11 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
11 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

Web 2.0 Question

by Paul Tovey
9 replies
  • SEO
    • |
Please correct me if i'm wrong. I'm just windering if my thoughts below about Web2.0 is correct:

A Web 2.0 is like a external blog? For example, WordPress, Blogger.
And an SEO method is to build a high PR blog.

SEO's build a few of these blog in various different platforms and then link back to their website? Because this then counts as a high PR link back?
#question #web
  • Profile picture of the author online only
    Originally Posted by Paul Tovey View Post

    Please correct me if i'm wrong. I'm just windering if my thoughts below about Web2.0 is correct:

    A Web 2.0 is like a external blog? For example, WordPress, Blogger.
    And an SEO method is to build a high PR blog.

    SEO's build a few of these blog in various different platforms and then link back to their website? Because this then counts as a high PR link back?
    Everything is right, but it will count as a PR n/a backlink without much juice at all.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8414037].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Cobaki
    Paul,

    I also researched the technical meaning of Web 2.0 some years ago.
    It does not really contain a technical definition that separates it from the other sites we see around. It's a term that was just popularized in 2004. From then on, I believe the term has been used on sites and they've blogged about it. Because it's been used by many, people just embraced the term. But who knows? Unless my research is outdated and the meaning of Web 2.0 has evolved, I stand corrected.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8414049].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author godoveryou
      A Web 2.0 site is virtually any 'network' of users that contribute and interact with each other in some way. That can mean blogs, but there are also bookmarking communities, micro blog communities and you could even consider a forum to be a Web 2.0 community.

      There's a lot of different ways to approach them for link building but yes, the primary way people use them are to build up blogs, or networks of blogs and link from the blog to their site.

      Of course, that's only for Web 2.0 sites that are based around or otherwise use blogs.
      Signature
      Don't Know Me? - Read my interview at Matthewwoodward.co.uk
      http://www.godoveryou.com/
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8414112].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author bigcat1967
        Hubpages and Squidoo are other web 2.0's as well...
        Signature

        <a href="https://changeyourbudget.com/save-money-on-your-water-bill/">How to Lower Your Water Bill</a>

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8414470].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Paul Tovey
    Ok, two more questions on a similar frame.

    I have a webeden micro website, so like mywebsite.webeden.com.
    Which seems to have a PR 4 ranking, would a link from my free website help my rankings?

    Secondly, if I got a WordPress blog, probably a free one too and built some links into it.
    Lets say I (somehow) got a PR1 ranking for my free blog and then linked it to my website, would that count as a PR1 link?

    Is this how SEO companies are using this 'Web 2.0' thingy.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8414520].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Paul Tovey View Post

      Ok, two more questions on a similar frame.

      I have a webeden micro website, so like mywebsite.webeden.com.
      Which seems to have a PR 4 ranking, would a link from my free website help my rankings?

      Secondly, if I got a WordPress blog, probably a free one too and built some links into it.
      Lets say I (somehow) got a PR1 ranking for my free blog and then linked it to my website, would that count as a PR1 link?

      Is this how SEO companies are using this 'Web 2.0' thingy.
      Yes that's the way a lot of folks around here build 2.0 links, they use the 2.0 page/s as a buffer.

      I'm pretty sure Google, maybe Matt C. mentioned they were planning on looking downstream on backlinks, so just a heads up, blasting crap links at a 2.0 buffer page, then pointing links from the 2.0 buffer page to the money page might not be a good idea long term.

      Build quality links & you won't need to worry about what Google does (possibly looking at downstream links).
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8415732].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author andishm
    Originally Posted by Paul Tovey View Post

    Please correct me if i'm wrong. I'm just windering if my thoughts below about Web2.0 is correct:

    A Web 2.0 is like a external blog? For example, WordPress, Blogger.
    And an SEO method is to build a high PR blog.

    SEO's build a few of these blog in various different platforms and then link back to their website? Because this then counts as a high PR link back?
    You can also create good backlinks to those blogs too which link to your money site or main site... this way you get more link juice passed to get higher ranking = Tiered Link Building.
    Signature
    Backup.Countryâ„¢ - Automated cloud backups for PC, Laptop & Servers
    Logon to https://backup.country/
    31% Off Coupon code: WORLDBACKUPDAY
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8415559].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dids
    web 2.0 are the stable part of most peoples backlink profile. What I would say is having these as your main type of backlink is not future proof. Although I have some strong web 2.0s in my authority sites backlink profile they make up a small percentage of a very diverse backlink profile.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8417881].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author theseoproz
    You have the jist of it correct, I actually just wrote a tutorial on this, check it out here: http://stellarseo.org/the-best-link-building-strategy-ever/ I believe it will help clarify for you.
    Signature

    Kicking A** over at Stellar SEO in St Louis.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8417894].message }}

Trending Topics