Duplicate Original Content On My Own Blog Network Sites?

16 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I am building a medical blog network. I have twenty very focused specialty topic niche sites and one main money site. Is there any problem using my original content twice, once on one niche site and also on my main site?

For clarification, the topic of the whole network is back pain. Each niche site deals with one topic like herniated disc or spinal stenosis etc. So if I put an original article on the herniated disc site and on my main site will I be penalized?

Thanks for your help!
#blog #blog network #content #duplicate #network #original #sites
  • Profile picture of the author Kevin Maguire
    Originally Posted by cadlemediagroup View Post

    I am building a medical blog network. I have twenty very focused specialty topic niche sites and one main money site. Is there any problem using my original content twice, once on one niche site and also on my main site?

    For clarification, the topic of the whole network is back pain. Each niche site deals with one topic like herniated disc or spinal stenosis etc. So if I put an original article on the herniated disc site and on my main site will I be penalized?

    Thanks for your help!
    No its not cool. Its duplicate content and Google will only credit one of the pages with the content ownership. Keep everything thats to do with you making money, absolutely 100% unique.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8610136].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    It's a network of same/similar sites that will be linked to each other so it's not a good idea to be using the same content across multiple sites in the same network.

    It wouldn't really be a penalty but one of those sites/pages would probably get buried in the SERPs, or buried in Supplemental SERPs where traffic would never find the pages, nobody clicks on the last page of the search results looking at the Supplemental results. Supplemental SERPs is a catch-all for duplicate pages.

    Scraping pages across a network of your own sites would most likely put one of the sites at a disadvantage & odds are Google will pick the page you want ranked least to be ranked for that duplicate content. Really it depends on which of the two sites/pages has better SEO.

    IMO you would be working against yourself in the SERPs with the duplicate pages.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8610197].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeadStartSEO
    The smaller the network, the more pain you can feel. I know, people think smaller networks are easier to manage.. no. less your QI is like 10.

    With the network being so small, don't use the same content. Just hire some write on elance for super cheap. We pay around 1-2 bucks per 600 words. If you want to make money, and build quality don't be cheap. It's not worth it in the end.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8610411].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DPM70
    What Kevin and Yukes said. I don't know where HeadstartjesterSEO gets his information but just steer away from anybody that advocates buy cheap in one sentence then says don't buy cheap in the next.
    Signature
    I don't build in order to have clients. I have clients in order to build. - Ayn Rand
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8610428].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author patadeperro
    This question is very common question and most of people will anser you as Yukon and Kev did, but I tend to disagree with their coments, most
    of people will tell you: NO.

    The real question here is: What are you trying to achieve?

    If you want your backlinks and content to be indexed faster, then creating a syndicated network for your own content via rss fedd it is a great way to do it, your content and backlinks will be indexed faster and as consequence you will rank higher in your money making site.

    If you want to use your content to "filter" the visitors to your money making site, then the answer here will be yes, do it, no matter that is the same content, if you are trying to create different sites about back pain (natural remedies, chiropractique experiences, science articles, pain killers) then it does not matter either, what you are creating is a community around a specific topic and the content will help you to keep your site fresh and to send the right type of crowd to the right part of your money making site.

    If you want to use this same content to push your money making site higher on the search engines, just by syndicating the same content, then the answer is: it depends, even if it is the same content syndicated on several sites, the one that will rank higher is the one that it is indexed first, the one that has more backlinks, and the one where the people spend the most time on it/interact/share.

    By no means you will be penalized.

    And here is the piece of information everybody will ask for: PROOF.

    Search for the word "news"

    Usually CNC or CBC (depending where you are) will pop first, how can they not be penalized if they are posting the same content than the other sites are posting from the news agencies?

    Focus onc reating communities of common interests, if the content it is the same than any other site it is absolutelly irrelevant, just the backlinks and the way the people interact with the site are important
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8615818].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by patadeperro View Post

      If you want to use your content to "filter" the visitors to your money making site, then the answer here will be yes, do it, no matter that is the same content,
      OP please ignore this advice. NO offense to Pat but its just awful, The one thing you want to do with a network is not leave footprints and nothing would scream network footprint louder. The proof offered is no proof.

      Syndicated content appearing all over the web has no comparison to a poster who only has the content on his money site and sites linking to his money site.


      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8616302].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author patadeperro
        Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

        OP please ignore this advice. NO offense to Pat but its just awful, The one thing you want to do with a network is not leave footprints and nothing would scream network footprint louder. The proof offered is no proof.

        Syndicated content appearing all over the web has no comparison to a poster who only has the content on his money site and sites linking to his money site.
        This is if you use the word "blog network" just in the seo sense of the word and that is exactly why I ask what was he trying to achieve, you can create a blog network to filter visitors, to index your content etc...

