Page Post Engagements VS Clicks To Website VS Conversion Tracking
Hey guys!
While I certainly understand this is possibly somewhat of a complex question, I'd love to know the advantages of the different AD possibilities..
Up until this point I have been running my campaigns via CLICKS TO WEBSITE, and everything has been working well, but I'm a little unclear the concrete advantages of which is optimal for the Teespring model.
I know within the TeeCashKit methodology they utilize CTW ads, where as Teespring themselves suggest using Conversion Tracking ads, and I see Don Wilson using PPE.. I guess I am simply unclear the reasons why people are using these different ad types..
Again, to reference that new Don Wilson video, he is running some PAGE POST ENGAGEMENTS, and CTW ads. Why fluctuate between the two?
What are the concrete advantages of each that may not be immediately apparent?
Is it to test each to see which are bringing in optimal ROI on individual campaigns? That would be the only reason I can see that would explain running the different ad types within singular campaigns... That for one campaign say about 'Dogs', PPE seems to bring in more than CTW, whereas a 'Cat' campaign brings in more via Conversion Tracking than PPE or CTW..
haha, fill me in.. !
Again, any & all input is hugely appreciated!
----
Also - separate question for JCorp!
In regards to what you wrote here:
You can also add this to the end of your teespring link: ?var="whatyouwanttotrack"
Place whatever you want between the " " and then erase the " "
Then you can track in the analytics of teespring.
Also, consider using a 3rd party tracker such as hypertracker (although they've been down the last few days) or pretty links.
At what stage do I add that code to the end of my teespring link? When I am setting up the campaign and choosing the url? ...or am I able to add this after?
Thanks!!
While I certainly understand this is possibly somewhat of a complex question, I'd love to know the advantages of the different AD possibilities..
Up until this point I have been running my campaigns via CLICKS TO WEBSITE, and everything has been working well, but I'm a little unclear the concrete advantages of which is optimal for the Teespring model.
I know within the TeeCashKit methodology they utilize CTW ads, where as Teespring themselves suggest using Conversion Tracking ads, and I see Don Wilson using PPE.. I guess I am simply unclear the reasons why people are using these different ad types..
Again, to reference that new Don Wilson video, he is running some PAGE POST ENGAGEMENTS, and CTW ads. Why fluctuate between the two?
What are the concrete advantages of each that may not be immediately apparent?
Is it to test each to see which are bringing in optimal ROI on individual campaigns? That would be the only reason I can see that would explain running the different ad types within singular campaigns... That for one campaign say about 'Dogs', PPE seems to bring in more than CTW, whereas a 'Cat' campaign brings in more via Conversion Tracking than PPE or CTW..
haha, fill me in.. !
Again, any & all input is hugely appreciated!
----
Also - separate question for JCorp!
In regards to what you wrote here:
You can also add this to the end of your teespring link: ?var="whatyouwanttotrack"
Place whatever you want between the " " and then erase the " "
Then you can track in the analytics of teespring.
Also, consider using a 3rd party tracker such as hypertracker (although they've been down the last few days) or pretty links.
At what stage do I add that code to the end of my teespring link? When I am setting up the campaign and choosing the url? ...or am I able to add this after?
Thanks!!