method above!
    I think, this plan may help you to brand yourself. Google prefers online branding. For an example, ABCWeightLoss.com, So you can brand your website about weight loss as "ABC". Use of web 2.0 are helpful in branding like that, under this, you can easily come up top for "ABC Weight Loss" on Google and branded yourself. Then, you can start targeting other keywords. This kind of branding may give you kind of authority
    Signature
    For TOP Ranks in Search Engines - Hire skilled expert in SEO. Check expanded services to Cheltenham
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6962534].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author risingrank
    RyanLB, you advise is solid and sound. This is what i am planning to do too.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6963705].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author redflyinghorse
    Curious related question. Let's say your Tier 2 content is all original, but just trash. Terribly uninteresting and horribly written. "I like to lose weight. I have learned many tricks. Tricks are good. I lost 25 pounds. I learned it from this site." Let's say you have 250 words of that dribble per Tier 2 article. Do search engines realize how crappy the writing is? I have seen SEO pluggins that tell you the grade level your article is written at. I wonder if search engines have some way of looking at the writing level and can somehow guess how "interesting" or "well written" and article is.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6963953].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bestpjs
    Guys I can do it for you,

    For 0.4$ a profile, I can manually create a profile in a high pr web2.0 site
    scarp relevent content
    Spin that content
    Add image
    Add your link
    And ping this profile so google will actually index it

    I have a list over 500 web2 sites, with pr3+

    All manuall work

    I take order if you want from 10$ or more, not less..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7413768].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Promotionsny
      Originally Posted by bestpjs View Post

      Guys I can do it for you,

      For 0.4$ a profile, I can manually create a profile in a high pr web2.0 site
      scarp relevent content
      Spin that content
      Add image
      Add your link
      And ping this profile so google will actually index it

      I have a list over 500 web2 sites, with pr3+

      All manuall work

      I take order if you want from 10$ or more, not less..
      Hey Boss, Please email me at palexeev@gmail.com or skype me at promotionsny.

      I would like to work with you!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7421635].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author deerdog40
        Guys I can do it for you,

        For 0.4$ a profile, I can manually create a profile in a high pr web2.0 site
        scarp relevent content
        Spin that content
        Add image
        Add your link
        And ping this profile so google will actually index it

        I have a list over 500 web2 sites, with pr3+

        All manuall work

        I take order if you want from 10$ or more, not less..


        I'm Also interested in your deal.
        You can contact me on here or at deerdogdeerdogdeerdog/at/yahoo.com
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7451944].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author veecreate
    Hi can you please explain much more about web 2.0 Please,,
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7454176].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jinx1221
    The web2.0 property wouldn't have the same IP address as your money site, nor would any property have the same IP address as each other web2.0 site.
    Signature

    The Ultimate Private Network Management,
    Visualization and Automation Tool




    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7457267].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author weston2012
    Listen @Greenfatman, web 2.0 backlinks are low quality backlinks. It will help you Search engine ranking but less than 10%. There is lots of powerful way to make more plan.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7457547].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jinx1221
    @weston2012 - And what do you consider high quality backinks? Your site in your sig doesn't say anywhere what your service provides. What proof can you show that web2.0's provide less than 10% (and less than 10% of what exactly)?

    Btw, content with poor grammar will most certainly be low quality, so judging by your reply, well.. hmm..
    Signature

    The Ultimate Private Network Management,
    Visualization and Automation Tool




    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7457750].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author weston2012
      Originally Posted by jinx1221 View Post

      @weston2012 - And what do you consider high quality backinks? Your site in your sig doesn't say anywhere what your service provides. What proof can you show that web2.0's provide less than 10% (and less than 10% of what exactly)?

      Btw, content with poor grammar will most certainly be low quality, so judging by your reply, well.. hmm..
      The problem is subdomain. Let guess you post 100% Unique content but need time to index subdomain in Google. I am providing service on Quality over Quality. My all links are indexed automatically. I am not forcing Google to index the link. After all Thank You for a good question.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7459453].message }}

Trending Topics