        It is bad not advice, it is simply that some of us have a broader vision for our virtual assets.

        And he never said that he was only going to syndicate the content on his network, you are implying that, I am just giving him a diferent perspective on how to use his assets.

        And no, I dont take offense on any critic to my work or opinions, on the contrary, if it helps me to increase my knowledge it is always welcome, I am willing to change my assumptions/beliefs when somebody proof me wrong.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8616333].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
          Originally Posted by patadeperro View Post

          It is bad not advice, it is simply that some of us have a broader vision for our virtual assets.
          Well you gave the advice so obviously you think its good even when its horrible. No shock there. It has nothing to do with any wider vision. A wider vision for virtual assets would be to have quality unique content on each. A "wider vision" would not be advocating populating site content with rss feeds but again good quality content.

          I may argue with you back and forth on some issues but not networks. My involvements with networks is no secret on this board. and people can decide for themselves what I know or do not know.
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8616404].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author patadeperro
            Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

            Well you gave the advice so obviously you think its good even when its horrible. No shock there. It has nothing to do with any wider vision. A wider vision for virtual assets would be to have quality unique content on each. A "wider vision" would not be advocating populating site content with rss feeds but again good quality content.

            I may argue with you back and forth on some issues but not networks. My involvements with networks is no secret on this board. and people can decide for themselves what I know or do not know.
            I wont argue with you either Mike, specially, because you dont read my comments, I said to use Rss feed of his own content so he can index the original content with his backlinks faster, I never talked about using other Rss feeds... and yes Mike, just because you sell networks it means you know everything there is to know about them...
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8616460].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
              Originally Posted by patadeperro View Post

              yes Mike, just because you sell networks it means you know everything there is to know about them...
              Yes Pat....what I know about networks comes just from selling them. It has nothing to do with using them and having helped hundreds of people to build their own :rolleyes:.
              Signature

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8616899].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Lokahi
        Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

        OP please ignore this advice. NO offense to Pat but its just awful, The one thing you want to do with a network is not leave footprints and nothing would scream network footprint louder. The proof offered is no proof.

        Syndicated content appearing all over the web has no comparison to a poster who only has the content on his money site and sites linking to his money site.


        That would kind of make the blog network a little more obvious to reuse content in that way. Really how hard is it to rewrite an article? Just thinking if the backlink is worth it, then maybe it's worth taking the time to rewrite or pay someone else to do so.
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8617002].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ViralMediaBoost
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8615823].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author patadeperro
      Originally Posted by ViralMediaBoost View Post

      It could be named as copyright and in some cases google may email you to say why you are using the same content as the other site.
      This is not true. when someone fills out a removal request is because he has sent some proof that he is the one who owns the piece of content (usually you send the url where you publish the content first) and Google sends you a DMCA request via Google Webmaster Tools, but in this case this wont apply since he is the owner of the same content.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8615860].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by ViralMediaBoost View Post

      It could be named as copyright and in some cases google may email you to say why you are using the same content as the other site.
      He's talking about scraping his own original content.

      Hopefully OP doesn't file a DMCA against his own site.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8616223].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author tech84
        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

        He's talking about scraping his own original content.

        Hopefully OP doesn't file a DMCA against his own site.

        He can always plead the 5th
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8616255].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kevin Maguire
    @patadeperro
    RSS used to work cool pat, around 2010. These days its not seen as an effective way to syndicate for links. We had 2 guys almost working full time setting up all sorts of crazy feed cross overs using yahoo pipes. Where one publishing could get sent out to thousands of sites whenever you wanted. but no more effective. Wild times are long gone my friend. Google would now eat you for that.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8616935].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author patadeperro
      Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire View Post

      @patadeperro
      RSS used to work cool pat, around 2010. These days its not seen as an effective way to syndicate for links. We had 2 guys almost working full time setting up all sorts of crazy feed cross overs using yahoo pipes. Where one publishing could get sent out to thousands of sites whenever you wanted. but no more effective. Wild times are long gone my friend. Google would now eat you for that.
      Here is something interesting, how exactly do you use the rssfeed Kev? I do it totally "white hat" meaning I take the Rss fees from the sites and I syndicate it through my Web 2.0 network, because I know many people who used to create Rss feed from their backlinks just to get them indexed, that is why I ask, because I use it on the "white hat" sense and i still get results, meaning I see my pages and backlinks indexed faster than any other way.

      Talking about yahoo pipes, good to know you have been playing around with them, I have always wanted, never had the time (will?) to get into it, because my theory was that if you combined a couple of good rssfeed and send quality backlinks to the content you would be able to create a good "community" that would help you to create some quality traffic at will, but it is very interesting to know that somebody is actually playing around seriously with them, what are you using them for? and what are the results? if you have a couple of guys (even at part time) you have some interesting experiences in that area.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8617179].message }}

Trending Topics